--On Friday, March 5, 2004 9:25 AM +0100 Sander Striker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
It's been a while since last release. I'd like to volunteer for
the RM task for 2.0.49, starting the release cycle Monday.
Thoughts?
+1.
If Sander doesn't get around to it by say 3PM PST (~6 hours from now), I'll
+1
On Mar 2, 2004, at 10:41 AM, Thom May wrote:
* Thom May ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
Hey guys,
just wondering why we use system(copy...)/system(cp...) in htdigest
in 1.3,
when the netware option seems to be more secure?
The patch attached just rips out the ifdef and uses the netware code
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
--On Friday, March 5, 2004 9:25 AM +0100 Sander Striker
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's been a while since last release. I'd like to volunteer for
the RM task for 2.0.49, starting the release cycle Monday.
Thoughts?
+1.
If Sander doesn't get around to it by say 3PM PST
* Andr? Malo ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
* Thom May [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Thom May ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
Hey guys,
just wondering why we use system(copy...)/system(cp...) in htdigest in
1.3, when the netware option seems to be more secure?
The patch attached just rips
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* include/http_connection.h: Declare eoc bucket interface.
Shouldn't this be a minor MMN bump?
nd
Hi,
I've been using the sslswamp tool (which btw is great) to stress apache - and
once in a while, I keep getting a 'abortive close' with the following message in the
error_log. Any ideas why this is happening ?
(on hpux running apache 2.0.48 with worker mpm + openssl 0.9.7c)
[Mon Mar
On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 08:32:30PM +0100, André Malo wrote:
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* include/http_connection.h: Declare eoc bucket interface.
Shouldn't this be a minor MMN bump?
I dunno, I don't really see the point in bumping the minor MMN more than
once between releases and it's
On Mon, 2004-03-08 at 18:07, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
--On Friday, March 5, 2004 9:25 AM +0100 Sander Striker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
It's been a while since last release. I'd like to volunteer for
the RM task for 2.0.49, starting the release cycle Monday.
Thoughts?
+1.
If
On Mon, 2004-03-08 at 22:18, Sander Striker wrote:
On Mon, 2004-03-08 at 18:07, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
--On Friday, March 5, 2004 9:25 AM +0100 Sander Striker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
It's been a while since last release. I'd like to volunteer for
the RM task for 2.0.49, starting
--On Tuesday, March 9, 2004 2:13 AM +0100 Sander Striker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist is where the tarballs of RC 1 reside.
Please test and provide feedback.
+1 for GA.
Passes httpd-test on Solaris with the following caveats/bugs in httpd-test:
- SSL tests were
Hi,
this patch adds the filename to the log warning since the problem can be in an
included file and not only in httpd.conf.
--- mod_alias.c.origTue Feb 10 00:16:10 2004
+++ mod_alias.c Mon Mar 08 22:06:20 2004
@@ -137,9 +137,10 @@
if ( (!p-regexp alias_matches(f,
* Joe Orton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 08:32:30PM +0100, André Malo wrote:
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* include/http_connection.h: Declare eoc bucket interface.
Shouldn't this be a minor MMN bump?
I dunno, I don't really see the point in bumping the minor
* Thom May [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
fix to 2.1 and then proposing it for backport to a totally different
codebase somewhat blows my mind.
IMO the two should happen more or less in parallel...
If (and only if) you have three +1 for the 1.3 patch (i.e. just one more),
then you can do it that
Currently, apache2 includes a full version of pcre-3.9 in its sources;
this is built during compilation, and statically linked against. The
symbols from this library, are exported to apache modules. This is
undesirable for some apache modules; for example, php. Php links
against libpcre on the
14 matches
Mail list logo
