* Ian Holsman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
your going to be forcing people to install some other piece of software.
while this might be fine for a lot of people, some won't or can't.
Some IDE's don't have SVN support yet, and some people have to deal with
sysadmins who think redhat 5.2 is
--On Sunday, March 14, 2004 11:18 PM -0600 William A. Rowe, Jr.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
as the GNU, ASF, and SF projects all discovered, full backups by third
parties are invaluable. What is the equivalent to rsync, and is it as stable?
I think you mean cvsup not rsync. We're currently
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
--On Sunday, March 14, 2004 11:18 PM -0600 William A. Rowe, Jr.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
as the GNU, ASF, and SF projects all discovered, full backups by third
parties are invaluable. What is the equivalent to rsync, and is it as
stable?
I think you mean cvsup not
On Mon, 2004-03-15 at 11:52, Ben Laurie wrote:
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
--On Sunday, March 14, 2004 11:18 PM -0600 William A. Rowe, Jr.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
as the GNU, ASF, and SF projects all discovered, full backups by third
parties are invaluable. What is the equivalent to
The Doctor wrote:
On Sun, Mar 14, 2004 at 05:18:19PM -0700, The Doctor wrote:
On Sun, Mar 14, 2004 at 04:04:31PM +, Joe Orton wrote:
On Sun, Mar 14, 2004 at 07:22:24AM -0700, The Doctor wrote:
Failure again on BSD/OS 5.1
It seems libtool does not know how to build shared libraries on BSD/OS
On Mon, 2004-03-15 at 12:44, Jeff Trawick wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
[...]
And in bsd/os 5.1 we have
Syntax error on line 252 of /var/www/conf/httpd.conf:
Cannot load /usr/libexec/apache/mod_expires.so into server:
/usr/libexec/apache/mod_expires.so: Undefined PLT symbol
On Sun, Mar 14, 2004 at 07:32:01PM -0700, The Doctor wrote:
On Sun, Mar 14, 2004 at 05:18:19PM -0700, The Doctor wrote:
On Sun, Mar 14, 2004 at 04:04:31PM +, Joe Orton wrote:
On Sun, Mar 14, 2004 at 07:22:24AM -0700, The Doctor wrote:
Failure again on BSD/OS 5.1
It seems
your going to be forcing people to install some other piece of software.
while this might be fine for a lot of people, some won't or can't.
Some IDE's don't have SVN support yet, and some people have to deal with
sysadmins who think redhat 5.2 is acceptable work environment to develop
with.
I'm
Hi,
As said in the subject...
The attached file ApacheMonitor.exe.manifest needs to be copied in the
/support/win32/ dir.
Index: ApacheMonitor.rc
===
RCS file: /home/cvspublic/httpd-2.0/support/win32/ApacheMonitor.rc,v
retrieving
--On Monday, March 15, 2004 10:52 AM + Ben Laurie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
It is? How? Unless the committer signs (which ISTR was rejected as an option
when I suggested it, so I'm assuming that doesn't happen), then they must be
signed by the server - a successful attacker can therefore sign
--On Monday, March 15, 2004 4:47 AM -0800 Kean Johnston [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
people have worked very hard to make it work, and its good. But at the same
time, one should be careful of falling into the when you have a new hammer
everything looks like a nail trap.
Subversion serves *exactly*
On Sun, 14 Mar 2004, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
As I mentioned to the [EMAIL PROTECTED]'ers I would feel much safer moving 2.1-dev
over to SVN (with APR 1.0) and leaving 2.0/apr 0.9 alone to the end of
their useful life.
Ugh. That sounds like it will make back-porting even more of a pain
--On Monday, March 15, 2004 1:02 PM -0500 Joshua Slive [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Disadvantages of moving to subversion:
...
- Backups/integrity (fixable?)
Not to beat a dead horse, but I think that's an advantage with Subversion:
on-the-wire checksums, repository checksums, (incremental) backups,
Something test-dev has kicked around that we should pick back up...
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 09:44:45 -0500 (CDT)
From: Randy Kobes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've been looking at getting apxs for Win32 working on Apache 2.
There's a number of changes needed due to the current
NetWare has a directive called ThreadStackSize which has been in use
for a number of years. The main reason for this directive on NetWare
was due to the fixed stack in the OS. Would it make more sense to call
the new directive ThreadStackSize rather than WorkerStackSize to avoid
two different
Justin Erenkrantz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
--On Sunday, March 14, 2004 11:18 PM -0600 William A. Rowe, Jr.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
as the GNU, ASF, and SF projects all discovered, full backups by third
parties are invaluable. What is the equivalent to rsync, and is it as stable?
I
On Mon, 2004-03-15 at 12:02, Joshua Slive wrote:
Disadvantages of moving to subversion:
- Not as portable (?)
(Subversion clients/servers run anywhere APR does. I think that's
actually more portable than CVS, since I don't believe CVS pserver runs
on win32 at all.)
--On Monday, March 15, 2004 1:29 PM -0600 C. Michael Pilato
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Justin, what's being done about unversioned properties (since those
can change at any time)? Do you have post-revprop-change hook setup
to squirrel away those mods so that they could be restored should the
Brad Nicholes wrote:
NetWare has a directive called ThreadStackSize which has been in use
for a number of years. The main reason for this directive on NetWare
was due to the fixed stack in the OS. Would it make more sense to call
the new directive ThreadStackSize rather than WorkerStackSize
On Mon, 2004-03-15 at 20:39, Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
On Mon, 2004-03-15 at 12:02, Joshua Slive wrote:
Disadvantages of moving to subversion:
- Not as portable (?)
(Subversion clients/servers run anywhere APR does. I think that's
actually more portable than CVS, since I don't believe
Sander Striker wrote:
There are 2.0.49-rc2 tarballs available at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
This is not a regression issue, but it is a storage corruption issue as well as
a simple fix that should be easy to review:
*) mod_cgid: Fix storage corruption caused by use of incorrect pool.
On Mon, 2004-03-15 at 20:29, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
Justin Erenkrantz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
--On Sunday, March 14, 2004 11:18 PM -0600 William A. Rowe, Jr.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
as the GNU, ASF, and SF projects all discovered, full backups by third
parties are invaluable.
I would +1 moving over after release of 2.0.49 and 1.3.30... :)
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order
Jim Jagielski wrote:
I would +1 moving over after release of 2.0.49 and 1.3.30... :)
+1
Bill
* Sander Striker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are 2.0.49-rc2 tarballs available at:
Please inform us of any problems you encounter. Thanks,
I'm going to backport the enableexceptionhook docs. Please put them
also into the next tag.
Thanks!
nd
On Mon, 2004-03-15 at 22:02, André Malo wrote:
* Sander Striker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are 2.0.49-rc2 tarballs available at:
Please inform us of any problems you encounter. Thanks,
I'm going to backport the enableexceptionhook docs. Please put them
also into the next tag.
TB
Jeff Trawick wrote:
Sander Striker wrote:
There are 2.0.49-rc2 tarballs available at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
This is not a regression issue, but it is a storage corruption issue as
well as a simple fix that should be easy to review:
*) mod_cgid: Fix storage corruption caused by
* Sander Striker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2004-03-15 at 22:02, André Malo wrote:
* Sander Striker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are 2.0.49-rc2 tarballs available at:
Please inform us of any problems you encounter. Thanks,
I'm going to backport the enableexceptionhook
At 03:05 PM 3/15/2004, Sander Striker wrote:
On Mon, 2004-03-15 at 22:02, André Malo wrote:
* Sander Striker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are 2.0.49-rc2 tarballs available at:
Please inform us of any problems you encounter. Thanks,
I'm going to backport the enableexceptionhook docs.
On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 08:19:00PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
martin 2004/03/15 12:19:00
Modified:server Makefile.in
Log:
Add missing source
It was already there, I've reverted this. Did you run buildconf after
updating?
util_script.c util_md5.c
Hi,
On Mon, 2004-03-15 at 22:02, André Malo wrote:
* Sander Striker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are 2.0.49-rc2 tarballs available at:
Please inform us of any problems you encounter. Thanks,
I'm going to backport the enableexceptionhook docs. Please put them
also into the next tag.
+1 NetWare
Jean-Jacques [EMAIL PROTECTED] 3/13/2004 5:32:53 AM
Hi,There are 2.0.49-rc2 tarballs available at: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/The differences with respect to the rc1 tarball are:- BeOS specific MPM fixes- Netware specific rand.c fixes- Documentation update- Berkeley DB
On Mon, 2004-03-15 at 22:05, Sander Striker wrote:
On Mon, 2004-03-15 at 22:02, André Malo wrote:
* Sander Striker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are 2.0.49-rc2 tarballs available at:
Please inform us of any problems you encounter. Thanks,
I'm going to backport the
Hi,
A +1 after the patch should put us on the track for releasing it.
Testers?
Makefile.win on HEAD and APACHE_2_0_BRANCH should be golden.
http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/httpd-2.0/Makefile.win?rev=1.120.2.14
+1; works again for me ; the ssl*.conf files are no longer empty.
Guenter.
Jeff Trawick wrote:
Brad Nicholes wrote:
NetWare has a directive called ThreadStackSize which has been in use
for a number of years. The main reason for this directive on NetWare
was due to the fixed stack in the OS. Would it make more sense to call
the new directive ThreadStackSize rather
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
nd 2004/03/15 12:45:59
Modified:docs/manual/mod leader.xml mpm_common.xml perchild.xml
prefork.xml threadpool.xml worker.xml
Log:
add initial documentation for EnableExceptionHook. Please review.
Index: mpm_common.xml
Sounds good, I will review the change and get mpm_netware fixed up to
use the mpm_common.c directive.
Brad
Brad Nicholes
Senior Software Engineer
Novell, Inc., the leading provider of Net business solutions
http://www.novell.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Monday, March 15, 2004 4:10:11 PM
Jeff
Hi Thom,
This really ought to be 4 seperate patches for ease of review.
Please can you resend as such?
something's wrong with the four splitted patches, or simply no time to review??
Guenter.
* Guenter Knauf ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
Hi Thom,
This really ought to be 4 seperate patches for ease of review.
Please can you resend as such?
something's wrong with the four splitted patches, or simply no time to review??
Damn, dude. it's only been 1 *work*day.
-Thom
On Mar 12, 2004, at 11:01 AM, Andre Breiler wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, 12 Mar 2004, Brian Pane wrote:
That definitely sounds useful. I think you can get the same effect,
though, by using the existing 2.0/2.1 mod_include hook to add new
directives... something like this:
!--#set_random var=blah
On Sun, Mar 14, 2004 at 05:27:16PM -0800, Aaron Bannert wrote:
This sounds reasonable to me, did it ever get committed?
I imagine you asked the flood developers but I just did a cvs diff and
this patch was not committed.
Philippe
Geoffrey Young wrote:
it all boils down to TestConfigParse::httpd_version()
glad to know it's somewhat identified.
that (or similar foo) will happen when you try to test first against 2.0 and
then against 1.3, regardless of win32 vs unix. at least that's been my
experience.
try first
On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 09:04:32AM -0500, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
explodes with the attempt to treat the 1.3 apxs.pl as 2.0, complete
with the same -D APACHE2.
Ken,
I had a slightly different variation of sticky preferences problems over
the weekend. I found preferences stored in the
also, there apparently is no longer an apxs.pl for 2.0 windows --
so what's the magic Makefile.PL argument to let the test modules
be built?
in case there was any question, i hate development on windows,
i hate libtool, and i think i've discovered a special subtype
of 'male pattern baldness' --
On Mon, 15 Mar 2004, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
also, there apparently is no longer an apxs.pl for 2.0 windows --
so what's the magic Makefile.PL argument to let the test modules
be built?
There is an alpha port of apxs for Win32 for Apache/2.0;
grab the script
William McKee wrote:
I'm running into a problem when doing testing under Win32 that doesn't
happen when testing in Linux or when I run my program in Win32 with
Apache2 and modperl (Randy's binary).
The error is as follows:
[Sun Mar 14 18:02:02 2004] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] Can't locate object
William McKee wrote:
On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 11:17:50PM -0500, William McKee wrote:
Just FYI, after moving the libperl.* out of /usr/lib and rebuilding
Apache/mp, I'm still having problems with the TestRun.pm module. I'll
try building Perl with O2 next.
Rebuilt Perl and mod_perl with -O2. But I'm
William McKee wrote:
On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 10:35:08PM -0500, William McKee wrote:
Yeah, that's certainly a concern. I'd like to figure out my
misconfiguration issue above then will attempt your proposal to nuke all
these old installations and start fresh.
Well, I'm now seeing this Statement
On Mon, 15 Mar 2004, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 02:51 PM 3/15/2004, you wrote:
On Mon, 15 Mar 2004, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
also, there apparently is no longer an apxs.pl for 2.0 windows --
so what's the magic Makefile.PL argument to let the test modules
be built?
There is
William McKee wrote:
On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 01:22:20PM -0800, Stas Bekman wrote:
have you loaded Apache::Response?
No, I wasn't aware that I needed to specify this module.
Probably because your startup/config setups are different. You loaded
'Apache::Response' in your normal setup, but not in
50 matches
Mail list logo
