I forgot to mention in r594796:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrevision=594796
That you currently need a patch to serf/trunk to add the pluggable event
loop. Hopefully we can fix that out tomorrow by adding it or some
derivative to serf trunk.
Patch is on the serf dev mailing list here:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: jim
Date: Tue Nov 13 13:55:05 2007
New Revision: 594659
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=594659view=rev
Log:
Add extremely butt-ugly sub-mod that exists simply to show how
to use providers in sub-mods to extend lbmethods in mod_proxy...
.
+
+/*
Hi All,
I want to build 64-bit apache httpd 2.2.x on
1. HP-UX 11w and
2. AIX 5.2
What extra flag I should use for building the 64-bit apache web server on
both the platforms?
Can somebody give me the build steps for both?
Urgently seeking for help.
Thanks and Regards,
Ashwani Sharma
Mob:
Hi,
You need to set following flags before build Apache 2.2.x source on AIX 5.2
CC= xlc (if using xlc compiler). Also set the compiler path in PATH variable.
CFLAGS=-qarch=com -q64
LDFLAGS=-b64
Also set OBJECT_MODE=64
After this give configure command.
Hope this help.
-Original
Hi,
I tried the options send by Renu but it doesn,t work for the GCC compiler.
Still waiting for the right answer.
Somebody please tell me the similar option for HP-UX platform for building
64-bit apache.
Please reply
Thanks and Regards,
Ashwani Sharma
Mob: 09916454843
Off: +91-80-26265053
For GCC try using -maix64 option
For more info on GCC compiler options on AIX refer to:-
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/aix/library/au-gnu.html
-Original Message-
From: Ashwani Kumar Sharma [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2007 5:48 PM
To: Renu Tiwari
Cc:
Hi Renu,
Thanks for the reply.
Can you please tell me, what will be the corresponding flags if I am using
GCC compiler.
Somebody please tell me how to proceed with the building on HP-UX machine.?
Thanks in advance.
Thanks and Regards,
Ashwani Sharma
Mob: 09916454843
Off: +91-80-26265053
On Tue, November 13, 2007 7:17 pm, Akins, Brian wrote:
We found it much easier to write our own proxy rather than try to plug
away
at mod_proxy...
As I recall, you needed a proxy server that was capable of behaving like
an origin server at the cost of RFC compliance. Under circumstances like
On Tue, November 13, 2007 5:39 pm, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
I'm very much okay with having competition and bake-offs. We have a
number of modules that do similar things (mod_alias / mod_rewrite,
etc.).
I find that mod_proxy is incredibly complex and doesn't even do the
things that it
On Wed, November 14, 2007 10:35 am, Paul Querna wrote:
That you currently need a patch to serf/trunk to add the pluggable event
loop. Hopefully we can fix that out tomorrow by adding it or some
derivative to serf trunk.
This could potentially become a recurring theme.
Adding the ability for
I just realized that there was a typo in the patchset - it applies
cleanly against httpd-2.2.6, but there's a line that shouldn't be there:
srclib/apr/network_io/unix/sendrecv.c line 118:
from-salen = sizeof(from-sa);
Remove this and it should build cleanly.
Issac
Rolf Banting wrote:
OK
Graham Leggett wrote:
On Wed, November 14, 2007 10:35 am, Paul Querna wrote:
That you currently need a patch to serf/trunk to add the pluggable event
loop. Hopefully we can fix that out tomorrow by adding it or some
derivative to serf trunk.
This could potentially become a
On Nov 14, 2007 8:17 AM, Graham Leggett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But if what httpd asks of serf deviates so far from the standard serf
library that we need to fork our own version of serf, then we will start
having all sorts of problems.
If you look at the committer roster of serf
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On Nov 14, 2007 9:07 AM, Issac Goldstand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, not to overstate the obvious, but aren't we implying here that
serf will become an integral part of apr-util (at least that's what I'd
understood)? As such, serf wouldn't be forked as much as
On Nov 14, 2007 9:06 AM, Issac Goldstand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ ] Immediate adoption as an included module (pending IP clearance via
the incubator)
[X] Immediate adoption as a subproject (pending IP clearance via the
incubator)
- But, no separate mailing lists and no separate committers
On Nov 14, 2007 9:16 AM, Davi Arnaut [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Under (or not) the Apache umbrella?
As Greg and I have stated, we know that the long-term home for Serf is
in Apache. However, we're slowly building a viable community to be
built around Serf that could withstand any single person's
On Wed, November 14, 2007 4:07 pm, Issac Goldstand wrote:
Well, not to overstate the obvious, but aren't we implying here that
serf will become an integral part of apr-util (at least that's what I'd
understood)? As such, serf wouldn't be forked as much as absorbed...
Serf is a separate
On Nov 14, 2007 9:07 AM, Issac Goldstand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, not to overstate the obvious, but aren't we implying here that
serf will become an integral part of apr-util (at least that's what I'd
understood)? As such, serf wouldn't be forked as much as absorbed...
IMO, serf is and
I'd like to offer up mod_dns
(http://www.beamartyr.net/mod-dns-1.02.tar.bz2) for inclusion in the
httpd project (either as a mod_ftp-like subproject, or as module with
the standard distribution - whatever people prefer). Can people vote
for what they're most comfortable with?
[ ] Immediate
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von:
Im Auftrag von Justin Erenkrantz
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 14. November 2007 15:18
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [PROPOSAL] Adoption of mod_dns to httpd?
On Nov 14, 2007 9:06 AM, Issac Goldstand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ ] Immediate
On Nov 14, 2007 3:06 PM, Issac Goldstand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to offer up mod_dns
(http://www.beamartyr.net/mod-dns-1.02.tar.bz2) for inclusion in the
httpd project (either as a mod_ftp-like subproject, or as module with
the standard distribution - whatever people prefer). Can
On Nov 14, 2007, at 4:37 AM, Paul Querna wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: jim
Date: Tue Nov 13 13:55:05 2007
New Revision: 594659
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=594659view=rev
Log:
Add extremely butt-ugly sub-mod that exists simply to show how
to use providers in sub-mods to
Issac Goldstand wrote:
[ ] Immediate adoption as an included module (pending IP clearance via
the incubator)
[x] Immediate adoption as a subproject (pending IP clearance via the
incubator)
[ ] Podling status in the incubator, followed by appropriate adoption at
graduation
[ ] No adoption by
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On Nov 14, 2007 9:06 AM, Issac Goldstand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ ] Immediate adoption as an included module (pending IP clearance via
the incubator)
[X] Immediate adoption as a subproject (pending IP clearance via the
incubator)
- But, no separate mailing lists and
On Nov 14, 2007, at 9:06 AM, Issac Goldstand wrote:
I'd like to offer up mod_dns
(http://www.beamartyr.net/mod-dns-1.02.tar.bz2) for inclusion in the
httpd project (either as a mod_ftp-like subproject, or as module with
the standard distribution - whatever people prefer). Can people vote
for
On Wed, 14 Nov 2007 09:06:51 -0500
Issac Goldstand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to offer up mod_dns
(http://www.beamartyr.net/mod-dns-1.02.tar.bz2) for inclusion in the
httpd project (either as a mod_ftp-like subproject, or as module with
the standard distribution - whatever people
On Nov 14, 2007, at 9:17 AM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On Nov 14, 2007 9:06 AM, Issac Goldstand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ ] Immediate adoption as an included module (pending IP clearance
via
the incubator)
[X] Immediate adoption as a subproject (pending IP clearance via the
incubator)
-
Nick Kew wrote:
On Wed, 14 Nov 2007 09:06:51 -0500
Issac Goldstand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to offer up mod_dns
(http://www.beamartyr.net/mod-dns-1.02.tar.bz2) for inclusion in the
httpd project (either as a mod_ftp-like subproject, or as module with
the standard distribution -
The last fix had a simple mistake: Good logic was inadvertently
trapped inside if (ap_extended_status), so a bunch of Bad pid
messages could show up at termination for folks with the default (off)
setting for ExtendedStatus.
Proposed fix:
Index: src/main/http_main.c
Any chance I can convince a developer to look at Apache Bug #37814:
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37814
I've gotten about half a dozen pings offline about people asking if the
patch I posted fixes the problem (it does indeed), and it'd be nice if
we can get this workaround
On 11/07/2007 03:43 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: covener
Date: Wed Nov 7 06:43:26 2007
New Revision: 592764
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=592764view=rev
Log:
Stop registering a cleanup on each LDAP connection created, this cleanup was
never called because it's
On 11/14/2007 08:59 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: jerenkrantz
Date: Wed Nov 14 11:59:05 2007
New Revision: 595028
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=595028view=rev
Log:
Amsterdam sandbox: add serf input/output filters that replace the core
filters.
Modified:
On Nov 14, 2007 4:18 PM, Ruediger Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+b = APR_BRIGADE_FIRST(ctx-bb);
+status = apr_bucket_read(b, data, len, APR_BLOCK_READ);
Isn't it dangerous that we do not copy *data here?
Doesn't this data get lost when we delete the bucket in the while loop below?
Hi Issac,
I'd like to offer up mod_dns
(http://www.beamartyr.net/mod-dns-1.02.tar.bz2) for inclusion in the
httpd project (either as a mod_ftp-like subproject, or as module with
the standard distribution - whatever people prefer). Can people vote
for what they're most comfortable with?
[x
On Nov 14, 2007 3:26 PM, Ruediger Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hm. Currently this works fine, but in r591488, you create a subpool of
st-pool and
save it in l-pool and I understood that it was your intention that this
subpool
will be cleared sometime in the future and at this point of
APACHE 2.0 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2007-11-12 19:10:44 -0500 (Mon, 12 Nov 2007) $]
The current version of this file can be found at:
* http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x/STATUS
Documentation status is
APACHE 2.2 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2007-11-14 20:55:20 -0500 (Wed, 14 Nov 2007) $]
The current version of this file can be found at:
* http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS
Documentation status is
APACHE 2.3 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2006-08-22 16:41:03 -0400 (Tue, 22 Aug 2006) $]
The current version of this file can be found at:
* http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/trunk/STATUS
Documentation status is maintained
I have the follow need:
While processing a request in my module (handler or
output filter), I need to ask apache to give me the
content of another page. Is there any way to do that,
or do I have to find the file and read it just within
my module?
Thanks in Advance for any help!
John
On Wed, 14 Nov 2007 09:24:54 -0800 (PST)
John Zhang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have the follow need:
While processing a request in my module (handler or
output filter), I need to ask apache to give me the
content of another page. Is there any way to do that,
or do I have to find the file
40 matches
Mail list logo
