On 30.01.2012 03:16, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 1/29/2012 3:18 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
Overview:
Minor problem (not a regression): config.guess and config.sub are a bit old
(2008) due to
buildconf in the released apr overwriting the config.* in our svn by the
system config.*. This is fixed
I have been adding this to the config.layout
# Adopt layout using /opt (read-only) filesystem conventions on AIX
# Standard executables in /opt (shareable)
# man pages at AIX standard location (/usr/share/man)
# editable files, scripts in /etc and /var
Layout AIX
prefix:
On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 11:03 +0100, Michael Felt wrote:
prefix:/opt/apache2
exec_prefix: /opt/apache2
I have often ponderd WHY people do things like this, the projects name
is apache, not apache2
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On 30 Jan 2012, at 12:03 PM, Michael Felt wrote:
So, my question about this proposed layout: are there any files in /opt that
need to be modified on a per-system basis?
Not that I could see, no.
Finally, as a distributeable I would be creating an installp, or AIX legacy
package as this,
Am 29.01.2012 20:19, schrieb William A. Rowe Jr.:
On 1/29/2012 4:21 AM, Michael Felt wrote:
Um. Now that I am back from vacation - I am aware you are busy with a known bug
(core
issue), but would still be nice to have a 2.4.0/2.4.1 something to test-build
with (for
AIX).
The right answer
Am 29.01.2012 20:19, schrieb William A. Rowe Jr.:
On 1/29/2012 4:21 AM, Michael Felt wrote:
Um. Now that I am back from vacation - I am aware you are busy with a known bug
(core
issue), but would still be nice to have a 2.4.0/2.4.1 something to test-build
with (for
AIX).
The right answer
On Jan 29, 2012, at 8:22 PM, Noel Butler wrote:
On Sun, 2012-01-29 at 13:19 -0600, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 1/29/2012 4:21 AM, Michael Felt wrote:
Um. Now that I am back from vacation - I am aware you are busy with a
known bug (core
issue), but would still be nice to have a
On 25.01.2012 14:00, Jeff Trawick wrote:
I'll start with the patch for CVE-2011-4317.
I removed CVE-2011-3348 from STATUS (does not apply to 2.0.x) and added
a comment for CVE-2010-2068, which IMHO does not apply either.
Regards,
Rainer
Anyone with Windows willing to sign up to review/test?
On Jan 29, 2012, at 2:53 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
On Wednesday 25 January 2012, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Looking over the code, impl as a hook seems more isolated,
rather than the current impl which is intrusive (which is
part of what we're
On Jan 29, 2012, at 2:53 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
On Wednesday 25 January 2012, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Looking over the code, impl as a hook seems more isolated,
rather than the current impl which is intrusive (which is
part of what we're trying to avoid, aren't we?)
OK, patch is attached.
On 1/30/2012 4:02 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
We add apu-1-confg --includes to CPPFLAGS and then use CPP and apu_version.h
to detect
which version we have. That works for most gcc versions, but recent gcc
chokes, because
apu_version.h includes apr_version.h, which can not be found due to our
On 1/30/2012 4:31 AM, Noel Butler wrote:
On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 11:03 +0100, Michael Felt wrote:
prefix:/opt/apache2
exec_prefix: /opt/apache2
I have often ponderd WHY people do things like this, the projects name is
apache, not apache2
No, it isn't. Apache is the name
On 1/30/2012 7:24 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Jan 29, 2012, at 8:22 PM, Noel Butler wrote:
On Sun, 2012-01-29 at 13:19 -0600, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 1/29/2012 4:21 AM, Michael Felt wrote:
Um. Now that I am back from vacation - I am aware you are busy with a
known bug (core
On 30.01.2012 19:10, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 1/30/2012 4:02 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
We add apu-1-confg --includes to CPPFLAGS and then use CPP and apu_version.h to
detect
which version we have. That works for most gcc versions, but recent gcc chokes,
because
apu_version.h includes
On 1/30/2012 7:24 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Sun, 2012-01-29 at 13:19 -0600, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
The right answer would be to have snapshots to share, but AFAIK we no
longer create them?
If people didn't test formally announced *betas*, I have significant
doubts that they would
On Jan 30, 2012, at 2:03 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 1/30/2012 7:24 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Sun, 2012-01-29 at 13:19 -0600, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
The right answer would be to have snapshots to share, but AFAIK we no
longer create them?
If people didn't test formally
Do I dare float the idea of a 2.4.1 TR very soon??
On Monday 30 January 2012, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 1/30/2012 4:31 AM, Noel Butler wrote:
On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 11:03 +0100, Michael Felt wrote:
prefix:/opt/apache2
exec_prefix: /opt/apache2
I have often ponderd WHY people do things like this, the projects
name
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Jan 29, 2012, at 2:53 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
On Wednesday 25 January 2012, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Looking over the code, impl as a hook seems more isolated,
rather than the current impl which is intrusive (which is
part of what we're trying to
On 1/30/2012 12:27 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 30.01.2012 19:10, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 1/30/2012 4:02 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
We add apu-1-confg --includes to CPPFLAGS and then use CPP and
apu_version.h to detect
which version we have. That works for most gcc versions, but recent gcc
On 1/30/2012 1:54 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Jan 30, 2012, at 2:03 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 1/30/2012 7:24 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Sun, 2012-01-29 at 13:19 -0600, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
The right answer would be to have snapshots to share, but AFAIK we no
longer create
On 1/30/2012 3:12 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
And there is apachectl, not httpdctl.
Would anyone else like to see this changed, now, for the 2.4 releases?
Notes to the general public:
* This is not necessarily a complete list, depending on your idea of recent.
* These are not official patches.
* These do not match any vetted commits to the source tree.
* No official release of these or other fixes to 1.3 is planned.
CVE-2011-3368/CVE-2011-4317:
On 1/25/2012 4:59 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
There are two considerations, as Jim pointed out. First a choice;
[ ] Include apr-util 1.4.1 in any httpd 2.2.x
[ ] Remain at apr-util 1.3.12 in any httpd 2.2.x
The concensus was for apr-util 1.4.1 to be included. Thanks for chiming
On 1/30/2012 3:54 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Notes to the general public:
* This is not necessarily a complete list, depending on your idea of recent.
* These are not official patches.
* These do not match any vetted commits to the source tree.
* No official release of these or other fixes to
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 4:57 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On 1/25/2012 4:59 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
There are two considerations, as Jim pointed out. First a choice;
[ ] Include apr-util 1.4.1 in any httpd 2.2.x
[ ] Remain at apr-util 1.3.12 in any httpd
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 5:07 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On 1/30/2012 3:54 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Notes to the general public:
* This is not necessarily a complete list, depending on your idea of
recent.
* These are not official patches.
* These do not match any
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 4:53 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On 1/30/2012 3:12 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
And there is apachectl, not httpdctl.
Would anyone else like to see this changed, now, for the 2.4 releases?
-0
On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 15:53 -0600, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 1/30/2012 3:12 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
And there is apachectl, not httpdctl.
Would anyone else like to see this changed, now, for the 2.4 releases?
No... Maybe that's a consideration for 3.stable-release, if at
On 1/30/2012 7:51 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Anyone with Windows willing to sign up to review/test?
I don't have a build environment to create something based on the diff,
but if someone can create a build , I'll happily do the testing.
--
Daniel Ruggeri
It's been hell lately - sorry for the sloow reply
On 1/19/2012 1:13 AM, Sander Temme wrote:
Interesting... which version of OpenSSL? Must be 0.9.7 or 0.9.8, because
err_cmp() disappeared after that. And the signature doesn't match what we're
seeing in the backtrace.
And which
I can look at RPM, but I am at least 80% of the way with installp. A
quickDirty one is already ready, but I want to finish it up a little bit
more (sub filesets, dependancies).
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 10:31 AM, Graham Leggett minf...@sharp.fm wrote:
On 30 Jan 2012, at 12:03 PM, Michael Felt
I had assummed that apache2 was so that people could test apache2 without
killing their apache1 installation.
IMHO IBM's packaging of early apache (called IHS for - I think IBM HTTP
Server) was 'different' and they kept changing the name of the main
directory, e.g. changed the capitalization of
On 30/01/2012 23:43, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
It's been hell lately - sorry for the sloow reply
On 1/19/2012 1:13 AM, Sander Temme wrote:
Interesting... which version of OpenSSL? Must be 0.9.7 or 0.9.8, because
err_cmp() disappeared after that. And the signature doesn't match what
On 1/30/2012 6:21 PM, Michael Felt wrote:
I had assummed that apache2 was so that people could test apache2 without
killing their
apache1 installation.
Fairly certain that was true. Of course moving from 2.0-2.2-2.4 that
is no longer much help.
Anyways, just wanted to let you know there is
On 31.01.2012 00:36, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
On 1/30/2012 7:51 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Anyone with Windows willing to sign up to review/test?
I don't have a build environment to create something based on the diff,
but if someone can create a build , I'll happily do the testing.
What's you
On 30.01.2012 22:53, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 1/30/2012 3:12 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
And there is apachectl, not httpdctl.
Would anyone else like to see this changed, now, for the 2.4 releases?
-0.5
Rainer
On 1/31/2012 12:01 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
What's you runtime env then (Win version and 32 or 64 Bits)?
Rainer
I have at my immediate disposal Server 2003 32-bit as well as Win7 and
Server 2008 64-bit. I may be able to scrounge up some more exotic
configurations if needed. My earlier tests to
On 1/29/2012 11:53 AM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
On Wednesday 25 January 2012, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Looking over the code, impl as a hook seems more isolated,
rather than the current impl which is intrusive (which is
part of what we're trying to avoid, aren't we?)
OK, patch is attached. This needs
On 1/30/2012 11:14 PM, Gregg Smith wrote:
On 1/29/2012 11:53 AM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
On Wednesday 25 January 2012, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Looking over the code, impl as a hook seems more isolated,
rather than the current impl which is intrusive (which is
part of what we're trying to avoid,
On Monday 30 January 2012, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 1/30/2012 3:12 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
And there is apachectl, not httpdctl.
Would anyone else like to see this changed, now, for the 2.4
releases?
FTR, I am also -0 to this change right now.
Hi Ray,
I'm using a slightly modified version of
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.3/mod/mod_proxy_fdpass.html
Regards,
Henrik
On Fri, 2012-01-20 at 17:12 +0100, Ray Morris wrote:
I'm using a httpd module that does a socket transfer from the httpd
process to another non-httpd process that is
42 matches
Mail list logo
