Release whenever you want, my 30 years in this game shows most networks,
including mine, are not going to touch it on a weekend anyway, so monday
or tuesday before it hits test beds - assuming there is a real need to
upgrade in the first place (high CVE etc), and later in the week before
it hit
even as
earlier this year, but as usual, it went nowhere.
--
Regards,
Noel Butler
This Email, including attachments, may contain legally privileged
information, therefore at all times remains confidential and subject to
copyright protected under international law. You may not disseminate
this m
hooks and
rewriting the patch as a module. Feedback encouraged.
Thanks,
Adam
[0] https://gist.github.com/adsr/d6360b5cd59c084d67adc5e8e6127695
applies to 2.4.6
eh? you do realise 2.4.6 is 9 years old, we at 2.4.54 currently.
--
Regards,
Noel Butler
This Email, including attachments, may
On 30/09/2023 22:28, General Email wrote:
On Sat, 30 Sep, 2023, 5:34 pm Will Fatherley,
wrote:
Please support/enable https by default in the Apache web server.
HTTPS is supported already by default. I like the idea of enabling by
default, but as it stands now probably should not be done as
o project should
include snakeoil. They might have been OK years ago when we were charged
criminal rates by likes of verisgn, thawte and co to get a signed cert,
but those days ended a long time ago.
--
Regards,
Noel Butler
This Email, including attachments, may contain legally privileged
info
GE
If you are that paranoid the only option really is to cut that chord.
And you'd be the first person who claims to be a web dev that doesn't
put their name to their code, courts don't recognise an alias if someone
plagiarises your work.
this is bad mean person signin
On 15/01/2015 20:06, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 9:25 AM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
>
>> There is still missing the "ListenCoresBucketsRatio" documentation, and I
>> don't think I can do it today, could you?
>
> Also, would you share maybe some recommended settings
> ({Min,Max}Sp
On 16/01/2015 06:10, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.11 can be found
> at the usual place:
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ [1]
>
> I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.11 GA.
>
> [ ] +1: Good to go
> [ ] +0: meh
> [ ] -1:
On 24/01/2015 00:56, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> On Jan 22, 2015, at 1:54 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: The
>> pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.12 can be found at the usual
>> place: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ [1] I'm calling a VOTE on releasing
>> these as Apache httpd 2.4.12
On 25/01/2015 17:21, Nick Edwards wrote:
> I am noticing a number of hits using UTC with this version?
> Not all, only some, is anyone else seeing this?
> Does not occur on 2.4.10.
> They are php pages, however, the main site which is php is static, it
> only uses php for counter nothing else,
of php between your 2.4.10 and 2.4.12
> test cases?
>
> On Mon, 26 Jan 2015 11:23:20 +1000
> Noel Butler wrote:
> On 25/01/2015 17:21, Nick Edwards wrote: I am noticing a number of hits using
> UTC with this version? Not all, only some, is anyone else seeing this? Does
> not
On 27/01/2015 03:21, Rainer Jung wrote:
> Am 26.01.2015 um 14:14 schrieb Eric Covener:
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 8:08 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: svn
> diff https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/tags/2.4.11 [1]
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/tags/2.4.12 [2] | cdiff first
On 28/01/2015 06:41, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> There is a possibility that OP's had actually rebuilt APR (from the
> -deps), even with the very same APR version, which resulting in some
> different autoconf detection on their platform relative to time.h
> function handling. It would be wort
On 13/03/2015 02:54, Eric Covener wrote:
> I stumbled on this link that Bill had shared previously and went back
> to look at previous snapshots:
>
> March 2014: 2.0: 4.1%, 2.4: 4.3%
>
> http://web.archive.org/web/20140327151641/http://w3techs.com/technologies/details/ws-apache/2/all
> [1]
On 07/05/2015 09:22, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
> For trunk, I propose we drop TLSv1 and TLSv1.1 protocols and simply adopt the
> recommended cipher list illustrated below (!SSLv3) in the default
> extra/httpd-ssl.conf source, following the SHOULD recommendations.
unless trunk is for the 2.6
On 07/05/2015 12:17, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
> On May 6, 2015 9:09 PM, "William A Rowe Jr" wrote:
>>
>>
>> On May 6, 2015 8:12 PM, "Noel Butler" wrote:
>> >
>> > On 07/05/2015 09:22, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
>> >>
&g
On 10/05/2015 11:08, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 10.05.2015 um 03:02 schrieb Noel Butler:
>
>> Either way, using slackware on all my servers its trivial since the
>> distro keeps pretty much up to date by design - unlike RH/debian and
>> their kiddy versions who bri
Thanks Christian.
On 11/05/2015 01:57, Christian Seiler wrote:
> On 05/10/2015 03:26 AM, Noel Butler wrote:
>
>> Can any SUSE and debian users confirm the current supported stable
>> release supports 1.2?
>
> Currently, three Debian releases are still support
On 28/05/2015 03:17, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> No need to go off... 2.2 has been out for almost 10 years.
> 2.4 for a bit over 3. That is a LONG time. I'm simply
> *suggesting* (no BDFL posturing Mr. Rowe) that after 10
> years, maybe it's time to say that 2.2's era is done, and
> 2.4's time is h
On 28/05/2015 07:38, olli hauer wrote:
> - for long time there was no working mod_php module for 2.4, and changing to
> php-fpm was not for everyone a solution.
huh?
I personally since dawn of the httpd/php love have always only ever used
mod_php and at no time did I have a a non usable ser
On 28/05/2015 14:48, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
> Enough of this ad-hominem BS... this is in fact a majority rule decision (it
> is a vote
> not on code but on procedure), and is binding on the project as a whole. I
> don't
> want to discuss this again for six months and I'm not keen on the
On 28/05/2015 17:59, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
> On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 2:48 AM, Noel Butler wrote:
>
> On 28/05/2015 14:48, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
>
> Enough of this ad-hominem BS... [...]
>
> You've lost the argument and lost respect, you have demonstrate
On 05/06/2015 02:33, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.13 can be found
> at the usual place:
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ [1]
>
> I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.13 GA.
>
> [ ] +1: Good to go
> [ ] +0: meh
> [ ] -1:
On 12/06/2015 00:08, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.14 GA.
>
> [ ] +1: Good to go
> [ ] +0: meh
> [ ] -1: Danger Will Robinson. And why.
-1
"The SSLCertificateChainFile directive () is deprecated,
SSLCertificateFile should be used instead"
On 15/06/2015 07:56, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Gregg Smith wrote:
>
>> http://people.apache.org/~gsmith/proposal/sslcertificatechainfile_compromise.diff
>> [1]
>
> I'm fine with this approach too.
> We have to decide whether a single [warn] is acceptable or not
On 20/06/2015 02:50, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.15 GA.
using included apr 1.5.2 and apr-util 1.5.4 and with mysql (mariadb)
+1 Slackware 13.1 -> 14.1
> PS: Hopefully, 3rd time's the charm!
:)
On 11/07/2015 06:33, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.16 can be found
> at the usual place:
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ [1]
>
> I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.16 GA.
>
> [ ] +1: Good to go
> [ ] +0: meh
> [ ] -1:
On 10/10/2015 03:40, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.17 can be found
at the usual place:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.17 GA.
[X] +1: Good to go
[ ] +0: meh
[ ] -1: Danger Will Robinso
On 17/11/2015 03:05, Jim Jagielski wrote:
My plan is to T&R 2.4.18 sometime next week in hopes of a formal
release the beginning of Dec.
??? We only had 2.4.17 5 weeks ago, why the rush?
--
If you have the urge to reply to all rather than reply to list, you best
read http://members.ausics.
On 17/11/2015 19:24, Graham Leggett wrote:
On 17 Nov 2015, at 07:13, Noel Butler wrote:
??? We only had 2.4.17 5 weeks ago, why the rush?
We have improvements, why make people wait?
Regards,
Graham
--
You run into complacency dangers if you end up in a "release very often"
On 17/11/2015 18:02, Stefan Eissing wrote:
Am 17.11.2015 um 08:13 schrieb Noel Butler :
On 17/11/2015 03:05, Jim Jagielski wrote:
My plan is to T&R 2.4.18 sometime next week in hopes of a formal
release the beginning of Dec.
??? We only had 2.4.17 5 weeks ago, why the rush?
Uhm.
On 17/11/2015 22:31, Graham Leggett wrote:
On 17 Nov 2015, at 2:18 PM, Noel Butler wrote:
You run into complacency dangers if you end up in a "release very
often" mode, take phpmyadmin as one example, most admins I know gave
up updating it, because there were updates every week,
On 17/11/2015 22:33, Reindl Harald wrote:
5 or 6 bloody weeks is a month - so what's the problem?
any other software but httpd is allowed to have monthly updates?
"I can accept" - seriously - you can just ignore a release when you
think it's not important for you but i don't get why anybody el
On 19/11/2015 01:43, Jim Jagielski wrote:
If you don't need the stuff in 2.4.18 and 2.4.17 is fine
for you then there is no need to upgrade...
I certainly wont be, nor will many others from what I've heard, anyway
close to holidays now so wont be doing much anyway.
--
If you have the urge
On 18/11/2015 19:48, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 18.11.2015 um 08:16 schrieb Noel Butler:
On 17/11/2015 22:33, Reindl Harald wrote:
5 or 6 bloody weeks is a month - so what's the problem?
any other software but httpd is allowed to have monthly updates?
"I can accept" - seriously
On 22/03/2016 03:37, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.19 can be found
at the usual place:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.19 GA.
[x ] +1: Good to go
[ ] +0: meh
[ ] -1: Danger Will Robins
On 23/03/2016 20:56, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Let's see: I recalled the vote for 2.4.19 because of a
single issue, basically related to a missing few lines in
a file which prevented building on Win. Nice, easy, simple
fix.
Now it appears that a slew of "fixes" related to Win have
been applied which,
On 23/03/2016 22:27, Jim Jagielski wrote:
I see your point and have no intent or desire to flame.
Release Often is hardly a Bad Thing, at least IMHO. When the
time is right for a release, then we release. It seemed a
good time, again IMHO.
My opinion that "this shit will happen" when, despite
On 25/03/2016 19:52, Graham Leggett wrote:
On 23 Mar 2016, at 1:58 PM, Noel Butler wrote:
as stated previously, this shit will happen when certain people push
with a release often mentality
AFAIK there is *ZERO* critical exploit bugs to be patched by any
pending release, so lets get house
On 26/03/2016 13:32, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 26.03.2016 um 04:13 schrieb Noel Butler:
On 25/03/2016 19:52, Graham Leggett wrote:
On 23 Mar 2016, at 1:58 PM, Noel Butler
wrote:
as stated previously, this shit will happen when certain people push
with a release often mentality
AFAIK there
On 26/03/2016 22:54, Reindl Harald wrote:
*yawn*
grow up!
especially with your off-list hate-mails while block responses
off-list hate mails? The message was pretty clear you emailed me asking
me never to reply to any of your posts some time ago, I emailed you
reminding you that works bo
On 29/03/2016 01:06, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
> @Everyone on this thread - keep it civil.
>
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 10:13 PM, Noel Butler wrote:
> On 25/03/2016 19:52, Graham Leggett wrote:
> On 23 Mar 2016, at 1:58 PM, Noel Butler wrote:
>
> as stated previously,
your short memory returns again, thank you, as that terminates any and
all prior agreements we had about (not) responding to each other and
your diatribe, the flood gates have now opened.
But as for this post, so it seems I did, I probably stopped reading half
way, my care factor isnt all th
On 12/05/2016 05:13, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 05/10/2016 10:38 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
It's been a year, and seems to be a good time to revisit this topic
while those folks who are present at ApacheCon can discuss f2f
the merits of bringing the 2.2.x chapter to a close, and share their
thou
On 17/06/2016 03:07, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.21 can be found
at the usual place:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.21 GA.
[X] +1: Good to go
[ ] +0: meh
[ ] -1: Danger Will Robinso
Good to go Slackware 14.x
On 01/07/2016 04:02, Jim Jagielski wrote:
+1:
o OSX 10.11.5, Xcode 7.3.1
o CentOS 6, 64bit
o CentOS 7, 64 bit
o Ubuntu 15.10, 64 bit
On Jun 30, 2016, at 1:21 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.23 can be found
at the usual
ts outdated and stays
outdated, to give those users a choice of using a modern code set would
be good, but requires long term dedication.
--
Kind Regard,
Noel Butler
This Email, including any attachments, may contain legally
privileged
information, therefore remains confide
this allows bug reporter to test further,
and time to see if the fix has introduced other problems before going
mainstream, but should exclude very critical security hole plugging,
which should go straight to release vote.
--
Kind Regard,
Noel Butler
This Email, including an
On 20/01/2017 07:07, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 2:52 PM, Noel Butler wrote:
> On 20/01/2017 05:54, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
>
> posts, I don't think you will find a single post where I suggested
> that there is an issue with the frequency of release
On 20/01/2017 07:45, Jacob Champion wrote:
> On 01/19/2017 12:52 PM, Noel Butler wrote:
>
>> Frequent releases set off alarms in system admins minds, frequent
>> releases give the view of unstable/unreliable software, and that is the
>> largest cause of movement to an a
On Wed, 2013-05-01 at 14:40 +0200, Graham Leggett wrote:
> On 01 May 2013, at 1:51 PM, André Warnier wrote:
>
> > But *based on the actual data and patterns which I can observe on my
> > servers (not guesses), I think it might have an effect*.
>
> Of course it might have an effect - the real i
On Wed, 2013-05-01 at 21:15 +0200, Christian Folini wrote:
> real-time blacklist lookup (-> ModSecurity's @rbl operator).
Try using that on busy servers (webhosts/ISP's)... might be fine for a
SOHO, but in a larger commercial world, forget it, the impact is far
far worse than the other suggest
sad state of affairs when "system administrators" don't even know how to
unsubscribe from mailing lists, what hope do their users have...
On Thu, 2013-05-30 at 21:44 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> do it yourself like on any other mailing-list
> mail-headers are your friend
>
> Am 30.05.2013 1
how to unsubscribe me lol
>
> On May 30, 2013, at 6:25 PM, "Noel Butler"
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > sad state of affairs when "system administrators" don't even know
> > how to unsubscribe from mailing lists, what hope do their users
> > have...
&
On Wed, 2013-07-10 at 03:24 -0500, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
>
> Because the project is incapable of releasing more than two minor
> subversions, per year, at present.
on holiday with a dog slow 3G vpn tonight, so I'll be brief (and wont
see any replies until I return on Sunday...)
I have nev
On Sun, 2013-07-14 at 23:40 +0200, Rainer Jung wrote:
> On 14.07.2013 23:05, Rainer Jung wrote:
> > On 11.07.2013 20:54, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> >> The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.5 can be found
> >> at the usual place:
> >>
> >>http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
> >>
> >> I'm
On Mon, 2013-07-15 at 13:51 -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> On Jul 15, 2013, at 12:48 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> > The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.6 can be found
> > at the usual place:
> >
> > http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
> >
> > I'm calling a VOTE on releasing the
>
>
> The cmake lists would have to largely duplicate the autoconf tests. I
> have no intention of messing with that, though others are of course
> welcome. So for now: httpd/apr cmake support is only for Windows.
>
and I sure as hell hope it stays that way, cmake is a complete PITA.
I'd g
On Tue, 2013-11-19 at 12:45 -0500, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.7 GA.
>
> [ ] +1: Good to go
> [ ] +0: meh
> [ ] -1: Danger Will Robinson. And why.
>
> Vote will last the normal 72 hrs.
>
+1 slackware 13.1 13.37 14.0 14.1
built w
On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 14:15 -0600, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> I can certainly apply and propose for back port the defect fixes, this
> week.
>
> Those which change the configured behavior in an unexpected way are no
> longer easy fits on 2.2 or 2.4, and need further discussion about
> their
On Fri, 2014-01-10 at 08:38 -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>
>
> [ X] It is mandatory to provide best available description and any
> available tracking information when committing fixes for
> vulnerabilities to any branch, delaying committing of the fix if the
> information shouldn't be provided ye
On Fri, 2014-03-07 at 12:58 -0500, Mikhail T. wrote:
> On 07.03.2014 12:28, Yann Ylavic wrote:
>
> >
> > Sorry, this was posted from gmail...
>
> Is it written anywhere in the bylaws of this mailing list, that use of
> HTML is something to apologize for? With all due sympathies to
> Reindl's med
Harry, you have been warned before, dont bring your antics onto this
list, this is about the only list you have been most well behaved on,
unlike others, please remember our previous conversations. If you think
a posters post violates some RFC, ignore it, or take it up with him in
private, do not
o you think you are calling others net cop because they ask for
easier readable posts while you are the one proven to playing net cop
due maintaining a RBL?
>> Is it written anywhere in the bylaws of this mailing list
is the response you should have been attacking
Am 08.03.2014 00:39, schr
On 12/03/2014 09:17, Noel Butler wrote:
> On 12/03/2014 02:34, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
>> The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.8 can be found
>> at the usual place:
>>
>> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ [1]
>>
>> I'm calling
On 12/03/2014 02:34, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.8 can be found
> at the usual place:
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ [1]
>
> I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.8 GA.
>
> [ ] +1: Good to go
> [ ] +0: meh
> [ ] -1: Da
On 14/03/2014 02:49, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.9 can be found
> at the usual place:
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ [1]
>
> I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.9 GA.
>
> [ ] +1: Good to go
> [ ] +0: meh
> [ ] -1: Da
On 16/07/2014 03:20, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.10 can be found
at the usual place:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.10 GA.
[ ] +1: Good to go
[ ] +0: meh
[ ] -1: Danger Will Robinso
On 21/07/2014 04:40, olli hauer wrote:
On 2014-07-20 19:14, Graham Leggett wrote:
On 20 Jul 2014, at 18:03, dev wrote:
Has 2.4.10 been released or not ?
It has been released, but we need to wait for the mirrors to update
before formerly announcing the release.
Regards,
Graham
--
Looki
On 22/07/2014 15:02, dev wrote:
I hope this is the right maillist for this sort of question.
not really, the users list would be more appropriate
and then build httpd after checking a few basic dependencies. Must I
unpack
the apr and apr-util sources into ./srclib and use --with-included-a
e 2.4.46
and this question is better suited to users@ not dev@
--
Regards,
Noel Butler
This Email, including attachments, may contain legally privileged
information, therefore at all times remains confidential and subject to
copyright protected under international law. You may not dissem
ate tarball as 2.4.46:
> [ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough!
> [ ] +0: Let's have a talk.
> [ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong.
All good running on slackware 13.1 through to -current
built with included APR 1.7.0, APR
about to release 2.4.46
> and this question is better suited to users@ not dev@
then take it up with centos, why you think someone will help you on
something thats 40, yes forty versions old is beyond sane thought,
either way you could ask on users list.
--
Regards,
Noel Butler
This
On 03/08/2020 23:38, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> On 8/3/2020 3:35 AM, JunkYardMail1 wrote:
>
>> Getting sporadic not found (404) and redirects (301). These occur maybe
>> about 1 per 1000+ or so.
>>
>> The 404 responses are for existing content, and the 301 response make no
>> sense. Sometimes
patch to resolve has been in apr-util svn for 15
months :)
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1872061&view=rev
Again, this is apr related, not http, so not a blocker, just a "FYI"
--
Regards,
Noel Butler
This Email, including attachments, may contain legally privileged
informati
and passes test suite on RHEL8. Thanks for
RMing
again.
Regards, Joe
All good on slackware 14.0 14.2 and 15.0beta running 48 hours
--
Regards,
Noel Butler
This Email, including attachments, may contain legally privileged
information, therefore at all times remains confidential and subject
t its name) but not used in freebsd, Redhat/fedora
Debian/ubuntu/mint, SuSe, Slackware, Gentoo, Arch ...
When one of these guys start using it in place of openssl then perhaps
it should be considered a problem, but I don't see that happening any
year soon
--
Regards,
Noel Butler
ainst OpenSSL 1.0.2 (initial release,
no letter suffix).
But in openssl 1.0.2, was that not EOL'd back in late 2019?
--
Regards,
Noel Butler
This Email, including attachments, may contain legally privileged
information, therefore at all times remains confidential and subject to
copyrig
On 28/05/2021 18:17, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
My personal view is that I like to see this in APR just like the DBD
and Crypto stuff, but as I have no time to offer to make
something happen I keep myself calm in this discussion.
+1
--
Regards,
Noel Butler
This Email, including attachments, may
ld be the same as in previous releases.
All good on slackware 14.2 and 15.0-rc1 (running 24 hours)
using apr 1.70, and apr-util-1.6.1-patched (1 patch only applied against
orig src, req'd for mariadb 10.2+) and openssl-1.1.1L
--
Regards,
Noel Butler
This Email, including attachments, ma
gets copied and changed upon running of
formal release processes
(No, 2.4.0 was released around the start of 2012)
--
Regards,
Noel Butler
This Email, including attachments, may contain legally privileged
information, therefore at all times remains confidential and subject to
copyright
1.
Kind Regards,
Stefan
All good on Slackware 14.2 and 15.0-rc1 no issues after 24 hours
--
Regards,
Noel Butler
This Email, including attachments, may contain legally privileged
information, therefore at all times remains confidential and subject to
copyright protected under internationa
www.
DocumentRoot /var/www/vhost/xxx/www/html
ScriptAlias /cgi-bin/ /var/www/vhost/x/www/cgi-bin/
...snip...
This is how every person expects it.
So you want to go make that more convoluted?
--
Regards,
Noel Butler
This Email, including attachments, may contain legally privil
Its simple and works for decades, if you feel its not sure and needs
replacing with other commands, the code for other commands should be
internally called by ScriptAlias directive
--
Regards,
Noel Butler
This Email, including attachments, may contain legally privileged
information, therefore
code still
--
Regards,
Noel Butler
This Email, including attachments, may contain legally privileged
information, therefore at all times remains confidential and subject to
copyright protected under international law. You may not disseminate
this message without the authors express written auth
are in embargo status in most organisations.
--
Regards,
Noel Butler
This Email, including attachments, may contain legally privileged
information, therefore at all times remains confidential and subject to
copyright protected under international law. You may not disseminate
this message wi
On 08/12/2021 01:14, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 06/12/2021 12:27, Noel Butler wrote: On 06/12/2021 20:36, Stefan
Eissing wrote:
Friends of httpd, how do you feel about a release in the next two
weeks?
Kind Regards,
Stefan
-1
Thats days before christmas, most testers and i'm sure devs wi
to go
> [ ] +0: meh
> [ ] -1: Danger Will Robinson. And why.
>
> Vote will last the normal 72 hrs.
>
> NOTE: The *-deps are only there for convenience.
>
> Thx!
All good on slackware 13+ w/ mysql, apr 1.6.3 , apr-util 1.6.1
Thanks Jim.
--
Kind Regards,
No
On 07/08/2018 03:37, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
> It appears 2.4.35 is unusable, as other distributors also paused to start
> hauling in regression fixes as they
eh? unusable? I have rooms full of them with no errors or problems
--
Kind Regards,
Noel Butler
This
On 18/09/2018 10:56, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
> Hi, all;
> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
all good on slackware 13.0+ with apr 1.6.5 and apr-util 1.6.1
--
Kind Regards,
Noel Butler
T
ailrelay2-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at
> mailrelay2-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPSA id redacted
> for ; Sat, 22 Sep 2018 11:41:38 + (UTC)
--
Kind Regards,
Noel Butler
This Email, including any attachments, may contain legally
privileged
information, the
it, I know of a few who moved to "courier", an oldy but a
goody.
The release often mentality might be good for a new nurturing project,
but that is not httpd.
System admins want stability.
flame away.
--
Kind Regards,
Noel Butler
This Email, includ
9a7b936a6ddbbf81b313c4a8b38bf232b40e *httpd-2.4.38.tar.gz
> sha256: 38d0b73aa313c28065bf58faf64cec12bf7c7d5196146107df2ad07541aa26a6
> *httpd-2.4.38.tar.gz
All good on slackware 14 to current, with apr-1.6.5 and apr-util 1.6.1
--
Kind Regards,
Noel Butler
This Email, including any attachments, may contain legally
privile
> It's not just good, it's good enough!
tongue in cheek here, but...
shouldn't that be the other way around, "It's not just good enough,
it's good!" :)
--
Kind Regards,
Noel Butler
This Email, including any attachments, may c
e835aa7cde823a4b7f8e3463164f3d9fe63e *httpd-2.4.41.tar.gz
> sha256: 3c0f9663240beb0f008acf3b4501c4f339d7467ee345a36c86c46b4d6f3a5461
> *httpd-2.4.41.tar.gz
> --
> Daniel Ruggeri
good to go slackware 13.0 -> -current
--
Kind Regards,
Noel Butler
This Email, including any attachments, may contain legally
privileg
On 24/01/2017 13:58, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 7:52 PM, Noel Butler wrote:
>
>> Perhaps the only person who wont bend over and take it up the arse like some
>> people here expect, if I have an opinion, i'll voice it
>
> Noel, your
On 23/01/2017 19:14, Stefan Eissing wrote:
> Am 23.01.2017 um 02:52 schrieb Noel Butler :
>
> On 20/01/2017 07:45, Jacob Champion wrote:
>
> On 01/19/2017 12:52 PM, Noel Butler wrote: Frequent releases set off alarms
> in system admins minds, frequent
> releases give
On 24/01/2017 20:22, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 23.01.2017 um 02:52 schrieb Noel Butler:
>
>> Perhaps the only person who wont bend over and take it up the arse like
>> some people here expect, if I have an opinion, i'll voice it
>
> no, you are just a hypocrite
to go
> [ ] +0: meh
> [ ] -1: Danger Will Robinson. And why.
>
> Vote will last the normal 72 hrs.
>
> NOTE: The *-deps are only there for convenience.
>
> Thx!
+1 Slackware with included apr 1.6.2 and apr-util 1.6.0
--
Kind Regards,
Noel Butler
it.
>
> WTF?
I don't use it Jim, but ... enabling it on dev box confirms your finding
wont start, trace is
0596 write(2, "AH00526: Syntax error on line 42 "..., 71) = 71
10596 write(2, "Duplicate WatchdogInterval direct"..., 54) = 54
--
Kind Regards,
Noel Bu
1 - 100 of 167 matches
Mail list logo
