On Saturday 04 February 2012, Gregg Smith wrote:
This fixes the crash, thanks.
Thanks. Committed to trunk and 2.4
FanTAStic!!!
On Feb 4, 2012, at 5:11 AM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
On Saturday 04 February 2012, Gregg Smith wrote:
This fixes the crash, thanks.
Thanks. Committed to trunk and 2.4
On Thursday 02 February 2012, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 2/2/2012 8:36 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
bb == NULL ??
Looking at his attached screen scrape; no. Which leaves with
something like e == NULL or a broken bb.
The former :-(
Gregg, please add this or try the attached patch which is
On Thursday 02 February 2012, Joe Orton wrote:
The combination of APR_SUCCESS and DECLINED is unusual; an int
return value with OK/DECLINED?
Input and output filters should return an apr_status_t. So, if the
hook does not return an apr_status_t, core_input_filter() would have
to invent some
On 2/3/2012 10:43 AM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
On Thursday 02 February 2012, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 2/2/2012 8:36 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
bb == NULL ??
Looking at his attached screen scrape; no. Which leaves with
something like e == NULL or a broken bb.
The former :-(
Gregg, please
bb == NULL ??
On Feb 2, 2012, at 3:40 AM, Gregg Smith wrote:
Stefan,
On 2/1/2012 12:44 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
Try removing the static:
--- a/server/mpm/winnt/child.c
+++ b/server/mpm/winnt/child.c
@@ -736,9 +736,9 @@ static winnt_conn_ctx_t
*winnt_get_connection(winnt_conn_ctx_t
On 2/2/2012 8:36 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
bb == NULL ??
Looking at his attached screen scrape; no. Which leaves with something
like e == NULL or a broken bb.
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 08:53:09PM +0100, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
+ * Insert the network bucket into the core input filter's input brigade.
+ * This hook is intended for MPMs or protocol modules that need to do special
+ * socket setup.
+ * @param c The connection
+ * @param bb The brigade to
On 31.01.2012 22:30, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
On Tuesday 31 January 2012, Gregg Smith wrote:
On 1/29/2012 11:53 AM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
On Wednesday 25 January 2012, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Looking over the code, impl as a hook seems more isolated,
rather than the current impl which is intrusive
On 1/31/2012 1:30 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
On Tuesday 31 January 2012, Gregg Smith wrote:
On 1/29/2012 11:53 AM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
On Wednesday 25 January 2012, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Looking over the code, impl as a hook seems more isolated,
rather than the current impl which is intrusive
On Wednesday 01 February 2012, Gregg Smith wrote:
Getting closer
Linking...
Creating library .\Release/libhttpd.lib and object
.\Release/libhttpd.exp
mpm_winnt.obj : error LNK2019: unresolved external symbol
_winnt_insert_network_bucket referenced in function _winnt_hooks
I don't
On 1/29/2012 11:53 AM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
On Wednesday 25 January 2012, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Looking over the code, impl as a hook seems more isolated,
rather than the current impl which is intrusive (which is
part of what we're trying to avoid, aren't we?)
OK, patch is attached. This needs
Hi Stefan,
On 29.01.2012 20:53, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
On Wednesday 25 January 2012, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Looking over the code, impl as a hook seems more isolated,
rather than the current impl which is intrusive (which is
part of what we're trying to avoid, aren't we?)
OK, patch is attached.
On Tuesday 31 January 2012, Gregg Smith wrote:
On 1/29/2012 11:53 AM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
On Wednesday 25 January 2012, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Looking over the code, impl as a hook seems more isolated,
rather than the current impl which is intrusive (which is
part of what we're trying to
Anyone with Windows willing to sign up to review/test?
On Jan 29, 2012, at 2:53 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
On Wednesday 25 January 2012, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Looking over the code, impl as a hook seems more isolated,
rather than the current impl which is intrusive (which is
part of what we're
On Jan 29, 2012, at 2:53 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
On Wednesday 25 January 2012, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Looking over the code, impl as a hook seems more isolated,
rather than the current impl which is intrusive (which is
part of what we're trying to avoid, aren't we?)
OK, patch is attached.
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Jan 29, 2012, at 2:53 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
On Wednesday 25 January 2012, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Looking over the code, impl as a hook seems more isolated,
rather than the current impl which is intrusive (which is
part of what we're trying to
On 1/30/2012 7:51 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Anyone with Windows willing to sign up to review/test?
I don't have a build environment to create something based on the diff,
but if someone can create a build , I'll happily do the testing.
--
Daniel Ruggeri
On 31.01.2012 00:36, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
On 1/30/2012 7:51 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Anyone with Windows willing to sign up to review/test?
I don't have a build environment to create something based on the diff,
but if someone can create a build , I'll happily do the testing.
What's you
On 1/31/2012 12:01 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
What's you runtime env then (Win version and 32 or 64 Bits)?
Rainer
I have at my immediate disposal Server 2003 32-bit as well as Win7 and
Server 2008 64-bit. I may be able to scrounge up some more exotic
configurations if needed. My earlier tests to
On 1/29/2012 11:53 AM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
On Wednesday 25 January 2012, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Looking over the code, impl as a hook seems more isolated,
rather than the current impl which is intrusive (which is
part of what we're trying to avoid, aren't we?)
OK, patch is attached. This needs
On 1/30/2012 11:14 PM, Gregg Smith wrote:
On 1/29/2012 11:53 AM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
On Wednesday 25 January 2012, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Looking over the code, impl as a hook seems more isolated,
rather than the current impl which is intrusive (which is
part of what we're trying to avoid,
22 matches
Mail list logo
