Just to be pedantic... even lazy consensus isn't that fast (3days),
but no big deal since we are CTR...
On Dec 2, 2011, at 6:33 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
On Thursday 01 December 2011, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
Any more comments/thoughts?
As nobody disagreed, this is now in trunk. I intend to
On Thursday 01 December 2011, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
Any more comments/thoughts?
As nobody disagreed, this is now in trunk. I intend to commit it to
2.4 tomorrow.
It's already a big step forward and the finishing touches can be done
in 2.4.1.
On Wednesday 30 November 2011, Guenter Knauf wrote:
Am 30.11.2011 01:51, schrieb William A. Rowe Jr.:
On 11/29/2011 5:30 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
Currently my scripts produces:
http://people.apache.org/~sf/error-msg-numbers.diff
http://people.apache.org/~sf/error-msg-numbers.list
On Wednesday 30 November 2011, Mikhail T. wrote:
On 29.11.2011 23:30, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
But my point remains, that we allocate each module a block of
some 50 codes, such that mod_aaa gets AHM-0049 and mod_aab
gets 50-99, etc.
How will 3rd-party modules be getting their
ap_log_error(..., APLOGNO(0815) foo went wrong, ...);
great idea on avoiding svn.a.o search hits.
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 01:09, Stefan Fritsch s...@sfritsch.de wrote:
On Wednesday 30 November 2011, Guenter Knauf wrote:
Am 30.11.2011 01:51, schrieb William A. Rowe Jr.:
On 11/29/2011 5:30 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
Currently my scripts produces:
On 11/30/2011 2:09 AM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
Another thought: Would having the AH0815 numbers verbatim in the
source actually hurt search engine users because they get hits on
svn.apache.org, github, and whatever. Maybe a macro that hides the
actual form would be better?
#define
On 11/30/2011 2:09 AM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
On Wednesday 30 November 2011, Guenter Knauf wrote:
Am 30.11.2011 01:51, schrieb William A. Rowe Jr.:
On 11/29/2011 5:30 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
Currently my scripts produces:
http://people.apache.org/~sf/error-msg-numbers.diff
On 30 Nov 2011, at 9:21 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
I'm not suggesting changing the alpha prefix. Just block out
ranges so that any listing of the codes is grouped by module that
emits them.
From my experience, any attempt at grouping some kind of numbering like this
normally results a
On Nov 30, 2011, at 3:23 AM, HyperHacker wrote:
Any reason *not* to use 5 digits?
The extra character, or using hex, seems worth the future flexibility. We want
to be able to assign new codes, rather than reusing old ones, when error
messages change in future versions.
Allocating 50
On Wednesday 30 November 2011, Graham Leggett wrote:
On 30 Nov 2011, at 9:21 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
I'm not suggesting changing the alpha prefix. Just block out
ranges so that any listing of the codes is grouped by module that
emits them.
From my experience, any attempt at
On 01 Dec 2011, at 1:28 AM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
I guess before we commit this to 2.4, all other pending backports
should be done.
Speaking for myself, all my backports are done.
Regards,
Graham
--
On Monday 28 November 2011, Rich Bowen wrote:
On Nov 28, 2011, at 11:21 AM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
A question on procedure: Do you want to add all error codes at
once and then fill in the descriptions or add the error codes as
the documentation evolves? If the former, some scripting would
On Nov 29, 2011, at 6:30 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
Currently my scripts produces:
http://people.apache.org/~sf/error-msg-numbers.diff
http://people.apache.org/~sf/error-msg-numbers.list
This is level info and up, but that is easily changed.
The script still misses all occurences where
On 11/29/2011 5:30 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
Currently my scripts produces:
http://people.apache.org/~sf/error-msg-numbers.diff
http://people.apache.org/~sf/error-msg-numbers.list
This is level info and up, but that is easily changed.
Everything from debug level up should be coded.
Am 30.11.2011 01:51, schrieb William A. Rowe Jr.:
On 11/29/2011 5:30 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
Currently my scripts produces:
http://people.apache.org/~sf/error-msg-numbers.diff
http://people.apache.org/~sf/error-msg-numbers.list
This is level info and up, but that is easily changed.
On 11/29/2011 8:58 PM, Guenter Knauf wrote:
Am 30.11.2011 01:51, schrieb William A. Rowe Jr.:
On 11/29/2011 5:30 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
Currently my scripts produces:
http://people.apache.org/~sf/error-msg-numbers.diff
http://people.apache.org/~sf/error-msg-numbers.list
This is level
On 29.11.2011 23:30, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
But my point remains, that we allocate each module a block of some 50
codes, such that mod_aaa gets AHM-0049 and mod_aab gets 50-99, etc.
How will 3rd-party modules be getting their blocks?
-mi
18 matches
Mail list logo
