Re: adding mod_reqtimeout to trunk?

2009-10-06 Thread Stefan Fritsch
On Monday 05 October 2009, Jim Jagielski wrote: Thx... I'm updating it with an eye to making it core, and therefore having ReqTimeout headerinit=5 headermax=10 As we also have RequestHeaders, maybe RequestTimeout would be better? Let me know if I can help w/ the docs. I have commited

Re: adding mod_reqtimeout to trunk?

2009-10-05 Thread Jim Jagielski
Thx... I'm updating it with an eye to making it core, and therefore having ReqTimeout headerinit=5 headermax=10 Let me know if I can help w/ the docs. On Oct 4, 2009, at 3:40 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote: On Sunday 04 October 2009, Nick Kew wrote: FWIW, IMO it should go in modules/filters

Re: adding mod_reqtimeout to trunk?

2009-10-04 Thread Ruediger Pluem
On 10/04/2009 10:23 AM, Stefan Fritsch wrote: Hi, I would like to add mod_reqtimeout [1,2] to trunk. Is this OK? Considering the positive comments it received, may I put it into modules/filter or should it go into modules/experimental first? I guess experimental is a good starting

Re: adding mod_reqtimeout to trunk?

2009-10-04 Thread Issac Goldstand
+1 Rainer Jung wrote: On 04.10.2009 10:23, Stefan Fritsch wrote: Hi, I would like to add mod_reqtimeout [1,2] to trunk. Is this OK? I think it would be a useful addition. Regards, Rainer

Re: adding mod_reqtimeout to trunk?

2009-10-04 Thread Nick Kew
On 4 Oct 2009, at 09:23, Stefan Fritsch wrote: Hi, I would like to add mod_reqtimeout [1,2] to trunk. Is this OK? Considering the positive comments it received, may I put it into modules/filter or should it go into modules/experimental first? experimental has been somewhat in limbo of

Re: adding mod_reqtimeout to trunk?

2009-10-04 Thread Jim Jagielski
Personally, I'd like to see this as part of the actual code core, where we have several Timeouts, eg: Timeout 30 5 10 2 which define timeout as now, timeout before 1st byte, timeout between bytes timeout after etc... We've always wanted better control over this ind timeouts and putting

Re: adding mod_reqtimeout to trunk?

2009-10-04 Thread Stefan Fritsch
On Sunday 04 October 2009, Jim Jagielski wrote: Personally, I'd like to see this as part of the actual code core, where we have several Timeouts, eg: Timeout 30 5 10 2 which define timeout as now, timeout before 1st byte, timeout between bytes timeout after etc... We've always

Re: adding mod_reqtimeout to trunk?

2009-10-04 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Oct 4, 2009, at 2:38 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote: On Sunday 04 October 2009, Jim Jagielski wrote: Personally, I'd like to see this as part of the actual code core, where we have several Timeouts, eg: Timeout 30 5 10 2 which define timeout as now, timeout before 1st byte, timeout

Re: adding mod_reqtimeout to trunk?

2009-10-04 Thread Nick Kew
Jim Jagielski wrote: And I would prefer several config directives instead of having to remember which value in Timeout means what. Well, I'm not a big fan of directive creep, but I see your point and agree with it in a general sense. Timeout Thistimeout=10 Thattimeout=2 Othertimeout=300 ?

Re: adding mod_reqtimeout to trunk?

2009-10-04 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Jim Jagielski wrote: On Oct 4, 2009, at 2:38 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote: On Sunday 04 October 2009, Jim Jagielski wrote: Personally, I'd like to see this as part of the actual code core, where we have several Timeouts, eg: Timeout 30 5 10 2 which define timeout as now, timeout

Re: adding mod_reqtimeout to trunk?

2009-10-04 Thread Stefan Fritsch
On Sunday 04 October 2009, Nick Kew wrote: FWIW, IMO it should go in modules/filters not experimental. +1. trunk is, by definition, experimental. But when we float off 2.3/4-branch, we should perhaps do some documentation of stability levels of different features and modules for users. I