[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7788) fail precommit on unparameterised log.trace messages

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7788?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15974739#comment-15974739 ] Michael Braun commented on LUCENE-7788: --- Another thing I've noticed is sometimes there are log

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-6630) Deprecate the "implicit" router and rename to "manual"

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6630?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15974752#comment-15974752 ] Steve Rowe commented on SOLR-6630: -- bq. I'd suggest to rename the implicit router to "userDefined". So

[jira] [Comment Edited] (SOLR-1485) Payload scoring support

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1485?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15973885#comment-15973885 ] Erik Hatcher edited comment on SOLR-1485 at 4/19/17 3:29 PM: - While I'm at it,

[jira] [Comment Edited] (LUCENE-7788) fail precommit on unparameterised log.trace messages

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7788?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15974899#comment-15974899 ] Christine Poerschke edited comment on LUCENE-7788 at 4/19/17 3:20 PM:

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-7788) fail precommit on unparameterised log.trace messages

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7788?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Christine Poerschke updated LUCENE-7788: Attachment: LUCENE-7788.patch bq. ... Also, should we remove the if (trace) from

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9824) Documents indexed in bulk are replicated using too many HTTP requests

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9824?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15974697#comment-15974697 ] Mark Miller commented on SOLR-9824: --- Once I get back to some beasting test runs on master. There were

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7788) fail precommit on unparameterised log.trace messages

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7788?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15974887#comment-15974887 ] Christine Poerschke commented on LUCENE-7788: - bq. ... it only catches cases when the logger

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10047) Mismatched Docvalue segments cause exception in Sorting/Facting; Uninvert per segment

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10047?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15974706#comment-15974706 ] Steve Rowe commented on SOLR-10047: --- Policeman Jenkins failure reproduces for me

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7788) fail precommit on unparameterised log.trace messages

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7788?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15974799#comment-15974799 ] Steve Rowe commented on LUCENE-7788: bq. It looks a bit fragile to me as it only catches cases when

[jira] [Comment Edited] (SOLR-9555) Leader incorrectly publishes state for replica when it puts replica into LIR.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9555?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15974803#comment-15974803 ] Mark Miller edited comment on SOLR-9555 at 4/19/17 2:45 PM: bq. We close the

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10415) Within solr-core, debug/trace level logging should use parameterized log messages

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10415?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15974835#comment-15974835 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-10415: Commit

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-5127) Allow multiple wildcards in hl.fl

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5127?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15974833#comment-15974833 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-5127: --- Commit

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10394) search.grouping.Command rename: getSortWithinGroup --> getWithinGroupSort

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10394?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15974836#comment-15974836 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-10394: Commit

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7788) fail precommit on unparameterised log.trace messages

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7788?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15974710#comment-15974710 ] Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-7788: -- It looks a bit fragile to me as it only catches cases when

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9104) NPE in CollapsingQParser when two fq={!collapse} and zero results

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9104?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15974805#comment-15974805 ] Markus Jelsma commented on SOLR-9104: - NPE is still present, stack trace is slightly different today:

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7785) Move dictionary for Ukrainian analyzer to external dependency

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7785?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15974717#comment-15974717 ] Andriy Rysin commented on LUCENE-7785: -- Thanks Dawid! Thanks everybody for your help and feedback!

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-6630) Deprecate the "implicit" router and rename to "manual"

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6630?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15974743#comment-15974743 ] Trey Cahill commented on SOLR-6630: --- I'd suggest to rename the implicit router to "userDefined". I

Re: Solr JMX changes and backwards (in)compatibility

I did report it a week ago. This is a reply to that email. New Relic displays the cache hit rate for each collection, showing the query result cache, filter cache, and document cache. With 6.5.0, that page shows this message: New Relic recorded no Solr caches data for this application in

[jira] [Comment Edited] (SOLR-9555) Leader incorrectly publishes state for replica when it puts replica into LIR.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9555?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15974808#comment-15974808 ] Mark Miller edited comment on SOLR-9555 at 4/19/17 2:44 PM: bq. So I get the

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9555) Leader incorrectly publishes state for replica when it puts replica into LIR.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9555?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15974808#comment-15974808 ] Mark Miller commented on SOLR-9555: --- bq. So I get the impression that closing a proxy only prevents

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9555) Leader incorrectly publishes state for replica when it puts replica into LIR.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9555?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15974803#comment-15974803 ] Mark Miller commented on SOLR-9555: --- bq. We close the followers' connections, and then need to send a doc

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9555) Leader incorrectly publishes state for replica when it puts replica into LIR.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9555?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15974813#comment-15974813 ] Mark Miller commented on SOLR-9555: --- If everything else is in order though, I can try and tackle that

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-6630) Deprecate the "implicit" router and rename to "manual"

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6630?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15974683#comment-15974683 ] Steve Rowe commented on SOLR-6630: -- bq. Another alternative to "manual" that came to mind was "custom".

[jira] [Comment Edited] (SOLR-6630) Deprecate the "implicit" router and rename to "manual"

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6630?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15974683#comment-15974683 ] Steve Rowe edited comment on SOLR-6630 at 4/19/17 1:42 PM: --- bq. Another

Re: Embeding distributed-solr in client-app without storing data

Does not make sense to me. It would do more queries from the client to the cluster, not fewer. And those HTTP request would probably be slower than the intra-cluster requests. I expect the distributed portion of the query load is small compared to other CPU usage. It adds complexity for no

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7788) fail precommit on unparameterised log.trace messages

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7788?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15974821#comment-15974821 ] Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-7788: -- I don't think the forbidden APIs can detect whether a String

[jira] [Created] (LUCENE-7789) replace & forbid "new FileInputStream" and "new FileOutputStream" with Files.newInputStream & Files.newOutputStream

Hoss Man created LUCENE-7789: Summary: replace & forbid "new FileInputStream" and "new FileOutputStream" with Files.newInputStream & Files.newOutputStream Key: LUCENE-7789 URL:

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10522) Duplicate keys in "collations" object with JSON response format

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10522?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15975087#comment-15975087 ] Nikita Pchelintsev commented on SOLR-10522: --- It seems that

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10439) SchemaField.getNamedPropertyValues doesn't include 'large'

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10439?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15975216#comment-15975216 ] David Smiley commented on SOLR-10439: - Thanks for filing SOLR-10518. It's a very thorough approach.

[jira] [Created] (SOLR-10522) Duplicate keys in "collations" object with JSON response format

Nikita Pchelintsev created SOLR-10522: - Summary: Duplicate keys in "collations" object with JSON response format Key: SOLR-10522 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10522 Project:

[jira] [Created] (SOLR-10523) Add Apache kerby jars in the Solr server classpath

Hrishikesh Gadre created SOLR-10523: --- Summary: Add Apache kerby jars in the Solr server classpath Key: SOLR-10523 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10523 Project: Solr Issue

[jira] [Created] (SOLR-10524) Explore in-memory partitioning for processing Overseer queue messages

Erick Erickson created SOLR-10524: - Summary: Explore in-memory partitioning for processing Overseer queue messages Key: SOLR-10524 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10524 Project: Solr

Re: Embeding distributed-solr in client-app without storing data

I know exactly how this works. MarkLogic can be configured with separate execute and data nodes. But in MarkLogic, the execute nodes can do a lot of work. The query may be a mix of indexed searching and “table scan” searching, all expressed in an XQuery program. It does not make sense for

Re: lucene-solr:master: SOLR-10439: 'large' was forgotten in /schema/fields?showDefaults=true

(I replied to your similar comment on the JIRA issue) On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 7:05 PM Chris Hostetter wrote: > > David: doesn't this same bug affect /schema/fieldType ? > > Can't large="true" be specified on fieldType as a default for all fields > that inherit from

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10047) Mismatched Docvalue segments cause exception in Sorting/Facting; Uninvert per segment

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10047?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15975006#comment-15975006 ] Keith Laban commented on SOLR-10047: Thanks Steve, I am able to reproduce this using this seed. The

Re: Embeding distributed-solr in client-app without storing data

@Walter: Think of it this way. 1. Separate data-solr from merger-solr. So merger-solr has more cpu, while data-solr has more ram (very simplistic). This way, you can also scale them separately. (es has something like search-only-node) 2. Second step is to join client-app with merger-solr.

Re: Issue with 6.5.1 RC2

It appears that it's failing on verifying the SSL cert for https://archive.apache.org/dist/lucene/java/. Joel Bernstein http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/ On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 3:36 PM, Joel Bernstein wrote: > I started working on 6.5.1 RC2. I ran the following: > > python3

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-6630) Deprecate the "implicit" router and rename to "manual"

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6630?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15975377#comment-15975377 ] Jan Høydahl commented on SOLR-6630: --- I like "manual", let's stick to the original plan :-) It says it

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-6630) Deprecate the "implicit" router and rename to "manual"

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6630?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15975379#comment-15975379 ] David Smiley commented on SOLR-6630: Anything is better than "implicit". Explicit, Manual, and Custom

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-8762) DIH entity child=true should respond nested documents on debug

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8762?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] gopikannan venugopalsamy updated SOLR-8762: --- Attachment: SOLR-8762.patch [~mkhludnev], Please check this patch, Added

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-8762) DIH entity child=true should respond nested documents on debug

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8762?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] gopikannan venugopalsamy updated SOLR-8762: --- Attachment: (was: SOLR-8762.patch) > DIH entity child=true should respond

Re: Issue with 6.5.1 RC2

Yeah, that is a sucky part of this: you want to make modifications on the release branch, but you can’t test unless you commit (and push). Another alternative: make modifications in another checkout, then invoke the script with from an unmodified source tree. e.g.: cd .. cp -r lucene-solr

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.5.1 RC1

Ok, I'll start the process. Joel Bernstein http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/ On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 2:26 PM, David Smiley wrote: > +1 works for me > > On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 8:06 AM Joel Bernstein wrote: > >> Shall I cut an RC2 today? >> >> Joel

[jira] [Closed] (SOLR-4381) Query-time multi-word synonym expansion

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4381?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jan Høydahl closed SOLR-4381. - Resolution: Won't Fix Fix Version/s: (was: 6.0) (was: 4.9) Closing as

Issue with 6.5.1 RC2

I started working on 6.5.1 RC2. I ran the following: python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/buildAndPushRelease.py --push-local /tmp/releases/6.5.1 --rc-num 2 --sign EE64CB1E I believe this is same basic command I used for RC1. But this time I got a new error. At first I thought it might be incorrect

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-10456) timeout-related setters should be deprecated in favor of SolrClientBuilder methods

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10456?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jason Gerlowski updated SOLR-10456: --- Attachment: SOLR-10456.patch Updates patch to remove conflicts with most recent master. >

[jira] [Created] (SOLR-10525) Stacked recovery requests can interfere with one another

Mike Drob created SOLR-10525: Summary: Stacked recovery requests can interfere with one another Key: SOLR-10525 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10525 Project: Solr Issue Type:

[GitHub] lucene-solr issue #189: Jira/solr 6203

Github user cpoerschke commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/189 Hi Judith - thanks for adding me to the collaborator list. I've added one more commit to the https://github.com/jitka18/lucene-solr/pull/1 request and would suggest something along the

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10394) search.grouping.Command rename: getSortWithinGroup --> getWithinGroupSort

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10394?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15975438#comment-15975438 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on SOLR-10394: --- Github user cpoerschke commented on the issue:

Re: Issue with 6.5.1 RC2

Could it be anything to do with the fact that the signer is Semantic and they are being actively distrusted by - at least - Google: http://www.securityweek.com/google-stops-trusting-symantec-issued-certificates Regards, Alex. http://www.solr-start.com/ - Resources for Solr users, new and

[jira] [Closed] (LUCENE-7068) Retrieve ranks

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7068?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Paul Elschot closed LUCENE-7068. Resolution: Won't Fix Not enough interest > Retrieve ranks > -- > >

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-6630) Deprecate the "implicit" router and rename to "manual"

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6630?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15975331#comment-15975331 ] Shawn Heisey commented on SOLR-6630: Thanks for the good discussion with names that I never thought of

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-master-MacOSX (64bit/jdk1.8.0) - Build # 3960 - Still Unstable!

Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-master-MacOSX/3960/ Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0 -XX:-UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseSerialGC 1 tests failed. FAILED: junit.framework.TestSuite.org.apache.solr.cloud.SolrCloudExampleTest Error Message: ObjectTracker found 5 object(s) that were not

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-master-Linux (32bit/jdk1.8.0_121) - Build # 19433 - Unstable!

Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-master-Linux/19433/ Java: 32bit/jdk1.8.0_121 -client -XX:+UseParallelGC 2 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.solr.cloud.CollectionsAPIDistributedZkTest.testNoConfigSetExist Error Message: Error from server at https://127.0.0.1:45919/solr: Could

[jira] [Issue Comment Deleted] (SOLR-10394) search.grouping.Command rename: getSortWithinGroup --> getWithinGroupSort

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10394?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Christine Poerschke updated SOLR-10394: --- Comment: was deleted (was: Github user cpoerschke commented on the issue:

[jira] [Resolved] (LUCENE-7602) Fix compiler warnings for ant clean compile

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7602?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Paul Elschot resolved LUCENE-7602. -- Resolution: Won't Fix Not enough interest > Fix compiler warnings for ant clean compile >

Re: Issue with 6.5.1 RC2

Ha, that doesn't work either. Now I get this error: RuntimeError: There are unpushed commits - "git log origin/branch_6_5.." output is: So, I'm going to have to push this out. Let's first decide if this makes sense as the way forward. Joel Bernstein http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/ On Wed, Apr

[jira] [Closed] (LUCENE-7471) Simplify NearSpansOrdered

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7471?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Paul Elschot closed LUCENE-7471. Resolution: Duplicate Duplicate of LUCENE-7715, fixed and closed. > Simplify NearSpansOrdered >

[jira] [Closed] (SOLR-5379) Query-time multi-word synonym expansion

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5379?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jan Høydahl closed SOLR-5379. - Resolution: Duplicate Fix Version/s: (was: 6.0) (was: 4.9) Closing as

Re: Issue with 6.5.1 RC2

Hi Joel, Not sure why this is suddenly an issue - I guess “SNI” has been enabled on archive.apache.org? Some useful info here (about a “requests” lib, AFAICT an alternative to urllib):

Re: Issue with 6.5.1 RC2

Ok, I'll turn off the cert verification. I wasn't sure if cert verification was something that was integral to the process. Joel Bernstein http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/ On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 4:18 PM, Steve Rowe wrote: > Hi Joel, > > Not sure why this is suddenly an issue -

[jira] [Resolved] (SOLR-5127) Allow multiple wildcards in hl.fl

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5127?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Christine Poerschke resolved SOLR-5127. --- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: master (7.0) 6.6 Thanks

[jira] [Resolved] (SOLR-10394) search.grouping.Command rename: getSortWithinGroup --> getWithinGroupSort

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10394?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Christine Poerschke resolved SOLR-10394. Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: master (7.0) 6.6 >

[jira] [Resolved] (SOLR-10283) SolrFeature fails to reject searches with missing efi (if used by fq)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10283?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Christine Poerschke resolved SOLR-10283. Resolution: Fixed > SolrFeature fails to reject searches with missing efi (if used

Re: Issue with 6.5.1 RC2

Steve, when I change the script to turn off verification I get the following error: RuntimeError: git clone is dirty: So as part of the work around I think I'm going to have to commit locally and then revert locally. Does that make sense to you as the way forward? Joel Bernstein

[jira] [Closed] (LUCENE-5687) Split off SinkTokenStream from TeeSinkTokenFilter (was add PrefillTokenStream ...)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5687?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Paul Elschot closed LUCENE-5687. Resolution: Won't Fix Not enough interest > Split off SinkTokenStream from TeeSinkTokenFilter

[jira] [Created] (SOLR-10526) facet.heatmap doesn't honor fq tag exclusion in distributed search

David Smiley created SOLR-10526: --- Summary: facet.heatmap doesn't honor fq tag exclusion in distributed search Key: SOLR-10526 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10526 Project: Solr

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10394) search.grouping.Command rename: getSortWithinGroup --> getWithinGroupSort

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10394?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15975525#comment-15975525 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on SOLR-10394: --- Github user jitka18 commented on the issue:

[jira] [Comment Edited] (SOLR-10525) Stacked recovery requests can interfere with one another

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10525?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15975566#comment-15975566 ] Mark Miller edited comment on SOLR-10525 at 4/19/17 9:33 PM: - Don't know if I

Re: Issue with 6.5.1 RC2

I'll push out the changes and then revert. Hopefully the changes will do the trick after they've been pushed. Joel Bernstein http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/ On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 4:37 PM, Steve Rowe wrote: > Yeah, that is a sucky part of this: you want to make modifications

[GitHub] lucene-solr issue #189: Jira/solr 6203

Github user jitka18 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/189 Hi, Christine. I accepted your pull request and will update my branch from the master later today. Will also take a look at the tests in DQCCST. Thanks, Judith On

[jira] [Comment Edited] (SOLR-10525) Stacked recovery requests can interfere with one another

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10525?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15975573#comment-15975573 ] Mark Miller edited comment on SOLR-10525 at 4/19/17 9:39 PM: - bq. looks like

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-master-Linux (64bit/jdk1.8.0_121) - Build # 19434 - Still Unstable!

Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-master-Linux/19434/ Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0_121 -XX:-UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseSerialGC 2 tests failed. FAILED: junit.framework.TestSuite.org.apache.solr.cloud.SolrCloudExampleTest Error Message: ObjectTracker found 10 object(s) that were not

Re: Embeding distributed-solr in client-app without storing data

That is exactly what I thought you meant. Adds complexity with no benefit. Now the merger needs to keep caches for global IDF. But those caches don’t get the benefit of other requests to the same cluster. I’m not sure if query result caches cache the results of distributed queries, but if they

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7789) replace & forbid "new FileInputStream" and "new FileOutputStream" with Files.newInputStream & Files.newOutputStream

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7789?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15975069#comment-15975069 ] Hoss Man commented on LUCENE-7789: -- NOTE: I have not audited our own code to see how much of an impact

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.5.1 RC1

+1 works for me On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 8:06 AM Joel Bernstein wrote: > Shall I cut an RC2 today? > > Joel Bernstein > http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/ > > On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 4:51 PM, Michael McCandless < > luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote: > >> OK backported! >> >> Mike

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-10525) Stacked recovery requests can interfere with one another

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10525?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mike Drob updated SOLR-10525: - Attachment: SOLR-10525.patch Patch for 7.0 fixed, probably good for 6.x also (in which case whoever

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10525) Stacked recovery requests can interfere with one another

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10525?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15975512#comment-15975512 ] Mike Drob commented on SOLR-10525: -- bq. The fact that multiple can still stack is as designed though why?

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10525) Stacked recovery requests can interfere with one another

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10525?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15975566#comment-15975566 ] Mark Miller commented on SOLR-10525: Don't know if I answered Shalin's comment, but I've answered

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10525) Stacked recovery requests can interfere with one another

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10525?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15975573#comment-15975573 ] Mark Miller commented on SOLR-10525: bq. looks like the same issue of multiple requests stacking.

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10525) Stacked recovery requests can interfere with one another

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10525?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15975585#comment-15975585 ] Mark Miller commented on SOLR-10525: Of course its complicated though. With the changes in SOLR-9555,

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-5127) Allow multiple wildcards in hl.fl

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5127?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15975613#comment-15975613 ] Sven-S. Porst commented on SOLR-5127: - Cool, thanks for taking care of this [~cpoerschke]! > Allow

[jira] [Created] (SOLR-10527) edismax with sow=false fails to create dismax-per-term queries when any field is boosted

Steve Rowe created SOLR-10527: - Summary: edismax with sow=false fails to create dismax-per-term queries when any field is boosted Key: SOLR-10527 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10527

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-10527) edismax with sow=false fails to create dismax-per-term queries when any field is boosted

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10527?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Steve Rowe updated SOLR-10527: -- Fix Version/s: master (7.0) 6.6 > edismax with sow=false fails to create

[jira] [Resolved] (SOLR-10396) Implement trigger support for nodeLost event type

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10396?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Cao Manh Dat resolved SOLR-10396. - Resolution: Fixed > Implement trigger support for nodeLost event type >

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10396) Implement trigger support for nodeLost event type

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10396?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15975832#comment-15975832 ] Cao Manh Dat commented on SOLR-10396: - Thanks [~shalinmangar] for review the patch. Committed to

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10528) Use docvalue for range faceting in JSON facet API

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10528?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15975849#comment-15975849 ] Kensho Hirasawa commented on SOLR-10528: Yonik, Thanks for the comment. In the first patch, I

Re: Embeding distributed-solr in client-app without storing data

@Walter Usually you have: client-app --> random-solr-node(mergerer) --> each other node that has a shard While what I want: client-app (mergerer is in same jvm) --> each other node that has a shard Makes sense ? On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 4:50 PM, Walter Underwood wrote: >

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-10433) switch between v2 and v1 endpoints internally in SolrJ

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10433?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Cao Manh Dat updated SOLR-10433: Attachment: SOLR-10433.patch Here are my strategy to accomplish this ticket. It uses code from

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10528) Use docvalue for range faceting in JSON facet API

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10528?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15976029#comment-15976029 ] Kensho Hirasawa commented on SOLR-10528: I guess it is possible to avoid numeric boxing by

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-6.x-Windows (64bit/jdk1.8.0_121) - Build # 846 - Unstable!

Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-6.x-Windows/846/ Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0_121 -XX:+UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseParallelGC 1 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.solr.cloud.MissingSegmentRecoveryTest.testLeaderRecovery Error Message: Expected a collection with one shard and two replicas

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-master-Linux (32bit/jdk1.8.0_121) - Build # 19436 - Still Unstable!

Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-master-Linux/19436/ Java: 32bit/jdk1.8.0_121 -server -XX:+UseParallelGC 2 tests failed. FAILED: junit.framework.TestSuite.org.apache.solr.util.TestSolrCLIRunExample Error Message: ObjectTracker found 5 object(s) that were not released!!!

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-10527) edismax with sow=false fails to create dismax-per-term queries when any field is boosted

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10527?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Steve Rowe updated SOLR-10527: -- Attachment: SOLR-10527.patch Patch with fix and tests. Committing shortly. > edismax with sow=false

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10527) edismax with sow=false fails to create dismax-per-term queries when any field is boosted

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10527?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15975713#comment-15975713 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-10527: Commit

Re: Issue with 6.5.1 RC2

Joel, I know you’re in-process with RC2, but if you have to restart for some reason, I’d like to include SOLR-10527. -- Steve www.lucidworks.com > On Apr 19, 2017, at 6:57 PM, Joel Bernstein wrote: > > I also had to change the smoke tester because of the SSL issue. Which

Re: Issue with 6.5.1 RC2

I'm OK with restarting RC2. Let me know when you finish the back port. Joel Bernstein http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/ On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 7:11 PM, Steve Rowe wrote: > Joel, > > I know you’re in-process with RC2, but if you have to restart for some > reason, I’d like to

Re: Issue with 6.5.1 RC2

Woohoo! Thanks Joel. Running all tests on branch_6_5 now. -- Steve www.lucidworks.com > On Apr 19, 2017, at 7:20 PM, Joel Bernstein wrote: > > I'm OK with restarting RC2. Let me know when you finish the back port. > > Joel Bernstein > http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/ > >

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10527) edismax with sow=false fails to create dismax-per-term queries when any field is boosted

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10527?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15975773#comment-15975773 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-10527: Commit

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10527) edismax with sow=false fails to create dismax-per-term queries when any field is boosted

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10527?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15975772#comment-15975772 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-10527: Commit

[jira] [Created] (SOLR-10528) Use docvalue for range faceting in JSON facet API

Kensho Hirasawa created SOLR-10528: -- Summary: Use docvalue for range faceting in JSON facet API Key: SOLR-10528 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10528 Project: Solr Issue

  1   2   >