-...@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed?
No no. It was just an example. As you already know, there are a lot of
changes in contrib codes related with those API changes in
Lucene.Net.2.9.4g core.
Therefore, I see no option like merging other
@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed?
@Rory,
Jira in the past had the ability to create sub tasks or convert a current
task to a sub task. I'm guessing that apache's jira should be able to do
that.
@All,
I've add a Paths Class under the Lucene.Net.Tests Util
and replacing trunk with 2.9.4g?
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Troy Howard [mailto:thowar...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, July 01, 2011 12:36 AM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed?
DIGY - Re: Why do I wait.. That's
-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed?
DIGY - Re: Why do I wait.. That's mostly because I intend to make some
deep
changes, which would make merging the 2.9.4g branch back to trunk
difficult.
So, it's easier to merge those changes first
Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed?
Yes. But if there are commits to trunk before that happens it's a merge.
-T
On Jul 2, 2011 1:53 PM, Digy digyd...@gmail.com wrote:
Troy,
What do you mean by merging? 2.9.4g is a superset of 2.9.4 and has
* bux fixes like
-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port
needed?
Scott -
The idea of the automated port is still worth doing. Perhaps it
makes
sense
for someone more passionate about the line-by-line idea to do that
work
-
From: Troy Howard [mailto:thowar...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2011 10:47 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave
port
needed?
Michael,
I agree with everything you
To: lucene-net-...@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed?
Scott -
The idea of the automated port is still worth doing. Perhaps it makes
sense
for someone more passionate about the line-by-line idea to do that work?
I would say, focus
-Original Message-
From: Digy [mailto:digyd...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2011 4:20 PM
To: lucene-net-...@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port
needed?
Michael,
You interpret the report as whoever
-
From: Ayende Rahien [mailto:aye...@ayende.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2011 8:16 PM
To: Rory Plaire; lucene-net-...@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave
port
needed?
As someone from the nhibernate project
We
]
Sent: Friday, July 01, 2011 12:43 AM
To: lucene-net-...@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port
needed?
Scott -
The idea of the automated port is still worth doing. Perhaps it
makes
sense
for someone more passionate about
: Granroth, Neal V. [mailto:neal.granr...@thermofisher.com]
Sent: 29 June 2011 20:47
To: lucene-net-u...@lucene.apache.org
Cc: lucene-net-...@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed?
This is has been discussed many times.
Lucene.NET is not valid
Message-
From: Moray McConnachie
Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2011 10:25 AM
To: lucene-net-u...@lucene.apache.org
Cc: lucene-net-...@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed?
I don't think I'm as hard core on this as Neal, but remember: the
history
McConnachie
Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2011 10:25 AM
To: lucene-net-user@lucene.apache.**orglucene-net-u...@lucene.apache.org
Cc: lucene-net-dev@incubator.**apache.orglucene-net-...@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed?
I don't think I'm
NHibernate has a much bigger community and more active devs afaict.
The proposed changes as I understand them are not about changing class
structure or APIs, but merely touch hunks of code and rewrite them to
use better .NET practices (yield, generics, LINQ etc). In conjunction
with a move
...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2011 10:47 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed?
Michael,
I agree with everything you said. My point in saying whoever commits code
wins was to illustrate the reality of how and why
), then commit.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Michael Herndon [mailto:mhern...@wickedsoftware.net]
Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2011 11:58 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed?
@Troy,
I've already started working
: Re: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed?
Michael,
I agree with everything you said. My point in saying whoever commits code
wins was to illustrate the reality of how and why the project has the
current form.
Building consensus is difficult. It is an essential first
PM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed?
Michael,
You interpret the report as whoever commits code wins? But when I look
at it, I see a lof of talk, no work. .Net community is not interested
in
contributing.
I
is I did it that way, should we continue with this.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Troy Howard [mailto:thowar...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2011 10:47 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed
[mailto:digyd...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2011 4:20 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed?
Michael,
You interpret the report as whoever commits code wins? But when I look
at it, I see a lof of talk
Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed?
Scott -
The idea of the automated port is still worth doing. Perhaps it makes sense
for someone more passionate about the line-by-line idea to do that work?
I would say, focus on what makes sense to you. Being
-...@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed?
I don't want to drag this out much longer, but I am curious with people who
hold the line-by-line sentiment - are you NHibernate users?
-r
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 2:39 AM, Noel Lysaght lysag...@hotmail.com wrote
%3AcontributionreportNext=Next
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Ayende Rahien [mailto:aye...@ayende.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2011 8:16 PM
To: Rory Plaire; lucene-net-...@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed?
As someone from
To: lucene-net-...@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed?
I don't want to drag this out much longer, but I am curious with people
who
hold the line-by-line sentiment - are you NHibernate users?
-r
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 2:39 AM, Noel
-Original Message-
From: Troy Howard [mailto:thowar...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2011 10:47 PM
To: lucene-net-...@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed?
Michael,
I agree with everything you said. My point in saying whoever
For what it's worth, I've participated in a number of projects which have
been ported from Java to .Net with varying levels of translation into
the native style and functionalty of the .Net framework. The largest are
NTS, a JTS port and NHibernate, a Java Hibernate port. My experience is that
a
-Original Message-
From: Rory Plaire [mailto:codekai...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2011 1:06 AM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed?
For what it's worth, I've participated in a number of projects which have
been
and run
correctly.
- Neal
-Original Message-
From: Wyatt Barnett [mailto:wyatt.barn...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2011 2:57 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed?
Those are pretty strong words -- I'd
Of course I'd love to contribute. I'm hopeful I can spend even a few hours a
week doing this when (if...) my people adopt NHibernate.Search.
Troy, I'm going to defer to your sense that there is enough interest and
support from the community to maintain both code bases. It is hard, however,
to
This is has been discussed many times.
Lucene.NET is not valid, the code cannot be trusted, if it is not a
line-by-line port. It ceases to be Lucene.
- Neal
-Original Message-
From: Scott Lombard [mailto:lombardena...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2011 1:58 PM
To:
Those are pretty strong words -- I'd really like to know why I
shouldn't trust anything but a line-by-line port. Can you explain a
bit?
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Granroth, Neal V.
neal.granr...@thermofisher.com wrote:
This is has been discussed many times.
Lucene.NET is not valid, the
.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Granroth, Neal V. [mailto:neal.granr...@thermofisher.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2011 10:47 PM
To: lucene-net-u...@lucene.apache.org
Cc: lucene-net-...@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed
, Neal V. [mailto:neal.granr...@thermofisher.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2011 10:47 PM
To: lucene-net-u...@lucene.apache.org
Cc: lucene-net-...@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed?
This is has been discussed many times.
Lucene.NET
...@wickedsoftware.net]
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2011 4:17 PM
To: lucene-net-...@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed?
For the sake of continued conversation, Scott could you define what you
mean
by line-by-line port vs non-line-by-line port
Hi Scott,
Please avoid crossposting(as I do now). Since when I reply to your eMail, it
goes to one of the lists and thread is splitted into two.
It may be good for announcements but not for discussions.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Scott Lombard [mailto:lombardena...@gmail.com]
Sent:
-
From: Digy [mailto:digyd...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2011 2:58 PM
To: lucene-net-...@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed?
As a Lucene.Net user I wouldn't care whether it is line-by-line port or not.
But as a contributer, I
and run
correctly.
- Neal
-Original Message-
From: Wyatt Barnett [mailto:wyatt.barn...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2011 2:57 PM
To: lucene-net-...@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed?
Those are pretty strong words -- I'd
-
From: Digy [mailto:digyd...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2011 2:58 PM
To: lucene-net-...@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed?
As a Lucene.Net user I wouldn't care whether it is line-by-line port or not.
But as a contributer, I
: Granroth, Neal V. [mailto:neal.granr...@thermofisher.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2011 11:23 PM
To: lucene-net-...@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed?
I do not know if too much emphasis should be placed on user vs.
contributor. The project
I pretty much agree with Rory.
And as others have said, this issue has been discussed many times. What is
most important about the fact that it has been discussed many times is that
it has not been resolve, even though it has been discussed so many times.
That means that the both the developer
41 matches
Mail list logo
