[GitHub] maven pull request #108: Added some javadoc

GitHub user LuboVarga opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/108 Added some javadoc Added javadoc help for making easier to compare two versions in command line. You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull

Re: Timeline for 3.5.0-alpha-2 / MNG-6057

Am 03/13/17 um 08:33 schrieb Hervé BOUTEMY: >> The flatten-maven-plugin solution appears to me like a workaround for >> some missing support in Maven core. Also a good reason to split build >> pom from deployed pom. Maybe all of this better be postponed to model >> version 5.0.0? > splitting build

New Branch SUREFIRE-1342

Hi All, The new branch SUREFIRE-1342 solves an issue when entire testset completed however the surefire's forked JVM finished printing serious issue. We know that the JVM did not crash however it looks so: The forked VM terminated without saying properly goodbye. VM crash or System.exit called

Re: Timeline for 3.5.0-alpha-2 / MNG-6057

> The flatten-maven-plugin solution appears to me like a workaround for > some missing support in Maven core. Also a good reason to split build > pom from deployed pom. Maybe all of this better be postponed to model > version 5.0.0? splitting build pom from deployed (or consumer) pom IMHO is: 1.

Re: [DISCUSS] Retrospective on Maven 3.5.0-alpha-1

On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 2:26 PM Stephen Connolly < stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote: Gentle reminder. If you can see this thread, you are entitled to contribute. This thread is about discovering where the Maven project can improve how we work in order to grow our community. I'll bite. (I

Re: [ANN] GitPubSub multi-branch notification now working on builds.apache.org

Not yet On Mon 13 Mar 2017 at 22:15, Guillaume Boué wrote: > How does this play with pull requests on GitHub? > > Guillaume > > > Le 12/03/2017 à 09:59, Stephen Connolly a écrit : > > My weekend project: > https://github.com/stephenc/asf-gitpubsub-jenkins-plugin > > was a

Contributing Javadoc (was Re: [DISCUSS] Retrospective on Maven 3.5.0-alpha-1)

Am 03/13/17 um 23:22 schrieb Laird Nelson: > On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 2:26 PM Stephen Connolly < > stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Gentle reminder. If you can see this thread, you are entitled to > contribute. This thread is about discovering where the Maven project can > improve how

Re: [DISCUSS] Retrospective on Maven 3.5.0-alpha-1

Am 03/11/17 um 22:56 schrieb Stephen Connolly: > Hi all, > > I think it is a good thing if we take stock of where we are and how we are > doing. I would really appreciate if everyone could take a few minutes to > respond with their top three of two areas: > > * What is working well The Jenkins

Re: [ANN] GitPubSub multi-branch notification now working on builds.apache.org

How does this play with pull requests on GitHub? Guillaume Le 12/03/2017 à 09:59, Stephen Connolly a écrit : My weekend project: https://github.com/stephenc/asf-gitpubsub-jenkins-plugin was a success (Need to find a home for it at the ASF (as it doesn't make sense at Jenkins / outside of

Re: [DISCUSS] Retrospective on Maven 3.5.0-alpha-1

>>What is working well 1. Maven still continues developing new visions and milestones. 2. The discipline to start code review of a branch. 3. Jenkinsfile + automatically tested branches >>What is not working well 1. long discussions on ML. I would like to kindly ask you to prefer Pull Requests in

Re: New Branch SUREFIRE-1342

We have performance tests. This means your machine should run only this build. The GC may affect the success therefore my fine tuning is MAVEN_OPTC=-server -Xmx768m -XX:MaxMetaspaceSize=864m. Of course MaxMetaspaceSize is available in JDK8. Use MaxPemSize in JDK7 or JDK6. The ideal would be to

Re: [DISCUSS] Retrospective on Maven 3.5.0-alpha-1

> The date of the commit is not the date it got committed to master, but the date it got committed to some branch, no longer existing after the commit. If this is the way GIT works, so be it. I just don't like it. It could not be more confusing. A couple of thoughts in case they help you. 1. Git

Maven Site vs Reporting Plugin workflows?

Hi everyone, I'm trying to troubleshoot an issue with the PDF plugin, https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MPDF-62. Root cause seems to be that the reportPlugins: @Parameter( readonly = true ) private org.apache.maven.reporting.exec.ReportPlugin[] reportPlugins; are not injected to the

Re: [DISCUSS] Retrospective on Maven 3.5.0-alpha-1

Gentle reminder. If you can see this thread, you are entitled to contribute. This thread is about discovering where the Maven project can improve how we work in order to grow our community. Everyone's opinions are welcome... We just ask that at this phase you just provide up to 3 sentences on

Re: [DISCUSS] Retrospective on Maven 3.5.0-alpha-1

What is working well: 1. Despite the mess that resulted in the birth of 3.5.0, the project was set back on track successfully. 2. There is good feedback on the version, which sets up solid grounds for the future. 3. Not the only one for this point but... colorized logging is truly great!

Re: New Branch SUREFIRE-1342

Hi, I finished setting up a FreeBSD VM with a couple of Maven and JDK versions, so I'll be testing this extensively (on Ubuntu as well). Thanks for the work! Guillaume Le 13/03/2017 à 10:46, Tibor Digana a écrit : Hi All, The new branch SUREFIRE-1342 solves an issue when entire testset