I agree with Tianqi and Marco. Probably what should happen is to let cmake
be the default in some minor release, and completely deprecate makefiles in
2.0.
On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 10:23 AM Marco de Abreu
wrote:
> I think this is rather about the depreciation of the make based build
> system. We
I think this is rather about the depreciation of the make based build
system. We currently have make and cmake in parallel but with diverging
feature support.
-Marco
Tianqi Chen schrieb am Fr., 5. Apr. 2019, 11:42:
> I am in favor of using CMake. And I personally think CMake is not something
>
I am in favor of using CMake. And I personally think CMake is not something
that has to be introduced in a 2.0. It can simply be part of a minor
release.
Tianqi
On Thu, Apr 4, 2019 at 10:31 AM Kellen Sunderland wrote:
> Hello MXNet devs,
>
> I'd like to start a thread discussing what our build
+1 single build system.
> -Original Message-
> From: Qing Lan [mailto:lanking...@live.com]
> Sent: Friday, April 5, 2019 5:27 AM
> To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [MXNET 2.0 Wishlist] [DISCUSS] Single build system
>
> +1 to have a single build
performance.
Thanks,
Qing
From: Marco de Abreu
Sent: Thursday, April 4, 2019 15:01
To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [MXNET 2.0 Wishlist] [DISCUSS] Single build system
+1 towards having a single build system
I'd like to add the benefit of this approach
+1 towards having a single build system
I'd like to add the benefit of this approach allowing us to have the same
build logic across all operating systems. It would be great if we could
make x86/Unix, x86/windows, x86/mac and ARM/Unix first class citizens from
the beginning.
-Marco
Kellen
