Planning to remove rosters from active podlings

All, This coming weekend (9/29) I plan to remove the roster sections from all podling status pages. Podling rosters are meant to be managed in Whimsy. The roster in the status page is redundant and end up out of sync. In place of the roster, I will be adding a link automatically to all podling

Re: Additional Rat excludes -- files without any degree of creativity

When these are added to the exclusions: ...the Rat report lists 6540 problematic files, instead of 9164, which is the current number. Gj On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 11:58 AM, Geertjan Wielenga < geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > Following on from the additional Rat

Re: Additional Rat excludes -- files without any degree of creativity

Correct. Really makes no sense to add copyright headers to META-INF/ files. Some are autogenerated but the manually created ones have only a few lines pointing to a classname. binaries-list is also obvious. --emi On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 1:36 PM, Geertjan Wielenga

[GitHub] incubator-netbeans pull request #6: [NETBEANS-54] Module Review db

Github user matthiasblaesing commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/6#discussion_r140854981 --- Diff: db/test/unit/src/org/netbeans/modules/db/explorer/DbDriverManagerTest.java --- @@ -221,7 +221,7 @@ private static JDBCDriver

[GitHub] incubator-netbeans pull request #6: [NETBEANS-54] Module Review db

Github user matthiasblaesing commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/6#discussion_r140853623 --- Diff: db/external/binaries-list --- @@ -1,2 +1,18 @@ -F787C9B484CD7526F866C21D8925C4DACE467F8A derby-10.2.2.0.jar

[GitHub] incubator-netbeans pull request #8: [NETBEANS-54] Module Review api.htmlui

GitHub user jlahoda opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/8 [NETBEANS-54] Module Review api.htmlui -no external library -checked Rat report: no license of manifest and signature file (see central problems); unconverted license in

[GitHub] incubator-netbeans pull request #6: [NETBEANS-54] Module Review db

Github user jlahoda commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/6#discussion_r140850999 --- Diff: db/test/unit/src/org/netbeans/modules/db/explorer/DbDriverManagerTest.java --- @@ -221,7 +221,7 @@ private static JDBCDriver

[GitHub] incubator-netbeans pull request #6: [NETBEANS-54] Module Review db

Github user jlahoda commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/6#discussion_r140850184 --- Diff: db/external/binaries-list --- @@ -1,2 +1,18 @@ -F787C9B484CD7526F866C21D8925C4DACE467F8A derby-10.2.2.0.jar

[GitHub] incubator-netbeans issue #3: NETBEANS-59 - Document split actions

Github user asfgit commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/3 Can one of the admins verify this patch? ---

[GitHub] incubator-netbeans issue #7: [NETBEANS-54] Module Review api.annotations.com...

Github user asfgit commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/7 Can one of the admins verify this patch? ---

[GitHub] incubator-netbeans issue #2: Allow custom authenticator

Github user asfgit commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/2 Can one of the admins verify this patch? ---

[GitHub] incubator-netbeans issue #8: [NETBEANS-54] Module Review api.htmlui

Github user asfgit commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/8 Can one of the admins verify this patch? ---

[GitHub] incubator-netbeans issue #6: [NETBEANS-54] Module Review db

Github user asfgit commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/6 Can one of the admins verify this patch? ---

[GitHub] incubator-netbeans issue #8: [NETBEANS-54] Module Review api.htmlui

Github user emilianbold commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/8 @asfgit who are you? ---

Re: To branch or to fork.

On 09/25/2017 11:24 AM, Geertjan Wielenga wrote: > I would prefer this approach too, also since we're working in this way > naturally already, however I have seen "Can't you do that in a branch of > the ASF repository instead? It's better IMO if things stay here.” from > Bertrand, one of our

Re: I say bye bye on this list

Thanks and bye! Gj On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 4:47 AM, Raphael Bircher wrote: > Hi all > > I have to say bye bye here. I never did real work for NetBeans and I have > a new Project and less time. I don't have planes to do something on > NetBeans and the ML Traffic

[GitHub] incubator-netbeans issue #7: [NETBEANS-54] Module Review api.annotations.com...

Github user jlahoda commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/7 I am afraid the license here is a little bit more complex. I think the license is probably BSD, at least based on FindBugs:

Re: To branch or to fork.

I would prefer this approach too, also since we're working in this way naturally already, however I have seen "Can't you do that in a branch of the ASF repository instead? It's better IMO if things stay here.” from Bertrand, one of our mentors. Hoping there'll be clarity on this point from our

[GitHub] incubator-netbeans issue #4: Adding some Rat excludes.

Github user jlahoda commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/4 Pushed, thanks. ---

[mentors] Review of Modules Review

Hi Mentors, Just want to make sure everyone is on the same page and that the outcome from the Modules Review that we're now going through as part of the Apache NetBeans (incubating) release process will be agreed upon by everyone.

[GitHub] incubator-netbeans pull request #4: Adding some Rat excludes.

Github user jlahoda closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/4 ---