Works for me...
Any other feedback?
> On Dec 29, 2020, at 6:31 AM, Marcus wrote:
>
> Am 29.12.20 um 11:40 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> It's been suggested that before we do an actual RC1, it might
>> be a Good Idea to have a Developer's Test Build of all platforms
>> available for a quick
On Tue, Dec 29, 2020 at 12:31:08PM +0100, Marcus wrote:
> Am 29.12.20 um 11:40 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> > It's been suggested that before we do an actual RC1, it might
> > be a Good Idea to have a Developer's Test Build of all platforms
> > available for a quick pre-test. That makes a LOT of
Hi Jim,
Am 29.12.20 um 11:40 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> It's been suggested that before we do an actual RC1, it might
> be a Good Idea to have a Developer's Test Build of all platforms
> available for a quick pre-test. That makes a LOT of sense. It
> doesn't seem like we need the full language set
Am 29.12.20 um 09:54 schrieb Jörg Schmidt:
-Original Message-
From: Andrea Pescetti [mailto:pesce...@apache.org]
Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2020 1:24 AM
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: Policy to deal with old web content - Archiving pages?
On 22/12/2020 Jörg Schmidt wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrea Pescetti [mailto:pesce...@apache.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2020 1:24 AM
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Policy to deal with old web content - Archiving pages?
>
> On 22/12/2020 Jörg Schmidt wrote:
> > my personal opinion is
On 28.12.20 23:54, Marcus wrote:
Am 28.12.20 um 20:32 schrieb Marcus:
Am 28.12.20 um 19:11 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
On 28.12.20 15:40, Marcus wrote:
We would then only learn of it if people run into issues. I rather
have them write a short mail to dev list, as I have suggested it in
the
It's been suggested that before we do an actual RC1, it might
be a Good Idea to have a Developer's Test Build of all platforms
available for a quick pre-test. That makes a LOT of sense. It
doesn't seem like we need the full language set though for these
but instead maybe just 3-5.
How about:
Am 29.12.20 um 11:40 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
It's been suggested that before we do an actual RC1, it might
be a Good Idea to have a Developer's Test Build of all platforms
available for a quick pre-test. That makes a LOT of sense. It
doesn't seem like we need the full language set though for
On 29.12.20 14:26, Arrigo Marchiori wrote:
On Tue, Dec 29, 2020 at 12:31:08PM +0100, Marcus wrote:
Am 29.12.20 um 11:40 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
It's been suggested that before we do an actual RC1, it might
be a Good Idea to have a Developer's Test Build of all platforms
available for a quick
Hello jim,
is there a Linux build, too?
I prefer *.deb.
kind regards
Am 29.12.20 um 13:47 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> Works for me...
>
> Any other feedback?
>
>> On Dec 29, 2020, at 6:31 AM, Marcus wrote:
>>
>> Am 29.12.20 um 11:40 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>> It's been suggested that before we
Sent from my iPhone
> On Dec 29, 2020, at 3:40 AM, Marcus wrote:
>
> Am 29.12.20 um 09:54 schrieb Jörg Schmidt:
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Andrea Pescetti [mailto:pesce...@apache.org]
>>> Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2020 1:24 AM
>>> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
>>> Subject:
> Personally, I don't see the need until we have a real x64 version.
+1
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> -Original Message-
> From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2020 12:40 PM
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Policy to deal with old web content - Archiving pages?
> Maybe we should send pointers to these collections of pages
> to dev@
> -Original Message-
> From: Bidouille [mailto:ooofo...@free.fr]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2020 3:02 PM
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Proposed change for download page
>
>
> > Personally, I don't see the need until we have a real x64 version.
> +1
Don't you care
Sent from my iPhone
> On Dec 29, 2020, at 8:39 AM, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
>
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Bidouille [mailto:ooofo...@free.fr]
>> Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2020 3:02 PM
>> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Proposed change for download page
>>
>>
> -Original Message-
> From: Dave Fisher [mailto:wave4d...@comcast.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2020 6:25 PM
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Cc: ooofo...@free.fr
> Subject: Re: Proposed change for download page
>
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On Dec 29, 2020, at 8:39 AM,
On Tue, 29 Dec 2020 18:31:23 +0100
Peter Kovacs wrote:
>
> On 29.12.20 18:25, Dave Fisher wrote:
> >
> > Sent from my iPhone
> >
> >> On Dec 29, 2020, at 8:39 AM, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> -Original Message-
> >>> From: Bidouille [mailto:ooofo...@free.fr]
> >>> Sent:
Hi Peter,
Am 29.12.20 um 18:31 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
>
> On 29.12.20 18:25, Dave Fisher wrote:
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>>> On Dec 29, 2020, at 8:39 AM, Jörg Schmidt
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
-Original Message-
From: Bidouille [mailto:ooofo...@free.fr]
Sent: Tuesday,
> On Dec 29, 2020, at 10:47 AM, Czesław Wolański
> wrote:
>
> Hi Dave,
>
>> I suggest we offer something clearer and more direct. I’m not sure what
> that is.
>> Perhaps we need a compatible java page to point Windows, macOS, and Linux
> users
>> to acceptable versions.
>> Maybe we have such
Sent from my iPhone
> On Dec 29, 2020, at 8:32 AM, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
>
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de]
>> Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2020 12:40 PM
>> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Policy to deal with old web content -
Hi Dave,
> I suggest we offer something clearer and more direct. I’m not sure what
that is.
> Perhaps we need a compatible java page to point Windows, macOS, and Linux
users
> to acceptable versions.
> Maybe we have such a page we can better highlight from the Download page?
Link on the
Hi Jörg,
On 12/29/20 3:54 AM, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
How do we want to define "outdated pages"?
Many pages are seemingly(!) outdated, but in reality they are needed (e.g. for
the daily voluntary support on mailing lists or in forums).
Look e.g. at the extremely important pages with technical
On 29.12.20 18:25, Dave Fisher wrote:
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 29, 2020, at 8:39 AM, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Bidouille [mailto:ooofo...@free.fr]
Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2020 3:02 PM
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: Proposed change for
Sent from my iPhone
> On Dec 29, 2020, at 9:47 AM, Rory O'Farrell wrote:
>
> On Tue, 29 Dec 2020 18:31:23 +0100
> Peter Kovacs wrote:
>
>>
>>> On 29.12.20 18:25, Dave Fisher wrote:
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>
On Dec 29, 2020, at 8:39 AM, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: Carl Marcum [mailto:cmar...@apache.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2020 7:55 PM
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Policy to deal with old web content - Archiving pages?
>
> Hi Jörg,
>
> On 12/29/20 3:54 AM, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
> >
> > How do
> -Original Message-
> From: Dave Fisher [mailto:w...@apache.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2020 12:23 AM
> To: dev
> Subject: Re: Policy to deal with old web content - Archiving pages?
> > right, and here you have misunderstood me. ;-)
> >
> > Of course where it's clear just
Am 29.12.20 um 20:05 schrieb Dave Fisher:
On Dec 29, 2020, at 10:47 AM, Czesław Wolański
wrote:
I suggest we offer something clearer and more direct. I’m not sure what
that is.
Perhaps we need a compatible java page to point Windows, macOS, and Linux
users
to acceptable versions.
Maybe
> -Original Message-
> From: Matthias Seidel [mailto:matthias.sei...@hamburg.de]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2020 6:52 PM
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Proposed change for download page
> >> It is better to discuss the actual problem which is that Windows
> >> users of
> -Original Message-
> From: Dave Fisher [mailto:w...@apache.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2020 7:02 PM
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Proposed change for download page
> >>> It is better to discuss the actual problem which is that
> Windows users of AOO don’t
> -Original Message-
> From: Dave Fisher [mailto:wave4d...@comcast.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2020 7:13 PM
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Policy to deal with old web content - Archiving pages?
>
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On Dec 29, 2020, at 8:32 AM,
> On Dec 29, 2020, at 3:05 PM, Marcus wrote:
>
> Am 29.12.20 um 17:32 schrieb Jörg Schmidt:
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de]
>>> Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2020 12:40 PM
>>> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
>>> Subject: Re: Policy to deal with old
Cual seria mejor opción para seguir
El mar., 29 de diciembre de 2020 17:18, Marcus
escribió:
> Am 29.12.20 um 20:05 schrieb Dave Fisher:
> >> On Dec 29, 2020, at 10:47 AM, Czesław Wolański <
> czeslaw.wolan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> I suggest we offer something clearer and more direct.
On 12/29/2020 6:40 AM, Marcus wrote:
> Am 29.12.20 um 09:54 schrieb Jörg Schmidt:
>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Andrea Pescetti [mailto:pesce...@apache.org]
>>> Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2020 1:24 AM
>>> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
>>> Subject: Re: Policy to deal with old web
> On Dec 29, 2020, at 11:50 AM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
>
> On Tue., 29 Dec. 2020, 05:55 Jörg Schmidt, wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> Much easier, and imho functionally sufficient, would be a footer on each
>> archive page informing that this is an archive page plus a link to the
>> start page (web
> -Original Message-
> From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2020 12:06 AM
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Policy to deal with old web content - Archiving pages?
>
> Am 29.12.20 um 17:32 schrieb Jörg Schmidt:
> >> -Original
Am 29.12.20 um 17:32 schrieb Jörg Schmidt:
-Original Message-
From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de]
Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2020 12:40 PM
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: Policy to deal with old web content - Archiving pages?
Maybe we should send pointers to these
> -Original Message-
> From: Keith N. McKenna [mailto:keith.mcke...@comcast.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2020 2:29 AM
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Policy to deal with old web content - Archiving pages?
> > If only parts are outdated, then the complete page
I've uploaded macOS, Linux32 and Linux64 bit Dev test builds to:
http://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
On Tue, 29 Dec 2020 17:02:34 -0500
Jim Jagielski wrote:
> I've uploaded macOS, Linux32 and Linux64 bit Dev test builds to:
>
> http://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/
>
I have downloaded and will install for routine work tomorrow the 64 bit en-US
deb version - my work will be mostly
On Tue., 29 Dec. 2020, 05:55 Jörg Schmidt, wrote:
>
>
>
> Much easier, and imho functionally sufficient, would be a footer on each
> archive page informing that this is an archive page plus a link to the
> start page (web and wiki) of the current pages.
>
I like the model used by Mozilla here:
40 matches
Mail list logo