Re: Language subsets

2020-12-29 Thread Jim Jagielski
Works for me... Any other feedback? > On Dec 29, 2020, at 6:31 AM, Marcus wrote: > > Am 29.12.20 um 11:40 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> It's been suggested that before we do an actual RC1, it might >> be a Good Idea to have a Developer's Test Build of all platforms >> available for a quick

Re: Language subsets

2020-12-29 Thread Arrigo Marchiori
On Tue, Dec 29, 2020 at 12:31:08PM +0100, Marcus wrote: > Am 29.12.20 um 11:40 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > > It's been suggested that before we do an actual RC1, it might > > be a Good Idea to have a Developer's Test Build of all platforms > > available for a quick pre-test. That makes a LOT of

Re: Language subsets

2020-12-29 Thread Matthias Seidel
Hi Jim, Am 29.12.20 um 11:40 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > It's been suggested that before we do an actual RC1, it might > be a Good Idea to have a Developer's Test Build of all platforms > available for a quick pre-test. That makes a LOT of sense. It > doesn't seem like we need the full language set

Re: Policy to deal with old web content - Archiving pages?

2020-12-29 Thread Marcus
Am 29.12.20 um 09:54 schrieb Jörg Schmidt: -Original Message- From: Andrea Pescetti [mailto:pesce...@apache.org] Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2020 1:24 AM To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: Policy to deal with old web content - Archiving pages? On 22/12/2020 Jörg Schmidt wrote:

RE: Policy to deal with old web content - Archiving pages?

2020-12-29 Thread Jörg Schmidt
> -Original Message- > From: Andrea Pescetti [mailto:pesce...@apache.org] > Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2020 1:24 AM > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: Policy to deal with old web content - Archiving pages? > > On 22/12/2020 Jörg Schmidt wrote: > > my personal opinion is

Re: [Consensus Building] What we should do now (was: [lazy consensus] ... Big Sur)

2020-12-29 Thread Peter Kovacs
On 28.12.20 23:54, Marcus wrote: Am 28.12.20 um 20:32 schrieb Marcus: Am 28.12.20 um 19:11 schrieb Peter Kovacs: On 28.12.20 15:40, Marcus wrote: We would then only learn of it if people run into issues. I rather have them write a short mail to dev list, as I have suggested it in the

Language subsets

2020-12-29 Thread Jim Jagielski
It's been suggested that before we do an actual RC1, it might be a Good Idea to have a Developer's Test Build of all platforms available for a quick pre-test. That makes a LOT of sense. It doesn't seem like we need the full language set though for these but instead maybe just 3-5. How about:

Re: Language subsets

2020-12-29 Thread Marcus
Am 29.12.20 um 11:40 schrieb Jim Jagielski: It's been suggested that before we do an actual RC1, it might be a Good Idea to have a Developer's Test Build of all platforms available for a quick pre-test. That makes a LOT of sense. It doesn't seem like we need the full language set though for

Re: Language subsets

2020-12-29 Thread Peter Kovacs
On 29.12.20 14:26, Arrigo Marchiori wrote: On Tue, Dec 29, 2020 at 12:31:08PM +0100, Marcus wrote: Am 29.12.20 um 11:40 schrieb Jim Jagielski: It's been suggested that before we do an actual RC1, it might be a Good Idea to have a Developer's Test Build of all platforms available for a quick

Re: Language subsets

2020-12-29 Thread Mechtilde
Hello jim, is there a Linux build, too? I prefer *.deb. kind regards Am 29.12.20 um 13:47 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > Works for me... > > Any other feedback? > >> On Dec 29, 2020, at 6:31 AM, Marcus wrote: >> >> Am 29.12.20 um 11:40 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >>> It's been suggested that before we

Re: Policy to deal with old web content - Archiving pages?

2020-12-29 Thread Dave Fisher
Sent from my iPhone > On Dec 29, 2020, at 3:40 AM, Marcus wrote: > > Am 29.12.20 um 09:54 schrieb Jörg Schmidt: >>> -Original Message- >>> From: Andrea Pescetti [mailto:pesce...@apache.org] >>> Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2020 1:24 AM >>> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org >>> Subject:

Re: Proposed change for download page

2020-12-29 Thread Bidouille
> Personally, I don't see the need until we have a real x64 version. +1 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

RE: Policy to deal with old web content - Archiving pages?

2020-12-29 Thread Jörg Schmidt
> -Original Message- > From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de] > Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2020 12:40 PM > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: Policy to deal with old web content - Archiving pages? > Maybe we should send pointers to these collections of pages > to dev@

RE: Proposed change for download page

2020-12-29 Thread Jörg Schmidt
> -Original Message- > From: Bidouille [mailto:ooofo...@free.fr] > Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2020 3:02 PM > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: Proposed change for download page > > > > Personally, I don't see the need until we have a real x64 version. > +1 Don't you care

Re: Proposed change for download page

2020-12-29 Thread Dave Fisher
Sent from my iPhone > On Dec 29, 2020, at 8:39 AM, Jörg Schmidt wrote: > >  > >> -Original Message- >> From: Bidouille [mailto:ooofo...@free.fr] >> Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2020 3:02 PM >> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org >> Subject: Re: Proposed change for download page >> >>

RE: Proposed change for download page

2020-12-29 Thread Jörg Schmidt
> -Original Message- > From: Dave Fisher [mailto:wave4d...@comcast.net] > Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2020 6:25 PM > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Cc: ooofo...@free.fr > Subject: Re: Proposed change for download page > > > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On Dec 29, 2020, at 8:39 AM,

Re: Proposed change for download page

2020-12-29 Thread Rory O'Farrell
On Tue, 29 Dec 2020 18:31:23 +0100 Peter Kovacs wrote: > > On 29.12.20 18:25, Dave Fisher wrote: > > > > Sent from my iPhone > > > >> On Dec 29, 2020, at 8:39 AM, Jörg Schmidt wrote: > >> > >>  > >> > >>> -Original Message- > >>> From: Bidouille [mailto:ooofo...@free.fr] > >>> Sent:

Re: Proposed change for download page

2020-12-29 Thread Matthias Seidel
Hi Peter, Am 29.12.20 um 18:31 schrieb Peter Kovacs: > > On 29.12.20 18:25, Dave Fisher wrote: >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >>> On Dec 29, 2020, at 8:39 AM, Jörg Schmidt >>> wrote: >>> >>>  >>> -Original Message- From: Bidouille [mailto:ooofo...@free.fr] Sent: Tuesday,

Re: Proposed change for download page

2020-12-29 Thread Dave Fisher
> On Dec 29, 2020, at 10:47 AM, Czesław Wolański > wrote: > > Hi Dave, > >> I suggest we offer something clearer and more direct. I’m not sure what > that is. >> Perhaps we need a compatible java page to point Windows, macOS, and Linux > users >> to acceptable versions. >> Maybe we have such

Re: Policy to deal with old web content - Archiving pages?

2020-12-29 Thread Dave Fisher
Sent from my iPhone > On Dec 29, 2020, at 8:32 AM, Jörg Schmidt wrote: > >  > >> -Original Message- >> From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de] >> Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2020 12:40 PM >> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org >> Subject: Re: Policy to deal with old web content -

Re: Proposed change for download page

2020-12-29 Thread Czesław Wolański
Hi Dave, > I suggest we offer something clearer and more direct. I’m not sure what that is. > Perhaps we need a compatible java page to point Windows, macOS, and Linux users > to acceptable versions. > Maybe we have such a page we can better highlight from the Download page? Link on the

Re: Policy to deal with old web content - Archiving pages?

2020-12-29 Thread Carl Marcum
Hi Jörg, On 12/29/20 3:54 AM, Jörg Schmidt wrote: How do we want to define "outdated pages"? Many pages are seemingly(!) outdated, but in reality they are needed (e.g. for the daily voluntary support on mailing lists or in forums). Look e.g. at the extremely important pages with technical

Re: Proposed change for download page

2020-12-29 Thread Peter Kovacs
On 29.12.20 18:25, Dave Fisher wrote: Sent from my iPhone On Dec 29, 2020, at 8:39 AM, Jörg Schmidt wrote:  -Original Message- From: Bidouille [mailto:ooofo...@free.fr] Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2020 3:02 PM To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: Proposed change for

Re: Proposed change for download page

2020-12-29 Thread Dave Fisher
Sent from my iPhone > On Dec 29, 2020, at 9:47 AM, Rory O'Farrell wrote: > > On Tue, 29 Dec 2020 18:31:23 +0100 > Peter Kovacs wrote: > >> >>> On 29.12.20 18:25, Dave Fisher wrote: >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> On Dec 29, 2020, at 8:39 AM, Jörg Schmidt wrote: 

RE: Policy to deal with old web content - Archiving pages?

2020-12-29 Thread Jörg Schmidt
> -Original Message- > From: Carl Marcum [mailto:cmar...@apache.org] > Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2020 7:55 PM > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: Policy to deal with old web content - Archiving pages? > > Hi Jörg, > > On 12/29/20 3:54 AM, Jörg Schmidt wrote: > > > > How do

RE: Policy to deal with old web content - Archiving pages?

2020-12-29 Thread Jörg Schmidt
> -Original Message- > From: Dave Fisher [mailto:w...@apache.org] > Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2020 12:23 AM > To: dev > Subject: Re: Policy to deal with old web content - Archiving pages? > > right, and here you have misunderstood me. ;-) > > > > Of course where it's clear just

Re: Proposed change for download page

2020-12-29 Thread Marcus
Am 29.12.20 um 20:05 schrieb Dave Fisher: On Dec 29, 2020, at 10:47 AM, Czesław Wolański wrote: I suggest we offer something clearer and more direct. I’m not sure what that is. Perhaps we need a compatible java page to point Windows, macOS, and Linux users to acceptable versions. Maybe

RE: Proposed change for download page

2020-12-29 Thread Jörg Schmidt
> -Original Message- > From: Matthias Seidel [mailto:matthias.sei...@hamburg.de] > Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2020 6:52 PM > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: Proposed change for download page > >> It is better to discuss the actual problem which is that Windows > >> users of

RE: Proposed change for download page

2020-12-29 Thread Jörg Schmidt
> -Original Message- > From: Dave Fisher [mailto:w...@apache.org] > Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2020 7:02 PM > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: Proposed change for download page > >>> It is better to discuss the actual problem which is that > Windows users of AOO don’t

RE: Policy to deal with old web content - Archiving pages?

2020-12-29 Thread Jörg Schmidt
> -Original Message- > From: Dave Fisher [mailto:wave4d...@comcast.net] > Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2020 7:13 PM > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: Policy to deal with old web content - Archiving pages? > > > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On Dec 29, 2020, at 8:32 AM,

Re: Policy to deal with old web content - Archiving pages?

2020-12-29 Thread Dave Fisher
> On Dec 29, 2020, at 3:05 PM, Marcus wrote: > > Am 29.12.20 um 17:32 schrieb Jörg Schmidt: >>> -Original Message- >>> From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de] >>> Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2020 12:40 PM >>> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org >>> Subject: Re: Policy to deal with old

Re: Proposed change for download page

2020-12-29 Thread Leonardo Fog
Cual seria mejor opción para seguir El mar., 29 de diciembre de 2020 17:18, Marcus escribió: > Am 29.12.20 um 20:05 schrieb Dave Fisher: > >> On Dec 29, 2020, at 10:47 AM, Czesław Wolański < > czeslaw.wolan...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >>> I suggest we offer something clearer and more direct.

Re: Policy to deal with old web content - Archiving pages?

2020-12-29 Thread Keith N. McKenna
On 12/29/2020 6:40 AM, Marcus wrote: > Am 29.12.20 um 09:54 schrieb Jörg Schmidt: >> >>> -Original Message- >>> From: Andrea Pescetti [mailto:pesce...@apache.org] >>> Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2020 1:24 AM >>> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org >>> Subject: Re: Policy to deal with old web

Re: Policy to deal with old web content - Archiving pages?

2020-12-29 Thread Dave Fisher
> On Dec 29, 2020, at 11:50 AM, Fernando Cassia wrote: > > On Tue., 29 Dec. 2020, 05:55 Jörg Schmidt, wrote: > >> >> >> >> Much easier, and imho functionally sufficient, would be a footer on each >> archive page informing that this is an archive page plus a link to the >> start page (web

RE: Policy to deal with old web content - Archiving pages?

2020-12-29 Thread Jörg Schmidt
> -Original Message- > From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de] > Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2020 12:06 AM > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: Policy to deal with old web content - Archiving pages? > > Am 29.12.20 um 17:32 schrieb Jörg Schmidt: > >> -Original

Re: Policy to deal with old web content - Archiving pages?

2020-12-29 Thread Marcus
Am 29.12.20 um 17:32 schrieb Jörg Schmidt: -Original Message- From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de] Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2020 12:40 PM To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: Policy to deal with old web content - Archiving pages? Maybe we should send pointers to these

RE: Policy to deal with old web content - Archiving pages?

2020-12-29 Thread Jörg Schmidt
> -Original Message- > From: Keith N. McKenna [mailto:keith.mcke...@comcast.net] > Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2020 2:29 AM > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: Policy to deal with old web content - Archiving pages? > > If only parts are outdated, then the complete page

Re: Language subsets

2020-12-29 Thread Jim Jagielski
I've uploaded macOS, Linux32 and Linux64 bit Dev test builds to: http://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: Language subsets

2020-12-29 Thread Rory O'Farrell
On Tue, 29 Dec 2020 17:02:34 -0500 Jim Jagielski wrote: > I've uploaded macOS, Linux32 and Linux64 bit Dev test builds to: > > http://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/ > I have downloaded and will install for routine work tomorrow the 64 bit en-US deb version - my work will be mostly

Re: Policy to deal with old web content - Archiving pages?

2020-12-29 Thread Fernando Cassia
On Tue., 29 Dec. 2020, 05:55 Jörg Schmidt, wrote: > > > > Much easier, and imho functionally sufficient, would be a footer on each > archive page informing that this is an archive page plus a link to the > start page (web and wiki) of the current pages. > I like the model used by Mozilla here: