Re: OpenOffice wordmark exploration (yet without the "Apache" mention)

2022-02-13 Thread Matthias Seidel
A more significant portion of people does not think so. Am 13.02.22 um 11:14 schrieb Corentin Verbrèghe: > Hi, > A significant portion of people outside the project believe it is out of > date. > > Cordially. > Manjiro (Corentin) > > Le sam. 12 févr. 2022 à 20:19, Carl Marcum a écrit : > >> Hi

Re: OpenOffice wordmark exploration (yet without the "Apache" mention)

2022-02-13 Thread Corentin Verbrèghe
Hi, I'm talking about a redesign in all levels including graphics (icons, logos, etc.). Cordially. Manjiro (Corentin Le sam. 12 févr. 2022 à 22:38, Peter Kovacs a écrit : > Welcome Corentin Verbrèghe! > > On 12.02.22 22:04, Corentin Verbrèghe wrote: > > What I mean is that on OpenOffice there

Re: OpenOffice wordmark exploration (yet without the "Apache" mention)

2022-02-13 Thread Corentin Verbrèghe
Hi, A significant portion of people outside the project believe it is out of date. Cordially. Manjiro (Corentin) Le sam. 12 févr. 2022 à 20:19, Carl Marcum a écrit : > Hi Corentin, > > On 2/12/22 1:45 PM, Corentin Verbrèghe wrote: > > My project is to make OpenOffice better, more current, more

Re: OpenOffice wordmark exploration (yet without the "Apache" mention)

2022-02-13 Thread Corentin Verbrèghe
It's the opposite in France in any case, OpenOffice is considered there as almost “dead”. Cordially. Manjiro (Corentin) Le dim. 13 févr. 2022 à 12:33, Matthias Seidel a écrit : > A more significant portion of people does not think so. > > Am 13.02.22 um 11:14 schrieb Corentin Verbrèghe: > > Hi,

Re: OpenOffice wordmark exploration (yet without the "Apache" mention)

2022-02-13 Thread Rory O'Farrell
On Sun, 13 Feb 2022 13:42:12 +0100 Corentin Verbrèghe wrote: > It's the opposite in France in any case, OpenOffice is considered there as > almost “dead”. > Cordially. > Manjiro (Corentin) If what you consider doing is a remake of icons and appearance, I'm sure all would welcome this; it

Re: OpenOffice wordmark exploration (yet without the "Apache" mention)

2022-02-13 Thread Matthias Seidel
So you can officially speak for France? Interesting that most of our downloads come from France: https://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/4.1.11/stats/timeline However, I am curious about your artwork. Can you present something? Regards,    Matthias Am 13.02.22 um 13:42

Re: OpenOffice wordmark exploration (yet without the "Apache" mention)

2022-02-13 Thread Matthias Seidel
Hi Rory, Am 13.02.22 um 13:53 schrieb Rory O'Farrell: > On Sun, 13 Feb 2022 13:42:12 +0100 > Corentin Verbrèghe wrote: > >> It's the opposite in France in any case, OpenOffice is considered there as >> almost “dead”. >> Cordially. >> Manjiro (Corentin) > > If what you consider doing is a remake

Re: OpenOffice wordmark exploration (yet without the "Apache" mention)

2022-02-13 Thread Peter Kovacs
On 13.02.22 13:53, Rory O'Farrell wrote: On Sun, 13 Feb 2022 13:42:12 +0100 Corentin Verbrèghe wrote: It's the opposite in France in any case, OpenOffice is considered there as almost “dead”. Cordially. Manjiro (Corentin) If what you consider doing is a remake of icons and appearance, I'm

Re: OpenOffice wordmark exploration (yet without the "Apache" mention)

2022-02-13 Thread Matthias Seidel
Hi all, Am 13.02.22 um 15:59 schrieb Peter Kovacs: > > On 13.02.22 13:53, Rory O'Farrell wrote: >> On Sun, 13 Feb 2022 13:42:12 +0100 >> Corentin Verbrèghe wrote: >> >>> It's the opposite in France in any case, OpenOffice is considered >>> there as >>> almost “dead”. >>> Cordially. >>> Manjiro

Re: OpenOffice wordmark exploration (yet without the "Apache" mention)

2022-02-13 Thread Rory O'Farrell
On Sun, 13 Feb 2022 18:59:00 +0100 Matthias Seidel wrote: > Am 13.02.22 um 18:53 schrieb Corentin Verbrèghe: > > It's a shame... The logo is much too flat, not dynamic enough. > > OpenOffice is therefore not entirely free. > > I think you don't understand trademarks... ;-) > > The source code

Re: [openoffice] branch AOO41X updated: Add support for Azul JDK's

2022-02-13 Thread Arrigo Marchiori
Hello Matthias, All, On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 08:15:32PM +0100, Matthias Seidel wrote: > Hi Arrigo, > > Same here: Would this also be wanted in trunk and AOO42X? I think so. This commit had to be adjusted because AOO42X and trunk do not seem to support Java 1.7, whereas AOO41X did. I merged

Re: OpenOffice wordmark exploration (yet without the "Apache" mention)

2022-02-13 Thread Corentin Verbrèghe
Thank you for the icon pack proposals, they should be modified to make them slightly more colorful. Cordially. Manjiro (Corentin) PS: I created the icon-logo of OpenOffice for the moment, I just added a gradient but I find that the logo is too flat. Available here :

Re: OpenOffice wordmark exploration (yet without the "Apache" mention)

2022-02-13 Thread Corentin Verbrèghe
It's a shame... The logo is much too flat, not dynamic enough. OpenOffice is therefore not entirely free. Cordially. Manjiro (Corentin) Le dim. 13 févr. 2022 à 18:33, Matthias Seidel a écrit : > Am 13.02.22 um 18:28 schrieb Corentin Verbrèghe: > > Thank you for the icon pack proposals, they

Re: OpenOffice wordmark exploration (yet without the "Apache" mention)

2022-02-13 Thread Corentin Verbrèghe
Reassure me, we can at least change the icons of Writer, Impress, Calc, Draw, Base and Math? Le dim. 13 févr. 2022 à 18:53, Corentin Verbrèghe < corentin.verbreg...@gmail.com> a écrit : > It's a shame... The logo is much too flat, not dynamic enough. OpenOffice is > therefore not entirely

Re: OpenOffice wordmark exploration (yet without the "Apache" mention)

2022-02-13 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Manjiro > On 02/13/2022 8:36 PM Corentin Verbrèghe > wrote: > I think by making a request to Apache to change the icons of Writer and > other software, they may agree. Only the Blue Orb icon (or Logo) is part of the trademark. Icons for Writer or any other modules as well as icons for

Re: OpenOffice wordmark exploration (yet without the "Apache" mention)

2022-02-13 Thread Bidouille
> >> If what you consider doing is a remake of icons and appearance, > >> I'm > >> sure all would welcome this; it would be good that one could > >> switch > >> between one them and another, so that the older theme was also > >> available. > BTW: The "Industrial" icon set is still missing a lot of

Re: OpenOffice wordmark exploration (yet without the "Apache" mention)

2022-02-13 Thread Matthias Seidel
Hi, Am 13.02.22 um 17:56 schrieb Bidouille: If what you consider doing is a remake of icons and appearance, I'm sure all would welcome this; it would be good that one could switch between one them and another, so that the older theme was also available. >> BTW: The

Re: OpenOffice wordmark exploration (yet without the "Apache" mention)

2022-02-13 Thread Corentin Verbrèghe
I think by making a request to Apache to change the icons of Writer and other software, they may agree. Cordially. Manjiro (Corentin) Le dim. 13 févr. 2022 à 19:06, Rory O'Farrell a écrit : > On Sun, 13 Feb 2022 18:59:00 +0100 > Matthias Seidel wrote: > > > Am 13.02.22 um 18:53 schrieb

Re: OpenOffice wordmark exploration (yet without the "Apache" mention)

2022-02-13 Thread Matthias Seidel
Am 13.02.22 um 18:28 schrieb Corentin Verbrèghe: > Thank you for the icon pack proposals, they should be modified to make them > slightly more colorful. > Cordially. > Manjiro (Corentin) > > PS: I created the icon-logo of OpenOffice for the moment, I just added a > gradient but I find that the

Re: OpenOffice wordmark exploration (yet without the "Apache" mention)

2022-02-13 Thread Peter Kovacs
On 13.02.22 21:36, Corentin Verbrèghe wrote: I think by making a request to Apache to change the icons of Writer and other software, they may agree. For clarification: The decision is made on this list. And we decide together. That is the way. The Apache Foundation is the body that

Re: [openoffice] branch AOO41X updated: Add support for Azul JDK's

2022-02-13 Thread Arrigo Marchiori
Hello Matthias, On Sun, Feb 13, 2022 at 05:43:25PM +0100, Matthias Seidel wrote: > Hi Arrigo, > > Am 13.02.22 um 17:22 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori: > > Hello Matthias, All, > > > > On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 08:15:32PM +0100, Matthias Seidel wrote: > > > >> Hi Arrigo, > >> > >> Same here: Would this

Re: Check for English spelling extension updates broken?

2022-02-13 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Andrea > On 02/13/2022 10:11 PM Andrea Pescetti wrote: > I had to try a lot of times since apparently the process changed since > the last time I checked this, but I was able to login at last and it's > still weekend! Thank you for taking some time to do this and for testing first! >

Re: OpenOffice wordmark exploration (yet without the "Apache" mention)

2022-02-13 Thread Matthias Seidel
Am 13.02.22 um 18:53 schrieb Corentin Verbrèghe: > It's a shame... The logo is much too flat, not dynamic enough. > OpenOffice is therefore not entirely free. I think you don't understand trademarks... ;-) The source code is free. You can build it with whatever graphics you want to use. But you

Re: OpenOffice wordmark exploration (yet without the "Apache" mention)

2022-02-13 Thread Corentin Verbrèghe
I know the licenses but I don't understand why I couldn't offer Apache a new logo. Cordially. Manjiro (Corentin) Le dim. 13 févr. 2022 à 18:59, Matthias Seidel a écrit : > Am 13.02.22 um 18:53 schrieb Corentin Verbrèghe: > > It's a shame... The logo is much too flat, not dynamic enough. > >

Re: Check for English spelling extension updates broken?

2022-02-13 Thread Andrea Pescetti
On 11/02/22 Pedro Lino wrote: Do you have time for this issue during this weekend? Hello Pedro, I had to try a lot of times since apparently the process changed since the last time I checked this, but I was able to login at last and it's still weekend! So, the first steps on your side,

Re: [openoffice] branch AOO41X updated: Add support for Azul JDK's

2022-02-13 Thread Matthias Seidel
Hi Arrigo, Am 13.02.22 um 17:22 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori: > Hello Matthias, All, > > On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 08:15:32PM +0100, Matthias Seidel wrote: > >> Hi Arrigo, >> >> Same here: Would this also be wanted in trunk and AOO42X? > I think so. This commit had to be adjusted because AOO42X and

Re: [openoffice] branch AOO41X updated: Add support for Azul JDK's

2022-02-13 Thread Matthias Seidel
Hi Arrigo, Am 13.02.22 um 18:43 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori: > Hello Matthias, > > On Sun, Feb 13, 2022 at 05:43:25PM +0100, Matthias Seidel wrote: > >> Hi Arrigo, >> >> Am 13.02.22 um 17:22 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori: >>> Hello Matthias, All, >>> >>> On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 08:15:32PM +0100, Matthias

Re: OpenOffice wordmark exploration (yet without the "Apache" mention)

2022-02-13 Thread Corentin Verbrèghe
I know the causes now, but I may still request Apache to modify the icon-logos (especially those of Writer and other products). Cordially. Manjiro (Corentin) Le dim. 13 févr. 2022 à 23:05, Pedro Lino a écrit : > Hi Manjiro > > > On 02/13/2022 8:36 PM Corentin Verbrèghe > wrote: > > > I think