-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 17/02/15 22:26, jan i wrote:
Do we (AOO) have to solve that, or is it the project (being downstream to
AOO) ?
To me it sounds like a downstream adaptation.
If the point is to remove _existing_ functionality, then it is a
downstream adaption.
-- replying in-line to --
From: jan i [mailto:j...@apache.org]
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2015 14:27
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org; dennis.hamil...@acm.org
Subject: Re: OOo4Kids OOoLight Status
On Tuesday, February 17, 2015, Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.org
wrote:
+1,
Nice
Hi Jan,
Hi all,
2015-02-16 10:26 GMT+01:00 jan i j...@apache.org:
In order to keep it (as AOO) we. need to know
- is the brand registred and eho has the current right to the brand
- can we as AOO provide resources to keep this alive
I think it is a good downstream project, but I do not
resource problem to solve, yet it is nice to see
thoughtful definition taking place.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Guy Waterval [mailto:waterval@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2015 13:00
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: OOo4Kids OOoLight Status
Hi Jan,
Hi all
.
rgds
jan i
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Guy Waterval [mailto:waterval@gmail.com javascript:;]
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2015 13:00
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org javascript:;
Subject: Re: OOo4Kids OOoLight Status
Hi Jan,
Hi all,
2015-02-16 10:26 GMT+01:00 jan i j
-
From: jan i [mailto:j...@apache.org]
Sent: Monday, February 16, 2015 01:26
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: OOo4Kids OOoLight Status
On Monday, February 16, 2015, RA Stehmann anw...@rechtsanwalt-stehmann.de
wrote:
On 15.02.2015 23:14, Guy Waterval wrote:
You could reduce
On Monday, February 16, 2015, RA Stehmann anw...@rechtsanwalt-stehmann.de
wrote:
On 15.02.2015 23:14, Guy Waterval wrote:
You could reduce the number of options here. For instance OOoLight is not
necessary. The differences with OOo4Kids are too small.
Novice, Intermediate and Advanced
On 15.02.2015 23:14, Guy Waterval wrote:
You could reduce the number of options here. For instance OOoLight is not
necessary. The differences with OOo4Kids are too small.
Novice, Intermediate and Advanced (AOO without modifications) should be
enough (personal opinion).
IMO the brand
Hello,
2015-02-14 23:36 GMT+01:00 jonathon toki.kant...@gmail.com:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[..]
That would require one addition to the Tools Options Appearance
Select UI-Profile, and offer:
* Prebuilt;
* Default;
* Custom;
That's exactly what we have discussed
Hi Andrea,
Hi all,
2015-02-13 20:51 GMT+01:00 Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org:
On 13/02/2015 jonathon wrote:
Were these projects (OOo4Kids, OooLight) included, when OOo became an
Apache project?
No. But as several people pointed out, they have always been independent
projects. Eric's
Hi Michael,
Hi all,
2015-02-13 9:42 GMT+01:00 RA Stehmann anw...@rechtsanwalt-stehmann.de:
On 13.02.2015 09:05, jan i wrote:
I cannot see them included in the original IP clearance, so my best
guess
is that they were forgotten, but others might know more.
I think, that both
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 14/02/15 19:47, Guy Waterval wrote:
more easy to simplify the interface of AOO and adapt it for the school
For both OOoLight and OOo4Kids, if a function was accessible using
keystrokes in OOo, it was accessible in those products. However, if the
On 13 February 2015 at 08:58, jonathon toki.kant...@gmail.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
All:
My impression was that when Apache Foundation accepted OOo, they also
accepted the OOo4Kids and OOoLight projects.
On 13.02.2015 09:05, jan i wrote:
I cannot see them included in the original IP clearance, so my best guess
is that they were forgotten, but others might know more.
I think, that both products are derived works from OpenOffice.org.
Maybe the people, who developed both projects, have not
who are the developers of these products and
how we can contact them.
See Eric Bachard
https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/User:Ericb
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: OOo4Kids OOoLight Status
On 13.02.2015 09:05, jan i wrote:
I cannot see them included in the original IP clearance, so my best guess
is that they were forgotten, but others might know more.
I think, that both products are derived works from OpenOffice.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 13/02/15 08:05, jan i wrote:
so my best guess is that they were forgotten,
That would be forgotten by developers.
The current Trinidad and Tobago DVD contains OOo4Kids.
jonathon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1
jan i wrote:
On 13 February 2015 at 08:58, jonathon toki.kant...@gmail.com wrote:
All:
My impression was that when Apache Foundation accepted OOo, they also
accepted the OOo4Kids and OOoLight projects.
https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Education_Project/OOo4Kids says that
the OOo4Kids
Пятница, 13 февраля 2015, 7:58 UTC от jonathon t:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
All:
My impression was that when Apache Foundation accepted OOo, they also
accepted the OOo4Kids and OOoLight projects.
https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Education_Project/OOo4Kids says that
the
On 13/02/2015 jonathon wrote:
Were these projects (OOo4Kids, OooLight) included, when OOo became an
Apache project?
No. But as several people pointed out, they have always been independent
projects. Eric's messages to this list cover pretty much all discussions
we had about them:
20 matches
Mail list logo
