[dev] Re: [porting-dev] Re: [tools-dev] Moving to bost 1.3?

2009-08-19 Thread Frank Schoenheit - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg
Hi Rene, We invite everybody porting OOo to another platform to give feedback to this project. As rumor has it, boost 1.39 creates problems when used on some platforms (either at compile- or runtime), so if your platform is know to be one of those, or if you just want to be sure - please give

Re: [dev] Moving to bost 1.3?

2009-08-19 Thread Regina Henschel
Hi Frank, Frank Schoenheit - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg schrieb: Hi Rene, [..] [ Seems so, do you now strictly need 1.39? No, I think 1.34 would do, too. As said, a previous incarnation of the CWS compiles fine with 1.34, but again, I didn't do extensive runtime checks with this

Re: [dev] OLE can not be activated in Windows OS after Java integration

2009-08-19 Thread Mikhail Voytenko
Hi, If the object can be activated when the document is loaded in the normal office, that would mean for me that a threading problem takes place. COM does not support multi-threading ( as well as actually OOo ), so the object should be activated from the same thread where it was created. So

Re: [dev] Re: [porting-dev] Re: [tools-dev] Moving to bost 1.3?

2009-08-19 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 08:30:39AM +0200, Frank Schoenheit - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg wrote: [ Seems so, do you now strictly need 1.39? No, I think 1.34 would do, too. As said, a previous incarnation of the CWS compiles fine with 1.34, but again, I didn't do extensive runtime

Re: [dev] Moving to bost 1.3?

2009-08-19 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 08:56:23AM +0200, Regina Henschel wrote: The new Math libraries 'Special Functions' and 'Statistical Distribution' are not included in Boost 1.34, but first in Boost 1.35. The accuracy of those functions is ongoing work in Calc and doing it ourself has been a

Re: [dev] Re: [porting-dev] Re: [tools-dev] Moving to bost 1.3?

2009-08-19 Thread Frank Schoenheit, Sun Microsystems Germany
Hi Rene, The code as-is now will fail to build/work with system-boost 1.39, I assume? Most probably. Didn't explicitly try that, though. Ciao Frank -- - Frank Schönheit, Software Engineer frank.schoenh...@sun.com - - Sun Microsystems

Re: [dev] Moving to bost 1.3?

2009-08-19 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 22:56 +0200, Frank Schönheit - Sun Microsystems Germany wrote: If boost 1.39 proves to be too problematic, We've been building with 1.39 for some time without any noticeable problems except for one little buglet in the function_template header where a #if

Re: [dev] Moving to bost 1.3?

2009-08-19 Thread Frank Schoenheit, Sun Microsystems Germany
Hi Caolán, We've been building with 1.39 for some time without any noticeable problems good to know, thanks. except for one little buglet in the function_template header where a #if !defined(BOOST_NO_EXCEPTIONS) is in the wrong place. Yeah, stumbled upon this, too. Thanks Ciao Frank --

Re: [dev] Re: [porting-dev] Re: [tools-dev] Moving to bost 1.3?

2009-08-19 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 10:31:59AM +0200, Frank Schoenheit, Sun Microsystems Germany wrote: Hi Rene, The code as-is now will fail to build/work with system-boost 1.39, I assume? Most probably. Didn't explicitly try that, though. OK, just tried, it fails e.g. in connectivity because

Re: [dev] Re: [porting-dev] Re: [tools-dev] Moving to bost 1.3?

2009-08-19 Thread Frank Schoenheit, Sun Microsystems Germany
Hi Rene, So we either need something like this (when did they change that?): [configure patch] I'd prefer that. Making the source code dependent on different boost versions (even if it's only about different headers to include) is too prone to breakage, IMO. Ciao Frank -- - Frank

Re: [dev] Re: [porting-dev] Re: [tools-dev] Moving to bost 1.3?

2009-08-19 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 03:12:11PM +0200, Frank Schoenheit, Sun Microsystems Germany wrote: So we either need something like this (when did they change that?): [configure patch] I'd prefer that. Making the source code dependent on different boost versions (even if it's only about

[dev] Re: [tools-tinderbox] Moving to bost 1.3?

2009-08-19 Thread Thorsten Behrens
[Cc to tinderbox removed] Frank Schönheit - Sun Microsystems Germany wrote: As an additional note, it has been suggested to not commit the boost*.tar.gz to boost/download, but make it a pre-requisite which needs to be downloaded before building. This would (for 1.39) save 50M in the

[dev] tabcontrol about openoffice.org SDK

2009-08-19 Thread dongtao
Hi, The module :: com :: sun :: star :: awt of openoffice.org sdk has no support to tabcontrol and tabpage. How can I create some tabpages in a popup window? Best regards, nuix - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: [dev] Re: [tools-tinderbox] Moving to bost 1.3?

2009-08-19 Thread Jens-Heiner Rechtien
Hi Thorsten, Thorsten Behrens wrote: [Cc to tinderbox removed] Frank Schönheit - Sun Microsystems Germany wrote: As an additional note, it has been suggested to not commit the boost*.tar.gz to boost/download, but make it a pre-requisite which needs to be downloaded before building. This would

Re: [dev] Re: [tools-tinderbox] Moving to bost 1.3?

2009-08-19 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 04:53:28PM +0200, Jens-Heiner Rechtien wrote: Or invent a nice solution that does auto-downloads, and switch a few other huge external libs to that (like icu). ;) That would be a problem for some builders unless you don't download it when the file is there... For

Re: [dev] Re: [tools-tinderbox] Moving to bost 1.3?

2009-08-19 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Rene Engelhard wrote: On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 04:53:28PM +0200, Jens-Heiner Rechtien wrote: Or invent a nice solution that does auto-downloads, and switch a few other huge external libs to that (like icu). ;) That would be a problem for some builders unless you don't download it when the

Re: [dev] Re: [tools-tinderbox] Moving to bost 1.3?

2009-08-19 Thread Jens-Heiner Rechtien
Hi Rene, Rene Engelhard wrote: Hi, On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 04:53:28PM +0200, Jens-Heiner Rechtien wrote: Or invent a nice solution that does auto-downloads, and switch a few other huge external libs to that (like icu). ;) That would be a problem for some builders unless you don't download

Re: [dev] Re: [tools-tinderbox] Moving to bost 1.3?

2009-08-19 Thread Frank Schoenheit, Sun Microsystems Germany
Hi Rene, Or invent a nice solution that does auto-downloads, and switch a few other huge external libs to that (like icu). ;) Nice idea. That would be a problem for some builders unless you don't download it when the file is there... Sure. For example, for Debian requiring any form of

Re: [dev] Re: [tools-tinderbox] Moving to bost 1.3?

2009-08-19 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 08:18:28PM +0200, Frank Schoenheit, Sun Microsystems Germany wrote: For example, for Debian requiring any form of net access on a build is a no-go (and for some libs we have to use the internal versions, and be it sometime, in emergency) What's the definition

Re: [dev] Re: [tools-tinderbox] Moving to bost 1.3?

2009-08-19 Thread Frank Schoenheit, Sun Microsystems Germany
Hi Rene, command - where's the no net access from here onwards-line drawn? After the download of the sources. Then let's define download the pre-requisites as a sub task of download the sources :) Finally, there might be people who could suggest that the pre-req-folder could be maintained

Re: [dev] Re: [tools-tinderbox] Moving to bost 1.3?

2009-08-19 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 09:11:53PM +0200, Frank Schoenheit, Sun Microsystems Germany wrote: After the download of the sources. Then let's define download the pre-requisites as a sub task of download the sources :) Doesn't work. I need to upload a self-contained thing. THAT gets

Re: [dev] Re: [porting-dev] Re: [tools-dev] Moving to bost 1.3?

2009-08-19 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 08:20:50PM +0200, Frank Schoenheit, Sun Microsystems Germany wrote: BTW, if the problem only is that header (build still running), no, there are much more of those. No. (At least on Linux) cws boost134 build with system-boost *1.34* only needs that header

Re: [dev] Using OpenOffice.org for Chemistry on Linux

2009-08-19 Thread Konstantin Tokarev
13.08.09, 04:20, Ariel Constenla-Haile ariel.constenla.ha...@googlemail.com: Hello Konstantin, On Tuesday 11 August 2009, 08:06, Konstantin Tokarev wrote: Hello! I think every chemist which wants to use Linux faces with one serious problem: structural formulae cannot be inserted into

[dev] Docking windows and todos

2009-08-19 Thread KAMI
Hexyl Chan írta: Hi Kami, Did you discuss the do-dos with Carsten? Carsten answer was: Hi KAMI, Unfortunately this is currently not possible. Fortunately OOo 3.1 contains many parts which are necessary to provide dockable windows via API. Some important parts are still missing and must

[dev] AccessibleTabControl, AccessibleTabPage. But no TabControl and TabPage services

2009-08-19 Thread dongtao
Hi, I am developing an add-on which needs TabCtrol and TabPage ui elements to show buttons, checkbox... But in the module :: com :: sun :: star :: awt, I only found AccessibleTabControl and AccessibleTabPage services without TabCtrol and TabPage. Anyone knows how to construct a TabCtrol with