As evident in the discussion on issue
https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/issues/1446 there
are several people interested in maintaining functionality that existed
only a few days ago - being able to view single tiles just as easily as
before.
A patch was submitted which
On Friday 24 February 2017, Jóhannes Birgir Jensson wrote:
> As evident in the discussion on issue
> https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/issues/1446
> there are several people interested in maintaining functionality that
> existed only a few days ago - being able to view single
On 24/02/17 11:33, Dave F wrote:
On 24/02/2017 11:19, Tom Hughes wrote:
Well it was a little odd that we suddenly got several people who are
not regular commenters turning up in the space of a few minute to add
"me too" style responses.
What's wrong with that? There are numerous discussions
On 24/02/2017 11:19, Tom Hughes wrote:
Well it was a little odd that we suddenly got several people who are
not regular commenters turning up in the space of a few minute to add
"me too" style responses.
What's wrong with that? There are numerous discussions in Dev that I
have no
On 24/02/17 10:26, Jóhannes Birgir Jensson wrote:
But removing functionality and then denying it to be re-added based on
very little but personal objective is unhelpful and detrimental.
As far as I know no functionality has been removed, at least not
recently. Rather a request to add
Hi!
пт, 24 февр. 2017 г. в 13:30, Jóhannes Birgir Jensson :
> As evident in the discussion on issue
> https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/issues/1446 there
> are several people interested in maintaining functionality that existed
> only a few days ago - being
On 24/02/2017 10:26, Jóhannes Birgir Jensson wrote:
It was closed and rejected in a very abrupt and unconstructive manner.
Yes. This seems to be Tom Hughes's default reaction. He's certainly
trigger happy with the close button.
DaveF
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast
2017-02-24 13:11 GMT+01:00 Michael Zangl <
openstreet...@michael.fam-zangl.net>:
> This is a not a dev playground, this is a website that
> should be used by millions of normal users. It should provide an entry
> point for people that want to improve the OSM database. It should not be
> a
On 24/02/17 10:26, Jóhannes Birgir Jensson wrote:
As evident in the discussion on issue
https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/issues/1446 there
are several people interested in maintaining functionality that existed
only a few days ago - being able to view single tiles just as
On 24/02/17 11:11, Tom Hughes wrote:
Rather what happened is that at some point (most likely in the 1.0.0
release about six months ago) leaflet started marking tile images with a
CSS attribute that stops the browser offering image options for them in
the default context menu.
This is the
On 24/02/17 11:27, Dave F wrote:
On 24/02/2017 10:26, Jóhannes Birgir Jensson wrote:
It was closed and rejected in a very abrupt and unconstructive manner.
Yes. This seems to be Tom Hughes's default reaction. He's certainly
trigger happy with the close button.
Tickets can always be
Hi,
A few words of someone who is just "using" the OSM website:
I personally think the current Menu is full enough. We should focus on
making that menu better for normal visitors. I could not really think of
a use case where a normal user would want to see a specific map tile. In
my opinion,
пт, 24 февр. 2017 г. в 14:44, Tom Hughes :
> On 24/02/17 11:27, Dave F wrote:
>
> > On 24/02/2017 10:26, Jóhannes Birgir Jensson wrote:
> >>
> >> It was closed and rejected in a very abrupt and unconstructive manner.
> >
> > Yes. This seems to be Tom Hughes's default reaction.
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 12:33 PM, Dave F wrote:
>
> On 24/02/2017 11:19, Tom Hughes wrote:
>>
>>
>> Well it was a little odd that we suddenly got several people who are not
>> regular commenters turning up in the space of a few minute to add "me too"
>> style
My five cents:
at this moment, we have some widely used resources such as osm.org and osm
carto,
started and threated as single persons gh repository.
And we (osm community) don't have a way to discuss and evaluate changes in
collaborative way.
Usually maintainer just decides "Do I love this
On 24/02/17 14:43, Blake Girardot HOT/OSM wrote:
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 12:33 PM, Dave F wrote:
On 24/02/2017 11:19, Tom Hughes wrote:
Well it was a little odd that we suddenly got several people who are not
regular commenters turning up in the space of a few
On 24/02/17 16:24, Дмитрий Киселев wrote:
> at this moment, we have some widely used resources such as osm.org
> and osm carto, started and threated as single persons gh repository.
Actually carto has had multiple maintainers for some time. Indeed the
original maintainer, who I assume you are
W dniu 24.02.2017 16:59, Darafei "Komяpa" Praliaskouski napisał(a):
If you look at it, it's not "community developed this", or "OSMF
developed this", or even "a private club developed this" which you
paint as a dark scenario.
It's being mostly written and deployed by the same person.
This is
On 24 February 2017 at 16:14, Tom Hughes wrote:
> On 24/02/17 14:43, Blake Girardot HOT/OSM wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 12:33 PM, Dave F
>> wrote:
>>
>> On 24/02/2017 11:19, Tom Hughes wrote:
>>>
>>> Well it was a little odd that we suddenly
On 24/02/17 17:15, Дмитрий Киселев wrote:
The key thing is that you need some mechanism for appointing people
to that circle of maintainers who get to vote on which things should
be included and which shouldn't. On most projects that is done by
promoting from those making useful
Hi!
> OSM Github is not a private club. You should be welcoming other
> contributors, not 'closing' on them.
>
Here lies a heartbreaking thing:
openstreetmap-website is actually a single person's project.
https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/graphs/contributors
If you look
>
> Actually carto has had multiple maintainers for some time. Indeed the
> original maintainer, who I assume you are referring to, is not actually
> doing very much these days.
> While osm.org has only one maintainer we have been getting some more
> contributors recently.
Andy has been
I have personally three use cases:
a) trigger a faster? rerender in a mapping situation I'm not sure of myself
b) compare a tile with another
c) get the tile scheme right zyx or zxy? ___
dev mailing list
dev@openstreetmap.org
Hi folks,
Please consider this a reminder that we should maintain a civil discourse,
stay on topic, and not make any personal attacks.
The governance of critical pieces of our software ecosystem are important
to talk about, but please don't attack or ridicule individuals.
Your friendly mailing
I didn't want to be offencive,
sorry if my mail sounds like personall offence,
I didn't meant Tom or anybody personally.
Most of the open-source projects, as I think,
quite authoritarian about commits and pull requests
and ruled the way "I'm the boss, fork it if you are desagree"
I would be
Ok, lets continue with our current
"I'm the boss, that's why" approach.
2017-02-24 13:25 GMT-04:00 Yves :
> I have personally three use cases:
> a) trigger a faster? rerender in a mapping situation I'm not sure of
> myself
> b) compare a tile with another
> c) get the tile
I'm new to OSM @dev but I see a couple of items that have come up on this
thread I wanted to try and note...
First, what is actually the request in Issue 1446? Yes, the word-by-word
request is to add the entry back to the right-click menu, but it seems a
little more than that. Useful (at least to
Hello Sarah,
Thank you for the suggestions.
http://localhost:8080/nominatim/search.php seems to be working now.
Could you please let me know the next steps necessary to prepare for the
Postcode project? The password is needed to download or upload files from
the Vagrant server using either SSH
Salut à tous.
Le projet OpenEarthView a besoin d'un serveur de tuiles 3D.
Démo du projet: https://www.openearthview.net
Actuellement, le client web s'appuie sur des données extraites de
requètes sur serveur overpass.
Exemple de requète http pour la tuile { z: 18, x: 77197, y: 98526
29 matches
Mail list logo