Yesterday, Matthew Flatt wrote:
>
> I don't think that will work right in the long run. There's
> currently no easy query to get all of the subcollections of a given
> collection.
>
> Instead of looking for subcollections of "games", I think
> `games/main' should find all "info.rkt"s that have a
Yesterday, Carl Eastlund wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 2:02 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
>
> 20 minutes ago, Carl Eastlund wrote:
> > [...]
> >
> > git rebase -s recursive -X rename-threshold=50% mflatt/pkg2
>
> From a brief reading, I think that you're much better off with
>
On 06/18/13 19:36, Carl Eastlund wrote:
I don't understand why version control systems don't take directories
and renames more seriously, because this stuff is part of the development
cycle and should be recorded like any other change.
Mercurial tracks renames. Look "hg help mv" :)
___
At Tue, 18 Jun 2013 15:40:27 -0400, Ryan Culpepper wrote:
> I tried it. It works, but DrRacket doesn't find the macro stepper tool.
> The racket/lib/info-cache.rktd has an entry for the right location, but
> it also has another (lib "macro-debugger") entry. Is this caused by
> having multiple mo
At Tue, 18 Jun 2013 17:23:56 -0500, Robby Findler wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 3:14 PM, Asumu Takikawa wrote:
>
> > On 2013-06-18 10:47:01 -0600, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> > > Because this change will break all sorts of things in the short run,
> > > I'd like to feel more confident that enough o
At Tue, 18 Jun 2013 13:56:14 -0400, Asumu Takikawa wrote:
> On 2013-06-18 10:47:01 -0600, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> > Because this change will break all sorts of things in the short run,
> > I'd like to feel more confident that enough of us are ready before
> > merging it to the main Racket repository
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 3:14 PM, Asumu Takikawa wrote:
> On 2013-06-18 10:47:01 -0600, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> > Because this change will break all sorts of things in the short run,
> > I'd like to feel more confident that enough of us are ready before
> > merging it to the main Racket repository.
At Tue, 18 Jun 2013 14:16:09 -0600, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> At Tue, 18 Jun 2013 16:13:09 -0400, Carl Eastlund wrote:
> > I ran 'make', after rebasing, and eventually got this error:
> >
> > pkg: missing dependencies
> > for package: pkgs/gui-pkgs/gui-lib
> > missing packages:
> >gui-x86_64-ma
At Tue, 18 Jun 2013 16:13:09 -0400, Carl Eastlund wrote:
> I ran 'make', after rebasing, and eventually got this error:
>
> pkg: missing dependencies
> for package: pkgs/gui-pkgs/gui-lib
> missing packages:
>gui-x86_64-macosx
>
> Anyone know what might have gone wrong?
It's a problem with
On 2013-06-18 10:47:01 -0600, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> Because this change will break all sorts of things in the short run,
> I'd like to feel more confident that enough of us are ready before
> merging it to the main Racket repository.
The pkg2 branch builds for me fine (modulo `plot`) and I can ru
I ran 'make', after rebasing, and eventually got this error:
pkg: missing dependencies
for package: pkgs/gui-pkgs/gui-lib
missing packages:
gui-x86_64-macosx
Anyone know what might have gone wrong?
--Carl
_
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 3:40 PM, Ryan Culpepper wrote:
> I tried it. It works, but DrRacket doesn't find the macro stepper tool. The
> racket/lib/info-cache.rktd has an entry for the right location, but it also
> has another (lib "macro-debugger") entry. Is this caused by having multiple
> modules
I tried it. It works, but DrRacket doesn't find the macro stepper tool.
The racket/lib/info-cache.rktd has an entry for the right location, but
it also has another (lib "macro-debugger") entry. Is this caused by
having multiple modules "named" macro-debugger/info?
BTW, something is still popul
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 2:02 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> 20 minutes ago, Carl Eastlund wrote:
> > [...]
> >
> > git rebase -s recursive -X rename-threshold=50% mflatt/pkg2
>
> From a brief reading, I think that you're much better off with
> "-X subtree=/some/path". There's also a subtree strateg
On 06/18/2013 12:47 PM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
2. Reply to the list to say that it works and we should merge it.
I got the below 4 similar errors. DrRacket works. Linux Mint 14 (Linux
funland 3.5.0-17-generic #28-Ubuntu SMP Tue Oct 9 19:31:23 UTC 2012
x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux). Let me
Carl Eastlund wrote at 06/18/2013 01:36 PM:
I don't understand why version control systems don't take
directories and renames more seriously, because this stuff is part of
the development cycle and should be recorded like any other change.
This doesn't help, but... I think the reason is that
20 minutes ago, Carl Eastlund wrote:
> [...]
>
> git rebase -s recursive -X rename-threshold=50% mflatt/pkg2
From a brief reading, I think that you're much better off with
"-X subtree=/some/path". There's also a subtree strategy, which you'd
get with "-s subtree", but it is guessing how to do
On 2013-06-18 10:47:01 -0600, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> Because this change will break all sorts of things in the short run,
> I'd like to feel more confident that enough of us are ready before
> merging it to the main Racket repository.
Just FYI, the build will probably complain when compiling `plot
I'm rebasing my generic-sets branch onto the pkg2 branch to make sure that
rebasing works well. Just using the default rebase options hasn't worked,
it doesn't figure out to follow the renames. The following command seems
to be working, however; it may work for other people as well:
git rebase
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 12:54 PM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> At Tue, 18 Jun 2013 10:47:01 -0600, Matthew Flatt wrote:
>> 1. Try the branch:
>>
>> git clone https://github.com/mflatt/racket.git
>
> Sorry --- that should be
>
> git clone git://github.com/mflatt/racket.git
Either of these URLs w
At Tue, 18 Jun 2013 10:47:01 -0600, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> 1. Try the branch:
>
> git clone https://github.com/mflatt/racket.git
Sorry --- that should be
git clone git://github.com/mflatt/racket.git
_
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
21 matches
Mail list logo
