Kohei Yoshida schrieb:
Hi Eike,
On Tue, 2008-12-09 at 20:41 +0100, Eike Rathke wrote:
If there isn't any,
wouldn't it be natural to share the filter's name mapping with VBA?
Absolutely, and that's what I envisioned too.
What we seem to disagree is where to keep the shared filter name
Hi Daniel,
On Wed, 2008-12-10 at 09:30 +0100, Daniel Rentz wrote:
Kohei Yoshida schrieb:
Hi Eike,
On Tue, 2008-12-09 at 20:41 +0100, Eike Rathke wrote:
If there isn't any,
wouldn't it be natural to share the filter's name mapping with VBA?
Absolutely, and that's what I envisioned
On 12/08/08 21:20, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
On Mon, 2008-12-08 at 20:43 +0100, Niklas Nebel wrote:
Again, modularization. We want to separate the Excel filter from the
sc module, and opcode mapping is part of it.
But VBA is not part of the filter, and we need that for VBA. The filter
is merely
On Tue, 2008-12-09 at 18:29 +0100, Niklas Nebel wrote:
On 12/08/08 21:20, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
On Mon, 2008-12-08 at 20:43 +0100, Niklas Nebel wrote:
Again, modularization. We want to separate the Excel filter from the
sc module, and opcode mapping is part of it.
But VBA is not part
Hi Kohei,
On Tuesday, 2008-12-09 13:20:48 -0500, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
Again, modularization. We want to separate the Excel filter from the
sc module, and opcode mapping is part of it.
But VBA is not part of the filter, and we need that for VBA. The filter
is merely re-using it.
Hi Eike,
On Tue, 2008-12-09 at 20:41 +0100, Eike Rathke wrote:
Hi Kohei,
On Tuesday, 2008-12-09 13:20:48 -0500, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
Again, modularization. We want to separate the Excel filter from the
sc module, and opcode mapping is part of it.
But VBA is not part of the
On 12/08/08 19:34, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Modified: cws/ooxml02/offapi/com/sun/star/sheet/FormulaLanguage.idl
==
--- cws/ooxml02/offapi/com/sun/star/sheet/FormulaLanguage.idl Mon Dec 8
18:33:06 2008
On 12/08/08 20:17, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
On Mon, 2008-12-08 at 20:05 +0100, Niklas Nebel wrote:
No, the map of Excel function names is supposed to be part of the Excel
filter, and that's how the import already works.
But what's the drawback? Defining a formula language here makes it
easier to
On Mon, 2008-12-08 at 20:43 +0100, Niklas Nebel wrote:
On 12/08/08 20:17, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
On Mon, 2008-12-08 at 20:05 +0100, Niklas Nebel wrote:
No, the map of Excel function names is supposed to be part of the Excel
filter, and that's how the import already works.
But what's the
