+1
Tested build from source on linux/windows machine and tested user case to be OK
-- --
??: "Mohammad Asif Siddiqui";
: 2018??2??9??(??) 11:26
??: "dev@servicecomb.apache.org";
: [VOTE] Release Apache ServiceComb Service-Ce
-1
there is a major bug in this version, i have raise an ISSUE here.
and i will fix it as soon as possible.
-- --
??: "Mahesh Raju Somalaraju";
: 2018??2??12??(??) 2:42
??: "dev";
: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ServiceComb Servi
ISSUE link: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCB-343
-- --
??: "Sure";
: 2018??2??12??(??) 5:27
??: "dev@servicecomb.apache.org";
: ?? [VOTE] Release Apache ServiceComb Service-Center
(incubat
+1
All tests are passed
-- Original --
From: preethi
Date: Tue,Feb 20,2018 2:14 PM
To: dev
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ServiceComb Service-Center
(incubating)version 1.0.0-m1
+1 Verified build from source on both Linux and windows
On 2018/02/19 10:07
+1
-- Original --
From: Sukesh A C
Date: Mon,Feb 26,2018 1:46 PM
To: Mohammad Asif Siddiqui ,
dev@servicecomb.apache.org
Cc: Vinay Murudi , Krishna M Kumar
Subject: Re: RE: [VOTE] Release Apache ServiceComb Service-Center
(incubating)version 1.0.0-m1
+1
Suggestion: merge these configures in SC app.conf, and move the frontend readme
into main readme.
-- --
??: "Yang Bo";
: 2018??3??8??(??) 3:36
??: "dev";
: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ServiceComb Service-Center (incubating)ver
+1
All testings are pass!
-- Original --
From: Mohammad Asif Siddiqui
Date: Thu,Mar 8,2018 8:02 PM
To: dev
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ServiceComb Service-Center (incubating)
version 1.0.0-m1 - Third Attempt
+1 LGTM
-- Original --
From: Mohammad Asif Siddiqui
Date: Sat,Mar 17,2018 2:52 AM
To: dev
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ServiceComb Java-Chassis (incubating)
version 1.0.0-m1 - Second Attempt
Hi All,
This is a call for Vote to release Apache Servi
+1 LGTM
-- Original --
From: Mohammad Asif Siddiqui
Date: Mon,Mar 19,2018 0:25 PM
To: dev
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ServiceComb Saga (incubating) version 0.1.0
- Second Attempt
+1 Binding
I Checked
- incubating in name
- hashes and signatu
+1
-- Original --
From: Mohammad Asif Siddiqui
Date: Mon,Mar 19,2018 0:16 PM
To: dev
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ServiceComb Service-Center (incubating)
version 1.0.0-m1 - Fourth Attempt
+1 Binding
I Checked
- incubating in name
- hashes and
+1
-- Original --
From: Willem Jiang
Date: Mon,Apr 2,2018 9:18 PM
To: dev
Subject: Re: Proposal for holding a Apache ServiceComb(incubating) mini
meetupas a Co-Located Event in LC3 2018
+1 for holding this kind of event to promote ServiceComb.
Willem Jian
we do not change the code in go-ecosystem package and we can remove these files
from project
Just make sure the same version of this package compiled with etcd components
when make the release.
-- --
??: "willem.jiang";
:
+1
1?? Commit id match.
2?? Checksum is correct.
3?? Release name is correct.
4?? DISCLAIMER/LICENSE/NOTICE file exist.
5?? README is correct.6?? Integration tests passed.
-- --
??: "Mohammad Asif Siddiqui";
: 2018??6??8??(??) 6:59
-1 I think just change cse to servicecomb. It would not have much work to
change one word in micro service project
-- Original --
From: Zen Lin
Date: Thu,Jun 14,2018 9:27 AM
To: dev
Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] How to migrate configurations from cse toservicecomb
Agree!
1. Just like willem.jiang said, we can push multiple SC versions to docker hub
2. Chassis integration test can run with different SC version in every time
-- --
??: "willem.jiang";
: 2018??7??10??(??) 5:16
??: "dev";
???
-1
we will publish the cse-UI in servicecomb(named servicecomb-UI may be), this??s
the unified console of sc,cc and monitoring. So we just need to cost a little
of time to fix bugs of SC-UI.
The sericecomb-UI will be more valuable in the future
iPhone
-- Origin
i think we can new a integrated test job per day and this test can use the
latest sc image version, and reuse the java chassis test cases.
Then sc and chassis test cases can be maintained together
iPhone
-- Original --
From: Willem Jiang
Date: Thu,Jul
-1 binding
i have check the UI, but there are two problems:
1. when i click the statistics, it change the page to service list not instance
list of the instance status
2. the top graph does not work at all, there are no error in brower console.
i use the chrome Version 67.0.3396.62 (Official B
this is the environment isolation problem. i have check the ci log and found
that the car-rental-service is registered in development environment but other
services are registered in ''(default) environment. so it will fail when car
service discovery hotal service instances from SC.
sorry, not the car service env mismatch, it is saga-service env mismatch
-- --
??: "Sure";
: 2018??7??26??(??) 3:37
??: "dev@servicecomb.apache.org";
: ?? Cannot find the instance in ServiceComb
tance in ServiceComb Discovery
Oh, it's my bad change the saga discovery servicecenter to development mode.
Thx Sure for your help.
From the log, I cannot tell it's the development issue, can we polish the
logger file to make it easy for user to dig the issue?
Willem Jiang
Twitter: willemj
+1 binding
1. check the UI topology BUG is fixed
2. the use cases ars passed
-- --
??: "Mohammad Asif Siddiqui";
: 2018??7??26??(??) 3:45
??: "dev";
: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ServiceComb Service-Center (incubating) versi
+1 binding
iPhone
-- Original --
From: wjm wjm
Date: Wed,Aug 1,2018 0:18 PM
To: dev
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Proposal for holding an Apache ServiceComb
(Incubating)Meetup in Bangalore, India
+1 binding.
2018-08-01 10:18 GMT+08:00 Willem Jiang :
> +1 bi
Now, shema test in the sc frontend does not contain the schema source, then the
developer can not debug it coveniently.
So, I suggest add a source panel to shema test
+1 binding
-- Original --
From: zhongyuan zhou
Date: Thu,Aug 23,2018 8:42 PM
To: dev
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Holding an Apache ServiceComb (incubating) Meetup as
aCo-located Event in HC 2018 Shanghai, China, OCT 12.
+1 non-binding.
Zen Lin ??2018??8??23?? ?
Developers from China complain it is hard to go get the 3rd depends source code
of sc.
I suggest add these source code in vendor directory in sc project, like Istio
and etcd project do.
> 10:48??
> > >
> > > > +1 Agree
> > > > the truth is go project can easily go into a dep hell and there is no
> > dep
> > > > tool can manage the complicated deps
> > > >
> > > > checkout how go project does
> > > > https
+1
-- Original --
From: wjm wjm
Date: Tue,Sep 4,2018 11:20 AM
To: dev
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Heading to graduation
+1
?? <342906...@qq.com> ??2018??9??4?? 10:54??
> +1
>
>
>
> -- --
> ??: "bismy
Yes
-- Original --
From: Zen Lin
Date: Thu,Sep 6,2018 10:17 AM
To: dev
Subject: Re: Invitation of the ServiceComb PMC
Yes
Best Regards,
---
Zen Lin
zenlintechnofr...@gmail.com
Focused on Micro Service and Apache ServiceComb
wjm wjm ??2018??9??6?? 1
+1 binding
-- Original --
From: wjm wjm
Date: Sat,Sep 15,2018 9:25 AM
To: dev
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache ServiceComb (incubating)
+1 (binding)
Sukesh A C ??2018??9??14?? 4:58??
> +1 Binding
>
> Thanks,
> Sukesh.
>
> -Original Messag
+1 binding
-- Original --
From: <15889502...@163.com>
Date: Mon,Sep 17,2018 11:13 AM
To: dev
Subject: Re: Re:[VOTE] Graduate Apache ServiceComb (incubating)
+1 non-binding
At 2018-09-14 15:58:32, "Willem Jiang" wrote:
>Please vote on the proposal for Serv
SC is ready to release
-- Original --
From: wjm wjm
Date: Sat,Oct 27,2018 10:59 AM
To: dev
Subject: Re: Release of ServiceComb 1.1.0
Sure! There are many important features done in SC:
1. Service-Center command line client.
2. Support multiple data center deployment.
3. Support deployment of Service-Center on multiple Infrastructure.
I think we should release SC as soon as possible, and prepare for external
advertising
Now, the way sc push instance event to Microservices is based on websocket.
This will lose events when connection is broken.
So, I think we can add a new optional way that push events into the MQ like
kafka, and Microservices can subscribe it and no longer lose the messages from
sc.
It has
This a optional way to deploy sc
There is a scenes can be supported, user want to listen the instance properties
change order for the next business logic.
Sure, this is an advance way
-- Original --
From: wjm wjm
Date: Wed,Nov 7,2018 10:30 AM
To: dev
https://github.com/apache/incubator-servicecomb-service-center/issues/482
Hi guys,
Our system has 20+ services, and each service has 2k instances at most. All the
instances are grouped by some labels(in Properties).
We are now querying all the instances from SC, and then filtering them by
l
Hi guys, the ServiceCenter docs and codes are fixed!
??: "zzzwjm";
: 2018??11??9??(??) 10:55
??: "dev";
: Re: [Heads Up ]Git repository names are changed
Great, thanks~
Zheng Feng ??2018??11??9?? 10:43??
> Nice work ! I just open the PR to fix in
Congratulations !
-- --
??: wjm wjm
: 2018??11??13?? 17:06
??: dev
: ??[ANN] New ServiceComb committer: Zhao Jun ()
Congratulations !
-- --
??: wjm wjm
: 2018??11??13?? 17:06
??: dev
: ??[ANN] New ServiceComb committer: Yao Haishi (??)
Congratulation
Mohammad Asif Siddiqui ??2018??11??13??
4:19??
> Congratulations Yao H
The Service-Center will also start a new release in 11.19~11.23
-- Original --
From: wjm wjm
Date: Tue,Nov 13,2018 5:08 PM
To: dev
Subject: Re: Release of ServiceComb 1.1.0
we can start release process between 11.19~11.23 for java chassis
Bin Ma ??2018??11
13, 2018 at 5:21 PM Sure wrote:
>
> The Service-Center will also start a new release in 11.19~11.23
>
>
>
>
> -- Original --
> From: wjm wjm
> Date: Tue,Nov 13,2018 5:08 PM
> To: dev
> Subject: Re: Release of ServiceComb 1.1.0
>
I have found the legal in http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html
The test data does not require header, please confirm it.
-- Original --
From: Sure
Date: Fri,Nov 16,2018 8:20 PM
To: dev
Subject: Re: Release of ServiceComb 1.1.0
Hi, JingNing. I
Hi, asif. I have checked the RC and found a bug.
In multiple DC aggregate case, sdk can??t get the instance event from SC.
I think it??s a major bug.
-- Original --
From: Mohammad Asif Siddiqui
Date: Wed,Nov 21,2018 0:34 AM
To: dev
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release
this and
> also if possible please add few IT/UT for this type of scenario so that these
> bugs can be identified by the CI itself.
>
> Regards
> Asif
>
> On 2018/11/21 00:24:16, "Sure" wrote:
> > Hi, asif. I have checked the RC and found a bug.
> &
+1 binding
-- Original --
From: Willem Jiang
Date: Fri,Nov 23,2018 5:44 PM
To: dev
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ServiceComb Saga version 0.2.1
Hi Walker,
Thanks for you time to verify the kit.
If you are the PMC[1] member, you can send a binding vote.
Done! here is the link https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCB-1040
-- --
??: "willem.jiang";
: 2018??11??22??(??) 9:30
??: "dev";
: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ServiceComb Service-Center version 1.1.
gt; >
> > >
> > > -- --
> > > ??: "willem.jiang";
> > > : 2018??11??9??(??) 8:50
> > > ??: "dev";
> > >
> > > : Re: [DISCUSS]Discovery API suppo
+1 binding
Checks I did:
- hashes and signatures is good
- NOTICE/LICENSE exists
- can make release kit from source
- checked for archive matching git tag
- Ran the java-chassis demo's
-- --
??: "Mohammad Asif Siddiqui";
: 2018
oes not have a timeline for it.
>
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 9:50 AM bismy wrote:
>
> > Do you have any evaluation document by using etcd as config center? Now
> > config-cc supports using Huawei Config Center as the backend. And this
> > implementation is based on ectd
+1
I checked:
1. license is ok
2. demos is work
-- Original --
From: Willem Jiang
Date: Wed,Nov 28,2018 10:37 AM
To: dev
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ServiceComb Java-Chassis version 1.1.0
+1.
I checked:
- signatures and hashes correct
- LICENSE is
se of ServiceComb
>
>
>
> I will update the document about alpha support consul later today
>
> coolbeevip
>
> BOCO
>
>
>
> > ?? 2019??3??194:54??Willem Jiang ??
> >
> > As we talked
+1 binding
the gpg verify is PASS
the use cases run in windows and linux are PASS
licenses are OK
readme is OK
-- Original --
From: Mohammad Asif Siddiqui
Date: Fri,Mar 29,2019 3:35 PM
To: dev
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ServiceComb Service-Center v
Congratulations!
-- --
??: Willem Jiang
: 2019??4??1?? 23:19
??: dev
: ??[ANN] New ServiceComb committer: Zhang Lei (??
Sorry, there is a typo in the first mail. The first sentence should be:
Please join me and the rest
in previous list-watch loop
-- --
??: "willem.jiang";
: 2019??4??2??(??) 4:04
??: "dev";"Sure";
: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ServiceComb Service-Center version 1.2.0
It looks like little cui j
+1
-- --
??: "zzzwjm";
: 2019??4??2??(??) 3:48
??: "dev";
: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ServiceComb Pack version 0.4.0 (RC-02)
+1
checked release notes.
Zheng Feng ??2019??4??2?? 2:13??
> +1 Release this pack
Tian ??2019??3??29?? 5:27??
> sure, mainly forcus on management , ease of use, rollback, key value
> version control. value validation.
>
> first we support API, later UX.
>
> bismy ??2019??3??29?? 4:08??
>
> > Provide a centered configuration
Hi all, Please review and vote on Apache Service-Center 2.0.0 release. The
release candidate has been tagged in GitHub as 2.0.0, available here:
https://github.com/apache/servicecomb-service-center/releases/tag/v2.0.0
Release Notes are here:
https://github.com/apache/servicecomb-service-center/
Hi all,
Please review and vote on Apache ServiceCenter 2.0.0 release.
The release candidate has been tagged in GitHub as 2.0.0, available
here:
https://github.com/apache/servicecomb-service-center/releases/tag/v2.0.0
Release Notes are here:
https://github.com/apache/servicecomb-service-center/bl
+1 (binding), I checked:
1. RAT headers is OK
2. sha512sum is OK
3. PGP verify OK
4. Build from source is OK
5. All use cases are PASS
-- Original --
Hi all,
Please review and vote on Apache ServiceCenter 2.0.0 release.
The release candidate has been tagged in Gi
Hi All,
We are glad to announce that ServiceComb community has approved the Apache
ServiceComb Service-Center 2.0.0 release with the following results:
+1 Approve the release: 4 binding (bismy, little-cui tianxiaoliang, Willem
Jiang)
+0 No opinion: 0
-1 Do not release: 0
Thanks all for your
Hello All,
Apache ServiceComb Team is glad to announce the release of Apache ServiceComb
Service-Center 2.0.0
Apache ServiceComb
Service-Center(https://github.com/apache/servicecomb-service-center) is a
Restful based service-registry that provides micro-services discovery and
micro-serv
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache ServiceComb
has invited Yasheng Tang[1] to become a committer and we are pleased
to announce that he has accepted.
[1] https://github.com/aseTo2016
Being a committer enables easier contribution to the
project since there is no need to go via the
Hello All.
This is a call for a Vote to create a new project servicecomb-istio.
It's a tool that synchronizes servicecomb-service-center microservice
registration information to Istio.
Discussion thread:
https://lists.apache.org/thread/ok1q1bdd2tcr8ynx7p27mkg6bj80p9t0
Voting will start now (
64 matches
Mail list logo