It will be great if we can also release *1.2*.x along with this.
Best Regards
Saurabh Kumar Mimani
On Sun, Jan 6, 2019 at 9:01 PM Alexandre Vermeerbergen <
avermeerber...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> Le sam. 5 janv. 2019 à 14:12, Kishorkumar Patil
> a écrit :
> >
> > +1
> >
> >
> > On Sat,
+1
Le sam. 5 janv. 2019 à 14:12, Kishorkumar Patil
a écrit :
>
> +1
>
>
> On Sat, Jan 5, 2019 at 5:04 AM Stig Rohde Døssing
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Den lør. 5. jan. 2019 kl. 07.42 skrev Govind Menon <
> > govindappume...@gmail.com>:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > On Jan 4, 2019 23:46, "Roshan Naik"
+1
On Sat, Jan 5, 2019 at 5:04 AM Stig Rohde Døssing
wrote:
> +1
>
> Den lør. 5. jan. 2019 kl. 07.42 skrev Govind Menon <
> govindappume...@gmail.com>:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Jan 4, 2019 23:46, "Roshan Naik"
> wrote:
> >
> > +1
> >
> >
> > Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
> >
> >
> >
> > On
+1
Den lør. 5. jan. 2019 kl. 07.42 skrev Govind Menon <
govindappume...@gmail.com>:
> +1
>
> On Jan 4, 2019 23:46, "Roshan Naik" wrote:
>
> +1
>
>
> Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
>
>
>
> On Friday, January 4, 2019, 9:02 PM, Ethan Li
> wrote:
>
> +1 on this
>
> Ethan Li
>
> > On Jan 4, 2019,
+1
On Jan 4, 2019 23:46, "Roshan Naik" wrote:
+1
Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
On Friday, January 4, 2019, 9:02 PM, Ethan Li
wrote:
+1 on this
Ethan Li
> On Jan 4, 2019, at 20:19, P. Taylor Goetz wrote:
>
> If no one objects, I’ll kick off a release candidate.
>
> -Taylor
>
>> On
+1
Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
On Friday, January 4, 2019, 9:02 PM, Ethan Li wrote:
+1 on this
Ethan Li
> On Jan 4, 2019, at 20:19, P. Taylor Goetz wrote:
>
> If no one objects, I’ll kick off a release candidate.
>
> -Taylor
>
>> On Jan 4, 2019, at 9:06 PM, saurabh mimani wrote:
+1 on this
Ethan Li
> On Jan 4, 2019, at 20:19, P. Taylor Goetz wrote:
>
> If no one objects, I’ll kick off a release candidate.
>
> -Taylor
>
>> On Jan 4, 2019, at 9:06 PM, saurabh mimani wrote:
>>
>> Hey, Any approximate date for 2.0 release given there are no blockers?
>>
>>
>>
>>
If no one objects, I’ll kick off a release candidate.
-Taylor
> On Jan 4, 2019, at 9:06 PM, saurabh mimani wrote:
>
> Hey, Any approximate date for 2.0 release given there are no blockers?
>
>
>
> Best Regards
>
> Saurabh Kumar Mimani
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 1:13 AM Stig
Hey, Any approximate date for 2.0 release given there are no blockers?
Best Regards
Saurabh Kumar Mimani
On Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 1:13 AM Stig Rohde Døssing
wrote:
> Looks good to me, the blockers list in JIRA is empty for 2.0.0.
>
> Den fre. 21. dec. 2018 kl. 19.52 skrev Bobby Evans :
>
Looks good to me, the blockers list in JIRA is empty for 2.0.0.
Den fre. 21. dec. 2018 kl. 19.52 skrev Bobby Evans :
> I think all of the blockers are in now. Please take a look and hopefully,
> we can get a release out soon.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Bobby
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 9:02 AM Bobby
I think all of the blockers are in now. Please take a look and hopefully,
we can get a release out soon.
Thanks,
Bobby
On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 9:02 AM Bobby Evans wrote:
> Sorry I was out at a conference for the past week, and have been heads down
> on a different project for a while before
Sorry I was out at a conference for the past week, and have been heads down
on a different project for a while before that. I'll respond to the JIRA.
I am happy to let it go in.
Thanks,
Bobby
On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 1:07 PM Stig Rohde Døssing
wrote:
> I think STORM-2990/3279 is ready. Bobby
I think STORM-2990/3279 is ready. Bobby had a question (
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2907#discussion_r234329136) regarding
whether Kafka offsets loop, but I wasn't sure where he was going with it,
so I didn't want to merge prematurely.
I agree that we can postpone STORM-2720. As far as I
Sounds like - https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2913 (STORM-3290) is
merged - https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2908 (STORM-3276) is nearly
complete and may need some small tweaks. -
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2907 (STORM-2990, STORM-3279) appears
ready to be committed ?
I would like to get at least https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2913
(breaking changes) and https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2908
(regression) in.
I think it would be nice to also get
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2907 and
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2911 in, but if we're in
15 matches
Mail list logo