Hi,
Let's have a lambda expression:
x-y-x-y
Let's now assign it and invoke it indirectly:
f = x-y-x-y; f(2)(1)
From the spec we have:
If the result of evaluating the function name is a LambdaExpression, the
LambdaExpression is invoked with the supplied arguments. If the result of
evaluating
I just saw sebb doing a little experiment in the JMeter repository with
svn:auto-props. Infra updated our svn repos to svn 1.8 and 1.8 has
Repository Dictated Configuration:
http://blogs.collab.net/subversion/the-road-to-repository-dictated-configuration-day-2-autoprops
Thinking about the
On 18.07.2013 06:04, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 07/17/2013 11:59 PM, sebb wrote:
Regardless, please consider documenting the script to explain why it
does not use -n/-z if that is necessary to avoid bugs.
It would be the same as documenting why one uses a+=1 instead a++ :)
I don't see where its
Author: markt
Date: Thu Jul 18 11:40:26 2013
New Revision: 1504437
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1504437
Log:
Modify the grammar for function to permit multiple sets of parameters for
lambda expressions. Implementing that handling is still a TODO.
Modified:
Author: markt
Date: Thu Jul 18 13:57:17 2013
New Revision: 1504475
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1504475
Log:
Fix handling expressions of the form:
v = (x-y-x-y); v(2)(1)
There is still some further clean-up that can be done.
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/el/parser/AstFunction.java
On 18/07/2013 08:00, Violeta Georgieva wrote:
Hi,
Let's have a lambda expression:
x-y-x-y
Let's now assign it and invoke it indirectly:
f = x-y-x-y; f(2)(1)
Several problems here.
1. The grammar didn't support functions having multiple sets of parameters.
2. The lambda expression
Author: markt
Date: Thu Jul 18 14:12:49 2013
New Revision: 1504483
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1504483
Log:
Simplify. Update comments.
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/el/parser/AstFunction.java
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/el/parser/AstLambdaExpression.java
Modified:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55268
Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|Integration |Catalina
Given recent progress, I have uploaded a snapshot of the current state
of trunk to the Maven snapshot repository. Note that our Maven builds
include full binary distributions (.zip .tar.gz) so if folks want to
test the latest Tomcat 8, they can without having to build from svn.
The snapshot repo
+1
Show must go one, really exited to take a look at this new cat :)
2013/7/18 Nick Williams nicho...@nicholaswilliams.net
No objection here. Things seem to be working well. I'm rather excited
about it. :-)
Nick
On Jul 18, 2013, at 11:11 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
Given recent progress, I
No objection here. Things seem to be working well. I'm rather excited about it.
:-)
Nick
On Jul 18, 2013, at 11:11 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
Given recent progress, I have uploaded a snapshot of the current state
of trunk to the Maven snapshot repository. Note that our Maven builds
include full
2013/7/18 Mark Thomas wrote:
On 18/07/2013 08:00, Violeta Georgieva wrote:
Hi,
Let's have a lambda expression:
x-y-x-y
Let's now assign it and invoke it indirectly:
f = x-y-x-y; f(2)(1)
Several problems here.
1. The grammar didn't support functions having multiple sets of
Author: markt
Date: Thu Jul 18 17:34:37 2013
New Revision: 1504558
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1504558
Log:
Filter out three false positives (the only warnings the trunk code base
currently generates)
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/res/findbugs/filter-false-positives.xml
Modified:
On 18/07/2013 18:24, Violeta Georgieva wrote:
2013/7/18 Mark Thomas wrote:
On 18/07/2013 08:00, Violeta Georgieva wrote:
Hi,
Let's have a lambda expression:
x-y-x-y
Let's now assign it and invoke it indirectly:
f = x-y-x-y; f(2)(1)
Several problems here.
1. The grammar didn't
Henri,
On 7/18/13 12:16 PM, Henri Gomez wrote:
+1
Show must go one, really exited to take a look at this new cat :)
Agreed.
Great job lately, Mark, with pushing everything through. I'm glad to see
that the bits you left until the end (because they looked like they
might be ugly) turned out
Author: markt
Date: Thu Jul 18 20:56:44 2013
New Revision: 1504657
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1504657
Log:
Yet more adventures with lambda expressions.
I suspect - but haven't yet checked - that there is scope to make the code more
efficient and/or reduce duplication.
Modified:
On 18/07/2013 18:36, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 18/07/2013 18:24, Violeta Georgieva wrote:
2013/7/18 Mark Thomas wrote:
I look forward to your next brain teaser :)
;)
If I modify the example above like this
f = ()-y-2-y; f()(1)
Thanks for all the testing.
I'll convert all the the
Great news.
I had successfully implemented webrtc with tomcat7 websockets. looking
forward to build a complete telephony solutions using tomcat8
--
View this message in context:
http://tomcat.10.x6.nabble.com/8-0-SNAPSHOT-updated-tp5001961p5001977.html
Sent from the Tomcat - Dev mailing list
Author: jboynes
Date: Fri Jul 19 03:11:40 2013
New Revision: 1504753
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1504753
Log:
Extract FragmentJarScannerCallback to descriptor package so it can be reused by
Jasper
Added:
Author: jboynes
Date: Fri Jul 19 03:15:47 2013
New Revision: 1504755
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1504755
Log:
Check needs to happen after call to scan
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/startup/ContextConfig.java
Modified:
20 matches
Mail list logo
