https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63612
--- Comment #7 from clemens...@mysign.ch ---
Thx Konstatin
>I think that you can avoid this error if you put the
>database driver into the same classloader where
>tomcat-jdbc.jar was loaded from
mariadb-connector.jar is indeed not in the same
michael-o opened a new pull request #186: BZ 63636: Context#findRoleMapping()
never called in RealmBase#hasRole()
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/186
Please have also an eye on the test. It passes as expected and it fails when
I modify it, but I am not certain whether I have bui
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63612
--- Comment #8 from clemens...@mysign.ch ---
looking into the logs of the "affected site" I guess to have made up a "common
denominator" for the "the null TCCL in that thread".
All callstacks "originate" from a parallelStream execution
(java.ut
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63612
--- Comment #9 from Mark Thomas ---
That is likely because of the fix to this memory leak:
https://bugs.java.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=JDK-8172726
The Fork/Join framework in the JRE does not play nicely with the per web
application cl
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63641
Bug ID: 63641
Summary: Tomcat Manager Server Status Errors After updating
from 8.5.19 to 8.5.40.
javax.management.AttributeNotFoundException: Cannot
find attribu
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63641
Michael Osipov changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
--- Comment #1 from Michael Osipo
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63641
--- Comment #2 from William Fraser ---
I'll test that this evening. This was just to highlight that Bug 62918 does not
appear to be resolved in 8.5.40.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63641
--- Comment #3 from Mark Thomas ---
Reference to previous bug?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubsc
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63641
--- Comment #4 from William Fraser ---
Yes, reference to previous bug with the same issue but was marked as resolved
as of 8.5.36.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63641
--- Comment #5 from Mark Thomas ---
And the previous bug number is ...?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: de
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63641
--- Comment #6 from William Fraser ---
Apologies, it is in the comment dated 2019-08-06 09:45:43 UTC
Bug 62918
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63641
--- Comment #7 from Mark Thomas ---
Thanks. I missed that. I'll take a look at this before the next release unless
someone beats me to it.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63641
--- Comment #8 from William Fraser ---
Perfect, thank you very much.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-u
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63645
Bug ID: 63645
Summary: Why its so hard for Linux distro to use Tomcat server
from IntelliJ?
Product: Tomcat 9
Version: 9.0.16
Hardware: PC
OS: Linux
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63645
--- Comment #1 from Pranav ---
Created attachment 36708
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36708&action=edit
Another problem
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
---
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63645
--- Comment #2 from Pranav ---
Created attachment 36709
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36709&action=edit
Tomcat is pointless
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
---
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63645
Pranav changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #36709|Tomcat is pointless |corrupted photo upload.
description|
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63645
--- Comment #3 from Pranav ---
Created attachment 36710
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36710&action=edit
Tomcat is issue
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
---
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63645
Coty Sutherland changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63645
--- Comment #5 from Emmanuel Bourg ---
The Tomcat package in Debian/Ubuntu is tailored for production use, the files
are owned by a dedicated user and by default the daemon has limited read/write
access to the system. If you want to use Tomcat
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
michaelo pushed a change to branch BZ-63636/tomcat-8.5.x
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git.
at 08e169e BZ 63636: Context#findRoleMapping() never called in
RealmBase#hasRole()
This branch inclu
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
michaelo pushed a commit to branch BZ-63636/tomcat-8.5.x
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
commit 08e169e304ae9b010b69846b077344467b3b0457
Author: Michael Osipov
AuthorDate: Mon Aug 5 21:32:58 2019 +02
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
All,
Someone recently had a problem where the FarmWarDeployer wouldn't work
on a secondary node because File.renameTo was failing -- likely due to
the underlying Java/OS refusing to re-name a file across filesystems.
I propose that we switch to usi
23 matches
Mail list logo
