Re: Proposal to remove AjpApr connector

2017-06-01 Thread Rainer Jung
Am 30.05.2017 um 22:06 schrieb Emmanuel Bourg: On 05/26/2017 01:46 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: It feels a bit late to do this for 9.0.x although we code if we wanted to. It is more of an option for 10.0.x. Tomcat 9 is still in an alpha stage and not widely deployed yet. I wouldn't be shocked if

Re: Proposal to remove AjpApr connector

2017-05-31 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Mark, On 5/30/17 4:57 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 30/05/17 21:00, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: >> On 05/30/2017 08:01 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote: >> >>> Unless OpenSSL starts providing a JNI binding, we'll always >>> have to have a wrapper for it. >>

Re: Proposal to remove AjpApr connector

2017-05-30 Thread Rémy Maucherat
2017-05-30 15:57 GMT-05:00 Mark Thomas : > On 30/05/17 21:00, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > > On 05/30/2017 08:01 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote: > > > >> Unless OpenSSL starts providing a JNI binding, we'll always have to > >> have a wrapper for it. > > > > Unless JNA is used. Has

Re: Proposal to remove AjpApr connector

2017-05-30 Thread Mark Thomas
On 30/05/17 21:00, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > On 05/30/2017 08:01 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote: > >> Unless OpenSSL starts providing a JNI binding, we'll always have to >> have a wrapper for it. > > Unless JNA is used. Has anyone experimented with this yet? I've looked at it, but not worked with

Re: Proposal to remove AjpApr connector

2017-05-30 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
On 05/26/2017 01:46 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: > It feels a bit late to do this for 9.0.x although we code if we wanted > to. It is more of an option for 10.0.x. Tomcat 9 is still in an alpha stage and not widely deployed yet. I wouldn't be shocked if APR was dropped in this release. Emmanuel Bourg

Re: Proposal to remove AjpApr connector

2017-05-30 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
On 05/30/2017 08:01 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote: > Unless OpenSSL starts providing a JNI binding, we'll always have to > have a wrapper for it. Unless JNA is used. Has anyone experimented with this yet? Emmanuel Bourg - To

Re: Proposal to remove AjpApr connector

2017-05-30 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Mark, On 5/26/17 7:46 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 25/05/17 18:04, Christopher Schultz wrote: >> All, >> >> At ApacheCon, a few of us were talking about things that could >> be removed in upcoming versions of Tomcat. The issue of >> connectors came

Re: Proposal to remove AjpApr connector

2017-05-29 Thread Violeta Georgieva
Hi, 2017-05-26 14:46 GMT+03:00 Mark Thomas : > > On 25/05/17 18:04, Christopher Schultz wrote: > > All, > > > > At ApacheCon, a few of us were talking about things that could be > > removed in upcoming versions of Tomcat. The issue of connectors came up, > > and I was thinking

Re: Proposal to remove AjpApr connector

2017-05-28 Thread Rainer Jung
Am 26.05.2017 um 13:46 schrieb Mark Thomas: On 25/05/17 18:04, Christopher Schultz wrote: All, At ApacheCon, a few of us were talking about things that could be removed in upcoming versions of Tomcat. The issue of connectors came up, and I was thinking that there doesn't seem to be a reason to

Re: Proposal to remove AjpApr connector

2017-05-27 Thread Rémy Maucherat
2017-05-26 6:46 GMT-05:00 Mark Thomas : > On 25/05/17 18:04, Christopher Schultz wrote: > > All, > > > > At ApacheCon, a few of us were talking about things that could be > > removed in upcoming versions of Tomcat. The issue of connectors came up, > > and I was thinking that

Re: Proposal to remove AjpApr connector

2017-05-26 Thread Coty Sutherland
On May 26, 2017 07:46, "Mark Thomas" wrote: On 25/05/17 18:04, Christopher Schultz wrote: > All, > > At ApacheCon, a few of us were talking about things that could be > removed in upcoming versions of Tomcat. The issue of connectors came up, > and I was thinking that there

Re: Proposal to remove AjpApr connector

2017-05-26 Thread Mark Thomas
On 25/05/17 18:04, Christopher Schultz wrote: > All, > > At ApacheCon, a few of us were talking about things that could be > removed in upcoming versions of Tomcat. The issue of connectors came up, > and I was thinking that there doesn't seem to be a reason to have an > AjpApr connector any more.