Fwd: [VOTE] Traffic Control Release 1.7.0 RC4

-- Forwarded message -- From: traffic_control-discuss Date: Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 12:35 PM Subject: [VOTE] Traffic Control Release 1.7.0 RC4 To: traffic_control-discuss Hello All, I've prepared a release for v1.7.0 (RC4) Changes since 1.6.1: https://github.com/Comcast/traffic_c

Re: Traffic Monitor - JDK problem in RPM

Hey Muhommed, I think to get around that issue you need to create a generic "jdk" in your yum repo. I thought we fixed this issue in 1.8.0, but maybe we only fixed it in Traffic Router and not Traffic Monitor. I will take a look. Thanks, Dave On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 11:09 PM, Muhammed Olgun wro

Re: Traffic Monitor - JDK problem in RPM

oops, sorry I spelled your name wrong. On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 7:57 AM, Dave Neuman wrote: > Hey Muhommed, > I think to get around that issue you need to create a generic "jdk" in > your yum repo. I thought we fixed this issue in 1.8.0, but maybe we only > fixed it in

Proposed change to Deliverservice API

Hey all, I have been working on creating some integration tests for the Traffic Ops client in the psql-rebase branch and fixing any bugs in Traffic Ops along the way. One thing I would like to change is to have the DeliveryService.create and Deliveryservice.update in the Traffic Ops API accept cdn

Re: Proposed change to Deliverservice API

fig file lookups. > > > On Nov 30, 2016, at 9:50 AM, Dave Neuman wrote: > > > > Hey all, > > I have been working on creating some integration tests for the Traffic > Ops > > client in the psql-rebase branch and fixing any bugs in Traffic Ops along > > th

Re: subscription

Hi Namma, If you are looking to subscribe to the dev mailing list, you need to send an email to dev-subscr...@trafficcontrol.incubator.apache.org. Alternatively you can click the links here: http://trafficcontrol.apache.org/ask/index.html Thanks, Dave On Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 7:08 PM, Udi Lerner

Re: subscription

No worries, just wanted to make sure you got to the correct place. On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 7:54 AM, Naama Shoresh wrote: > Thanks, Dave. > I noticed the mistake and subscribed using the correct address. > Sorry for the noise. > > On Jan 16, 2017 4:45 PM, "Dave Neuman&quo

Re: Issues with using Traffic-Vault

Hey Nir, I think I can help here. First of all, what version of Traffic Control are you running and which version of Riak are you running? We have seen issues using newer versions of Riak with Traffic Control 1.7 and 1.8. Those issues should be resolved in the next release. For now we recommend

Re: Issues with using Traffic-Vault

certificate generation: > > [2017-01-17 20:29:58,119] [ERROR] Active Server Severe Error: 404 - > vault-int.nirs-tc1.tc-dev.qwilt.com:8088 - not found > > Nir > > On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 6:56 PM, Dave Neuman wrote: > > > Hey Nir, > > I think I can help here. Fir

Re: Issues with using Traffic-Vault

st","ynet- > images-4","ynet-images-3"]} > > $ curl -k "https://admin:admin...@vault-int.nirs-tc1.tc-dev.qwilt.com: > 8088/riak/ssl/xmlid-latest" > not found > > Nir > > On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 4:56 PM, Dave Neuman wrote: > > >

Re: Issues with using Traffic-Vault

vZDZaKy83ZlVDUUZPaUlEbUowbndqSmdycDk > zWDEvaWJXZEp1aQ0K\nbFVvV0RmMUVvbWV3b1luSEhPQ05Pb > nhoaUJxclRQMHN2VzVUZU5rY3FEam9nR21LTjJmWXROZXJR\ > ndEVDUUJWZQ0KM25jR2EwWWJ0ZU5wallVK0xkMFd0dTZObDN1MnVGR2MyaVk > 1UzdacXZvKzYvdFdP\nZ3pNK1dObjJxMFNhTmlkNA0KeDVBc > lhsU1RZVkwway9STXdxVUNRUUR6SFoyT0JRbHJ

Re: [VOTE] incubator-trafficcontrol-1.8.0-RC8

I am +1. We are running TR and TM 1.8.0 in production, Traffic Stats and traffic ops have been running in the lab for weeks and will be in production soon. On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 17:02 Jan van Doorn wrote: > I am +0; > > > > I built all components and am working on a script to do a pre vs post

Re: Issues with using Traffic-Vault

e've seen ours (1.6) not > > > > > being able to create Certificates after a while. > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 11:10 PM, Nir Sopher wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > ERROR result for > > http://ops.

Re: [VOTE] incubator-trafficcontrol-1.8.0-RC8

It also appears the issue I brought up about Traffic Ops not working with Riak 2.1.4 hasn't been addressed. We agreed, I think on email but maybe on slack, that we would document the Riak issue in release notes and fix it in the next release. Do you think you are ok with that solution? Thanks, Da

Re: [VOTE] incubator-trafficcontrol-1.8.0-RC8

FYI...Here is a link the converstation on slack. http://traffic-control-cdn.slackarchive.io/dev/-/1481579848.000262/1482862383.00037/1482442468000323/ --Dave On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 12:22 PM, Dave Neuman wrote: > It also appears the issue I brought up about Traffic Ops not working with >

Re: Issues with using Traffic-Vault

Thank you again, > Nir > > > However, the certificates > > On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 5:02 PM, Dave Neuman wrote: > > > Can you try curl -kvs "https://admin:password@riakURL > > :8088/search/query/sslkeys?wt=json&q=cdn:nirs-tc1-cdn" and let me know >

Re: Issues with using Traffic-Vault

directory however is > missing. > Thanks, > Nir > > On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 11:44 PM, Dave Neuman wrote: > > > The certificates should be put on the cache by ORT. Do you have a > location > > parameter for ssl_multicert.config? If not, you will need to create that

Re: Invalidate Content Error

Do you have an agent in your job_agent table with the id of 1? On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 5:42 AM, Naama Shoresh wrote: > Hi, > > When trying to invalidate content from the TO UI, I get the following fatal > error message: > > Traffic Ops fatal error occurred while processing your request. > -

Re: Traffic Ops - Running Test Cases

Is your PERL5LIB set to include traffic_control/traffic_ops/app/local/lib/perl5? If not, you will need to make sure it does. As far as I know, everything that you need should be installed by Carton. —Dave ​ On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 2:44 PM, Nir Sopher wrote: > Hi, > > I am trying to run "prove t

Re: Traffic Ops Dev environment - postgresql installation

I am certainly not the expert here, but I would start by taking a look at the README.md file in traffic_control/traffic_ops/app/db/pg-migration. You can use that to migrate from mysql to postgres using docker-compose. —Dave ​ On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 2:44 PM, Nir Sopher wrote: > Hi, > > I am try

Re: Invalidate Content Error

te: > No, only this one: > (2,'dummy','Description of Purge Agent',1,'2017-01-04 13:16:30') > > What does that mean? > > Thanks, > Naama > > On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 5:27 PM, Dave Neuman wrote: > > > Do you have an agent in your job_

Re: Invalidate Content Error

, 4='312', 5='59', 6="PURGE", 7=undef, 8=undef, > 9="TTL:48h", > >> > > 10='2017-01-22 13:05:22', 11=1] at /opt/traffic_ops/app/lib/UI/ > Job.pm > >> > line > >> > > 146``` > >> > > I am

Re: astats counters

Hi Adan, I answered inline based on my understand of astats, if I am wrong, hopefully someone will correct me. Thanks, Dave On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 1:40 AM, Adan Alper wrote: > Hello, > > > > First of all thanks for the previous replies they were very helpful. > > > > We currently have a running

Re: Invalidate Content Error

specific record id in > the DB. > > After fixing the DB, there was another error, the parameter snapshot_dir > was missing from regex_revalidate.config profile. > When I added the missing parameter,"Invalidate content" worked as expected. > > Thanks a lot for your help. &g

Re: Debugging TO in a local (dev) environment

Hey Amiry, Unfortunately we do not have a mock version of Traffic Monitor to use for testing. We do, however, have an ATS simulator here: https://github.com/apache/incubator-trafficcontrol/blob/master/traffic_monitor/etc/ats_sim.js which you can use with a Traffic Monitor to simulate traffic monit

Re: Debugging TO in a local (dev) environment

lad to hear any insights about this. > > Thanks > /amiry > > On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 7:10 PM Dave Neuman wrote: > > > Hey Amiry, > > Unfortunately we do not have a mock version of Traffic Monitor to use for > > testing. We do, however, have an ATS simulator here: &g

Re: Invalidate Content Error

aster', which is now adapted to postgresql, it seems that it is totally > different code, but the inconsistency is now gone, because the numbering > starts at 1: > > CREATE TABLE job_agent ( > id bigint NOT NULL, > name text, > description text, > active integer DEF

Re: Invalidate Content Error

> > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-trafficcontrol/blob/ > > > > > master/traffic_ops/app/lib/UI/Job.pm#L42 > > > > > > > > > > Also, I don't think the concept of jobs, job agents, etc was ever > > fully > > > &g

Re: Invalidate Content Error

ntent works on a fresh install: > > - an insert into the job_agent table (so a job agent with id=1 exists) > - an insert into the the job_status table with name=PENDING > > I'll create an issue for that. > > Jeremy > > On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 8:17 AM, Dave Neuman wr

Re: Possible bug in traffic ops when sending an e-mail

Thanks Jeremy. We did merge that PR not too long ago to fix one issue, but it looks like it created another. I agree that it would be better to use a different library. On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 1:29 PM, Jeremy Mitchell wrote: > I'll have to defer to someone else as most of that was way over my h

Re: TO - Queue server updates on delivery service servers only?

In the near future we plan to make the DS -> Server mapping optional. This means that we assign all DSs to all caches and rely on Traffic Router to do the right thing using consistent hashing and dispersion. If we assign a DS to all servers then queueing updates for a DS is not really needed, sin

Re: Test status on master (Postgres)

Jeremy mentioned those to me not too long ago, but I haven't had time to look into it. On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 19:15 Jan van Doorn wrote: > I see 2 failing tests (the modules.t fail is my env), anyone have any info > on these?: > > Test Summary Report > --- > ./t/api/1.1/deliverys

Re: Possible bug in traffic ops when sending an e-mail

ode and knows that the second fork went OK. > > 6. Because the first child is dead, the parent of the daemon is set to 1 > > (init), so when the daemon exits, it does not become a zombie (init > > reclaims it). > > > > This way the SIGCHLD handler is not affected,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Control 1.8.0-incubating (RC11)

+1, this shows that only license files changed: https://github.com/apache/incubator-trafficcontrol/compare/RELEASE-1.8.0-RC9...RELEASE-1.8.0-RC11 On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 10:04 AM, Jeremy Mitchell wrote: > +1 > > On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 7:26 AM, Hank Beatty wrote: > >> +1 >> >> Looks like only l

Re: Upcoming TC 2.0 Release Branch

I'll take a look at open PRs tomorrow and see if there is anything I want to make sure gets in. Other than that I am +1 On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 16:06 Mark Torluemke wrote: > Agree -- I think sooner-is-better for branching 2.0. > > Cheers, > Mark > > On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 3:57 PM, Jan van Doorn

Re: Upcoming TC 2.0 Release Branch

re other reasons to keep code “in your pocket” until > the release branch is cut? > > —Eric > > > On Feb 20, 2017, at 6:08 PM, Dave Neuman wrote: > > > > I'll take a look at open PRs tomorrow and see if there is anything I want > > to make sure gets in. Ot

Re: Access Control Model

Currently, if you have LDAP configured, when a user tries to login to Traffic Ops, Traffic Ops will first check the database and then check LDAP. If a user is not in the database, but is in LDAP, the user will be allowed to access Traffic Ops with read-only permissions. Are we planning on keeping

Re: Write permission to the wiki

You should be good to go now. Thanks, Dave On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 12:06 AM, Oren Shemesh wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to edit a TC wiki page. > Can someone grant me that privilege, please ? > > My E-mail in the wiki is: shemesh.o...@gmail.com > > Thanks in advance, Oren. > > p.s. It would be nice

Re: docker-compose for builds

+1 on the backport. On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 7:25 AM, Eric Friedrich (efriedri) < efrie...@cisco.com> wrote: > I’ll echo my comment from Slack: > This looks like a pretty low risk change, so would not be opposed to back > porting to 2.0 > > —Eric > > > On Mar 1, 2017, at 4:02 PM, Dan Kirkwood wrot

Re: Github "Backport" Label

I see the label, but I don't see a way to add the label to existing PRs. On Sun, Mar 12, 2017 at 8:38 PM, Eric Friedrich (efriedri) < efrie...@cisco.com> wrote: > I created a new label in Github called “backport”. > > Please tag any PRs with this label to make them easier to find. > > —Eric > >

Re: Public CI Builds for Traffic Control

I don't have experience with Travis CI, but we are using Jenkins internally to build the project. If we can get an Apache hosted Jenkins that would be cool. I think maybe we should spend an hour (or a few) at the meetup and see if we can get something up and going, thoughts? On Sun, Mar 12, 2017

Re: Public CI Builds for Traffic Control

mine is neuman. Thanks! On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 10:11 AM, Bryan Call wrote: > I added you to the group: > bcall@minotaur:~$ list_appgroups.pl hudson-jobadmin | grep friede > friede > > What are the other two apache usernames? > > -Bryan > > > On Mar 14, 2017, at 5:29 PM, Eric Friedrich (efried

Re: TO API Versioning

Maybe this is a topic that we should discuss at the meetup in May? On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 11:20 AM, Hank Beatty wrote: > I recently ran into an issue where one of my scripts that uses the TO API > stopped working correctly. It was failing in such a way that if I had not > been in there updating

Re: 2.0 release?

Good question. I would also like to see us try to get some release candidates out for 2.0. I am pretty sure the actual install and postinstall need work. There are also a couple of issue that are still assigned to 2.0 and unresolved: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TC/fixforversion/1233856

Re: Recent changes to ATS config file generation

Great work Derek! On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 17:01 Gelinas, Derek wrote: > Recently, I have made several changes to both Traffic Ops and the ORT > script as pertains to ATS configuration files. Many of the changes will be > seen in 2.1. These changes do the following: > > > · A configurat

Re: Proposal for CDN definition file based configuration management

@Ryan, I think its better to have conversations on the dev list than a wiki page... On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 9:01 AM, Durfey, Ryan wrote: > Started a new wiki page to discuss this here https://cwiki.apache.org/ > confluence/display/TC/Configuration+Management > > I will do my best to summarize th

Re: Duplicate TO API routes

I assume you did a check of the client to make sure it wasn't using those routes? Other than that, no concerns here. On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 12:37 PM, Jeremy Mitchell wrote: > As we move towards a new authorization model on the TO API which includes > roles, capabilities and tenancy, it's import

Fwd: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Traffic Server and Traffic Control Summits Spring 2017

Forwarding to the Traffic Control user and dev lists. -- Forwarded message -- From: Bryan Call Date: Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 12:50 PM Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Traffic Server and Traffic Control Summits Spring 2017 To: dev , us...@trafficserver.apache.org The Spring Summit Sch

Re: Seeking help making HTTPS work in Traffic Router

Hey Oren, I believe there were some issues with TR support for HTTPS in 1.7. Can you upgrade to at least the 1.8 version of Traffic Router and let us know if you are still having issues? If you are not already, you need to be using a newer version of curl that supports SNI in order to successfully

Re: Seeking help making HTTPS work in Traffic Router

Oops, I guess I responded too late, glad you figured it out :) For what it's worth, I do believe that TR 1.8 handles that case and converts the key to the proper format. I still recommend that you run at least 1.8 if you want HTTPS support. Thanks, Dave On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 3:38 PM,

Re: Proposed changes to xml_id on a delivery service (from the API perspective)

I don't think we should be forcing users into using their xml_id as the host_regex used to create the delivery URL. I think we can offer to create it for them, but we should also let users have the ability to define what their regex needs to be when they create their delivery service. We have ins

Re: Goose installer script

Maybe it's time we take a look at what goose really buys us and consider writing our own database migration tool. We already have admin.pl, it could probably fit in with that? On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 11:45 AM, Eric Friedrich (efriedri) < efrie...@cisco.com> wrote: > Hey Dew- > What calls this

Re: Goose installer script

are more recent versions like > https://github.com/mattes/migrate. The question becomes if we ever get > around to rewriting TrafficOps APIs in golang, will the Perl version then > become obsolete? > > On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 11:58 AM, Dave Neuman wrote: > > > Maybe it

Re: Proposed changes to xml_id on a delivery service (from the API perspective)

ervice. > Can Static DNS entries be used to accomplish this use case while leaving > .*\xml-id\..* alone? (Elsloo keyed me into that possibility) > > Jeremy > > > On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 9:44 AM, Dave Neuman wrote: > > > I don't think we should be forcing users

Re: Why traffic_ops never gets online?

I saw problems similiar to this in my environment. A few things to check: 1) make sure you have logging turned up to debug so you can make sure everything that can be logged is. You can change the level in /opt/traffic_ops/app/conf/production/log4perl.conf 2) make sure that all of the files under

Moving Traffic Control the "full" github

While at ApaceCon, a few of us attended a talk about navigating the incubator where we were informed that "full" Github is now available for podlings. This gives us the ability to use github issues, to use github wiki, to assign PRs, to add tags to PRs, and the "merge PR" button among other things

Re: 2.0 release?

> >>>>>>> then I can push to this fork. > >>>>>>> Jeff Martin > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 1:59 PM, Eric Friedrich (efriedri) < > >>>>&g

[VOTE] Adding a CHANGELOG.md file

Hey All, One thing we discussed at the meetup was the addition of a CHANGELOG.md file to the project. This file will contain changes that are made to the project including bug fixes and new features. (e.g. https://github.com/influxdata/influxdb/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md). Adding this file means t

Re: 2.0 release?

Also, has Rat been run against 2.0? How does that look? On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 11:02 AM, Dave Neuman wrote: > Hey All, > We had some great discussion about the 2.0 release at the summit, I was > wondering if anyone had a summary of that discussion and a list of what's > left

Re: 2.0 release?

er this week that is a > > showstopper. > > > > Also Dan was going to look into seeing if we needed more post > > install/postgres fixes back ported to 2.0.x so it could be useful. > > > > —Eric > > > > > > > > > On May 17, 2017, at 11:0

Re: [VOTE] Adding a CHANGELOG.md file

needs > > documenting and what doesn't yet have it. > > > > > On May 17, 2017, at 11:44 AM, Dave Neuman wrote: > > > > > > Hey All, > > > One thing we discussed at the meetup was the addition of a CHANGELOG.md > > > file to the pro

Re: [VOTE] Adding a CHANGELOG.md file

>>>>> On May 17, 2017, at 12:18 PM, Phil Sorber wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> Don't we have a script that can generate this? ATS had this for a > long > >>>> > >>>> time > >>>>> > >>>>>

Re: Traffic Control SLA

I feel like we aren't mature enough yet to formalize this. We only have 1 official "release" under our belt and we are working towards our second. I think the best solution for now would be to try to define this as we go and handle security, regressions, etc with discussions. Of course, I can be

Re: [VOTE] Move Traffic Control to full GitHub

+1, thanks for putting the vote up Jan On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 4:57 PM, Steve Malenfant wrote: > +1 >

Re: Moving Traffic Control the "full" github

onsensus in favour of the move. Dave, I believe your motion > carries. :) > > On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 10:57 AM Hank Beatty wrote: > > > +1 > > > > On 05/17/2017 10:51 AM, Dave Neuman wrote: > > > While at ApaceCon, a few of us attended a talk about navigating the

Re: Using a full-chain SSL certificate For a Delivery Service.

Hey Oren, Yes you can enter an externally created, full-chain certificate in Traffic Ops; we do this all the time. You shouldn't need to do anything special besides make sure that the certificate chain is in the correct order. I think you need to have the server (wildcard first) then the intermed

Re: TC Contributers to Publish list of Planned/WIP Items for Better Community Sync

I am probably opening a can of worms that I don't know if I want to open, but can't we just use Jira for this (and Github once we move there)? If someone is working on something it should be in Jira as an issue that assigned to that person. From there you can see who is working on what. It's not

Re: TC Contributers to Publish list of Planned/WIP Items for Better Community Sync

gt; > separate > > >>> page (many mouse clicks). I'm also more of a list-of-open-bullets guy > > than > > >>> a table-with-fixed-columns guy when it comes to viewing information. > > >>> > > >>> On the other hand JIRA gi

Re: Simple Session Tracking - ready for PR

Hey Mike, I think opening a PR is a great idea. Can you please open it against master? Thanks, Dave On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 16:43 Mike Sandman (misandma) wrote: > Hi All, > > I discussed with Eric Friedrich about opening a PR for the session > tracking Lua plugin (as presented by Eric at the T

Re: LDAP Access

Just because we *can* do something doesn't mean we *should* do something. I don't think we should try to over engineer this part of the system and make it any more complicated than it needs to be. I think Rob's PR should be merged so that LDAP users, by default, have very limited capabilities. On

Re: Anonymous IP Blocking

Hey Peter, Thanks for the write up. It sounds like you want to embed this new config file in the CrConfig? Is there a reason we can't keep it standalone and have Traffic Router fetch it like we do with Federations, Steering, etc? Also, you say "Anonymous Blocking will occur after RGB check" does

Re: Anonymous IP Blocking

bled, I just mentioned specifically in case > there are thoughts in which order the checks should be done. As it stands > right now, it would check CZF first, then Geo and finally anonymous > blocking. > > -Peter > > On 6/1/17, 2:23 PM, "Dave Neuman" wrote: > > Hey

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Control 2.0.0-incubating (RC2)

Unfortunately I have to be -1 due to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TC-365. The source tar ball does not extract a proper directory structure. Thanks, Dave On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 9:31 AM, Jeff Elsloo wrote: > I'm +1 on this. Thanks for creating the RC Eric! > -- > Thanks, > Jeff > > > On

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Control 2.0.0-incubating (RC2)

Sounds like this issue can be resolved by re-creating the tarball without changing any code, so I will rescind my -1 and keep testing. On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 11:32 AM, Dave Neuman wrote: > Unfortunately I have to be -1 due to https://issues.apache.org/ > jira/browse/TC-365. > The s

Re: Component Naming Standards - Project Management

To be honest, I would hold off on that for now since we should be moving to full github soon. Once we move to full github we can slice and dice things up. On Sun, Jun 11, 2017 at 8:25 AM, Durfey, Ryan wrote: > I wanted to start organizing the Jira issues and the first thing I need to > do is ens

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Control 2.0.0-incubating (RC4)

Sorry, I have been out the last few days and I was holding off on my vote on purpose. Last week I installed Traffic Ops and I noticed that all of the default data that I expected to be there was not there. For example, default EDGE and MID profiles were not created, same for the default parameter

Re: Traffic Ops Default Profile Management

I would make sure we clearly mark a section on the Downloads page for Default Profile Downloads. I would also make sure we update the Traffic Ops install doc to reflect that default profiles can be downloaded from the website; assuming Jan's PR doesn't do this already. I am +1 on having ATS in the

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Control 2.0.0-incubating (RC4)

that should go into RC5, please get > them to me tonight! > > —Eric > > > > > On Jun 12, 2017, at 9:58 AM, Dave Neuman wrote: > > > > Sorry, I have been out the last few days and I was holding off on my vote > > on purpose. Last week I installed Traffic

Re: Project Management - Shared Dashboards

Links? On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 8:42 AM, Durfey, Ryan wrote: > I created shared dashboards for the open issues of each major component. > Please let me know if you think of any other dashboards that might be > helpful. > > Ryan Durfey > Sr. Product Manager - CDN | Comcast Technology Solutions > 1

Re: Traffic Ops - Reorganize the client directory

How about we leave all of the golang stuff in the client directory and then add a "python_client" directory (or whatever you want to call it)? That way we don't break everyone using the client and we still get the python client in there. On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 8:42 AM, Dan Kirkwood wrote: > +1

Re: Component Naming Standards - Project Management

structure know? > > On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 7:55 AM, Gelinas, Derek > > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > On Jun 12, 2017, at 9:54 AM, Dave Neuman mailto:neum > > a...@apache.org>> wrote: > > > > To be honest, I would hold off on that for now since we should

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Control 2.0.0-incubating (RC6)

+1 Things I tested (Centos 7.2 VM): -- verified md5 -- verified gpg sig -- built all RPMs from source tar -- Traffic Stats installs, starts, and runs -- Traffic Router installs, starts, serves digs and curls -- Traffic Ops can be installed and started. I found a couple issues that should be addres

Re: Support custom routing selection logics

Have you taken a look at how we did the neustar geo location provider integration? That should give you some ideas. On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 10:58 AM, Eric Friedrich (efriedri) < efrie...@cisco.com> wrote: > Thanks John- > A few more questions: > >- Are there any extensions to the Track cla

2.1 RM

Hey All, Now that 2.0 has officially passed the project and IPMC vote (YAY!), it's time to start thinking about 2.1. I don't think we have identified a release manager for the 2.1 release yet, would anyone like to volunteer? Thanks, Dave

Re: Promote Golang Traffic Monitor to Default

+1 on the rename On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 10:23 AM, Jan van Doorn wrote: > +1 > > On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 9:47 AM Dewayne Richardson > wrote: > > > When: Read · Mon, Jul 17. > > > > [image: Timyo expectation line] > > +1 > > >

Re: 2.1 RM

> On Jul 17, 2017, at 3:03 PM, Dan Kirkwood wrote: > > > > > > Thanks, Hank..feel free to ping either me or Eric if anything is > > > unclear in the release manager notes. > > > > > > -dan > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 17, 2017

Re: Proposal for PR requirements

I personally don't think that we should require a Jira for every single PR. I think blanket statements like "you must create a Jira ticket for each PR", while made with good intentions, are too hard to enforce, don't take every situation into account, and are sometimes a deterrent to new contribut

Re: Can you fix your footers?

Hi John, I can take care of it today. Thanks, Dave On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 1:36 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > Dear TrafficControl, > > Would you mind fixing the footers on your website? We've updated the > incubator logo months ago, and the disclaimer only appears on your homepage > (not on other

Re: Can you fix your footers?

The website has been updated: http://trafficcontrol.apache.org/index.html Thanks, Dave On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 7:28 AM, Dave Neuman wrote: > Hi John, > I can take care of it today. > > Thanks, > Dave > > On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 1:36 PM, John D. Ament > wrote:

Re: Starting the 2.1 Branch for Next Release of TC

Hey Hank, Are you still planning on cutting a release sometime this week? I have a few PRs that I was planning on merging and wanted to see if I have some time. Thanks, Dave On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 2:46 PM, Nir Sopher wrote: > Hi Hank, > With guidance and review by Jeremy, we are working on the

Re: Starting the 2.1 Branch for Next Release of TC

+1 from me. Thanks Hank. On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 6:58 AM, Hank Beatty wrote: > Hello All, > > How does getting all the changes in this week and I'll cut the 2.1 branch > first thing Monday morning (8/7/17 6AM Eastern)? > > Thanks, > Hank > > > On 07/

Re: Adding support for per-DeliveryService routing names

Inline On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 1:57 PM, Peters, Rawlin wrote: > Sorry, Outlook converted my numbered list poorly. I’ve corrected the > numbering (items 1-3) below. > > On 8/3/17, 1:52 PM, "Peters, Rawlin" wrote: > > Hello All, > > I’ve been working on adding support for configurable per-

Re: Adding support for per-DeliveryService routing names

@Eric It looks like Zhilin's proposal is for custom delivery service domains (eg instead of "tr.foo.domain.com" you can have "tr.foo.otherdomain.com") while Rawlins is for custom routing names (eg instead of "tr.foo.domain.com" you can have "bar.foo.domain.com"). I think the two features are simil

Re: Edge server default config

We really should make it so you can navigate to those through the Downloads page on our website. Right now you have to know about them or get the link for the docs. --Dave On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 8:57 AM, Burak Sarp wrote: > yes thats it, > thanks,Sarp > > On Friday, August 4, 2017 5:35 PM,

Re: Edge server default config

docs/latest/admin/traffic_ops/ > default_profiles.html > > Where else could I add the link to make it obvious? > > -Dew > > > > On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 9:40 AM, Dave Neuman wrote: > > > We really should make it so you can navigate to those through the > Downloads

Open Issues against 2.1

Hey All, I was looking at Jira and noticed that we have 53 unresolved issues against TC 2.1 [1]. Of these 53, 6 are Critical or Blocker. I know that we Hank just cut the 2.1 branch and is thinking about putting out an RC0. In my opinion we need to address these issues before RC0 is released for

Re: New Committer - Rob Butts

Congratulations, Rob! On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 5:26 AM, Eric Friedrich wrote: > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache Traffic Control > (incubating) > has invited Rob Butts to become a committer and we are pleased > to announce that he has accepted. > > Rob began his Traffic Control c

Re: [jira] [Updated] (TC-118) Traffic Ops should get it's name from some confioguration when generating CrConfig

To my knowledge it has not been fixed and will not be fixed for 2.1. On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 8:09 AM, Hank Beatty wrote: > Does anyone know if this has been fixed? If not, are we planning in fixing > it for 2.1? > > Thanks, > Hank > > > > > Forwarded Message > Subject:[

Re: [jira] [Created] (TC-151) Delivery Service XML IDs should be limited to lower-case letters

This looks like a feature request and not a bug. On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 8:20 AM, Hank Beatty wrote: > Does anyone know if this has been fixed? If not, are we planning in fixing > it for 2.1? > > Thanks, > Hank > > > > > Forwarded Message > Subject:[jira] [Created] (TC-

Re: [jira] [Created] (TC-187) Update delivery service makes SSL keys invalid

You are a committer too, Hank! ;) On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 1:26 PM, Hank Beatty wrote: > It looks like this one is ready to be merged. Can someone please take a > look at this PR https://github.com/apache/incu > bator-trafficcontrol/pull/360? > > Thanks, > Hank > > > > > Forwarded Messag

  1   2   >