Orcan Ogetbil wrote, at 07/28/2010 02:44 PM +9:00:
Author: oget
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/python-sexy/devel
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv31418
Modified Files:
python-sexy.spec
Added Files:
python-sexy-gdk-pixbuf.patch
Log Message:
* Wed Jul 28 2010
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 2:09 AM, Mamoru Tasaka wrote:
Orcan Ogetbil wrote, at 07/28/2010 02:44 PM +9:00:
Author: oget
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/python-sexy/devel
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv31418
Modified Files:
python-sexy.spec
Added Files:
Orcan Ogetbil wrote, at 07/28/2010 03:19 PM +9:00:
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 2:09 AM, Mamoru Tasaka wrote:
Orcan Ogetbil wrote, at 07/28/2010 02:44 PM +9:00:
Author: oget
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/python-sexy/devel
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv31418
Modified Files:
Greetings Testers,
I'm happy to announce that validation test event against F-14 Alpha Test
Compose is coming! Similar with F-13, this time we planned testing of
both Installation Process[1] and Desktop functionality[2] to ensure that
they meet the F-14 Alpha Release Criteria[3].
Welcome
On Tuesday, July 27, 2010 07:46:48 pm Kevin Kofler wrote:
Rahul Sundaram
wrote:
DeviceKit or udisks backend?
libudev / udisks / upower
actually. The original DeviceKit is dead. The
name for the Solid backend
stuck, it should probably be renamed.
Yes, it should be renamed - which
name???
Hello, good news everyone! (sort of)
We recently updated maven to version 2.2.1 in rawhide (soon to be F14
branch) and with this update certain bugs/problems creeped in. I'd say
most are fixed now but update to javadoc plugin is causing maven
projects that have multiple modules to fail with
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 02:31:19PM +0200, Sven Lankes wrote:
Following the process
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers
Is someone able to get in touch with Christian Balint (rezso)?
His last koji activity was on the 18th of March 2010. I sent a personal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/23/2010 11:54 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
The conversion will take a couple days, which means our normal short
outage for branching will be a bit extended. I wish there was another
way, but converting over 9K cvs repos into git repos does take
hi,
I've recently come across an selinux issue.
Is this another selinux issue with the package?
(I don't want to switch off selinux.)
regards,
Ankur
Summary:
SELinux has prevented wine from performing an unsafe memory operation.
Detailed Description:
SELinux denied an operation
On Sat, 24.07.10 00:14, Casey Dahlin (cdah...@redhat.com) wrote:
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 10:54:50PM -0500, Garrett Holmstrom wrote:
On 7/23/2010 20:26, Lennart Poettering wrote:
- You can boot into either of them by setting the init= kernel cmdline
option according to your wishes.
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 2:57 AM, Nicu Buculei nicu_fed...@nicubunu.ro wrote:
On 07/28/2010 01:08 AM, Mike McGrath wrote:
On 07/27/2010 10:53 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Are we skipping Firefox 4 for Fedora 14? Beta 2 has been released
recently and I am wondering if we can go with it if it fits
On 07/28/2010 04:15 PM, Brandon Lozza wrote:
We're NOT allowed to make changes (patches) without their permission.
This is defacto non-free. I understand we work with upstream but that
shouldn't prevent us from maintaining it.
We are maintaining it just fine. Licensing is offtopic for this
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 6:49 AM, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote:
On 07/28/2010 04:15 PM, Brandon Lozza wrote:
We're NOT allowed to make changes (patches) without their permission.
This is defacto non-free. I understand we work with upstream but that
shouldn't prevent us from
On 07/28/2010 04:22 PM, Brandon Lozza wrote
The FSF drafted up the four freedoms and it's not offtopic, we're
discussing Firefox4 and the fact that we won't be able to make changes
to it to fix it without their permission.
There is no specific non-upstream change that Firefox maintainers in
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 12:52 PM, Brandon Lozza bran...@pwnage.ca wrote:
The FSF drafted up the four freedoms and it's not offtopic, we're
discussing Firefox4 and the fact that we won't be able to make changes
to it to fix it without their permission.
You know that Fedora isn't any different
Le 28/07/2010 12:45, Brandon Lozza a écrit :
Mozilla's trademark requirements violate Freedom #2
The freedom to study how the program works, and change it to make it
do what you wish (freedom 1). Access to the source code is a
precondition for this.
We're NOT allowed to make changes
On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 12:38 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 15:08:24 +0530, Ankur wrote:
hi,
I've recently come across an selinux issue.
Is this another selinux issue with the package?
(I don't want to switch off selinux.)
Why don't you comment on the
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 16:50:49 +0530, Ankur wrote:
We generally report selinux denials as bugs, and wanted to confirm if
this is another one that is to be reported.
Well, if there were a policy for this already, SELinux would not
have complained about it.
--
devel mailing list
On 28/07/10 12:20, Ankur Sinha wrote:
snip /
I know nothing about selinux. I have no clue what the command would do.
We generally report selinux denials as bugs, and wanted to confirm if
this is another one that is to be reported.
Sorry if it cause noise on the list.
Hi Ankur,
*Normally*
On 28/07/2010 00:24, Brandon Lozza wrote:
F11 or F12 had a beta version of firefox
spot's chromium builds do support webm, it works great :)
It's still not included in fedora's repositories, so it doesn't change
anything.
Firefox 4 in F14 is, in my opinion, a MUST HAVE for a distribution
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 6:55 AM, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote:
On 07/28/2010 04:22 PM, Brandon Lozza wrote
The FSF drafted up the four freedoms and it's not offtopic, we're
discussing Firefox4 and the fact that we won't be able to make changes
to it to fix it without their
On 07/28/2010 05:47 PM, Brandon Lozza wrote:
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 6:55 AM, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote:
On 07/28/2010 04:22 PM, Brandon Lozza wrote
The FSF drafted up the four freedoms and it's not offtopic, we're
discussing Firefox4 and the fact that we won't be able to make
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 8:27 AM, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote:
On 07/28/2010 05:47 PM, Brandon Lozza wrote:
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 6:55 AM, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote:
On 07/28/2010 04:22 PM, Brandon Lozza wrote
The FSF drafted up the four freedoms and it's not
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010, Florent Le Coz wrote:
On 28/07/2010 00:24, Brandon Lozza wrote:
F11 or F12 had a beta version of firefox
spot's chromium builds do support webm, it works great :)
It's still not included in fedora's repositories, so it doesn't change
anything.
Firefox 4 in F14
On 28/07/10 13:52, Mike McGrath wrote:
snip
Maybe as firefox4 available in
updates-testing, but certainly not a core default package.
+1
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encoded
Friend of Fedora
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 8:57 AM, Frank Murphy frankl...@gmail.com wrote:
On 28/07/10 13:52, Mike McGrath wrote:
snip
Maybe as firefox4 available in
updates-testing, but certainly not a core default package.
+1
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encoded
Friend of Fedora
--
devel mailing
On 28/07/2010 14:52, Mike McGrath wrote:
In my opinion including software that even upstream says is not ready is
for a distribution that's lost their way. We can still be a leading
distribution and not include pre-release software. Especially pre-release
software that's not only in our
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-4.fc13.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.1)
On i386:
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-4.fc13.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.1)
Please resolve this as soon
perl-Config-Model has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Config-Model-1.205-2.fc14.noarch requires perl(YAML::Any) =
0:0.303
On i386:
perl-Config-Model-1.205-2.fc14.noarch requires perl(YAML::Any) =
0:0.303
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
perl-Data-Alias has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Data-Alias-1.07-6.fc13.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.1)
On i386:
perl-Data-Alias-1.07-6.fc13.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.1)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora
2010/7/28 Frank Murphy frankl...@gmail.com:
On 28/07/10 13:52, Mike McGrath wrote:
snip
Maybe as firefox4 available in
updates-testing, but certainly not a core default package.
+1
--
Regards,
This is extremely complicated which means we can't push any xulrunner
related packages to
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 9:28 AM, Chen Lei wrote:
2010/7/28 Frank Murphy :
On 28/07/10 13:52, Mike McGrath wrote:
snip
Maybe as firefox4 available in
updates-testing, but certainly not a core default package.
+1
--
Regards,
This is extremely complicated which means we can't push any
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 17:57:39 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 07/28/2010 05:47 PM, Brandon Lozza wrote:
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 6:55 AM, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 07/28/2010 04:22 PM, Brandon Lozza wrote
The FSF drafted up the four freedoms and it's not offtopic, we're
On 07/28/2010 07:23 PM, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
Is Red Hat Legal just more careful than Novell's legal department?
Otherwise, how is it that they ship Firefox with custom patches (and call
it Firefox) and we don't..
Firefox can be shipped with custom patches and the trademark intact
2010/7/28 Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com:
On 07/28/2010 03:33 AM, Brandon Lozza wrote:
Doesn't our version already support WebM?
Nope. We have updated Gstreamer and WebKit-Gtk in Fedora 13 and 12 for
WebM support bringing it to Epiphany and Midori users and I assume
Spot's Chromium repo
Hi,
It seems that Gnome 3 will be released in march 2011. How will this
affect Fedora 14? Gnome 3 was an important feature of F14.
http://lwn.net/Articles/397482/
Regards,
Michal
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 07/28/2010 07:50 PM, Andreas Tunek wrote:
Epiphany is basically uselessin F13, see Bug 603358.
Using it here just fine without that issue.
Rahul
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 16:27 +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
Hi,
It seems that Gnome 3 will be released in march 2011. How will this
affect Fedora 14? Gnome 3 was an important feature of F14.
http://lwn.net/Articles/397482/
I believe it will continued to be offered as an experimental
On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 09:57 +0300, Nicu Buculei wrote:
On 07/28/2010 01:08 AM, Mike McGrath wrote:
On 07/27/2010 10:53 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Are we skipping Firefox 4 for Fedora 14? Beta 2 has been released
recently and I am wondering if we can go with it if it fits into the
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 10:40 AM, Martin Sourada
martin.sour...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 09:57 +0300, Nicu Buculei wrote:
On 07/28/2010 01:08 AM, Mike McGrath wrote:
On 07/27/2010 10:53 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Are we skipping Firefox 4 for Fedora 14? Beta 2 has been
Hi
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 6:26 AM, Lennart Poettering
mzerq...@0pointer.de wrote:
On Sat, 24.07.10 00:14, Casey Dahlin (cdah...@redhat.com) wrote:
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 10:54:50PM -0500, Garrett Holmstrom wrote:
On 7/23/2010 20:26, Lennart Poettering wrote:
- You can boot into either
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 10:18 AM, Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/23/2010 11:54 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
The conversion will take a couple days, which means our normal short
outage for branching will be a bit extended. I wish
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 03:04:46PM +0200, Florent Le Coz wrote:
On 28/07/2010 14:52, Mike McGrath wrote:
In my opinion including software that even upstream says is not ready is
for a distribution that's lost their way. We can still be a leading
distribution and not include pre-release
David Malcolm (dmalc...@redhat.com) said:
A further 26 builds in dist-f14-py27-rebuild had newer builds in
rawhide, so we'll need to rebuild these; some are important e.g. yum and
anaconda (see [1] again).
Oof. In the future, can we make sure we just don't move these builds
that override
On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 11:55 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
David Malcolm (dmalc...@redhat.com) said:
A further 26 builds in dist-f14-py27-rebuild had newer builds in
rawhide, so we'll need to rebuild these; some are important e.g. yum and
anaconda (see [1] again).
Oof. In the future, can
On Tue, 2010-07-27 at 13:47 -0700, Benjamin Kosnik wrote:
Do you have a list of packages which will need to be rebuilt? This is
the last day before we branch, and with the dist-git outage there will
be a short time to fix things before the Alpha freeze. Is anything in
the critpath
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/28/2010 08:15 AM, pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
So once the package is converted is the git repo read/write so we can
begin updates or is it all down until the conversion is complete?
Kinda, but not for production use. Once they are all
On Tue, 2010-07-27 at 19:16 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
We was delayed in F-12 (two weeks) and in F-13 (two weeks), probably
we'll have a final version for Firefox 4 before or a bit after we
release F-14. Another thing, we can test a lot and assist in upstream
during our testing phase.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/28/2010 09:25 AM, David Malcolm wrote:
Looks like a bug in the script that I used; it was meant to not move
them, but in fact it did.
D'oh. Due to an earlier bug in this script (which David successfully
fixed) I didn't notice this later bug,
On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 07:52 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
I think what people are missing is that even though our release is
scheduled for late October. The feature freeze was _yesterday_. meaning
that firefox would need to have been ready for use yesterday. Not in
October when it might maybe
On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 09:41 -0400, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 9:28 AM, Chen Lei wrote:
2010/7/28 Frank Murphy :
On 28/07/10 13:52, Mike McGrath wrote:
snip
Maybe as firefox4 available in
updates-testing, but certainly not a core default package.
+1
--
On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 11:37 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 03:04:46PM +0200, Florent Le Coz wrote:
On 28/07/2010 14:52, Mike McGrath wrote:
In my opinion including software that even upstream says is not ready is
for a distribution that's lost their way. We can
On 18.07.2010 16:06, Mike Chambers wrote:
Anyone doing any builds of this during development and supplying a repo
to download and install that way instead of source builds? Or is it too
buggy to do at the moment?
Remi does:
On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 11:55 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
David Malcolm (dmalc...@redhat.com) said:
A further 26 builds in dist-f14-py27-rebuild had newer builds in
rawhide, so we'll need to rebuild these; some are important e.g. yum and
anaconda (see [1] again).
Oof. In the future, can
The work done by Remi, providing a parallel install Firefox 4 for
Fedora 13, could be reused to provide the same parallel install in
Fedora 14.
http://rpms.famillecollet.com/fedora/13/remi/i386/repoview/firefox4.html
http://blog.famillecollet.com/pages/Config-en
kai
--
devel mailing list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/28/2010 09:59 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
Nope. That's only for things that are declared as features. If you don't
declare your version update to be a feature, you can happily do it right
up to the release freeze.
I'd like to apply it to
At 19:00 on 26 Jul 2010, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 6:38 PM, Adam Williamson
awill...@redhat.com wrote:
revelation (okay, okay, i'm sneaking this one in because *i* depend
on it :)
I depend on it to and it needs a complete overhaul and an upstream
reboot. Want to help
On 07/28/2010 01:10 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 11:37 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 03:04:46PM +0200, Florent Le Coz wrote:
On 28/07/2010 14:52, Mike McGrath wrote:
In my opinion including software that even upstream says is not ready is
for a
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010, Peter Jones wrote:
On 07/28/2010 01:10 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 11:37 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 03:04:46PM +0200, Florent Le Coz wrote:
On 28/07/2010 14:52, Mike McGrath wrote:
In my opinion including software
On 07/28/2010 02:25 PM, Mike McGrath wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010, Peter Jones wrote:
On 07/28/2010 01:10 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 11:37 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 03:04:46PM +0200, Florent Le Coz wrote:
On 28/07/2010 14:52, Mike McGrath
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010, Peter Jones wrote:
On 07/28/2010 02:25 PM, Mike McGrath wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010, Peter Jones wrote:
On 07/28/2010 01:10 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 11:37 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 03:04:46PM +0200, Florent Le Coz
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 8:42 PM, Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010, Peter Jones wrote:
On 07/28/2010 02:25 PM, Mike McGrath wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010, Peter Jones wrote:
On 07/28/2010 01:10 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 11:37 -0400, Paul W.
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010, drago01 wrote:
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 8:42 PM, Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010, Peter Jones wrote:
On 07/28/2010 02:25 PM, Mike McGrath wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010, Peter Jones wrote:
On 07/28/2010 01:10 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 9:12 PM, Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010, drago01 wrote:
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 8:42 PM, Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010, Peter Jones wrote:
On 07/28/2010 02:25 PM, Mike McGrath wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010,
I've been asked by FESCo to post this public service announcement :)
We'd just like to remind those who test Fedora, in whatever
way...running a stable release with updates-testing, running Rawhide,
being a proven tester (especially)...that it's best if you test with
SELinux enabled and
On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 14:12 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
Maybe baby steps? Small incremental changes. Sure some features will be
missing that kopers will provide. But perhaps we could just create a
Fedora-13-devel tag in koji, push it to it's own repo or to individual
fedora-13-spot /
Adam Williamson (awill...@redhat.com) said:
Still, if they were in the py27 tag they *must* need to be rebuilt again
anyway, because the later builds in Rawhide would have been against
Python 2.6 and hence would be broken anyway. So in practice it doesn't
make a huge different, AFAICT.
Boost
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 9:37 PM, seth vidal skvi...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 14:12 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
Maybe baby steps? Small incremental changes. Sure some features will be
missing that kopers will provide. But perhaps we could just create a
Fedora-13-devel
On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 21:49 +0200, drago01 wrote:
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 9:37 PM, seth vidal skvi...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 14:12 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
Maybe baby steps? Small incremental changes. Sure some features will be
missing that kopers will provide.
drago01 (drag...@gmail.com) said:
5. Some easy way to enable/disable such repos other than messing with
config files?
yum-plugin-tmprepo? (This may not fit your definition of 'easy'.)
Bill
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 28/07/10 20:49, drago01 wrote:
5. Some easy way to enable/disable such repos other than messing with
config files?
gnome-packagekit-extra
tick what you need.
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encoded
Friend of Fedora
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 15:37 -0400, seth vidal wrote:
On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 14:12 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
Maybe baby steps? Small incremental changes. Sure some features will be
missing that kopers will provide. But perhaps we could just create a
Fedora-13-devel tag in koji, push it
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 9:51 PM, seth vidal skvi...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 21:49 +0200, drago01 wrote:
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 9:37 PM, seth vidal skvi...@fedoraproject.org
wrote:
On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 14:12 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
Maybe baby steps? Small
Hi all,
As some of you might know, we (the Fedora Design Team) would like to
have first wallpapers available in Alpha release. So I've prepared a
package with them (pretty much reusing spec file from previous releases)
which is now awaiting a review:
On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 23:34, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
First it seems that my boot would fail. It was unable to find or run a
'default.target' and would hang. Unfortunately it advises you to check
the logs, but since syslog isn't up yet and you can't do anything to
look at dmesg
On 07/28/2010 04:47 PM, Conan Kudo (ニール・ゴンパ) wrote:
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 2:16 PM, drago01 drag...@gmail.com
mailto:drag...@gmail.com wrote:
No disagreement here ... in fact this is a not really a baby step
but have something usable and start from there which makes a lot of
2010/7/28 James Laska jla...@redhat.com:
On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 16:27 +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
Hi,
It seems that Gnome 3 will be released in march 2011. How will this
affect Fedora 14? Gnome 3 was an important feature of F14.
http://lwn.net/Articles/397482/
I believe it will
2010/7/29 Chris Jones chrisjo...@comcen.com.au:
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 12:36 AM, James Laska jla...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 16:27 +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
Hi,
It seems that Gnome 3 will be released in march 2011. How will this
affect Fedora 14? Gnome 3 was an
Yesterday, July 27, 2010, we reached Feature Freeze for Fedora 14
As previously noted, at Feature Freeze it is expected that all features
are *significantly* feature complete and ready for testing:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Feature_Freeze_Policy.
A review of the status section on the
Jonathan MERCIER said the following on 07/28/2010 06:37 PM Pacific Time:
For D Programming Feature:
ldc is in stable repo
tango is in review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608069 by
Chen Lei.
For guideline i do a draft and ticket is open for review:
I installed the latest systemd and added the appropriate symbolic link to
graphical startup.
My system hangs when almost complete at the plymouth throbber. In text mode
it gets to the end of starting services and hangs. gdm never starts.
In /var/log/messages, these seem to be the suspicious
2010/7/29 Conan Kudo (ニール・ゴンパ) ngomp...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 4:38 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 23:28 +0200, Martin Sourada wrote:
Speaking of which, is there any chance to split ffmpeg into free (which
could be included in fedora) and
Add init=/sbin/upstart to the end of the kernel line and it will boot up using
upstart. Last lines in my boot read failing to load default.service and then
failing to start default.service.
-Original Message-
From: darrell pfeifer darrel...@gmail.com
To: Development discussions
Open Fedora 14 Alpha Blocker Bugs = 6
Days until Release Candidate Compose = 8
Here's the run down on the current open Fedora 14 Alpha Blocker bugs
615443 :: NEW :: livecd-tools :: David Huff :: booting live images from
nightly fails (can't mount root filesystem) ::
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 19:33, goinea...@aol.com wrote:
Add init=/sbin/upstart to the end of the kernel line and it will boot up
using upstart. Last lines in my boot read failing to load default.service
and then failing to start default.service.
Check one of the recent previous messages.
I found a fix on bugzilla:
rpm -e --nodeps systemd-units
yum install systemd-units
Which created the symlinks and default.service which seemed to be missing, and
allowed the boot to finish, but I may have been to quick to use it. One CPU
core is at maximum and Chrome won't open, so I'm
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 21:20, goinea...@aol.com wrote:
I found a fix on bugzilla:
rpm -e --nodeps systemd-units
yum install systemd-units
Which created the symlinks and default.service which seemed to be missing,
and allowed the boot to finish, but I may have been to quick to use it. One
On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 19:33 -0700, John Poelstra wrote:
597858 :: NEW :: firefox :: Gecko Maintainer :: SELinux is preventing
firefox from making its memory writable and executable. crashes rawhide
firefox start :: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597858
--It's unclear if this
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 09:57:56AM +0300, Nicu Buculei wrote:
On 07/28/2010 01:08 AM, Mike McGrath wrote:
On 07/27/2010 10:53 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Are we skipping Firefox 4 for Fedora 14? Beta 2 has been released
recently and I am wondering if we can go with it if it fits into the
On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 21:57 -0700, Matt McCutchen wrote:
On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 19:33 -0700, John Poelstra wrote:
597858 :: NEW :: firefox :: Gecko Maintainer :: SELinux is preventing
firefox from making its memory writable and executable. crashes rawhide
firefox start ::
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 19:33:46 -0700
John Poelstra poels...@redhat.com wrote:
Open Fedora 14 Alpha Blocker Bugs = 6
Days until Release Candidate Compose = 8
Here's the run down on the current open Fedora 14 Alpha Blocker
bugs
Just a few cents from me on a few of them...
615443 ::
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 10:39:02 +0200
Sven Lankes s...@lank.es wrote:
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 02:31:19PM +0200, Sven Lankes wrote:
Following the process
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers
Is someone able to get in touch with Christian Balint (rezso)?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=617967
--- Comment #8 from Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com 2010-07-28 03:43:08 EDT ---
Bodhi won't let me submit the update since I
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=617967
--- Comment #9 from Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com 2010-07-28 04:08:51 EDT ---
Thank you, Paul.
The update is here:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=617967
Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=617966
Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Yesterday, July 27, 2010, we reached Feature Freeze for Fedora 14
As previously noted, at Feature Freeze it is expected that all features
are *significantly* feature complete and ready for testing:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Feature_Freeze_Policy.
A review of the status section on the
97 matches
Mail list logo
