On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 7:25 AM, Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de wrote:
On 09/14/2011 06:23 PM, drago01 wrote:
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 5:34 PM, Ralf Corsepiusrc040...@freenet.de wrote:
My netbook boots up F14 in ca. 60 secs, while F15 boots up in 62 secs.
I'd call this below measurement
2011/9/14 Tom Lane t...@redhat.com:
=?ISO-8859-2?Q?Micha=B3_Piotrowski?= mkkp...@gmail.com writes:
Ok, I made four series of tests:
- start/stop an old init script
- start/stop an old init script with dropping caches - should simulate
system booting
- start/stop service file
- start/stop
2011/9/14 Jef Spaleta jspal...@gmail.com:
2011/9/14 Michał Piotrowski mkkp...@gmail.com
Exactly. F15, PostgreSQL 9.0 and just service file from PostgreSQL
9.1. Root filesystem and database are on SSD and Ext4.
Okay... brace yourself.
I just ran this test on my non-SSD ext4 based F15
On 09/15/2011 05:25 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
In general, there are other factors coming into play, such as parallel
startup using more memory, parallelization not providing many advantages
on systems with a small number of CPU cores, hard synchronisation points
in the bootup process,
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Jan F. Chadima jchad...@redhat.com wrote:
[...]
. When watching the load of the virtual machine that starts with systemd it is
clear to me that the total CPU consumption is significantly greater than in
the case of upstart one.
That's the whole point of doing
On Sep 15, 2011, at 11:03 AM, drago01 wrote:
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Jan F. Chadima jchad...@redhat.com wrote:
[...]
. When watching the load of the virtual machine that starts with systemd it
is clear to me that the total CPU consumption is significantly greater than
in the
On 09/15/2011 02:07 AM, drago01 wrote:
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 7:25 AM, Ralf Corsepiusrc040...@freenet.de wrote:
On 09/14/2011 06:23 PM, drago01 wrote:
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 5:34 PM, Ralf Corsepiusrc040...@freenet.dewrote:
snip
Anyway, some more figures: On the same machine, bootup
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 12:45 PM, Steve Clark scl...@netwolves.com wrote:
On 09/15/2011 02:07 AM, drago01 wrote:
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 7:25 AM, Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de wrote:
On 09/14/2011 06:23 PM, drago01 wrote:
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 5:34 PM, Ralf
Summary of changes:
d047ed8... Upstream update 1.92 (*)
19353f8... Upstream update 1.98 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 12:10 PM, Jan F. Chadima jchad...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sep 15, 2011, at 11:03 AM, drago01 wrote:
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Jan F. Chadima jchad...@redhat.com wrote:
[...]
. When watching the load of the virtual machine that starts with systemd it
is clear to
On Sep 15, 2011, at 1:02 PM, drago01 wrote:
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 12:10 PM, Jan F. Chadima jchad...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sep 15, 2011, at 11:03 AM, drago01 wrote:
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Jan F. Chadima jchad...@redhat.com
wrote:
[...]
. When watching the load of the
Summary of changes:
b951bea... Do not provide private perl(Time::Piece) (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 1:10 PM, Jan F. Chadima jchad...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sep 15, 2011, at 1:02 PM, drago01 wrote:
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 12:10 PM, Jan F. Chadima jchad...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sep 15, 2011, at 11:03 AM, drago01 wrote:
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Jan F. Chadima
On 09/15/2011 11:03 AM, drago01 wrote:
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Jan F. Chadimajchad...@redhat.com wrote:
[...]
. When watching the load of the virtual machine that starts with systemd it
is clear to me that the total CPU consumption is significantly greater than
in the case of
On Thu, 2011-04-21 at 22:14 +0200, Johannes Lips wrote:
Hello,
I tried to reach the maintainer of elementary-icon-theme.noarch for
several times now.[1] So far I didn't receive any notice if he even read
the mails from bugzilla.
I don't feel the need to take over the package but if no one
On Sep 15, 2011, at 1:13 PM, drago01 wrote:
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 1:10 PM, Jan F. Chadima jchad...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sep 15, 2011, at 1:02 PM, drago01 wrote:
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 12:10 PM, Jan F. Chadima jchad...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Sep 15, 2011, at 11:03 AM, drago01 wrote:
On Wed, 2011-09-14 at 14:16 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
The 'fix' for the F16 kernel is simply that, with the rc6 build,
debugging has been disabled. debugging is never disabled in Rawhide
kernels, so if debugging overhead is your problem, no Rawhide kernel is
going to cure it. To check if
This is about:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737261
F16 TC2 DVD grub/grub2 conflict
The grub package in F16 has a Conflicts: grub2 line. There are no
actual file conflicts, but this was added in order to workaround some
bugs in grubby, including:
-
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 03:27:16PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
So I propose that we drop this conflicts and fix grubby instead.
No. It is not sane to have multiple bootloaders installed on one
machine. Requiring the ability to do so adds a significant amount of
extra complexity to the
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 03:31:49PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 03:27:16PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
So I propose that we drop this conflicts and fix grubby instead.
No. It is not sane to have multiple bootloaders installed on one
machine.
There's an
As per the Fedora 16 schedule [1], Fedora 16 Beta Release Candidate 1
(RC1) is now available for testing. Please see the following pages for
download links and testing instructions. In general, official live
images arrive a few hours after the install images: see the links below
for updates. When
2011/9/15 Michał Piotrowski mkkp...@gmail.com:
2011/9/14 Tom Lane t...@redhat.com:
3. As root, do
date --rfc-3339=ns ; systemctl start postgresql.service ; date --rfc-3339=ns
with dropped cache
date --rfc-3339=ns ; systemctl start postgresql.service ; date --rfc-3339=ns
2011-09-15
On 09/15/2011 10:27 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
This is about:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737261
F16 TC2 DVD grub/grub2 conflict
The grub package in F16 has a Conflicts: grub2 line. There are no
actual file conflicts, but this was added in order to workaround some
bugs
On 09/14/2011 07:29 PM, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
The context for this question can be found here:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/virt-maint/2011-March/002289.html
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=679179
So the summary is that openbios needs to be compiled on PPC/SPARC
Steve Clark (scl...@netwolves.com) said:
Is there a reason Fedora starts a bunch of stuff that pretty much nobody
would use in a typical desktop system ?
One example of a synchronization point is the LVM/dmraid/etc. startup. If
we were able to conclusively determine that there weren't any of
On 09/15/2011 10:36 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 03:31:49PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 03:27:16PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
So I propose that we drop this conflicts and fix grubby instead.
No. It is not sane to have multiple
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 03:36:55PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 03:31:49PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 03:27:16PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
So I propose that we drop this conflicts and fix grubby instead.
No. It is not sane
There are known bugs in FC15/FC16 that have been filled some time ago that
folks will sadly run into: 728775, 658387 and 668063
Fortunatly the bugs have patches attached and the files to be modified are
shell scripts.
Yep, links here:
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 05:45:39PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
([3]https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/219). It takes time
for us
to setup test environment, and would be good to have some info in
advance.
Ok, so some basic steps to test Xen dom0 functionality
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 10:46:34AM -0400, Peter Jones wrote:
On 09/15/2011 10:27 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
So I propose that we drop this conflicts and fix grubby instead.
We certainly can't do that without at least first fixing other problems.
Could you explain (preferably with a full
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 03:59:57PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
We're talking about guest creation, aren't we?
No, we're talking about fixing and resizing existing guests, where
grub-install needs to be run to fix the bootloader.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 04:21:36PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 03:59:57PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
We're talking about guest creation, aren't we?
No, we're talking about fixing and resizing existing guests, where
grub-install needs to be run to fix the
On 09/15/2011 11:16 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 10:46:34AM -0400, Peter Jones wrote:
On 09/15/2011 10:27 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
So I propose that we drop this conflicts and fix grubby instead.
We certainly can't do that without at least first fixing other
I will simply say that this is not my view of what happened. In any
case I hope we can be more excellent about this now.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
virt-df lists disk usage of guests without needing to install any
software inside the
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 10:46:34AM -0400, Peter Jones wrote:
On 09/15/2011 10:27 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
libguestfs, as I guess is well known, uses tools from the host in
order to manage guests.
Honestly I don't think this is that well known, and looking at it
I'm amazed this passed
On 09/15/2011 09:42 AM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 09/15/2011 05:25 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
In general, there are other factors coming into play, such as parallel
startup using more memory, parallelization not providing many advantages
on systems with a small number of CPU cores,
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 04:25:41PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 04:21:36PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 03:59:57PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
We're talking about guest creation, aren't we?
No, we're talking about fixing and
On Wed, 2011-09-14 at 21:48 -0700, Jorge Gallegos wrote:
So, I gather no one can shed some light on this? anyone? bueller?
The bug (point #2) doesn't really stop the plugin from working, but it is
annoying.
Any help would be much appreciated
You'd probably have been better off mailing
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 04:56:43PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
For grub1 guests, it has turned out not to matter which specific
version of grub [as long as it was grub1] was used, as apparently
grub-install updates all files needed in /boot/grub as appropriate.
Or at least we haven't
Am Donnerstag, den 15.09.2011, 10:39 -0400 schrieb Andre Robatino:
As per the Fedora 16 schedule [1], Fedora 16 Beta Release Candidate 1
(RC1) is now available for testing.
Is there a deltaiso?
--
Stefan Held VI has only 2 Modes:
obi unixkiste orgThe
On 09/15/2011 05:54 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 09/15/2011 09:42 AM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 09/15/2011 05:25 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Anyway, some more figures: On the same machine, bootup times when
booting from a (slow) external (IDE) USB2 HD:
- Fedora 15/i386: ca. 135 secs.
-
On 09/15/2011 12:01 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 04:56:43PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
For grub1 guests, it has turned out not to matter which specific
version of grub [as long as it was grub1] was used, as apparently
grub-install updates all files needed in
On 09/15/2011 09:59 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
We're talking about guest creation, aren't we? Why would you ever need
to run grub-install against a guest image that already exists? And if
you do, you're already going to have problems come F17. It's likely that
grub will no longer exist, but
On 09/15/2011 12:19 PM, Ian Pilcher wrote:
On 09/15/2011 09:59 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
We're talking about guest creation, aren't we? Why would you ever need
to run grub-install against a guest image that already exists? And if
you do, you're already going to have problems come F17. It's
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 11:19:24AM -0500, Ian Pilcher wrote:
On 09/15/2011 09:59 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
We're talking about guest creation, aren't we? Why would you ever need
to run grub-install against a guest image that already exists? And if
you do, you're already going to have
On 09/15/2011 04:11 PM, Michal Schmidt wrote:
On 09/15/2011 05:54 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 09/15/2011 09:42 AM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 09/15/2011 05:25 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Anyway, some more figures: On the same machine, bootup times when
booting from a (slow) external (IDE)
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 10:16:29AM +0200, Jan F. Chadima wrote:
It amazes me how much energy people spend on it to save 3 seconds a
day. Of course, if the computer being turned daily. In the case of a
server time saving is even more amazing.
Virtualization changes things.
The way _I_ use
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 07:29:09PM -0400, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
The context for this question can be found here:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/virt-maint/2011-March/002289.html
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=679179
So the summary is that openbios needs to be
On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 18:27:29 +0100
Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 10:16:29AM +0200, Jan F. Chadima wrote:
It amazes me how much energy people spend on it to save 3 seconds a
day. Of course, if the computer being turned daily. In the case of a
server
On 09/15/2011 02:14 PM, Bernd Stramm wrote:
On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 18:27:29 +0100
Many computers are booted very rarely, once a day or so, and then
sit idle for very long periods of time. This is very wasteful. The
reason people do this is because booting takes a long time compared to
Hi Fedora!
Currently, the abrt reporting program does not seem to work for me, when
I try to submit to bugzilla I get
Essential file 'duphash' is missing, can't continue..
(exited with 1)
Is this a known problem or is there anything wrong on my part?
/Andreas
--
devel mailing list
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728667
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-09-15
15:34:12 EDT ---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712886
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org
2011-09-15 15:35:28 EDT ---
perl-Gtk2-1.224-2.el6 has been
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712886
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728668
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-09-15
15:35:52 EDT ---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728668
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728669
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=733820
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=733820
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-09-15
15:36:14 EDT ---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728669
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-09-15
15:36:50 EDT ---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728667
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
On 09/15/2011 09:29 PM, Andreas Tunek wrote:
Hi Fedora!
Currently, the abrt reporting program does not seem to work for me, when
I try to submit to bugzilla I get
Essential file 'duphash' is missing, can't continue..
(exited with 1)
Is this a known problem or is there anything wrong on my
http://rmeggins.fedorapeople.org/patches/0001-Make-all-backend-operations-transaction-aware.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
Hi there Fedora People!!
One of my biggest passions in life is audio editing, so when I started using
Linux I found this friendly (yet powerful) audio editor called Jokosher.
When I
installed Fedora 15, I realized that jokosher wasn't added to the F15 repos
and I missed it a lot, so I built an
Rich Megginson wrote:
http://rmeggins.fedorapeople.org/patches/0001-Make-all-backend-operations-transaction-aware.patch
ack.
--noriko
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 3:40 PM, Manuel Escudero jmlev...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi there Fedora People!!
One of my biggest passions in life is audio editing, so when I started using
Linux I found this friendly (yet powerful) audio editor called Jokosher.
When I
installed Fedora 15, I realized
2011/9/15 Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 3:40 PM, Manuel Escudero jmlev...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi there Fedora People!!
One of my biggest passions in life is audio editing, so when I started
using
Linux I found this friendly (yet powerful) audio editor called
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 5:50 PM, Manuel Escudero jmlev...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/9/15 Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 3:40 PM, Manuel Escudero jmlev...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi there Fedora People!!
One of my biggest passions in life is audio editing, so when I
On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 16:39:23 -0500, RS (Richard) wrote:
Here's the updated SRPM:
http://hobbes1069.fedorapeople.org/jokosher/jokosher-0.11.5-1.fc15.src.rpm
So the question remains, instead of seeing if someone else will submit
it, why not submit it yourself?
Notice that jokosher used to be
On 09/16/2011 02:10 AM, Manuel Escudero wrote:
RPM -
http://commondatastorage.googleapis.com/xenodecdn/jokosher-0.11.5-0.fc15.noarch.rpm
SRC.RPM -
http://commondatastorage.googleapis.com/xenodecdn/jokosher-0.11.5-0.fc15.src.rpm
it's a noarch package so it can be installed in both 32 and 64
On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 17:54 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 09/15/2011 09:42 AM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 09/15/2011 05:25 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
In general, there are other factors coming into play, such as parallel
startup using more memory, parallelization not providing
On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 14:14 -0400, Bernd Stramm wrote:
Many computers are booted very rarely, once a day or so, and then
sit idle for very long periods of time. This is very wasteful. The
reason people do this is because booting takes a long time compared to
starting the set of applications
On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 10:10 -0500, W. Michael Petullo wrote:
There are known bugs in FC15/FC16 that have been filled some time ago that
folks will sadly run into: 728775, 658387 and 668063
Fortunatly the bugs have patches attached and the files to be modified are
shell scripts.
On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 18:05 +0200, Stefan Held wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 15.09.2011, 10:39 -0400 schrieb Andre Robatino:
As per the Fedora 16 schedule [1], Fedora 16 Beta Release Candidate 1
(RC1) is now available for testing.
Is there a deltaiso?
Yes, there are always are, here:
On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 15:27:49 -0700
Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 14:14 -0400, Bernd Stramm wrote:
Many computers are booted very rarely, once a day or so, and then
sit idle for very long periods of time. This is very wasteful. The
reason people do this
Hi everyone,
I'm keen to help out with Fedora by helping to create RPM packages and do
some testing when possible. I work for a television station in NZ and look
after most of the RHEL systems around the place including their video on
demand product. My interests include motorcycling and computer
On 09/15/2011 05:27 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 14:14 -0400, Bernd Stramm wrote:
Many computers are booted very rarely, once a day or so, and then
sit idle for very long periods of time. This is very wasteful. The
reason people do this is because booting takes a long
On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 19:10 -0500, Michael Ekstrand wrote:
On 09/15/2011 05:27 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 14:14 -0400, Bernd Stramm wrote:
Many computers are booted very rarely, once a day or so, and then
sit idle for very long periods of time. This is very
On 15/09/11 04:00 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 09/16/2011 02:10 AM, Manuel Escudero wrote:
RPM -
http://commondatastorage.googleapis.com/xenodecdn/jokosher-0.11.5-0.fc15.noarch.rpm
SRC.RPM -
http://commondatastorage.googleapis.com/xenodecdn/jokosher-0.11.5-0.fc15.src.rpm
it's a noarch
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 7:48 PM, Al Reay alre...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi everyone,
I'm keen to help out with Fedora by helping to create RPM packages and do
some testing when possible. I work for a television station in NZ and look
after most of the RHEL systems around the place including their
On 09/15/2011 06:11 PM, Michal Schmidt wrote:
On 09/15/2011 05:54 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 09/15/2011 09:42 AM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 09/15/2011 05:25 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Anyway, some more figures: On the same machine, bootup times when
booting from a (slow) external (IDE)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=738383
--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com 2011-09-15 02:30:24 EDT ---
I had feeling the perl-Mozilla-CA database comes in
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247253
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
commit b951bea9232c840be50699c737735c1825d59e0c
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Sep 15 12:07:13 2011 +0200
Do not provide private perl(Time::Piece)
perl-Time-Piece-MySQL.spec |7 ++-
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247253
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247253
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: mojomojo-1.05 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=738596
Summary: mojomojo-1.05 is available
Product: Fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-Mozilla-CA-20110914 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=738599
Summary: perl-Mozilla-CA-20110914 is available
Product:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=715559
Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
changed:
What|Removed
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-File-pushd-1.001 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=738598
Summary: perl-File-pushd-1.001 is available
Product: Fedora
perl-Unicode-CheckUTF8 has broken dependencies in the F-16 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Unicode-CheckUTF8-1.03-2.fc15.x86_64 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.4)
On i386:
perl-Unicode-CheckUTF8-1.03-2.fc15.i686 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.4)
Please resolve this as soon as
perl-Test-Version has broken dependencies in the F-16 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Test-Version-1.0.0-3.fc15.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.4)
On i386:
perl-Test-Version-1.0.0-3.fc15.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.4)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule has broken dependencies in the F-16 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-9.fc16.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3)
On i386:
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-9.fc16.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3)
Please resolve this as soon as
perl-HTML-FormatText-WithLinks-AndTables has broken dependencies in the F-16
tree:
On x86_64:
perl-HTML-FormatText-WithLinks-AndTables-0.01-2.fc15.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.4)
On i386:
perl-HTML-FormatText-WithLinks-AndTables-0.01-2.fc15.noarch requires
perl-NOCpulse-Gritch has broken dependencies in the F-16 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-NOCpulse-Gritch-1.27.9-1.fc16.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3)
On i386:
perl-NOCpulse-Gritch-1.27.9-1.fc16.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3)
Please resolve this as soon as
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Mojolicious:
f39feb56dc7a0931807a0a9b77989741 Mojolicious-1.98.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 19353f853b6395a08917a96e2ecb9ecec7e9bf90
Author: Yanko Kaneti yan...@declera.com
Date: Thu Sep 15 13:50:01 2011 +0300
Upstream update 1.98
.gitignore|1 +
perl-Mojolicious.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-File-pushd:
aed697867748e3376f2befc13fb23865 File-pushd-1.001.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 92424658eb3bbdd24f6f6d13698606ffd844a201
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Sep 15 12:07:13 2011 +0200
Do not provide private perl(Time::Piece)
perl-Time-Piece-MySQL.spec |9 -
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=738598
Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
1 - 100 of 119 matches
Mail list logo
