On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 7:43 PM, Jef Spaleta jspal...@gmail.com wrote:
If you haven't read the new summary write-up on the benefits of the
/user feature that I think you would benefit from reading it.
http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/TheCaseForTheUsrMerge
If you have read it,
On 01/28/2012 10:47 AM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
[1] Improved compatibility with Solaris - Seriously? We didn't need
that level of compatibility back when Linux was a small niche, why
would we care now?
I feel mildly insulted by that argument.
Why stop with Solaris compatibility and not mimick
Morning people,
Having just caught onto this thread about half way through and now read
the various pages concerning the topic, I am still in the dark about
going forward.
I have 3 machines running F15 that I am upgrading to F16 shortly. I have
been using yum to upgrade 2 of them since Fedora
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 5:57 PM, John Ellson john.ell...@comcast.net wrote:
Another issue is that I have:
/bin/sh: error while loading shared libraries: libc.so.6: cannot open
shared object file: No such file or directory
[ 1.796642] Kernel panic - not syncing: attempted to kill
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/27/2012 09:16 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2012-01-27 at 16:36 -0500, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
On 01/27/2012 04:13 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
Roland Grunberg wrote:
I noticed that libselinux was just updated to have ldconfig
in /usr/sbin/
On 28/01/12 12:30, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
Ok the problem with that is people like me run in rawhide all the time
to try to prevent other people seeing SELinux Hickups. So the sooner
I see major changes the better. Do we have a yum repository I could
point at to switch my machine to the new
On 01/27/2012 10:50 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
You can make your fork of Fedora roll all you want, but please leave
us in peace!
Good luck! ^^
Kevin Kofler
Way to represent Fedora by being a jerk.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Fri, 27.01.12 22:40, Kevin Kofler (kevin.kof...@chello.at) wrote:
Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
people targetting FHS compliant systems (unless the FHS changes)
That's the biggest flaw of this feature: It violates the FHS!
You know, not even its former editor seems to to believe that (or that
On Sat, 28.01.12 11:29, Ralf Corsepius (rc040...@freenet.de) wrote:
On 01/28/2012 10:47 AM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
[1] Improved compatibility with Solaris - Seriously? We didn't need
that level of compatibility back when Linux was a small niche, why
would we care now?
I feel mildly
On 01/28/2012 06:48 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 5:57 PM, John Ellsonjohn.ell...@comcast.net wrote:
Another issue is that I have:
/bin/sh: error while loading shared libraries: libc.so.6: cannot open
shared object file: No such file or directory
[1.796642] Kernel
On Sat, 2012-01-28 at 11:27 +, phantomjinx wrote:
Morning people,
Having just caught onto this thread about half way through and now read
the various pages concerning the topic, I am still in the dark about
going forward.
I have 3 machines running F15 that I am upgrading to F16
On Sat, 2012-01-28 at 07:30 -0500, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
On 01/27/2012 09:16 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2012-01-27 at 16:36 -0500, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
On 01/27/2012 04:13 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
Roland Grunberg wrote:
I noticed that libselinux was just updated to have ldconfig
- Andrew Wyatt and...@fuduntu.org wrote:
Way to represent Fedora by being a jerk.
Way to represent Fedora by being a jerk.
Next time try to be excellent to each other. Two things I personally get
tired of reading. A rhetorical question comes to mind Would you rather he was
excellent to
On 01/28/2012 10:35 AM, Robert 'Bob' Jensen wrote:
- Andrew Wyattand...@fuduntu.org wrote:
Way to represent Fedora by being a jerk.
Way to represent Fedora by being a jerk.
Next time try to be excellent to each other. Two things I personally get tired of
reading. A rhetorical question
- Andrew Wyatt and...@fuduntu.org wrote:
I didn't call him a jerk because he disagreed about the potential of
Fedora as a rolling release. I called him a jerk for being a jerk. I
offered nothing but praise for Fedora, and he started the response
with
just go away.
There is a
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 11:15:11AM -0600, Andrew Wyatt wrote:
Back on topic. It wouldn't continue to come up if people didn't see
value in it. Simply discarding the idea because a lot of developers
feel that it's a waste of time is not valid criticism of the idea.
If you can't count how
On 01/28/2012 11:23 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Sat, 28 Jan 2012 11:15:11 -0600
Andrew Wyattand...@fuduntu.org wrote:
...snip...
Back on topic. It wouldn't continue to come up if people didn't see
value in it. Simply discarding the idea because a lot of
developers feel that it's a waste of
On 01/28/2012 10:59 AM, Robert 'Bob' Jensen wrote:
- Andrew Wyattand...@fuduntu.org wrote:
I didn't call him a jerk because he disagreed about the potential of
Fedora as a rolling release. I called him a jerk for being a jerk. I
offered nothing but praise for Fedora, and he started the
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 07:41:47AM -0600, Andrew Wyatt wrote:
On 01/27/2012 10:50 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
You can make your fork of Fedora roll all you want, but please
leave us in peace!
Good luck! ^^
Kevin Kofler
Way to represent Fedora by being a jerk.
Just as a reminder,
2012/1/28 Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de:
Why stop with Solaris compatibility and not mimick Windows?
No /usr, no /bin = /redhat. Seems to be the spirit behind all this.
Ralf
The rhetoric spoils the argument. Various people inside of Red Hat are
either for this, against this, wanting to
On 01/27/2012 05:57 PM, John Ellson wrote:
On 01/27/2012 08:10 AM, Harald Hoyer wrote:
Hello Testers and rawhide Users,
Fedora 17 will locate the entire base operating system in /usr. The
directories
/bin, /sbin, /lib, /lib64 will only be symlinks:
/bin → /usr/bin
/sbin → /usr/sbin
On 2012-01-27 5:10, Harald Hoyer wrote:
Any files with conflicting names, which the conversion could not resolve, will
be backed up to files named *.usrmove~ residing in /usr/lib, /usr/lib64,
/usr/bin and /usr/sbin.
To which file does the conversion script append this suffix when it
resolves
On 01/28/2012 05:40 AM, Andrew Wyatt wrote:
I read the list thread concerning a Fedora rolling release distribution,
and I found it interesting enough to compel me to join the list and
weigh in.
First, I think a rolling release Fedora is a fantastic idea. I'm
certain that it's possible,
On 01/28/2012 12:23 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Sat, 28 Jan 2012 11:15:11 -0600
Andrew Wyatt and...@fuduntu.org wrote:
...snip...
...
I think the way forward is the one I outlined in:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2012-January/161632.html
Until those interested can
- Genes MailLists li...@sapience.com wrote:
Possibly - but without the support from at least some of the Fedora
core team (fesco, board, key redhatters etc) and possibly some on the
RH
business side recognizing some potential benefit in the enterprise
setting, this is quite likely
On 01/28/2012 04:26 PM, Robert 'Bob' Jensen wrote:
Gene, forgive me while I go off on a slight tangent forking the thread.
I do not thing it is worthwhile for them to do so. There may already be a
document somewhere on the wiki on this topic. It will never be found because
since the day
Fuduntu Dev here.
I'm not going to bore you all on how great rolling is, and how it's a
great model that works for everyone - I'll assume the good folks of
Fedora have already researched many different models. Instead, what
I'm going to talk about is the feasibility and the logistics.
Fuduntu
Daniel J Walsh wrote:
Oops, I thought we could build packages now. I also built an updated
policycoreutils...
And why didn't you untag the darn package? All our daily live image builds
failed today because of this!
I moved your build to the f17-usrmove tag where it belongs. (Any packager
Andrew Wyatt wrote:
I didn't call him a jerk because he disagreed about the potential of
Fedora as a rolling release. I called him a jerk for being a jerk. I
offered nothing but praise for Fedora, and he started the response with
just go away.
After seeing you boast about how at Fuduntu we
I thought you didn't speak for the community. I'm sorry if forking hurt your
feelings, but there really were only two options. Go forward and rework
everything for 15 or 16, or fork. Fedora 14 was EOS, remember?
Besides, you have no right and no business telling me where I am or am not
On 01/29/2012 06:12 AM, Noah Hall wrote:
Fuduntu Dev here.
I'm not going to bore you all on how great rolling is, and how it's a
great model that works for everyone - I'll assume the good folks of
Fedora have already researched many different models. Instead, what
I'm going to talk about is
On 01/28/2012 07:30 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
It may, however, be worth doing something with the naming of TCs / RCs,
as has been proposed in the past, because they do seem to confuse
people.
Every TC and RC announcement should have a brief blurb on who it is
targeting and whats the exact
On Sun, 2012-01-29 at 11:14 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 01/28/2012 07:30 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
It may, however, be worth doing something with the naming of TCs / RCs,
as has been proposed in the past, because they do seem to confuse
people.
Every TC and RC announcement
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Directory-Queue:
5be9ae874aa49bf6f5ba64d33d99ed07 Directory-Queue-1.5.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 9d4ba5e1779fb20f1c67fa8f2fedc5ce87f39457
Author: Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch
Date: Sat Jan 28 11:13:00 2012 +0100
Update to 1.5 rhbz#785073.
.gitignore|1 +
perl-Directory-Queue.spec |7 +--
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 7
The unsigned tag 'perl-Directory-Queue-1.5-1.fc17' was created.
Tagger: Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch
Date: Sat Jan 28 11:13:37 2012 +0100
Update to 1.5 rhbz#785073.
Changes since the last tag 'perl-Directory-Queue-1.4-1.fc16':
Dennis Gilmore (1):
- Rebuilt for
Summary of changes:
1418423... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_17_Mass (*)
9d4ba5e... Update to 1.5 rhbz#785073. (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
The unsigned tag 'perl-Directory-Queue-1.5-1.fc16' was created.
Tagger: Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch
Date: Sat Jan 28 11:15:15 2012 +0100
Update to 1.5 rhbz#785073.
Changes since the last tag 'perl-Directory-Queue-1.4-1.fc16':
Dennis Gilmore (1):
- Rebuilt for
Summary of changes:
1418423... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_17_Mass (*)
9d4ba5e... Update to 1.5 rhbz#785073. (*)
3331d84... Update to 1.5 rhbz#785073.
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
The unsigned tag 'perl-Directory-Queue-1.5-1.el6' was created.
Tagger: Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch
Date: Sat Jan 28 11:16:44 2012 +0100
Update to 1.5 rhbz#785073.
Changes since the last tag 'perl-Directory-Queue-1.4-1.el6':
Dennis Gilmore (1):
- Rebuilt for
commit 3331d84f63da451f6ce574f7c6ed8682d57c776e
Merge: 03c5164 9d4ba5e
Author: Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch
Date: Sat Jan 28 11:16:28 2012 +0100
Update to 1.5 rhbz#785073.
.gitignore|1 +
perl-Directory-Queue.spec |5 -
sources |2
Summary of changes:
10ad12b... Initialize branch EL-6 for perl-Directory-Queue (*)
7e053f1... Populate branches: #607355 (*)
fb47d34... Forgot the .spec file. (*)
11e99d5... Bump release due to my mitake. (*)
7e1c4f3... dist-git conversion (*)
ec67560... Merge branch 'master' into el6
The unsigned tag 'perl-Directory-Queue-1.5-1.el5' was created.
Tagger: Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch
Date: Sat Jan 28 11:17:32 2012 +0100
Update to 1.5 rhbz#785073.
Changes since the last tag 'perl-Directory-Queue-1.4-1.el5':
Dennis Gilmore (1):
- Rebuilt for
commit 4ce1fa89e6d4c5f0bfd899ec71236ebadab6959f
Merge: 1d6494b 3331d84
Author: Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch
Date: Sat Jan 28 11:17:18 2012 +0100
Merge branch 'el6' into el5
.gitignore|1 +
perl-Directory-Queue.spec |5 -
sources |2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785073
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-01-28
04:18:35 EST ---
perl-Directory-Queue-1.5-1.fc16
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785073
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-01-28
04:18:28 EST ---
perl-Directory-Queue-1.5-1.el6
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785073
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-01-28
04:18:43 EST ---
perl-Directory-Queue-1.5-1.el5
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-Glib-Object-Introspection-0.006 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785363
Summary: perl-Glib-Object-Introspection-0.006 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-Archive-RPM-0.07 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785361
Summary: perl-Archive-RPM-0.07 is available
Product: Fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-MogileFS-Client-1.15 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785365
Summary: perl-MogileFS-Client-1.15 is available
Product:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-MogileFS-Utils-2.22 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785366
Summary: perl-MogileFS-Utils-2.22 is available
Product:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-Module-Install-ExtraTests-0.007 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785364
Summary: perl-Module-Install-ExtraTests-0.007 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785073
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
53 matches
Mail list logo
