This is what I get for the last few days:
# yum --skip-broken update
This is a fairly common scenario. Let me explain..
Repository cachecookie was older than 6 hours,
Yum updates the metalink.xml file:
updates/17/x86_64/metalink | 16 kB 00:00
The repomd.xml timestamp stored in
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-IO-Socket-SSL:
a8a68e432e02d58a67c3e99742c07f83 IO-Socket-SSL-1.79.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
I came across what looks like a possible licensing issue with LibRaw and
applications that link to it. I am not totally sure that there is a problem,
but I have enough reason to have doubts. I welcome any clarifications and
advice.
LibRaw's License tag was changed from LGPLv2 or CDDL to GPLv3
Il 23/11/2012 15:33, Johannes Lips ha scritto:
Hi all,
I am looking for a new freemind maintainer. I've stated the reason for
this in this mail to java-devel:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/java-devel/2012-November/004561.html
Perhaps someone would like to take over...
Johannes
documentation, F17 update pushes etc that may
be needed.
This is a reminder of the upcoming QA meeting. Please add any topic
suggestions to the meeting wiki page:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Meetings/20121126
The current proposed agenda is included below.
== Proposed Agenda Topics ==
1
Hi,
I have retired mod_auth_shadow for F18 and anything newer. Package will be
blocked (hopefully soon, ticket for this was raised to rel-eng).
If there is somebody who wants to maintain this, please go ahead and pick
ownership in PKGDB.
Reason for retirement is that upstream is dead (no
On 11/25/2012 05:12 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 11:43:01AM +0100, Simon Lukasik wrote:
On 11/22/2012 09:07 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 12:52:30PM -0500, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
Interpreters do not preclude simple data: they just scale
Won't you need to retire it when elfutils obsoletes it?
On 24 November 2012 07:40, Jan Kratochvil jan.kratoch...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi,
as elfutils package is going to contain unwinder in its next release orphaning
the libunwind library.
You're asking for something very open-ended, and which is not even
possible to implement in general -- what if the inspecting operating
system is Linux, and the inspected operating system needs custom Mac OS X
libraries?
In any case, the correct place to request this is with the SCAP
standards
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Caterpillar caterpilla...@gmail.com wrote:
Il 23/11/2012 15:33, Johannes Lips ha scritto:
Hi all,
I am looking for a new freemind maintainer. I've stated the reason for
this in this mail to java-devel:
On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 12:23:16 +0100, Mat Booth wrote:
Won't you need to retire it when elfutils obsoletes it?
The development is not yet at that point, it may happen later:
(1) elfutils needs to integrate it and get released first (January/February),
being worked on with Mark Wielaard:
I'm here asking advice. PackageKit used to ship subpackages of
PackageKit-glib, PackageKit-glib-devel, PackageKit-qt, and
PackageKit-qt-devel amoung others.
Upstream PackageKit-Qt has been split out into another separate
project as it had different API and ABI promises to PackageKit-glib
and it
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 7:14 AM, Jan Kratochvil
jan.kratoch...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 12:23:16 +0100, Mat Booth wrote:
Won't you need to retire it when elfutils obsoletes it?
The development is not yet at that point, it may happen later:
(1) elfutils needs to integrate it and
On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 14:00:17 +0100, Josh Boyer wrote:
So are you not orphaning libunwind until that is merged into the
upstream kernel?
To get the terminology right:
I am 'orphaning' it now. Later it may be 'obsolsted'.
If I should keep it formally maintaining I could. But factically it
On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 15:22:08 +0100, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 14:00:17 +0100, Josh Boyer wrote:
So are you not orphaning libunwind until that is merged into the
upstream kernel?
To get the terminology right:
I am 'orphaning' it now. Later it may be 'obsolsted'.
Probably
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 03:22:08PM +0100, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 14:00:17 +0100, Josh Boyer wrote:
So are you not orphaning libunwind until that is merged into the
upstream kernel?
To get the terminology right:
I am 'orphaning' it now. Later it may be 'obsolsted'.
commit 2e05079f215ab2f2c3a9d804461f780c8274a728
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Nov 26 15:02:09 2012 +0100
3.52 bump to fix CVE-2012-5526
.gitignore |1 +
...n_cookies.patch = CGI-3.51-CVE-2012-5526.patch |0
perl-CGI.spec
Hot problems:
ID Components Count
---
90599 kernel 406
91614 kernel 303
90633 gnome-packagekit 212
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 9:29 AM, Jiri Olsa jo...@redhat.com wrote:
If perf winds up getting stuck relying on an orphaned library for some
non-trivial amount of time,
AFAIK that is common in Fedora there are orphaned libraries in use for
a release or two.
I'd rather just turn off
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 09:34:35AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 9:29 AM, Jiri Olsa jo...@redhat.com wrote:
If perf winds up getting stuck relying on an orphaned library for some
non-trivial amount of time,
AFAIK that is common in Fedora there are orphaned libraries
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Net-GitHub:
024925e1df996838ca8dd6ae518afac3 Net-GitHub-0.48.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 38bc297279c2040a428e65be7e6f28e4e7c8ce2c
Author: Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Nov 26 15:45:24 2012 +0100
0.48 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Net-GitHub.spec | 11 ---
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
---
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 9:41 AM, Jiri Olsa jo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 09:34:35AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 9:29 AM, Jiri Olsa jo...@redhat.com wrote:
If perf winds up getting stuck relying on an orphaned library for some
non-trivial amount of
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876974
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-CGI-3.52-218.fc17,perl-5.14.3-218.fc17 has been submitted as an update for
Fedora 17.
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 10:00:52AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 9:41 AM, Jiri Olsa jo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 09:34:35AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 9:29 AM, Jiri Olsa jo...@redhat.com wrote:
If perf winds up getting stuck
Richard Hughes wrote:
I'm here asking advice. PackageKit used to ship subpackages of
PackageKit-glib, PackageKit-glib-devel, PackageKit-qt, and
PackageKit-qt-devel amoung others.
Upstream PackageKit-Qt has been split out into another separate
project as it had different API and ABI
Summary of changes:
f3696b6... Update to 0.770 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-XML-LibXSLT:
92dfd4188353d50f0aa1f848f379914f XML-LibXSLT-1.79.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 0d2419553c088d4164ededed82eabd87b1ffd494
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Nov 26 16:27:33 2012 +0100
1.79 bump
.gitignore|1 +
perl-XML-LibXSLT.spec |8 +---
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
---
Hi everyone,
I am trying to follow the procedure here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_SCM_admin_requests#Package_Change_Requests_for_existing_packages
But I cannot set the fedora-cvs flag. Am I missing some sort of
permissions? What should I do?
Thanks,
Ben
--
Benjamin R Kreuter
On 26 November 2012 13:10, Fedora Rawhide Report
rawh...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
- no need to drop upstream commits patch as some twat blew it away
Bonus expletives today!
--
Mat Booth
http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 26 November 2012 15:19, Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu wrote:
I'll help with the review, if still needed.
Yes please, all help very welcome. I want to get the new version of PK
into F18 if possible, as it's got quite a few nice fixes that people
want.
Imo, the Obsoletes/Provides should
On Nov 26, 2012 7:39 AM, Richard Hughes hughsi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 26 November 2012 15:19, Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu wrote:
Imo, the Obsoletes/Provides should only go in the new and sepearate -qt
package
Sure, that's somewhat easier. Something like:
Obsoletes: PackageKit-qt
commit 986b9b0cbdcd7ceeace3f7000af22d52ff9dca25
Author: Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Nov 26 17:07:41 2012 +0100
Buildrequire perl(Cwd), simplify filters
perl-IO-Tty.spec | 12 ++--
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-IO-Tty.spec
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879963
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Rose-DB-0.770-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Rose-DB-0.770-1.fc17
--
You are
On 11/25/12 1:46 PM, darrell pfeifer wrote:
Last night on my rawhide laptop I installed
kernel 3.7.0-0.rc6.git4.1.fc19.
Upon reboot I got a grub shell prompt. Turns out my /boot was empty.
Are you sure it was properly mounted, and you weren't just looking at the empty
mountpoint?
-Eric
On 11/26/2012 10:14 AM, Debarshi Ray wrote:
I came across what looks like a possible licensing issue with LibRaw and
applications that link to it. I am not totally sure that there is a problem,
but I have enough reason to have doubts. I welcome any clarifications and
advice.
LibRaw's
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Rose-DB-Object:
acd603db13869672f018268802558bfb Rose-DB-Object-0.801.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit f25f6ff74216d238ab8da2af024b1319465e83f7
Author: Bill Pemberton wf...@virginia.edu
Date: Mon Nov 26 11:21:53 2012 -0500
Update to 0.801
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Rose-DB-Object.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2
If that is the case, then has Yorba been notified of that? I doubt they
would suddenly want their code to become GPLv3 instead of LGPLv2+.
Why does it matter? Their code hasn't changed, and has not become
GPLv3. The package is GPLv3+.
It matters because Shotwell links to GStreamer.
On Mon, 2012-11-26 at 15:38 +, Mat Booth wrote:
On 26 November 2012 13:10, Fedora Rawhide Report
rawh...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
- no need to drop upstream commits patch as some twat blew it away
Bonus expletives today!
Hahaha such way with words.
--
Mike Chambers
Madisonville, KY
On 11/26/2012 04:26 PM, Debarshi Ray wrote:
If that is the case, then has Yorba been notified of that? I doubt they
would suddenly want their code to become GPLv3 instead of LGPLv2+.
Why does it matter? Their code hasn't changed, and has not become GPLv3.
The package is GPLv3+.
It
Why does it matter? Their code hasn't changed, and has not become GPLv3.
The package is GPLv3+.
It matters because Shotwell links to GStreamer.
GStreamer applications either opt for LGPLv2+ or GPLv2+ with exceptions
because they might end up using proprietary or otherwise unfavourably
On 11/26/2012 07:29 PM, Debarshi Ray wrote:
Why does it matter? Their code hasn't changed, and has not become GPLv3.
The package is GPLv3+.
It matters because Shotwell links to GStreamer.
GStreamer applications either opt for LGPLv2+ or GPLv2+ with exceptions
because they might end up using
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 07:40:10PM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
I am not familiar with gstreamer's internals, but AFAIIK, these
plugins aren't linked, but dlopen'ed.
Otherwise these plugins would not be plugins ;)
The difference is an implementation detail, and so depending on it for
legal
On Thu, 2012-11-22 at 17:51 +0100, Nils Philippsen wrote:
Hi,
as nmcli doesn't yet offer all functionality s-c-network-tui had for
configuring networks on the command line, I want to resurrect
system-config-network for the time being, i.e. until nmcli (or other
tools) fill the gaps. I plan
On Thu, 2012-11-22 at 17:51 +0100, Nils Philippsen wrote:
Hi,
as nmcli doesn't yet offer all functionality s-c-network-tui had for
configuring networks on the command line, I want to resurrect
system-config-network for the time being, i.e. until nmcli (or other
tools) fill the gaps. I plan
On 11/26/2012 07:54 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 07:40:10PM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
I am not familiar with gstreamer's internals, but AFAIIK, these
plugins aren't linked, but dlopen'ed.
Otherwise these plugins would not be plugins ;)
The difference is an
On Mon, 2012-11-26 at 14:08 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Thu, 2012-11-22 at 17:51 +0100, Nils Philippsen wrote:
Hi,
as nmcli doesn't yet offer all functionality s-c-network-tui had for
configuring networks on the command line, I want to resurrect
system-config-network for the time
Dne 26/11/12 16:29, Benjamin Kreuter napsal(a):
Hi everyone,
I am trying to follow the procedure here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_SCM_admin_requests#Package_Change_Requests_for_existing_packages
But I cannot set the fedora-cvs flag. Am I missing some sort of
permissions?
Once upon a time, Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de said:
Well, dlopen'ed modules/plugins aren't directly linked, i.e. there is
only an indirect dependency. AFAICT (IANAL), this is what makes the
legal key-difference.
IANAL either, but neither is what matters in the legal sense; derived
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 8:43 PM, Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.comwrote:
On 11/22/2012 10:07 PM, Ben Boeckel wrote:
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 18:15:26 GMT, Jon Ciesla wrote:
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 12:08 PM, Panu Matilainen
pmati...@laiskiainen.org wrote:
-- Build files have been written
On 11/26/2012 06:29 PM, Debarshi Ray wrote:
Why does it matter? Their code hasn't changed, and has not become GPLv3.
The package is GPLv3+.
It matters because Shotwell links to GStreamer.
GStreamer applications either opt for LGPLv2+ or GPLv2+ with exceptions
because they might end up
Hi folks,
A gentle reminder that the FESCo town hall session for the F19 elections
is at 1700UTC on November 27[1][2]. It's a good chance to question the
candidates[3] before you cast your votes at the ballot.
I hope to see you there.
More information on the elections can be found here[3].
On Mon, 26.11.12 11:23, Mat Booth (fed...@matbooth.co.uk) wrote:
On 24 November 2012 07:40, Jan Kratochvil jan.kratoch...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi,
as elfutils package is going to contain unwinder in its next release
orphaning
the libunwind library.
Hi,
A package called rssh has been marked as duplicate on Bugzilla and I am
working on a 2.3.3 version and would like to update it to a new
release. Could you please inform me why this package have been orphaned.
I am not a packager; I am seeking a sponsor to help me review the file.
Thank
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 04:08:22PM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
python-offtrac
I'll take this one!
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Nov 26, 2012 8:22 AM, Jan Kratochvil jan.kratoch...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 14:00:17 +0100, Josh Boyer wrote:
If perf winds up getting stuck relying on an orphaned library for some
non-trivial amount of time,
AFAIK that is common in Fedora there are orphaned libraries in
- Original Message -
From: Alexander Aristotle Davis aadav...@learn.senecac.on.ca
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 8:03:17 PM
Subject: need help with a package
Hi,
A package called rssh has been marked as duplicate on Bugzilla and I
am
working
On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 23:44:24 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Mon, 26.11.12 11:23, Mat Booth (fed...@matbooth.co.uk) wrote:
On 24 November 2012 07:40, Jan Kratochvil jan.kratoch...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi,
as elfutils package is going to contain unwinder in its next release
On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 02:48:00 +0100, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
But these are just implementation. Ideally we want every package that gets
released to the users to have a maintainer that is watching bug reports and
attempting to fix anything serious.
There are serious bugs so that some cases are
On Mon, 2012-11-26 at 20:13 +, Andrew Haley wrote:
On 11/26/2012 06:29 PM, Debarshi Ray wrote:
Why does it matter? Their code hasn't changed, and has not become
GPLv3. The package is GPLv3+.
If the license of libraw changed significantly, the libraw package
should be updated to reflect
Summary of changes:
87df3e2... Update to 2.059 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
6905824... Update to 2.059 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879957
--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
Bug-fix release, suitable for F≥18.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Digest-SHA:
671d35a73c0feaf38533465f5355aaa2 Digest-SHA-5.74.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit ff3c4acc0b7866d2c4cae884776eef7850f2373a
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Nov 26 09:27:50 2012 +0100
5.74 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Digest-SHA.spec |7 +--
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff
commit 2a7c945b20a51733909d18753dc689b47e5a0502
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Nov 1 10:54:46 2012 +0100
5.73 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Digest-SHA.spec |9 ++---
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
---
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879957
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879957
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Digest-SHA-5.74-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Digest-SHA-5.74-1.fc18
--
You are
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879959
--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
Bug-fix release suitable for F≥18.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for
perl-MooseX-TrackDirty-Attributes:
30ebefbf191424d564085750771ca438 MooseX-TrackDirty-Attributes-2.002.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit d9c45e596e4dabcbcd6e67fd8f06e786e5f2975b
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Nov 26 09:47:44 2012 +0100
2.002 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-MooseX-TrackDirty-Attributes.spec |5 -
sources|2 +-
3
Summary of changes:
d9c45e5... 2.002 bump (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Perl-Critic-Pulp:
3481192fa1df327a74600326fc3bf548 Perl-Critic-Pulp-75.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 57349615440130ee449784e9fe18dc3bac5166e3
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Nov 26 10:00:35 2012 +0100
75 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Perl-Critic-Pulp.spec |5 -
sources|2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879959
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879959
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-MooseX-TrackDirty-Attributes-2.002-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update
for Fedora 18.
The lightweight tag 'perl-Compress-Raw-Lzma-2.059-1.fc19' was created pointing
to:
6315882... Update to 2.059
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2-2.059-1.fc19' was created pointing
to:
6905824... Update to 2.059
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2-2.059-1.fc18' was created pointing
to:
6905824... Update to 2.059
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-Compress-Raw-Lzma-2.059-1.fc18' was created pointing
to:
6315882... Update to 2.059
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib-2.059-1.fc18' was created pointing
to:
87df3e2... Update to 2.059
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib-2.059-1.fc19' was created pointing
to:
87df3e2... Update to 2.059
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-podlinkcheck:
58af5557a3d6e5ba3684fe16b0309737 podlinkcheck-10.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879955
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib-2.059-1.fc18,perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2-2.059-1.fc18,perl-Compress-Raw-Lzma-2.059-1.fc18
has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879956
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib-2.059-1.fc18,perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2-2.059-1.fc18,perl-Compress-Raw-Lzma-2.059-1.fc18
has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
commit 8923e8f087d9aa34a49de04f71d2d5773cf79ee5
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Nov 26 10:14:59 2012 +0100
10 bump
perl-podlinkcheck.spec | 14 --
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-podlinkcheck.spec b/perl-podlinkcheck.spec
commit 00f61082dc0f86c77dab013ef73a85a4595090ba
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Nov 26 10:18:48 2012 +0100
Cache sources
.gitignore |1 +
sources|2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879960
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879961
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
commit 4b03cab2e56be5bc81c96f615074cec5e24b1469
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Mon Nov 26 09:30:31 2012 +
Update to 1.79
- New upstream release 1.79
- Use getnameinfo instead of unpack_sockaddr_in6 to get PeerAddr and
PeerPort
from sockaddr in
Summary of changes:
afe37c0... Added some missing build dependencies (*)
4b03cab... Update to 1.79 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
The lightweight tag 'perl-IO-Socket-SSL-1.79-1.fc18' was created pointing to:
4b03cab... Update to 1.79
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-IO-Socket-SSL-1.79-1.fc19' was created pointing to:
4b03cab... Update to 1.79
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879965
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-X11-Protocol-Other:
aadc9cc7b8882e67fa10645f0197cb19 X11-Protocol-Other-22.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit feed99908622811ae6132b8a6561912f3d4e2b8f
Author: Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Nov 26 11:20:43 2012 +0100
22 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-X11-Protocol-Other.spec | 16 ++--
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 12
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879965
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-POE-Component-IRC:
7e01cdd3feb46b96b7623355fcefb547 POE-Component-IRC-6.81.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
1 - 100 of 145 matches
Mail list logo
