On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 11:40 AM, Tyler Brock tyler.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey Dave, hope you had a nice weekend.
Any update on the rpms?
Repos for x86 32-bit and 64-bit can be found at:
http://daveisfera.fedorapeople.org/yum/llvm-3.4/
___
WG meeting will be at 16:00 UTC, 17:00 Central Europe, 12:00 (noon)
Boston, 9:00 San Francisco, 1:00 Tokyo in #fedora-meeting on Freenode.
== Topic ==
Comments to topics from lists:
* Allow to delete builds/coprs from playground?
On 04/16/2014 06:46 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
I understand the pull vs push distinction ... I'm just not clear why pull
would ever be a model you'd want to use. (vs something like a local cockpit
agent.)
Isn't remote Windows event logging pull-only (unless you somehow gate it
to syslog)?
- Original Message -
From: Liam l...@fightingcrane.com
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Monday, April 21, 2014 10:10:13 PM
Subject: Re: F21 System Wide Change: Workstation: Disable firewall
On Apr 21, 2014 4:32 AM, drago01
- Original Message -
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 1:38 PM, Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com
wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/15/2014 11:29 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
...snip...
Special Requests: Cockpit would like to request an additional
2-4 weeks
On 04/20/2014 06:46 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Lukas Zapletal wrote:
This is a great change that actually allows other teams that heavily
relies on Fedoras to put their software on hold for two Fedora
releases.
And that's a good thing how? Stale software relying on old compatibility
libraries is
On 04/21/2014 12:22 AM, drago01 wrote:
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 12:02 AM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
* there are network services enabled by default
Again that's a bug and a viloation of the guidelines. Which services
are you talking about?
Please file bugs.
* avahi is one
On 04/21/2014 10:46 PM, Haïkel Guémar wrote:
Hi,
Google just published the list of the accepted GSoC proposals:
http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/projects/list/google/gsoc2014
We -the GSoC SIG- had a hard time to trim the list of proposals down to
10 slots and we're very pleased to see
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 11:23 AM, Thomas Woerner twoer...@redhat.com wrote:
On 04/21/2014 12:22 AM, drago01 wrote:
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 12:02 AM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
wrote:
* there are network services enabled by default
Again that's a bug and a viloation of the
- Original Message -
From: Thomas Woerner twoer...@redhat.com
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2014 11:23:46 AM
Subject: Re: F21 System Wide Change: Workstation: Disable firewall
On 04/21/2014 12:22 AM, drago01 wrote:
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 12:02 AM,
On Mon, 2014-04-21 at 08:36 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
The language in this Foundation is sometimes dangerously unclear. For
example, it pretty much explicitly forbids the use of non-free
components in the creation of Fedora (sorry, folks: you can't use
Photoshop to create your package
- Original Message -
From: Nikos Roussos comzer...@fedoraproject.org
There is also a third group, somewhere in between, who believe that's ok
to ship Free Software that connects and interops with proprietary
services (gtalk, aws, etc), but it's not ok to ship proprietary
software,
On Tue, 2014-04-22 at 06:46 -0400, Christian Schaller wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Nikos Roussos comzer...@fedoraproject.org
There is also a third group, somewhere in between, who believe that's ok
to ship Free Software that connects and interops with proprietary
services
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/22/2014 05:43 AM, Christian Schaller wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Thomas Woerner twoer...@redhat.com To:
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2014
11:23:46 AM Subject: Re: F21 System Wide Change:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/21/2014 06:23 PM, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
On 04/21/2014 01:27 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On 04/21/2014 01:07 PM, Haïkel Guémar wrote:
We should think on how we could improve collaboration with
third-party repos, fedmsg/copr might be
On 04/22/2014 11:43 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
I'd like to summon Máirín Duffy into this conversation here, if she's
willing. She's done a fair amount of research into exactly how many
and what kind of questions are reasonable to ask a user in startup
before scaring them off or confusing
Yay! Spamming the list for once, but indeed - congrats to everyone!
This time around, we should plan a meeting on irc sometime :-)
On Apr 22, 2014 1:16 AM, Haïkel Guémar hgue...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Hi,
Google just published the list of the accepted GSoC proposals:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/21/2014 05:31 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On 21 April 2014 11:19, Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com
mailto:sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
On 04/21/2014 01:08 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/22/2014 07:40 AM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 04/22/2014 11:43 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
I'd like to summon Máirín Duffy into this conversation here, if
she's willing. She's done a fair amount of research into exactly
how many and
- Original Message -
From: Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2014 1:40:05 PM
Subject: Re: F21 System Wide Change: Workstation: Disable firewall
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/22/2014 05:43
Hello,
we are rolling out update of Puppet to 3.4.3 in Fedora 20 and Rawhide that
adds one important change. We have found that puppet master was running
unconfined, therefore the Puppet SELinux policy was not effective in Fedoras.
The puppet package update fixes one little issue (missing
Hi folks,
On 04/22/2014 07:40 AM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
Is it safe to assume that research is backup by public usability
tests?
On 04/22/2014 07:55 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
When I invoke Máirín, I usually find it safe to make that assumption,
but I'll let her speak for herself on
On Tue, 2014-04-22 at 06:34 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Wed, 16.04.14 12:46, Bill Nottingham (nott...@splat.cc) wrote:
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) said:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 04:20:16PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Jaroslav Reznik (jrez...@redhat.com)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/22/2014 08:55 AM, Máirín Duffy wrote:
Hi folks,
On 04/22/2014 07:40 AM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
Is it safe to assume that research is backup by public
usability tests?
On 04/22/2014 07:55 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
When I invoke
- Original Message -
Le lundi 21 avril 2014 à 11:17 -0400, Stephen Gallagher a écrit :
I'm trying to assert with this proposal that the best way for us to
advance free and open source software is to continue shipping only
open-source software, while making it easy for users to
On Apr 22, 2014 3:05 AM, Christian Schaller cscha...@redhat.com wrote:
...
As a sidenote, there has been a lot of discussions on this an other
Fedora lists
over the last few Months where people have loudly come out against what
they see
as infringements on the Freedom part of the four F's.
2014-04-22 16:10 GMT+02:00 Máirín Duffy du...@fedoraproject.org:
To be honest, I'm fairly uncomfortable discussing this without Fedora Legal
weighing in. I don't see any problem with re-visiting the decisions made
along this path, but I also am pretty confident the folks who decided things
On 04/22/2014 09:13 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
So one of the key questions here is whether the current policy on
essentially hiding (protecting?) the user from these external software
sources is truly in keeping with our Foundations, Mission and general
project health.
To be honest, I'm
Hi,
On 04/22/2014 10:14 AM, H. Guémar wrote:
Well, we may end up lawyered by Legal, but I think it's good we try to
realign ourselves and clear up few misunderstandings.
How do you propose we do that?
~m
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 06:01:31AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Note that it should be relatively straight-forward to implement a
generator (even in shell...) that generates native systemd-networkd
configuration snippets from ifcfg files at runtime (or upgrade-time),
similar to how we
Broken deps for i386
--
[MegaMek]
MegaMek-0.30.11-13.fc20.i686 requires java-gcj-compat
MegaMek-0.30.11-13.fc20.i686 requires java-gcj-compat
[PyKDE]
PyKDE-3.16.6-14.fc20.i686 requires sip-api(10) = 0:10.0
[apper]
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 05:06:33AM -0400, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
Cutting one week from Alpha/Beta cycle is doable but only when it's
really, really needed. We did this voodoo magic a few times to avoid
Christmas etc. and believe me - that note in the Task Juggler source
for schedule - never,
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 06:34:48AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Pull is the only model that scales, since the centralized log infrastructure
can
schedule when it pulls from where and thus do this according to
available resources. THe push model is prone to logging bursts
overwhelming log
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 05:50:20PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
Board seats should absolutely keep in mind various aspects of the
entire project, but we need less partisanship and more open-mindedness
at this level. We need people willing to work together to find out
what is best for the Project
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/22/2014 11:17 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 05:50:20PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
Board seats should absolutely keep in mind various aspects of
the entire project, but we need less partisanship and more
open-mindedness at
On 04/22/2014 08:55 AM, Máirín Duffy wrote:
Some of the choices Przemek suggested don't make sense depending on
the context. E.g., full functionality vs. small size / speed I think
has a different meaning depending on whether you have a workstation
target (which, either way, will include X) or
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 05:05:24AM -0400, Christian Schaller wrote:
As a sidenote, there has been a lot of discussions on this an other Fedora
lists
over the last few Months where people have loudly come out against what they
see
as infringements on the Freedom part of the four F's. Having
#fedora-meeting: Env and Stacks (2014-04-22)
Meeting started by mmaslano at 15:01:39 UTC. The full logs are available
at
http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/5520/6765520/root.log
All the scriptlets are failing like this:
DEBUG util.py:281: /bin/sh: error while loading shared libraries:
libtinfo.so.5: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
DEBUG util.py:281: error:
2014-04-21 16:18 GMT+02:00 Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org:
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 10:30:48PM +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
Writing too fast... you were actually arguing for a situation 2 used by
default + 1 used but not used by default I think. In that case your
argument is right
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Matthew Miller
mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 05:50:20PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
Board seats should absolutely keep in mind various aspects of the
entire project, but we need less partisanship and more open-mindedness
at this level.
2014-04-20 22:56 GMT+02:00 Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net:
than just install one of the already available by default
unsecure operating systems instead damage Linux and bring
it in the same bad shape
Note that there *aren't* any major available by default unsecure operating
systems
2014-04-20 23:20 GMT+02:00 Lars Seipel lars.sei...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 11:44:58PM +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
We don't, actually. *Only* applications running in a session of a member
of the wheel group would have that right, and those applications are
pretty
much
2014-04-22 13:40 GMT+02:00 Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com:
3) Recovery and auditing are more important than prevention.
This is *only* true for large managed enterprises, where recovery is
possible in the first place (how many people don't have good backups?), and
prevention is
Am 22.04.2014 19:01, schrieb Miloslav Trmač:
2014-04-22 13:40 GMT+02:00 Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com
mailto:sgall...@redhat.com:
3) Recovery and auditing are more important than prevention.
This is /only/ true for large managed enterprises, where recovery is possible
in
2014-04-22 15:10 GMT+02:00 Simo Sorce s...@redhat.com:
A good protocol would allow to send a first small
packet that establish a connection and a reply that can push back on
the client w/o requiring huge bandwidth to be spent.
Isn't that an inherent capability of TCP? If it is not
On 22 April 2014 05:40, Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Since you missed the link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jYGgVUYjXQ8
I too recommend that everyone gives it a look. It is very insightful
and helpful in understanding what
On Tue, 2014-04-22 at 19:01 +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
2014-04-22 13:40 GMT+02:00 Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com:
3) Recovery and auditing are more important than prevention.
This is only true for large managed enterprises, where recovery is
possible in the first place (how
This is repeatable, and it's not just me that's reporting it.
So far it only happens on i686 however.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
virt-df lists disk usage of guests
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 12:17 AM, Florian Weimer fwei...@redhat.com wrote:
On 04/21/2014 03:44 AM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
Would it
make sense to audit all spec files to look for instances of
'systemctl.*enable'?
I'm attaching the hits for that pattern on the actual RPM scripts in Fedora
From: l...@redhat.com
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Date: 04/22/2014 08:47
Hello,
we are rolling out update of Puppet to 3.4.3 in Fedora 20 and Rawhide
that
adds one important change. We have found that puppet master was running
unconfined, therefore the Puppet SELinux policy was
On 22 April 2014 05:53, Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/21/2014 05:31 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On 21 April 2014 11:19, Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com
mailto:sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP
The issue appears to be varnish-libs-devel over-providing various
things (pkg-config, env). Kevin Fenzi fixed it -- thanks!
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
virt-builder
On Tue, 2014-04-22 at 19:04 +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
2014-04-22 15:10 GMT+02:00 Simo Sorce s...@redhat.com:
A good protocol would allow to send a first small
packet that establish a connection and a reply that can push back on
the client w/o requiring huge bandwidth to be spent.
On Tue, 2014-04-22 at 13:22 -0400, Russell Doty wrote:
On Tue, 2014-04-22 at 19:01 +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
2014-04-22 13:40 GMT+02:00 Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com:
3) Recovery and auditing are more important than prevention.
This is only true for large managed
On Tue, 22 Apr 2014 10:33:12 -0700
Andrew Lutomirski l...@mit.edu wrote:
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 12:17 AM, Florian Weimer fwei...@redhat.com
wrote:
On 04/21/2014 03:44 AM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
Would it
make sense to audit all spec files to look for instances of
2014-04-21 17:56 GMT+02:00 Eric H. Christensen spa...@fedoraproject.org:
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 08:36:55AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
...I'd
like to suggest a fifth Foundation, one to ultimately supersede all
the rest: Functional.
I think anytime anyone suggests a new foundation
2014-04-21 19:07 GMT+02:00 Haïkel Guémar hgue...@fedoraproject.org:
Le 21/04/2014 18:37, Stephen Gallagher a écrit :
I spoke too strongly there, I think. We do however give a *very*
strong impression that using non-FOSS solutions for anything at all is
unwelcome at best. Consider the recent
On Tue, 2014-04-22 at 14:23 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Tue, 2014-04-22 at 13:22 -0400, Russell Doty wrote:
On Tue, 2014-04-22 at 19:01 +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
2014-04-22 13:40 GMT+02:00 Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com:
3) Recovery and auditing are more important than
2014-04-21 19:37 GMT+02:00 Eric H. Christensen spa...@fedoraproject.org:
And how are these contributors going to contribute to their proprietary
solutions that we now provide for them?
They aren't; isn't that a *benefit* for the open solutions?
How do we support something that is simply
Hi all-
I propose a mass bug against packages that install services and enable
them without using the preset mechanism. Some of these can be
security issues if they get installed as dependencies.
As a related issue, it may pay to review the default presets. For
example, rpcbind is enabled.
2014-04-22 20:19 GMT+02:00 Simo Sorce s...@redhat.com:
On Tue, 2014-04-22 at 19:04 +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
2014-04-22 15:10 GMT+02:00 Simo Sorce s...@redhat.com:
A good protocol would allow to send a first small
packet that establish a connection and a reply that can push back on
Jaroslav Reznik (jrez...@redhat.com) said:
I think this definitely better way - not being as strict regarding
deadlines for Cockpit and get some test coverage during later Test
Day.
I'd be fine with a later deadline for Cockpit if needed, especially since
(from the feature page description)
Hello,
2014-04-22 20:50 GMT+02:00 Andrew Lutomirski l...@mit.edu:
If your package has an exception from FESCo permitting it to enable
itself,
Note that many (most?) packages don't need an individual exception by
FESCo: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Starting_services_by_default allows
fairly
On Tue, 2014-04-22 at 14:41 -0400, Russell Doty wrote:
On Tue, 2014-04-22 at 14:23 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Tue, 2014-04-22 at 13:22 -0400, Russell Doty wrote:
On Tue, 2014-04-22 at 19:01 +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
2014-04-22 13:40 GMT+02:00 Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com:
Marcela Mašláňová (mmasl...@redhat.com) said:
On 04/14/2014 10:17 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Jaroslav Reznik (jrez...@redhat.com) said:
= Proposed System Wide Change: Ruby193 in SCL =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Ruby193_in_SCL
Change owner(s): Marcela Mašláňová
Miloslav Trmač (m...@volny.cz) said:
AFAICS this discussion basically says applications can't depend on
firewalld, therefore they can't use firewalld APIs, therefore they wouldn't
know whether the firewall restircts them, therefore firewalld must be
removed.
The only given reason why the
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 12:00 PM, Miloslav Trmač m...@volny.cz wrote:
Hello,
2014-04-22 20:50 GMT+02:00 Andrew Lutomirski l...@mit.edu:
If your package has an exception from FESCo permitting it to enable
itself,
Note that many (most?) packages don't need an individual exception by FESCo:
On Tue, 2014-04-22 at 15:04 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Tue, 2014-04-22 at 14:41 -0400, Russell Doty wrote:
On Tue, 2014-04-22 at 14:23 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Tue, 2014-04-22 at 13:22 -0400, Russell Doty wrote:
On Tue, 2014-04-22 at 19:01 +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
2014-04-22
Dear all,
A while ago I introduced you the dev instance of pkgdb2. Since then, I have been
working some more on it.
I recently updated pgkdb-cli to work with the new API [1] as well as writing
a python module for those that want to script against said API [2].
On March 10th, pkgdb2 made it to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 08:33:55PM +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
I find it difficult to believe that most users [don't have Flash
installed]. AFAIK there is no data to say either way, and anecdotal
evidence from around here isn't supportive.
On Tue, 2014-04-22 at 20:58 +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
2014-04-22 20:19 GMT+02:00 Simo Sorce s...@redhat.com:
On Tue, 2014-04-22 at 19:04 +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
2014-04-22 15:10 GMT+02:00 Simo Sorce s...@redhat.com:
A good protocol would allow to send a first small
2014-04-22 21:31 GMT+02:00 Eric H. Christensen spa...@fedoraproject.org:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 08:33:55PM +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
I find it difficult to believe that most users [don't have Flash
installed]. AFAIK there is no data to
On Tue, 22 Apr 2014 15:31:11 -0400
Eric H. Christensen spa...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 08:33:55PM +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
I find it difficult to believe that most users [don't have Flash
installed]. AFAIK there
Reposted from
http://fedoramagazine.org/five-things-in-fedora-this-week-2014-04-22/
Fedora is a big project, and it’s hard to follow it all. This series
highlights interesting happenings in five different areas every week.
It isn’t comprehensive news coverage — just quick summaries with links
to
On 04/22/2014 06:50 PM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
Hi all-
I propose a mass bug against packages that install services and enable
them without using the preset mechanism. Some of these can be
security issues if they get installed as dependencies.
I will revisit all of this once I run the
On 04/17/2014 12:09 PM, Tim Flink wrote:
On Thu, 17 Apr 2014 10:03:24 -0400 (EDT)
Kamil Paral kpa...@redhat.com wrote:
https://pythonhosted.org/an_example_pypi_project/sphinx.html#auto-directives
I'm not suggesting that we drop everything and fix all the
docstrings right now but I am
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 2:19 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
johan...@gmail.com wrote:
On 04/22/2014 06:50 PM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
Hi all-
I propose a mass bug against packages that install services and enable
them without using the preset mechanism. Some of these can be
security issues if
On 04/22/2014 09:32 PM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 2:19 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
johan...@gmail.com wrote:
On 04/22/2014 06:50 PM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
Hi all-
I propose a mass bug against packages that install services and enable
them without using the preset
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 2:54 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
johan...@gmail.com wrote:
On 04/22/2014 09:32 PM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 2:19 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
johan...@gmail.com wrote:
On 04/22/2014 06:50 PM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
Hi all-
I propose a
On 04/22/2014 10:14 PM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
I don't think that fixing the broken packages should need to wait for
this migration to finish -- there is a security problem now, and it
can be fixed now with local changes to the thirty-something affected
packages.
By all means provide
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 3:14 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
johan...@gmail.com wrote:
On 04/22/2014 10:14 PM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
I don't think that fixing the broken packages should need to wait for
this migration to finish -- there is a security problem now, and it
can be fixed now with
Hi,
I see openjdk-1.8.0 got built and pushed as an update for fedora 19
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=505651 .
In the past the i686 rpms of openjdk were pushed into release x86_64
repo of fedora 19
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting Wednesday at 17:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2014-04-23 17:00 UTC'
Links to all tickets
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 12:17:10PM -0700, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
Examples of runs once then goes away services
include iptables and udev.
I removed udev from this paragraph on the wiki, since it's persistent and
is a bad example.
Zbyszek
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 06:34:48AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Wed, 16.04.14 12:46, Bill Nottingham (nott...@splat.cc) wrote:
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) said:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 04:20:16PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Jaroslav Reznik
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 03:32:26PM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Tue, 2014-04-22 at 20:58 +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
2014-04-22 20:19 GMT+02:00 Simo Sorce s...@redhat.com:
On Tue, 2014-04-22 at 19:04 +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
2014-04-22 15:10 GMT+02:00 Simo Sorce s...@redhat.com:
On Tue, 22.04.14 09:10, Simo Sorce (s...@redhat.com) wrote:
I am pretty sure that a pull model should be the default for everything
we do, and push only be done where realtimish behaviour is desired to do
live debugging or suchlike.
I am pretty sure the push model concept is one of the
On Wed, 2014-04-23 at 05:36 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Tue, 22.04.14 09:10, Simo Sorce (s...@redhat.com) wrote:
I am pretty sure that a pull model should be the default for everything
we do, and push only be done where realtimish behaviour is desired to do
live debugging or
Hi everyone,
I am using Fedora20. I wanted to add a new tuned profile and used the
script plugin for the same.
This essentially tweaks the cpu frequency governor and min/max frequency
settings. When I opt out of this profile, I want the settings to be
restored. I have included the restoration
On Apr 22, 2014 5:09 AM, Christian Schaller cscha...@redhat.com wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Liam l...@fightingcrane.com
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Monday, April 21, 2014 10:10:13 PM
Subject: Re: F21 System Wide
Package perl-Module-Install-Repository in Fedora EPEL 7 is now owned by pghmcfc
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Module-Install-Repository
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing
Package perl-Module-Install-ReadmeMarkdownFromPod in Fedora EPEL 7 is now owned
by pghmcfc
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Module-Install-ReadmeMarkdownFromPod
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
Package perl-Module-Install-AuthorTests in Fedora EPEL 7 is now owned by pghmcfc
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Module-Install-AuthorTests
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing
Package perl-Pod-Markdown in Fedora EPEL 7 is now owned by pghmcfc
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Pod-Markdown
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1087903
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-CSS-Minifier-0.01-15.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL
6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-CSS-Minifier-0.01-15.el6
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1087904
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Text-Patch-1.8-7.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Text-Patch-1.8-7.el6
--
You are receiving this
perl-PDL has broken dependencies in the epel-7 tree:
On ppc64:
perl-PDL-2.7.0-2.el7.1.ppc64 requires perl(PDL::Slatec)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1089994
Bug ID: 1089994
Summary: perl-Email-Address-1.903 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Email-Address
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1089998
Bug ID: 1089998
Summary: perl-libwww-perl-6.06 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-libwww-perl
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
1 - 100 of 127 matches
Mail list logo
