https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270076
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Log-Report-1.08-1.fc21 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 21.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-6d5c41bb1b
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1250532
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
3f1e1f325b0c13bb23926aaa98af522c App-Cmd-0.329.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-App-Cmd/App-Cmd-0.329.tar.gz/md5/3f1e1f325b0c13bb23926aaa98af522c/App-Cmd-0.329.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing
From 80bf3e9cb2b0f9db93e90c60dc7ddd5af6d43dd9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Emmanuel Seyman
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2015 11:34:18 +0200
Subject: Update to 0.44
---
.gitignore | 1 +
perl-Catalyst-View-TT.spec | 6 +-
sources| 2 +-
3 files
aace8c973abee7a59fa865ef3a954f18 Mojolicious-6.23.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Mojolicious/Mojolicious-6.23.tar.gz/md5/aace8c973abee7a59fa865ef3a954f18/Mojolicious-6.23.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
Hi
Recent versions of devscripts-minimal (containing licensecheck) began
depending on dpkg-perl due to [1]. Unfortunately I'm quite unfamiliar
with perl, can anyone suggest an alternative way to accomplish the same
which does not use spawn from Dpkg::IPC?
Thanks
Sandro
[1]
From 2e7586dc398528871074fb744fda34dbeb174375 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2015 10:23:19 +0200
Subject: 3.3.7 bump
---
.gitignore| 1 +
perl-Text-Xslate.spec | 9 ++---
sources | 2 +-
3 files changed, 8
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270189
Bug ID: 1270189
Summary: Upgrade perl-Cairo to 1.106
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Cairo
Keywords: FutureFeature
Assignee: tcall...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1225047
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Curses-1.32-1.fc22
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270197
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 1081228
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1081228=edit
[patch] Update to 0.49 (#1270197)
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270197
Bug ID: 1270197
Summary: perl-MooseX-Method-Signatures-0.49 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-MooseX-Method-Signatures
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
0f6b73ea9885ff2839cabf9dbcb91559 Catalyst-View-TT-0.44.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Catalyst-View-TT/Catalyst-View-TT-0.44.tar.gz/md5/0f6b73ea9885ff2839cabf9dbcb91559/Catalyst-View-TT-0.44.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
On 8 October 2015 at 23:58, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Matthew Miller wrote:
>> In many cases, this effectively means creating a Fedora-specfic fork of
>> the project.
>
> Only if you call patches to the build system (with little to no changes to
> the actual code) a "fork".
>
c373d0bf5c37bbd03c0b1d93c27ab95c Struct-Dumb-0.06.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Struct-Dumb/Struct-Dumb-0.06.tar.gz/md5/c373d0bf5c37bbd03c0b1d93c27ab95c/Struct-Dumb-0.06.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1269061
--- Comment #3 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
eseyman's perl-Catalyst-View-TT-0.44-1.fc24 completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=690577
--
You are receiving this
2015-10-09 1:17 GMT+02:00 Kevin Kofler :
> Haïkel wrote:
>> Not that I'm 100% happy with the way it happened but this has been a
>> very long-lived topic. To some, it'll be a hasty decision, to others,
>> it's already a late one.
>
> There's a REASON it had always been shot
From f53e2f4df93fbe6b42868642b68f25d6320b2127 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Emmanuel Seyman
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2015 11:47:01 +0200
Subject: Update to 0.59
---
.gitignore | 1 +
perl-Variable-Magic.spec | 5 -
sources | 2 +-
3 files changed,
From e29ed0de574e720140efff2a1b0650e2c2c8a3a9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Emmanuel Seyman
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2015 12:00:51 +0200
Subject: Update to 6.23
---
.gitignore| 1 +
perl-Mojolicious.spec | 5 -
sources | 2 +-
3 files changed, 6
From 29bfe1c816bb5c8beddff655b5c6f543c0416ec0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2015 12:23:38 +0200
Subject: 0.072 bump
---
.gitignore | 1 +
perl-Tree-R.spec | 15 ++-
sources | 2 +-
3 files changed, 12
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270076
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Log-Report-1.08-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-60a13a9011
--
You are receiving this mail
4a05ff0e0cb56475a1520230a9dd299b Text-Xslate-3.3.7.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Text-Xslate/Text-Xslate-3.3.7.tar.gz/md5/4a05ff0e0cb56475a1520230a9dd299b/Text-Xslate-3.3.7.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270076
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Log-Report-1.08-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 22.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-cca919fd76
--
You are receiving this mail
From c18b112b59253b330cd3942ff01cbfb33095358b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?=
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2015 10:27:30 +0200
Subject: 1.21 bump
---
.gitignore | 1 +
perl-Unicode-Normalize.spec | 7 +--
sources
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270090
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270090
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Unicode-Normalize-1.21-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora
23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-c53bbb2c60
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270193
Bug ID: 1270193
Summary: Upgrade perl-Config-Model to 2.074
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Config-Model
Keywords: FutureFeature
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270198
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Scratch build failed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11382980
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
f43b0182fe4b0f38bcdb69a4a838785e Variable-Magic-0.59.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Variable-Magic/Variable-Magic-0.59.tar.gz/md5/f43b0182fe4b0f38bcdb69a4a838785e/Variable-Magic-0.59.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
From c18b112b59253b330cd3942ff01cbfb33095358b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?=
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2015 10:27:30 +0200
Subject: 1.21 bump
---
.gitignore | 1 +
perl-Unicode-Normalize.spec | 7 +--
sources
ab0c459cc53d5e23c1ecda1eb3d8e01f Unicode-Normalize-1.21.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Unicode-Normalize/Unicode-Normalize-1.21.tar.gz/md5/ab0c459cc53d5e23c1ecda1eb3d8e01f/Unicode-Normalize-1.21.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270090
--- Comment #3 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
ppisar's perl-Unicode-Normalize-1.21-1.fc24 completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=690565
--
You are receiving this
For those who are interested new (official) mailing list was created (kudos to
Nick
Coghlan and Barry Warsaw). The purpose of the mailing list is to bring together
all folks
from various Linux distro communities to discuss any future (e.g.
usr/bin/python)
or current features (/wave PEP476)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270188
Bug ID: 1270188
Summary: Upgrade perl-App-Cmd to 0.329
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-App-Cmd
Keywords: FutureFeature
Assignee: emman...@seyman.fr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270191
Bug ID: 1270191
Summary: Upgrade perl-CGI-Ex to 2.44
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-CGI-Ex
Keywords: FutureFeature
Assignee: emman...@seyman.fr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270195
Bug ID: 1270195
Summary: Upgrade perl-Crypt-SMIME to 0.16
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Crypt-SMIME
Keywords: FutureFeature
Assignee:
From b047002d5d49388f7b0f213a689ccaa5101955d3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Emmanuel Seyman
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2015 11:11:49 +0200
Subject: Update to 0.329
---
.gitignore| 1 +
perl-App-Cmd.spec | 5 -
sources | 2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270196
Bug ID: 1270196
Summary: Upgrade perl-Curses to 1.33
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Curses
Keywords: FutureFeature
Assignee: steve.tray...@cern.ch
b6c4723cf7c64606cc43310f7b54e830 CGI-Ex-2.44.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-CGI-Ex/CGI-Ex-2.44.tar.gz/md5/b6c4723cf7c64606cc43310f7b54e830/CGI-Ex-2.44.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270198
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 1081230
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1081230=edit
[patch] Update to 0.17 (#1270198)
--
You are
From def582d90cd9d4c29de79062254c2813a7be6544 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Emmanuel Seyman
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2015 11:19:36 +0200
Subject: Update to 2.44
---
.gitignore | 1 +
perl-CGI-Ex.spec | 5 -
sources | 2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270197
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Scratch build failed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11382964
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270199
Bug ID: 1270199
Summary: Upgrade perl-MooseX-Types-DateTime to 0.13
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-MooseX-Types-DateTime
Keywords: FutureFeature
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270198
Bug ID: 1270198
Summary: perl-MooseX-Role-WithOverloading-0.17 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-MooseX-Role-WithOverloading
Keywords: FutureFeature,
From 2f7f65ffc5c9c3170fd7f5c0dafdf44755ecbad1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Emmanuel Seyman
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2015 11:38:56 +0200
Subject: Update to 0.06
---
.gitignore| 1 +
perl-Struct-Dumb.spec | 5 -
sources | 2 +-
3 files changed, 6
465e8faf3e68d2a136f7b2bcd8cb4891 Tree-R-0.072.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Tree-R/Tree-R-0.072.tar.gz/md5/465e8faf3e68d2a136f7b2bcd8cb4891/Tree-R-0.072.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
Matthew Miller wrote:
> When the packager has reasoned belief that debundling is actively bad
> in some way for this package, I think we should trust the packager. I
> know not everyone on this thread agrees, but in general, Fedora
> *always* places a high level of trust in our packagers to make
Adam Jackson wrote:
> I'd call that the app not working, yes. Symbol conflicts are literally
> trivial to find, I'm really not sure why you bring the point up.
Because it is the worst possible consequence of bundled libraries (or abuse
of compatibility libraries – there too, more effort needs
On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 7:33 PM, Reindl Harald
wrote:
>
>
> Am 09.10.2015 um 21:41 schrieb Orion Poplawski:
>
>> On 10/08/2015 01:08 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> From an unrelated practical point of view: consider that the metadata
>>> pulled down so DNF can
Neal Gompa wrote:
> At this point in time, Fedora is the only major distribution I know of
> that doesn't use versioned shared library package names. Both SUSE and
> Mageia do, and of course the Debian/Ubuntu family does. I've spoken to
> folks working in both SUSE and Mageia (especially Mageia
Orion Poplawski wrote:
> Perhaps every product should produce a os/{repodata,Packages} directory as
> well as an updates/VERSION/PRODUCT/ tree with .
Please no! Let's not fragment Fedora even more than it already is with those
"products".
* Would packages belonging to multiple products (kernel,
On 10/09/2015 05:20 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Orion Poplawski wrote:
Perhaps every product should produce a os/{repodata,Packages} directory as
well as an updates/VERSION/PRODUCT/ tree with .
Please no! Let's not fragment Fedora even more than it already is with those
"products".
* Would
Missing expected images:
Kde disk raw armhfp
Kde live i386
Kde live x86_64
No images in this compose but not Rawhide 20151008
Images in Rawhide 20151008 but not this:
Design_suite live x86_64
Cloud docker x86_64
Kde disk raw armhfp
Kde live i386
Design_suite live i386
Kde live x86_64
--
Mail
On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 4:47 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <
zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 11:38:30AM -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> > On 10/09/2015 10:27 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 09:46:11AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > >> On
Adam Jackson wrote:
> Bundling is _not_ intrinsically poor practice. Firefox is a good
> example of this,
Firefox is exactly an example of how NOT to do things, and I'm fed up of it
getting a blanket exception to our packaging guidelines. And now the "fix"
is to simply remove the guideline for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270076
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
Am 09.10.2015 um 21:41 schrieb Orion Poplawski:
On 10/08/2015 01:08 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
From an unrelated practical point of view: consider that the metadata
pulled down so DNF can operate is basically the same size as the entire
(compressed) Fedora Cloud Base image. It'd be very nice
Am 10.10.2015 um 01:59 schrieb Neal Gompa:
On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 7:33 PM, Reindl Harald
Zdenek Kabelac wrote:
> IMHO all we need is to support multiple version of same library
> to be installable -- that's mine point why usability of Fedora
> is miles behind other distros.
Then you open the doors to symbol conflicts (see my reply to Adam Jackson
elsewhere in this thread).
And
Chris Adams wrote:
> Is that short-sighted? IMHO yes. Can Fedora fix that? Doubtful.
> There are three choices:
>
> - Fedora attempts to patch in a stable(-enough) ABI, build shared
> libraries, and unbundle all consumers of said libraries. This is a
> large (and growing) amount of work,
Ian Malone wrote:
> I'm actually all for unbundling, but going it alone is not guaranteed
> to be simple. "Oh, hey, that deprecated function has been removed."
Then you try to port the application to the new APIs, and if it's not
possible, you revert the library commit that removed the old API.
From 2bc42f2007557b88c7b1641f9b6e33b1c6197421 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?=
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2015 10:09:15 +0200
Subject: 1.08 bump
---
.gitignore | 1 +
perl-Log-Report.spec | 6 --
sources | 2 +-
3 files
From ba377e116908c11bd029677d59a39126a411f1a6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?=
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2015 10:09:15 +0200
Subject: 1.08 bump
---
.gitignore | 1 +
perl-Log-Report.spec | 6 --
sources | 2 +-
3 files
From ba377e116908c11bd029677d59a39126a411f1a6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?=
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2015 10:09:15 +0200
Subject: 1.08 bump
---
.gitignore | 1 +
perl-Log-Report.spec | 6 --
sources | 2 +-
3 files
From 08604d81a2b81ad3268b4bf70f5b00d64118ffe3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?=
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2015 10:09:15 +0200
Subject: 1.08 bump
---
.gitignore | 1 +
perl-Log-Report.spec | 6 --
sources | 2 +-
3 files
f2e5fb5329704b7940fb4a1101e3c8a1 CPAN-FindDependencies-2.44.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-CPAN-FindDependencies/CPAN-FindDependencies-2.44.tar.gz/md5/f2e5fb5329704b7940fb4a1101e3c8a1/CPAN-FindDependencies-2.44.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
941ef45a81ee0b00c227795b47747691 CPAN-Reporter-1.2015.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-CPAN-Reporter/CPAN-Reporter-1.2015.tar.gz/md5/941ef45a81ee0b00c227795b47747691/CPAN-Reporter-1.2015.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
From 4b88a429651da38d7f348a0cc2edaaa38734fe8c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2015 10:03:38 +0200
Subject: 1.2015 bump
---
.gitignore | 1 +
perl-CPAN-Reporter.spec | 8 ++--
sources | 2 +-
3 files changed,
4962ca69c5705f64398ed3fd7b8ae1f2 Log-Report-1.08.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Log-Report/Log-Report-1.08.tar.gz/md5/4962ca69c5705f64398ed3fd7b8ae1f2/Log-Report-1.08.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256146
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270076
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270076
--- Comment #4 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
ppisar's perl-Log-Report-1.08-1.fc24 completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=690561
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1269063
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-local-lib-2.17-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
From fdd3b1af413d6a79869bab88f2f1bc3d89b78331 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2015 09:41:01 +0200
Subject: 2.44 bump
---
.gitignore | 1 +
perl-CPAN-FindDependencies.spec | 6 +-
sources | 2
Hello,
I built an update for f22-backgrounds package which includes the missing
supplemental backgrounds.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/f22-backgrounds/
Unfortunately, I do not have permission to commit the change although I
uploaded the latest tar.xz file as
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245383
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 01:41:15PM -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> > From an unrelated practical point of view: consider that the metadata
> > pulled down so DNF can operate is basically the same size as the entire
> > (compressed) Fedora Cloud Base image. It'd be very nice to not have
> > that
On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 11:38:30AM -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 10/09/2015 10:27 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 09:46:11AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >> On Fri, 9 Oct 2015 17:05:00 +0200
> >> Vít Ondruch wrote:
> >>
> >>> This does
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
215 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1087
dokuwiki-0-0.24.20140929c.el7
111 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-6813
chicken-4.9.0.1-4.el7
44
On Fri, 2015-10-09 at 13:05 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > How are the screenshots rebased? Is it all manual work?
>
> More or less. the openQA web UI has an interactive needle editor
> which
> lets you basically run a test and pause after each failed match, then
> you can fiddle with the
One of proven packager, nonamedotc, will be able to commit the updated
f22-backgrounds.
The request of co-maintainance is no longer required.
Regards,
--
Luya Tshimbalanga
Graphic & Web Designer
E: l...@fedoraproject.org
W: http://www.coolest-storm.net
--
devel mailing list
On 10/09/2015 09:17 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On 8 October 2015 at 17:04, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Christopher Meng wrote:
IMO motif should 'Obsoletes' lesstif in Fedora since motif is free now.
The reason we kept lesstif even after OpenMotif was finally freed is
On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 9:32 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Neal Gompa wrote:
> > At this point in time, Fedora is the only major distribution I know of
> > that doesn't use versioned shared library package names. Both SUSE and
> > Mageia do, and of course the Debian/Ubuntu
On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 10:47:22AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> as of this morning US time we have changed the way rawhide buildroots are
> created in koji. rawhide is now using dnf to install the packages into the
> buildroot. this means that in f24 and on dnf will be used to create the
>
On 10/09/2015 10:39 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-10-09 at 13:05 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
>>> How are the screenshots rebased? Is it all manual work?
>>
>> More or less. the openQA web UI has an interactive needle editor
>> which
>> lets you basically run a test and pause after
Hi all,
as of this morning US time we have changed the way rawhide buildroots are
created in koji. rawhide is now using dnf to install the packages into the
buildroot. this means that in f24 and on dnf will be used to create the
buildroot. as well as manage the updates on your system.
We
On Fri, 2015-10-09 at 14:55 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
> Interesting taking the consumer perspective.
>
> So where does FESCo intend to draw the line now that it has chosen to
> head down this path.
I mean, I can't speak for fesco as a whole, but speaking for myself: I
reject the
On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 10:16:31AM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> So from an OS maintenance perspective we have to recognize that
> bundling code occasionally does have merit, and that it is incumbent on
> us to manage it well. And from a Fedora perspective, we have to
> acknowledge that a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270198
--- Comment #3 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
eseyman's perl-MooseX-Role-WithOverloading-0.17-1.fc24 completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=690652
--
You are
On Fri, 9 Oct 2015 17:22:34 +0200
Zdenek Kabelac wrote:
> If all it would take would be e.g. : dnf install-compat
>
> Otherwise you basically require that every user of Fedora is
> supposedly quite skilled rpm package-maintainer ??
> (Which would roughly cut the user-base
On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 10:37:56AM -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-10-08 at 23:32 -0700, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
> > I built an update for f22-backgrounds package which includes the
> > missing
> > supplemental backgrounds.
>
> Isn't it rather late to be adding wallpapers to F22?
No missing expected images.
Images in this compose but not 23 Branched 20151008:
Cloud docker x86_64
Images in 23 Branched 20151008 but not this:
Workstation disk raw armhfp
Failed openQA tests: 48 of 52
ID: 5182Test: i386 kde_live default_install
ID: 5181Test: x86_64
On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 09:46:11AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Oct 2015 17:05:00 +0200
> Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> > This does not scale unfortunately ... and it is common excuse to not
> > support it properly. IOW, I want to have package foo-1.0 installed
> > side by
Hi all,
as of this morning US time we have changed the way rawhide buildroots are
created in koji. rawhide is now using dnf to install the packages into the
buildroot. this means that in f24 and on dnf will be used to create the
buildroot. as well as manage the updates on your system.
We
c4ba197decb5b6a2e45120a4a987e25d MooseX-Types-DateTime-0.13.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-MooseX-Types-DateTime/MooseX-Types-DateTime-0.13.tar.gz/md5/c4ba197decb5b6a2e45120a4a987e25d/MooseX-Types-DateTime-0.13.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
On Fri, 9 Oct 2015 17:05:00 +0200
Vít Ondruch wrote:
> This does not scale unfortunately ... and it is common excuse to not
> support it properly. IOW, I want to have package foo-1.0 installed
> side by side with foo-2.0 and I don't want to have foo1-1.0 side by
> side with
On Fri, 2015-10-09 at 12:17 -0400, Fedora compose checker wrote:
> No missing expected images.
>
> Images in this compose but not 23 Branched 20151008:
>
> Cloud docker x86_64
>
> Images in 23 Branched 20151008 but not this:
>
> Workstation disk raw armhfp
>
> Failed openQA tests: 48 of 52
From 070c9bde1dacf5cfbafcfa8726323e68fbfbd799 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2015 12:45:31 +0200
Subject: 0.31 bump
---
.gitignore | 1 +
perl-Net-Amazon-EC2.spec | 6 +-
sources | 2 +-
3 files changed, 7
On 10/09/2015 12:08 AM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
On Wednesday, 07 October 2015 at 21:17, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
Meeting summary
---
[...]
* #1483 Decision on bundling policy in the Fedora Package Collection
(sgallagh, 18:11:40)
* LINK:
160d5ed829882fb9ca8b29e6bb027abe Net-Amazon-EC2-0.31.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Net-Amazon-EC2/Net-Amazon-EC2-0.31.tar.gz/md5/160d5ed829882fb9ca8b29e6bb027abe/Net-Amazon-EC2-0.31.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270255
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Scratch build completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11385729
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
1 - 100 of 173 matches
Mail list logo