Re: [Fedora-packaging] Schedule for Wednesday's FPC Meeting (2017-08-09 17:00 UTC)

On Wed, 2017-08-09 at 01:28 -0400, James Antill wrote: > Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC > meeting Thursday at 2017-08-09 17:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-3 on > irc.freenode.net. Note that this should be #fedora-meeting-2 as that is free. > Local time

Schedule for Wednesday's FPC Meeting (2017-08-09 17:00 UTC)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC meeting Thursday at 2017-08-09 17:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-3 on irc.freenode.net. Local time information (via. uitime): = Day: Wednesday = 2017-08-09 10:00 PDT US/Pacific 2017-08-09

[389-devel] Please review: 49348 and 88

Hi, While at pyconau I was very quiet - because I was working toward a major goal that I have had for a while. This patch allows a perl-less install of the 389-ds server: https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49348

Re: 'No More Alphas': wiki revision drafts

On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 04:24:16PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > Is there any chance of running that at, say, > > https://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs-nextrelease/ instead of a > > local instance? > I mean, in *theory* we could for sure, it's just yet another > maintenance task for

Re: Self Introduction: David J Battaglia

Hello and thank you. What is the best direction to get started with doing reviews and or helping out triaging/fixing bugs. Just find something in bugzilla to work on ? Regards On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 10:39 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek < zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at

Re: Self Introduction: David J Battaglia

On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 09:01:59PM -0400, djb djb wrote: > Hello, > > I am just starting out with fedora packaging. My background is mostly > working in NOCs, infrastructure support roles and working as sys admin. > > Look for forward to learning as much as possible with the hopes of getting >

Self Introduction: David J Battaglia

Hello, I am just starting out with fedora packaging. My background is mostly working in NOCs, infrastructure support roles and working as sys admin. Look for forward to learning as much as possible with the hopes of getting sponsored. Regards, David J Battaglia

[Bug 1479602] New: perl-FFI-CheckLib-0.16 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1479602 Bug ID: 1479602 Summary: perl-FFI-CheckLib-0.16 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-FFI-CheckLib Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[389-devel] Re: future of lib389 - seperate or merged?

> > > > -- Merging lib389 to 389-ds-base > > ... > > * Testing DS is guaranteed to work. Right now we have rapid change in > > lib389 and the tests in say 1.3.5 or 1.2.11.x are unlikely to work with > > latest lib389. > Another problem here is that tests are not backported to the older >

Re: 'No More Alphas': wiki revision drafts

On Fri, 2017-08-04 at 00:38 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 08:50:09PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > Will the blockerbugs app start showing F28 blockers at the F27 branch > > > point? Or sometime later? From my point of view, the sooner the better. > > > > It tends to

[389-devel] Re: [PATCH] Allow to override build date

On Tue, 2017-08-08 at 08:00 +0200, Bernhard M. Wiedemann wrote: > in order to make builds reproducible. > See https://reproducible-builds.org/ for why this is good > and https://reproducible-builds.org/specs/source-date-epoch/ > for the definition of this variable. > --- > buildnum.pl | 2 +- > 1

Mass package change (python2- binary package renaming)

Hello Fedora Python package maintainers! This is an announcement of a mass package renaming: Python 2 binary packages will be renamed to python2-*. This will happen soon after the F27 branching on August 15th. Currently ~1330 source packages already generate a binary package with the python2-

Mass package change (python2- binary package renaming)

Hello Fedora Python package maintainers! This is an announcement of a mass package renaming: Python 2 binary packages will be renamed to python2-*. This will happen soon after the F27 branching on August 15th. Currently ~1330 source packages already generate a binary package with the python2-

Mass package change (python2- binary package renaming)

Hello Fedora Python package maintainers! This is an announcement of a mass package renaming: Python 2 binary packages will be renamed to python2-*. This will happen soon after the F27 branching on August 15th. Currently ~1330 source packages already generate a binary package with the python2-

Re: Module Stream "Expansion"

On Tue, 2017-08-08 at 13:39 -0400, Ralph Bean wrote: > ## Solution: "Input" Modulemd Syntax Changes > > We’re going to extend the modulemd syntax to allow specifying multiple > dependencies in an "input" modulemd (the one that packagers modify). When > submitted to the build system, the

Re: Module Stream "Expansion"

On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 03:11:38PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 09:04:40PM +0200, Petr Šabata wrote: > > dependencies: > > buildrequires: > > platform: [f28, f27, f26] > > shared-userspace: [fancy, nonfancy] > > requires: *deps > > > > Another

Re: Module Stream "Expansion"

On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 09:04:40PM +0200, Petr Šabata wrote: > dependencies: > buildrequires: > platform: [f28, f27, f26] > shared-userspace: [fancy, nonfancy] > requires: *deps > > Another point that came up later -- instead of shared-userspace, > imagine different streams

Re: Module Stream "Expansion"

On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 01:39:45PM -0400, Ralph Bean wrote: > This is a writeup on a problem we’re facing with modularity, and some ideas on > how to resolve it. > > # The "Problem" > > Imagine I have an **httpd module**. To simplify things, let’s say that this > module has only one stream:

Fedora 24 End Of Life

As of the 8th of August 2017, Fedora 24 has reached its end of life for updates and support. No further updates, including security updates, will be available for Fedora 24. A previous reminder was sent on 21st of July 2017 [0]. Fedora 25 will continue to receive updates until approximately one

Fedora 24 End Of Life

As of the 8th of August 2017, Fedora 24 has reached its end of life for updates and support. No further updates, including security updates, will be available for Fedora 24. A previous reminder was sent on 21st of July 2017 [0]. Fedora 25 will continue to receive updates until approximately one

[Bug 1283764] Use of uninitialized value in numeric eq (==) at /usr/share/ perl5/vendor_perl/File/Tail.pm line 391

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1283764 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- perl-File-Tail-1.3-7.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-f475d1d0a5 -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1283764] Use of uninitialized value in numeric eq (==) at /usr/share/ perl5/vendor_perl/File/Tail.pm line 391

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1283764 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED

spot pushed to perl-File-Tail (f25). "- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_26_Mass_Rebuild"

spot pushed to perl-File-Tail (f25). "- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_26_Mass_Rebuild; https://src.fedoraproject.org/cgit/perl-File-Tail.git/commit/?h=f25=e899616067a2ce100f3ed347cbfb8f794aa84213 ___ perl-devel mailing list

spot pushed to perl-File-Tail (f25). "- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_27_Mass_Rebuild"

spot pushed to perl-File-Tail (f25). "- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_27_Mass_Rebuild; https://src.fedoraproject.org/cgit/perl-File-Tail.git/commit/?h=f25=8ef5f551ef8a5b1599fa66af016bf12ad7e6cebe ___ perl-devel mailing list

spot pushed to perl-File-Tail (f25). "Perl 5.26 rebuild"

spot pushed to perl-File-Tail (f25). "Perl 5.26 rebuild" https://src.fedoraproject.org/cgit/perl-File-Tail.git/commit/?h=f25=1a21e3a58d83f0045de147839d01834c3c08a92c ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To

spot pushed to perl-File-Tail (f25). "do sanity checks"

spot pushed to perl-File-Tail (f25). "do sanity checks" https://src.fedoraproject.org/cgit/perl-File-Tail.git/commit/?h=f25=118747202323ebd29a6ec90ca280f7b2e60ff0d0 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To

Module Stream "Expansion"

This is a writeup on a problem we’re facing with modularity, and some ideas on how to resolve it. # The "Problem" Imagine I have an **httpd module**. To simplify things, let’s say that this module has only one stream: **2.4**. Today, in the modulemd for this module, I declare build and runtime

spot pushed to perl-File-Tail (f26). "Perl 5.26 rebuild"

spot pushed to perl-File-Tail (f26). "Perl 5.26 rebuild" https://src.fedoraproject.org/cgit/perl-File-Tail.git/commit/?h=f26=1a21e3a58d83f0045de147839d01834c3c08a92c ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To

spot pushed to perl-File-Tail (f26). "- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_27_Mass_Rebuild"

spot pushed to perl-File-Tail (f26). "- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_27_Mass_Rebuild; https://src.fedoraproject.org/cgit/perl-File-Tail.git/commit/?h=f26=8ef5f551ef8a5b1599fa66af016bf12ad7e6cebe ___ perl-devel mailing list

spot pushed to perl-File-Tail (f26). "do sanity checks"

spot pushed to perl-File-Tail (f26). "do sanity checks" https://src.fedoraproject.org/cgit/perl-File-Tail.git/commit/?h=f26=118747202323ebd29a6ec90ca280f7b2e60ff0d0 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To

[Bug 1378713] [abrt] slic3r: wxTopLevelWindowGTK::RequestUserAttention(): perl killed by SIGSEGV

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378713 Fedora End Of Life changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED

spot pushed to perl-File-Tail (master). "do sanity checks"

spot pushed to perl-File-Tail (master). "do sanity checks" https://src.fedoraproject.org/cgit/perl-File-Tail.git/commit/?h=master=118747202323ebd29a6ec90ca280f7b2e60ff0d0 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To

[EPEL-devel] Re: EPEL Steering Committee Meeting for 1800 UTC 2017-08-09

On 08/08/2017 07:40 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > We did not have the meeting last week. Could I get an RSVP or something > similar from committee members for this weeks meeting? I should be around. kevin -- > > > #startmeeting EPEL (2017-08-09) > #meetingname EPEL > #topic aloha > #chair

Re: Arbitrary Branching and solving the "Change Checkpoint? Better hit the gas!" problem

On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 03:26:04PM +0200, Petr Šabata wrote: > > Hm. I agree entirely with you, but when reading this I thought of > > another possibility. I think modularity gives people the option for a > > rolling release, where we don't have to make release == "collection of > > specific

Re: Arbitrary Branching and solving the "Change Checkpoint? Better hit the gas!" problem

On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 07:58:35PM +, Langdon White wrote: > We haven't documented this yet because we have been working through the > details of the how it should work. Basically, we need to provide a way, on > the system, to define: > a) what the "release" is. In other words, what did the

Re: [Modularity]: Service levels and EOL expectations?

On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 11:48:53PM +, Langdon White wrote: > I guess I am not sure how this is different with modules than with Fedora > today. We promise a 13 month lifecycle on openssl (and everything else) > already. I think the difference here is only that the "position" is > explicit.

Re: [Modularity]: Service levels and EOL expectations?

On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 10:38:15AM -0400, Przemek Klosowski wrote: > >Yeah, that would get crazy fast. The 6 month granularity proposal > >should help*some*, and we should probably go into this carefully. > > Technically, the SL for the module could have the narrow meaning > referring to the

Re: [Modularity]: Service levels and EOL expectations?

On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 02:13:38PM -, Ralph Bean wrote: > Thanks for starting this. I'm not aware of a ticket or a responsible > party at this point. +1 to working towards formalizing this. I'll make one if no one else has. Should we start at a rel-eng ticket, get a proposal worked out, and

Modularity Working Group IRC Meeting Minutes (2017-08-08)

= #fedora-meeting-3: Meeting of the Modularity Working Group (once every two weeks) = Meeting started by nils at 14:00:21 UTC.

[389-devel] Re: future of lib389 - seperate or merged?

On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 04:00:23PM +1000, William Brown wrote: > My vote is to merge them. I came to this decision because I believe that > this will make development against multiple branches easier with regard > to testing and backport of patches. For example, we'll know that lib389 > that's

[EPEL-devel] EPEL Steering Committee Meeting for 1800 UTC 2017-08-09

We did not have the meeting last week. Could I get an RSVP or something similar from committee members for this weeks meeting? #startmeeting EPEL (2017-08-09) #meetingname EPEL #topic aloha #chair avij bstinson Evolution nirik smooge #topic Announcements #info RHEL-7.4 released #info FLOCK 2017

Re: [Modularity]: Service levels and EOL expectations?

On 08/07/2017 03:58 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 02:10:23PM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: I still don't see how this is going to work with a tree of Service Levels and Lifetimes. Any module can not give a SL greater than the lowest SL and the shortest lifetime that any

Re: [Modularity]: Service levels and EOL expectations?

> Is there an active plan on figuring out these Service Levels? Is there > a ticket? Is there a specific person who owns this? I think we need at > least a preliminary understanding of what goes here for the F27 beta > (freeze on Sept. 9th, so... I guess by then?) Thanks for starting this. I'm

[389-devel] Re: future of lib389 - seperate or merged?

Hi William, On Tue, Aug 01 2017 at 16:00:23 +1000, William Brown wrote: > Hi all, > > Last night on IRC we were discussing the curious case of lib389. I think > this is a discussion we should have at some point. > > The question really boils down to - "is lib389 a seperate

Re: Arbitrary Branching and solving the "Change Checkpoint? Better hit the gas!" problem

On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 07:33:21AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 10:57 AM, Matthew Miller > wrote: > > Our Change process has the basic assumption that if a Change isn't > > working, we will be able to back out. But, in practice, when there are > >

[Bug 1283764] Use of uninitialized value in numeric eq (==) at /usr/share/ perl5/vendor_perl/File/Tail.pm line 391

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1283764 Harald Reindl changed: What|Removed |Added Version|24 |25 -- You

Re: Long time for package to be tagged into Rawhide

On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 01:33:31PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 12:31 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > > I built this one 3½ hours ago: > > > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=953201 > > > > A whole series of builds depend on

Re: Long time for package to be tagged into Rawhide

On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 12:31 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > I built this one 3½ hours ago: > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=953201 > > A whole series of builds depend on this but I'm still waiting for it > to get into the buildroot ... Can

[Bug 1288914] RT package is missing database schemas

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288914 Fedora End Of Life changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED

[Bug 1283764] Use of uninitialized value in numeric eq (==) at /usr/share/ perl5/vendor_perl/File/Tail.pm line 391

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1283764 Fedora End Of Life changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED

[Bug 1260609] bucardo-4.5.0-11.fc24 FTBFS randomly: Bucardo did not start, but we waited!

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1260609 Fedora End Of Life changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED

[EPEL-devel] recent builds of glusterfs in epel-7

I've noticed that puiterwijk and kevin have done builds recently of glusterfs. It's unclear to me why anyone would do that. I don't mind really, but I want remind everyone that glusterfs was retired from EPEL when RHEL started to ship glusterfs client-side RPMs. The correct place to get el7

[Bug 992723] perl-Sys-SigAction FTBFS: t/nested.t segfaults on ARM

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=992723 Fedora End Of Life changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED

[Bug 694496] rpm requirements - provides/requires (tracker)

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=694496 Bug 694496 depends on bug 674052, which changed state. Bug 674052 Summary: rpmbuild 4.9.0-0.beta1 does not find some perl run time dependencies https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674052 What|Removed

Long time for package to be tagged into Rawhide

I built this one 3½ hours ago: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=953201 A whole series of builds depend on this but I'm still waiting for it to get into the buildroot ... Can something be done to speed this up? Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat

[Bug 1379554] perl-XML-Twig: expand_external_ents option fails to work as documented [fedora-all]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379554 Jan Kurik changed: What|Removed |Added Version|24 |25 --- Comment #3

[Bug 1377997] perl-XML-LibXML: Expanding external entities by default [ fedora-all]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1377997 Jan Kurik changed: What|Removed |Added Version|24 |25 --- Comment #3

[Bug 1477577] perl-Data-Printer-0.40 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1477577 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED

[389-devel] Please review 48081: CI test - password - regression tests

https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/48081 https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/raw/files/f42429499528aa390d9bbaa02ed82eae90e693866a6456beaa04b4cd0eb9911c-0001-CI-tests-PasswordCheckSyntax.patch ___ 389-devel mailing list --

[Bug 1477577] perl-Data-Printer-0.40 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1477577 --- Comment #3 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- jplesnik's perl-Data-Printer-0.40-1.fc27 completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=953248 -- You are receiving this

jplesnik pushed to perl-Data-Printer (master). "0.40 bump"

jplesnik pushed to perl-Data-Printer (master). "0.40 bump" https://src.fedoraproject.org/cgit/perl-Data-Printer.git/commit/?h=master=ff11bf1c08ab7709f6cf27237a05a3e2c33031cb ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To

jplesnik uploaded Data-Printer-0.40.tar.gz for perl-Data-Printer

9aa92013c4d1f43a654f2e40f797a20f2fc5576d9496bc40bfe4b63e3f2c5893ffb4b83aaeca9c27ca09ab248e18ec44c1a0ca5a34cf140f62522f7adf15f446 Data-Printer-0.40.tar.gz

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Error (master). "Update to 0.17025, drop EL-5 support (..more)"

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Error (master). "Update to 0.17025, drop EL-5 support (..more)" https://src.fedoraproject.org/cgit/perl-Error.git/commit/?h=master=1fcaf339c688ae359fff3ac467f724a9b416febb ___ perl-devel mailing list --

pghmcfc uploaded Error-0.17025.tar.gz for perl-Error

0cb77d8be2f759aaf8970f9d5fa5483ba5ba687c115f6bbeaa22afb1b5c50fe6f70b4dce19a3c8d1bf6e9bfad0af86f2e03faac493f428b04962e5337be3ae2b Error-0.17025.tar.gz

[Bug 1468401] perl-Log-Dispatch-FileRotate-1.30 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1468401 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED

[Bug 1468829] perl-XML-Tidy-1.20 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1468829 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED

[Bug 1468928] perl-Tie-Cycle-1.225 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1468928 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED

[Bug 1473060] perl-Text-BibTeX-0.81 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1473060 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED

jplesnik pushed to perl-Text-BibTeX (master). "0.81 bump"

jplesnik pushed to perl-Text-BibTeX (master). "0.81 bump" https://src.fedoraproject.org/cgit/perl-Text-BibTeX.git/commit/?h=master=32ade3989f848de10ff391123a4e2187bf33f949 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To

jplesnik uploaded Text-BibTeX-0.81.tar.gz for perl-Text-BibTeX

72f7d780a96d99f5126b2b4958807f9d158af2220339e3686c178decb82f19d82cc3b9e0f5775dc3f9be70e53bbb27160f4555022a2c9c09bca192db7b12d52b Text-BibTeX-0.81.tar.gz

Re: Pagure over dist-git: what changes?

Hi, How can one request new package for multiple repoes at once like it was possible with pkgdb, is this possible with this new tool? ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

[389-devel] Please review: issue 77, issue 79, issue 83

Hi team, please, check out the issues. They were updated recently (or just waiting for the review): https://pagure.io/lib389/issue/77 https://pagure.io/lib389/issue/raw/files/6047ac156e06192837271afc2770a83f7f3206400669537bb1d8f43ab7b9a434-Guidelines-for-using-pytest-and-lib389_47541162.html

[Bug 1479255] New: request a desktop file for perli11ndoc

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1479255 Bug ID: 1479255 Summary: request a desktop file for perli11ndoc Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Glib-Object-Introspection Assignee: berra...@redhat.com

[Bug 1466082] perl-SNMP-Info-3.37 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1466082 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED

jplesnik pushed to perl-SNMP-Info (master). "3.37 bump"

jplesnik pushed to perl-SNMP-Info (master). "3.37 bump" https://src.fedoraproject.org/cgit/perl-SNMP-Info.git/commit/?h=master=2130ef8f76cb68d80f2991ddf1df034bf763be0c ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To

[389-devel] [PATCH] Allow to override build date

in order to make builds reproducible. See https://reproducible-builds.org/ for why this is good and https://reproducible-builds.org/specs/source-date-epoch/ for the definition of this variable. --- buildnum.pl | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/buildnum.pl