Licensing guidelines for AppStream project_license

I asked this question a while ago on the packaging mailing list [0], but did not receive any replies. Let me try again here on devel with more subscribers: During the package review of qvge [1], the following question came up: Are the any requirements placed on the contents of AppStream

[EPEL-devel] Re: EPEL build target in COPR

On Wednesday, May 19, 2021 1:57:17 AM CEST Leon Fauster wrote: > Dear all, the EPEL build target in COPR build packages based on > CentOS Linux 8. What happens at EOL of CentOS Linux 8? Any clues? Copr just uses `mock-core-configs` package, and the `epel-*.cfg` files there. I believe that

Re: Package review #1961174

On 5/18/21 3:19 PM, Antonio T. sagitter wrote: Hi all. I have a new package in review (rhbz#1961174) that will obsolete 'mld2p4' Please, take a look if you can; i'll review one in exchange. Thanks. I have started the review. In exchange could you review jpegxl:

Re: Fedora CoreOS stable stream now rebased to Fedora 34

Dnia Tue, May 18, 2021 at 03:37:27PM -0400, Dusty Mabe napisał(a): > Over the next two days we're rolling out the first Fedora 34 based > Fedora CoreOS into the `stable` stream. > > - systemd-resolved is still enabled but not used yet [1] This was Fedora 33 feature. > - Move to cgroup v2 by

Re: RPMLint 2.0 released!

This sounds terrific ! I too can't wait till Fedora adopts it. > * RPMLint includes _many more checks_! Nearly all of the generally However I always have a hard time understanding what the issue caught by RPMLint actually is. I would like to see some library of the checks with the explanation of

[EPEL-devel] EPEL build target in COPR

Dear all, the EPEL build target in COPR build packages based on CentOS Linux 8. What happens at EOL of CentOS Linux 8? Any clues? BTW, I assume that EPEL stuff are build on RHEL. RHEL8.4 is out now and new EPEL builds would be done on EL8.4 while COPR is bounded to CL8.3 ... mmh? -- Leon

[Bug 1905190] biber FTBFS in Rawhide (F34): tests fail on different \field{sortinithash} values

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1905190 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-d5916963ae has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 11 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-680600d10f python-impacket-0.9.22-3.el7 6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-352a65d3bc djvulibre-3.5.25.3-23.el7 4

[Bug 1905190] biber FTBFS in Rawhide (F34): tests fail on different \field{sortinithash} values

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1905190 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #12 from

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing: Age URL 13 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-e393e03d96 screen-4.6.2-12.el8 10 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-80b9d6d879 python-impacket-0.9.22-3.el8 8

[Bug 1947703] Fix broken call to perl.prov when filenames contain spaces

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1947703 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In

Re: How to replace the rpm-build package with my own in a mock container

On Mon, 17 May 2021 at 01:30, Mikhail Gavrilov wrote: > Once again tried rebuilt rpm-build and updated the local metadata and it > worked. > I was just confused that even though there is a mention of the > rpm-build package in the root.log on line 218 [1] > But nowhere is it written where this

Re: i686 build OOMing

On 5/18/2021 4:44 PM, David Airlie wrote: https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/3814/68223814/build.log cd /builddir/build/BUILD/Vulkan-ValidationLayers-sdk-1.2.176.1/i686-redhat-linux-gnu/layers && /usr/bin/g++ -DAPI_NAME=\"Vulkan\" -DVK_ENABLE_BETA_EXTENSIONS

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

> emacs-auctex orphan 1 weeks > ago > > This one is going to break some non-emacs packages as well because the spec actually provides a "tex-preview" package that is just preview.sty and is used by several packages to do tex rendering and preview: $

i686 build OOMing

https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/3814/68223814/build.log cd /builddir/build/BUILD/Vulkan-ValidationLayers-sdk-1.2.176.1/i686-redhat-linux-gnu/layers && /usr/bin/g++ -DAPI_NAME=\"Vulkan\" -DVK_ENABLE_BETA_EXTENSIONS -DVK_USE_PLATFORM_WAYLAND_KHR -DVK_USE_PLATFORM_WAYLAND_KHX

[Bug 1961865] perl-Net-CIDR-Lite: Incorrect handling of IP address with leading zeros in IP octets

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1961865 Tomas Hoger changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1961866 Depends On|

[Bug 1961865] New: perl-Net-CIDR-Lite: Incorrect handling of IP address with leading zeros in IP octets

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1961865 Bug ID: 1961865 Summary: perl-Net-CIDR-Lite: Incorrect handling of IP address with leading zeros in IP octets Product: Security Response Hardware: All OS: Linux

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

On 19. 05. 21 0:17, Kaleb Keithley wrote: On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 4:15 PM Miro Hrončok > wrote: Full report available at: https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/orphans-2021-05-18.txt grep

[Bug 1961842] New: perl-HTTP-Message-6.32 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1961842 Bug ID: 1961842 Summary: perl-HTTP-Message-6.32 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-HTTP-Message Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

On 18. 05. 21 22:24, Marek Polacek wrote: On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 10:14:41PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so

opam (was: Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers)

(I've added a few opam devs to CC) On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 10:14:41PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > opam orphan 1 weeks ago I didn't notice that opam had been orphaned. This package is the tool used for source packaging of OCaml packages

[Bug 1207174] perl-IO-Socket-INET6-2.72-3.fc23 FTBFS sometimes: Can't use an undefined value as a symbol reference at t/io_multihomed6.t line 116.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1207174 Michal Josef Spacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mspa...@redhat.com --- Comment

Building for EPEL-8 and CMake (again)

Hey all- Awhile back I asked about the status of CMake in CentOS so I could build my packages for EPEL-8; they require a version of CMake that is greater than 3.11.4 which is currently available. CentOS Stream has a later version, as does RHEL 8.4. I get that CentOS Stream is the future of

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

On 18. 05. 21 22:04, Miro Hrončok wrote: *Warning*: Affected package maintainers were not bcc'ed becasue I've recently migrated to Gmail and it doesn't let me bcc nearly 500 email addresses. I'll try to figure out what to do next. I've managed to re-send the bcc'ed message via Gmail web

Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

*Warning*: Affected package maintainers were not bcc'ed becasue I've recently migrated to Gmail and it doesn't let me bcc nearly 500 email addresses. I'll try to figure out what to do next. The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless

Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

*Warning*: Affected package maintainers were not bcc'ed becasue I've recently migrated to Gmail and it doesn't let me bcc nearly 500 email addresses. I'll try to figure out what to do next. The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless

Fedora CoreOS stable stream now rebased to Fedora 34

Over the next two days we're rolling out the first Fedora 34 based Fedora CoreOS into the `stable` stream. Some notable issues/configurations: - Very old systems (Fedora 32 and earlier) may not be able to update [0] - systemd-resolved is still enabled but not used yet [1] Here are some

Re: F35 Change: Replace SDL 1.2 with sdl12-compat using SDL 2.0 (Self-Contained Change proposal)

On 5/18/21 9:17 PM, Jan Drögehoff wrote: It uses the exact same code as SDL 1.2 which has a version for i386 systems with inline assembly so that might need some eyes looking at it. Actually scratch that I had misinterpreted a contributors response to the issue and it has a completely fresh

Re: F35 Change: Replace SDL 1.2 with sdl12-compat using SDL 2.0 (Self-Contained Change proposal)

On 5/18/21 12:45 PM, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: Ben Cotton wrote: This Change proposes to replace SDL 1.2 with sdl12-compat, which uses SDL 2.0. FYI, it took me just a few minutes of casually browsing commits to spot a memory corruption bug in this code:

Planned Outage - s390x builders - 2021-06-04 22:00 UTC

Planned Outage - s390x builders - 2021-06-04 22:00 UTC There will be an outage starting at 2021-06-04 22:00 UTC, which will last approximately 36 hours. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2021-06-04 22:00UTC'

Planned Outage - s390x builders - 2021-06-04 22:00 UTC

Planned Outage - s390x builders - 2021-06-04 22:00 UTC There will be an outage starting at 2021-06-04 22:00 UTC, which will last approximately 36 hours. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2021-06-04 22:00UTC'

aom soname bump

Hi, AOM AV1 version 3 has been published a while ago and I am planning to update it in Fedora. Due to a CVE affecting versions prior to 2021-04-07 (CVE-2021-30473), I plan to push this update to ALL STABLE RELEASES: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1961376 I intend to wait until

[Bug 1960392] Upgrade perl-File-Which to 1.27

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1960392 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|---

Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2021-05-18)

=== #fedora-meeting: FESCO (2021-05-18) === Meeting started by mhroncok at 17:00:35 UTC. The full logs are available at https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2021-05-18/fesco.2021-05-18-17.00.log.html . Meeting

Disable annobin on 32 bit Arm while an issue is investigated?

Hello, devel and arm lists! We recently ran into a testsuite failure when building glibc for Rawhide on armv7hl: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1951492 The test program experienced a hang after a thread was cancelled. So far, it appears that either annobin generated notes or the

[Bug 1837988] CVE-2020-10878 perl: corruption of intermediate language state of compiled regular expression due to integer overflow leads to DoS

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1837988 --- Comment #29 from errata-xmlrpc --- This issue has been addressed in the following products: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 Via RHSA-2021:1678 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2021:1678 -- You are receiving this mail because: You

[Bug 1837975] CVE-2020-10543 perl: heap-based buffer overflow in regular expression compiler leads to DoS

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1837975 --- Comment #27 from errata-xmlrpc --- This issue has been addressed in the following products: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 Via RHSA-2021:1678 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2021:1678 -- You are receiving this mail because: You

Re: RPMLint 2.0 released!

Dne 18. 05. 21 v 17:05 Susi Lehtola napsal(a): On 5/18/21 8:13 AM, Neal Gompa wrote: On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 8:10 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: Awesome! What is the plan for Fedora? Shall we migrate to rpmlint 2 in rawhide? I recall Mirek Suchý had some WIP Fedora config.

Re: Bodhi critpath package updates now gated on openQA results

On Tue, 2021-05-18 at 10:55 -0500, Justin Forbes wrote: > On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 08:38:29AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Tue, 2021-05-18 at 08:26 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > > You reported my complaints as: > > > https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/issues/4219. Thanks! > > > >

[EPEL-devel] [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : EPEL Steering Committee

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: EPEL Steering Committee on 2021-05-19 from 16:00:00 to 17:00:00 US/Eastern At fedora-meet...@irc.freenode.net The meeting will be about: This is the weekly EPEL Steering Committee Meeting. A general agenda is the following: #meetingname

[EPEL-devel] [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : EPEL Steering Committee

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: EPEL Steering Committee on 2021-05-19 from 16:00:00 to 17:00:00 US/Eastern At fedora-meet...@irc.freenode.net The meeting will be about: This is the weekly EPEL Steering Committee Meeting. A general agenda is the following: #meetingname

Re: Bodhi critpath package updates now gated on openQA results

On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 08:38:29AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Tue, 2021-05-18 at 08:26 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > You reported my complaints as: > > https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/issues/4219. Thanks! > > > > I'm going to go ahead and ask that the gating be turned off

Re: Bodhi critpath package updates now gated on openQA results

On Tue, 2021-05-18 at 08:26 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > You reported my complaints as: > https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/issues/4219. Thanks! > > I'm going to go ahead and ask that the gating be turned off until it's > fixed. If it doesn't display accurate test results, it's not

[rpms/perl-IO-Socket-INET6] PR #1: Patch for bad code in test

mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-IO-Socket-INET6` that you are following: `` Patch for bad code in test `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-IO-Socket-INET6/pull-request/1 ___ perl-devel

Re: RPMLint 2.0 released!

On 5/18/21 8:13 AM, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 8:10 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: >> Awesome! What is the plan for Fedora? Shall we migrate to rpmlint 2 in >> rawhide? I recall Mirek Suchý had some WIP Fedora config. >> > > Yes, please! The new rpmlint is *way* better than what we have

Schedule for Tuesdays's FESCo Meeting (2021-05-18)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Tuesday at 17:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2021-05-18 17:00 UTC' Links to all issues to be

[EPEL-devel] Re: intent to retire roundcubemail in epel7

On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 4:20 AM Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > > On Mon, 17 May 2021 at 18:14, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > >> On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 08:56:06PM +0100, Nick Howitt wrote: >> > >> > >> > On 17/05/2021 19:32, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> > > roundcubemail in epel7 is very old at this point,

Re: Bodhi critpath package updates now gated on openQA results

You reported my complaints as: https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/issues/4219. Thanks! I'm going to go ahead and ask that the gating be turned off until it's fixed. If it doesn't display accurate test results, it's not even close to being ready yet. Good gating is good, but bad gating is

Package review #1961174

Hi all. I have a new package in review (rhbz#1961174) that will obsolete 'mld2p4' Please, take a look if you can; i'll review one in exchange. Thanks. -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org GPG key: 0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F GPG key server: https://keys.gnupg.net/

[Bug 1905190] biber FTBFS in Rawhide (F34): tests fail on different \field{sortinithash} values

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1905190 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-d5916963ae has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-d5916963ae -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC

[Bug 1905190] biber FTBFS in Rawhide (F34): tests fail on different \field{sortinithash} values

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1905190 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-c82dc9bfab has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-c82dc9bfab -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC

Re: RPMLint 2.0 released!

On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 8:10 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 18. 05. 21 14:00, Neal Gompa wrote: > > Hey all, > > > > Nearly four years and *754 commits* since rpmlint 1.10, we are > > releasing rpmlint 2.0.0! > > > > This new release has a _lot_ of new features, but here are the most notable: > >

Re: RPMLint 2.0 released!

On 18. 05. 21 14:00, Neal Gompa wrote: Hey all, Nearly four years and *754 commits* since rpmlint 1.10, we are releasing rpmlint 2.0.0! This new release has a _lot_ of new features, but here are the most notable: * RPMLint now is a "normal" Python application and now supports being imported

Re: RPMLint 2.0 released!

On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 8:00 AM Neal Gompa wrote: > > Hey all, > > Nearly four years and *754 commits* since rpmlint 1.10, we are > releasing rpmlint 2.0.0! > Oh whoops, I forgot to include the release URL: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpmlint/releases/tag/2.0.0 -- 真実はいつも一つ！/

RPMLint 2.0 released!

Hey all, Nearly four years and *754 commits* since rpmlint 1.10, we are releasing rpmlint 2.0.0! This new release has a _lot_ of new features, but here are the most notable: * RPMLint now is a "normal" Python application and now supports being imported like a standard Python module! This means

[Bug 1905190] biber FTBFS in Rawhide (F34): tests fail on different \field{sortinithash} values

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1905190 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(extras-orphan@fed | |oraproject.org)

[Bug 1869114] biber-2.16 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1869114 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version|

[EPEL-devel] Re: intent to retire roundcubemail in epel7

On Mon, 17 May 2021 at 18:14, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 08:56:06PM +0100, Nick Howitt wrote: > > > > > > On 17/05/2021 19:32, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > roundcubemail in epel7 is very old at this point, and can never be > > > upgraded because epel7 has too old a php. > > > > > >

[Bug 1905190] biber FTBFS in Rawhide (F34): tests fail on different \field{sortinithash} values

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1905190 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED Fixed In Version|

[rpms/biber] PR #2: Tests

ppisar merged a pull-request against the project: `biber` that you are following. Merged pull-request: `` Tests `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/biber/pull-request/2 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To

[Bug 1961543] perl-Encode-3.10 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1961543 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Encode-3.10-1.fc35 |perl-Encode-3.10-460.fc35 --

Re: F35 Change: Replace SDL 1.2 with sdl12-compat using SDL 2.0 (Self-Contained Change proposal)

Ben Cotton wrote: > This Change proposes to replace SDL 1.2 with sdl12-compat, which uses SDL > 2.0. FYI, it took me just a few minutes of casually browsing commits to spot a memory corruption bug in this code:

Re: F35 Change: Replace SDL 1.2 with sdl12-compat using SDL 2.0 (Self-Contained Change proposal)

Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > On 17.05.2021 16:19, Ben Cotton wrote: >> In order to help move SDL 1.2 games into the modern world, let's >> replace SDL 1.2 with sdl12-compat, which uses SDL 2.0. > > What about third-party **proprietary** games from Steam for example? sdl12-compat claims to

Fedora-Cloud-32-20210518.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20210517.0): ID: 889272 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL:

[rpms/biber] PR #2: Tests

ppisar opened a new pull-request against the project: `biber` that you are following: `` Tests `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/biber/pull-request/2 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: F35 Change: Replace SDL 1.2 with sdl12-compat using SDL 2.0 (Self-Contained Change proposal)

On 5/17/21 9:53 PM, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > On 17.05.2021 20:50, Jan Drögehoff wrote: >> the Steam runtime ships its own SDL 1.2 so I don't think anything >> will change on that front > > Steam was just an example. There are lots of other proprietary > applications and games without

[Bug 1961543] perl-Encode-3.10 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1961543 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version|

[rpms/perl-Encode] PR #1: 3.10 bump

jplesnik merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Encode` that you are following. Merged pull-request: `` 3.10 bump `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Encode/pull-request/1 ___ perl-devel mailing list --

[rpms/perl-Encode] PR #1: 3.10 bump

jplesnik opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Encode` that you are following: `` 3.10 bump `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Encode/pull-request/1 ___ perl-devel mailing list --

Fedora-Cloud-34-20210518.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64) Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20210517.0): ID: 889256 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/889256 Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests

Re: F35 Change: More flexible use of SSSD fast cache for local users (System-Wide Change proposal)

Am Tue, May 18, 2021 at 07:18:50AM + schrieb Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek: > On Mon, May 03, 2021 at 10:47:37AM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/FlexibleLocalUserCache > > > > == Summary == > > Allow to switch SSSD’s fast cache for local users on and off at

[Bug 1961543] perl-Encode-3.10 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1961543 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug 1961543] New: perl-Encode-3.10 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1961543 Bug ID: 1961543 Summary: perl-Encode-3.10 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Encode Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

Fedora-Cloud-33-20210518.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210517.0): ID: 889128 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL:

[EPEL-devel] Re: intent to retire roundcubemail in epel7

On 17/05/2021 23:14, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 08:56:06PM +0100, Nick Howitt wrote: On 17/05/2021 19:32, Kevin Fenzi wrote: roundcubemail in epel7 is very old at this point, and can never be upgraded because epel7 has too old a php. It's got 10 CVEs open against it. I'm

Re: F35 Change: More flexible use of SSSD fast cache for local users (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Mon, May 03, 2021 at 10:47:37AM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/FlexibleLocalUserCache > > == Summary == > Allow to switch SSSD’s fast cache for local users on and off at runtime. Could you please also amend the summary to say how the default will change? >

[Bug 1869114] biber-2.16 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1869114 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|