Hey Fedorans,
We are running a Fedora 37 Pre-Beta Release Validation[0] Test Week!
Come help test the Pre-Beta image and fill up matrixes in here[1].
If you have any questions, reach out to #fedora-test-day on libera or test list!
[0]
On 9/1/22 4:25 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
Let me rephrase, is the mingw package going to be built on ALL arches with the
expectation that they are the same (like -data packages)? If so, that seems like a
huge waste of resources.
The MinGW packages would build on all arches. I believe the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2123496
Bug ID: 2123496
Summary: perl-Verilog-Perl-3.480 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Verilog-Perl
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 3:57 PM Stephen Smoogen wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, 30 Aug 2022 at 14:16, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 9:53 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>>
>> To submit more scratch builds we would need larger builder capacity.
>> This doesn't necessarily mean more or
Hi Adam
Always on a long weekend. I have an issue with the installation of the
workspace 37beta.
BTW, rawhide is OK for installation (clear images), ditto for reinstallation of
F36live.
Am I the only one getting screen corruption with anaconda and with some parts
of Workspace 37.
I am
On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 4:03 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 30. 08. 22 20:15, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
> >> 2) One-time enablement of all existing packages
> >>
> >> That should be doable. Right?
> >>
> >>
> >> 3) Automatic enablement of all new packages
> >>
> >> That should be just a matter of
On 9/1/22 13:47, Jaroslav Mracek wrote:
> With loading or not loading file list it is not so easy or in general -
> performance optimization is allways a trade one resource for another one or
> for some features. DNF5 will provide a setting to not load file list, as well
> to not create disk
With loading or not loading file list it is not so easy or in general -
performance optimization is allways a trade one resource for another one or for
some features. DNF5 will provide a setting to not load file list, as well to
not create disk cache, or not using zchunk (already implemented in
On 01.09.22 17:18, Richard Shaw wrote:
I'd like to unify fltk but there are a couple of things I'm still
unclear about...
1. If I build the x86_64 package locally via fedpkg or mock, will it
build both the linux and mingw artifacts by default?
Unless you have any specific %ifarch etc, yes.
On Wednesday, August 31, 2022 Troy Dawson wrote:
> EPEL2RHEL is part of the RHEL 8 and 9 new package workflow. When a RHEL
> maintainer wants to add a package to RHEL 8 or 9 they start a "new package
> workflow". There are several automations that happen when they start that
> workflow. One of
Hi everyone,
It's that time already! The Fedora Linux 37 Beta Go/No-Go[1] meeting
is scheduled for Thursday 8 September at 1700 UTC in #fedora-meeting.
At this time, we will determine the status of the F37 Beta for the 13
September early target date[2]. For more information about the
Go/No-Go
Hi everyone,
It's that time already! The Fedora Linux 37 Beta Go/No-Go[1] meeting
is scheduled for Thursday 8 September at 1700 UTC in #fedora-meeting.
At this time, we will determine the status of the F37 Beta for the 13
September early target date[2]. For more information about the
Go/No-Go
On Thu, 1 Sept 2022 at 12:25, Troy Dawson wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 1, 2022 at 12:19 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
>> On 31. 08. 22 23:08, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
>> >
>> > When EPEL-8 was launched, it came with some support for modules with
>> the hope
>> > that a module ecosystem could be built from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2123426
Bug ID: 2123426
Summary: perl-Locale-Codes-3.72 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Locale-Codes
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
On Thu, Sep 1, 2022 at 12:19 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 31. 08. 22 23:08, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
> >
> > When EPEL-8 was launched, it came with some support for modules with the
> hope
> > that a module ecosystem could be built from Fedora packages using RHEL
> modules
> > as an underlying
On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 11:04 AM Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
> Packages that are known to require or build-require slf4j and
> therefore are possibly affected by the update:
>
> antlr3
> antlr4-project
Mock builds of these 2 packages succeeded with SLF4J 2.0.0. They
appear to function normally.
--
Josef Skladanka wrote:
> [...] document the UI changes you'd like to see, the different icon
> choice you made, and explain why you believe those are more
> "universally understood" or better.
I would not choose different icons, because I believe it's impossible
to draw a universally understood
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2123418
Bug ID: 2123418
Summary: perl-Date-Manip-6.89 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Date-Manip
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
I'd like to unify fltk but there are a couple of things I'm still unclear
about...
1. If I build the x86_64 package locally via fedpkg or mock, will it build
both the linux and mingw artifacts by default?
2. Since mingw packages are considered "noarch" in infrastructure, I assume
there's some
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2102641
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2102674
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #4 from
On Thu, Sep 1, 2022 at 8:51 AM Dan Čermák
wrote:
>
> Casey Jao via devel writes:
>
> > Old rpm-ostree thread about this:
> > https://github.com/coreos/rpm-ostree/issues/1127
> >
> > 1. Debian provides a comparably sized package catalog using one-tenth the
> > size of Fedora's metadata. Are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2102635
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2112904
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #4 from
On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 5:30 PM Jerry James wrote:
>
> As I've been working on converting license tags to SPDX, I have found
> myself frequently needing to determine the license for some file that
> is not distributed by the package upstream, such as JavaScript and CSS
> files copied in by
OLD: Fedora-37-20220831.n.0
NEW: Fedora-37-20220901.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:10
Upgraded packages: 12
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:6.86 MiB
Size
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2102597
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2102641
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|iarn...@gmail.com, |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2102674
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|spo...@gmail.com|jples...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2112904
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|spo...@gmail.com|jples...@redhat.com
Casey Jao via devel writes:
> Old rpm-ostree thread about this:
> https://github.com/coreos/rpm-ostree/issues/1127
>
> 1. Debian provides a comparably sized package catalog using one-tenth the
> size of Fedora's metadata. Are there any lessons that Fedora can learn from
> Debian?
> 2. Does
Upstream has released a beta and plans to release mid-September. This will
be updated in Rawhide and maybe f37.
Affected packages:
blender
luxcorerender
OpenColorIO
openshadinglanguage
usd
All builds will be performed in a side tag.
Thanks,
Richrad
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2112904
Tom "spot" Callaway changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(spo...@gmail.com) |
--- Comment #2 from Tom
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2102674
Tom "spot" Callaway changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(spo...@gmail.com) |
--- Comment #2 from Tom
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2103364
Tom "spot" Callaway changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(spo...@gmail.com) |
--
You are receiving this
Old rpm-ostree thread about this:
https://github.com/coreos/rpm-ostree/issues/1127
1. Debian provides a comparably sized package catalog using one-tenth the size
of Fedora's metadata. Are there any lessons that Fedora can learn from Debian?
2. Does SUSE have the same problem?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2091301
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-35663995b3 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 37.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-35663995b3
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2091301
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Dist-Zilla-6.025-1.fc3
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20220831.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20220901.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 4
Dropped packages:10
Upgraded packages: 57
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 2.11 MiB
Size of dropped packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2123187
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-a05eb23dc8 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 37.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-a05eb23dc8
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2123187
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Test-File-Contents-0.2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2123185
Upstream Release Monitoring
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|perl-HTML-Tiny-1.06 is |perl-HTML-Tiny-1.07 is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2123187
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2123150
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-aae57fb905 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 37.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-aae57fb905
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-cf9b662b60
tcpreplay-4.4.2-1.el7
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing
python-apprise-1.0.0-1.el7
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
43 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-89ad385971
chromium-103.0.5060.114-1.el8
4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-00b4829e45
tcpreplay-4.4.2-1.el8
The following builds
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2123150
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Net-Netmask-2.0002-1.f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2123150
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Doc Type|---
On 01. 09. 22 0:19, Troy Dawson wrote:
** Solution(s)
A - At the very least, we need to change the wording of the bugs. I am
proposing the following
Subject: Remove from epel9 when rhel 9.1 is released
Comment: This package is being added to RHEL 9.1 at the next minor release.
After the
On 31. 08. 22 23:08, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
When EPEL-8 was launched, it came with some support for modules with the hope
that a module ecosystem could be built from Fedora packages using RHEL modules
as an underlying tool. This has never happened and we have ended up with a
muddle of
50 matches
Mail list logo
