Libcmis solib bump

Libcmis 0.6.0 is coming to rawhide, and libreoffice-TexMaths, openoffice.org-diafilter, python-paperwork-backend, and libreoffice are being rebuild against it. \-- Gwyn Ciesla she/her/hers \ in your fear, seek only peace in your fear,

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing: Age URL 6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-99a9054ad1 netatalk-3.1.18-1.el8 5 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-f2e087c62d chromium-117.0.5938.149-1.el8 1

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-36e0ca3184 netatalk-3.1.18-1.el7 5 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-0d68b0d3aa chromium-117.0.5938.149-1.el7 The following builds

[Bug 2241802] perl-Test-Harness-3.48 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2241802 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Test-Harness-3.48-1.fc |perl-Test-Harness-3.48-1.fc

Re: OpenSlide soname bump in Rawhide

vtk build submitted: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=107377295 Orion On 10/11/23 16:17, Benjamin Gilbert wrote: Hi, OpenSlide 4.0.0 includes a soname bump to

OpenSlide soname bump in Rawhide

Hi, OpenSlide 4.0.0 includes a soname bump to libopenslide.so.1. The API changes [1] are unlikely to cause issues: they remove functions deprecated since 2014 and change the behavior of some obscure corner cases. These packages are affected: vips vtk Please submit rebuilds in the side

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora Linux 39 Final is NO-GO

On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 09:45:01AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2023-10-11 at 15:45 +0200, Michael J Gruber wrote: > > I was just wondering what the "anchor" is, say "right after final > > freeze" or "7 days before GA". We could put "updates-testing disabled > > in fedora-release GA

[EPEL-devel] Re: retirement of klee from EPEL 9

Closing the loop here, I've retired klee in EPEL 9. https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/SP2624QZPY33N3NZNX5QLSMO2HZBHNNQ/ On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 12:01 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 10:37:28PM -0500, Carl George wrote: >

Fedora CoreOS Community Meeting Minutes 2023-10-11

Minutes: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2023-10-11/fedora_coreos_meeting.2023-10-11-16.31.html Minutes (text): https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2023-10-11/fedora_coreos_meeting.2023-10-11-16.31.txt Log:

[EPEL-devel] Re: Are we sticking with exa or moving to eza in EPEL?

On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 10:10 PM Ian Laurie wrote: > > I realize exa is still in the EPEL9 repos, was wondering if there is an > intention to move to its replacement eza as was done in F39 and F40? > > Ian > -- > Ian Laurie > FAS: nixuser | IRC: nixuser > TZ: Australia/Sydney >

Re: Python enable dependency generator problem

On Wed, 2023-10-11 at 09:31 -0300, Priscila Gutierres wrote: > Thank you, > It works removing -t from %pyproject_buildrequires, EXCEPT if I keep all > the pytest tests running > When running the test, it blames about the modules needed for the tests, as > you can see here:

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora Linux 39 Final is NO-GO

On Wed, 2023-10-11 at 15:45 +0200, Michael J Gruber wrote: > I was just wondering what the "anchor" is, say "right after final > freeze" or "7 days before GA". We could put "updates-testing disabled > in fedora-release GA version" as a remark in there, just like "xy plan > on this" and such. The

Re: Python enable dependency generator problem

On Wed Oct 11, 2023 at 09:31 -0300, Priscila Gutierres wrote: > Thank you, > It works removing -t from %pyproject_buildrequires, EXCEPT if I keep all > the pytest tests running > When running the test, it blames about the modules needed for the tests, as > you can see here:

Help packaging PyTorch dependencies for Fedora

Hello everyone, I hope this email finds everyone well. We are currently packaging PyTorch for Fedora and we are actively packaging the dependencies. We’re reaching out to see if anyone is interested in joining the project. If you’re interested in more information, our meeting notes are in a

Fedora 39 compose report: 20231011.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-39-20231010.n.0 NEW: Fedora-39-20231011.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:2 Dropped images: 1 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 6 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:56.17 KiB Size

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora Linux 39 Final is NO-GO

Stephen Gallagher venit, vidit, dixit 2023-10-11 15:03:30: > On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 6:14 AM Kamil Paral wrote: > > > > On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 11:06 AM Michael J Gruber > > wrote: > >> > >> I noticed that we switched off updates-testing by default for F39 > >> installs very recently. Is that

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora Linux 39 Final is NO-GO

On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 6:14 AM Kamil Paral wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 11:06 AM Michael J Gruber > wrote: >> >> I noticed that we switched off updates-testing by default for F39 >> installs very recently. Is that something that is tied to the release >> date or the final freeze date? >

Re: Python enable dependency generator problem

Thank you, It works removing -t from %pyproject_buildrequires, EXCEPT if I keep all the pytest tests running When running the test, it blames about the modules needed for the tests, as you can see here: https://paste.centos.org/view/5f0e107a Deleting line 61 here:

Re: Strange(?) build failures for golang package

The log output from the go compiler is really bad for grepping for errors. I've learned that searching for ".go:" is a good way to do it. Looks like this is the error that causes the failure: """ # github.com/go-task/task/internal/orderedmap

Re: Strange(?) build failures for golang package

_build/src/github.com/go-task/task/internal/orderedmap/orderedmap.go:94:24 : type func(i K, j K) bool of less does not match inferred type func(a K, b K) int for func(a E, b E) int is  the error. Jakub Čajka Oct 11,

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20231011.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20231010.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20231011.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:2 Dropped images: 3 Added packages: 12 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 97 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 33.38 MiB Size of dropped packages

Strange(?) build failures for golang package

I am trying to update go-task for some time now and consistently getting a build error/failure with no clear indication of what's happened: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/fuller/test-builds/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/06508072-golang-github-task/builder-live.log.gz Is it possible

[Bug 2242326] perl-DateTime-Format-Natural-1.18 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2242326 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution|---

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora Linux 39 Final is NO-GO

On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 11:06 AM Michael J Gruber wrote: > I noticed that we switched off updates-testing by default for F39 > installs very recently. Is that something that is tied to the release > date or the final freeze date? > There's no exact time defined, but usually this happens shortly

[Bug 2242326] perl-DateTime-Format-Natural-1.18 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2242326 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #1 from

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora Linux 39 Final is NO-GO

Adam Williamson venit, vidit, dixit 2023-10-10 23:03:57: > Due to outstanding blocker bugs[1], we do not have a release candidate > for Fedora Linux 39 Final. Thursday's Go/No-Go meeting is cancelled. > > The next Fedora Linux 39 Final Go/No-Go meeting will be held at > 1700 UTC on Thursday 19

[Bug 2243201] perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Session-1.05-27.fc40 FTBFS with CGI-4.59: Failed test 'Expiry should not change' at t/06_expiry.t line 69

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2243201 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Link ID||CPAN 149959 -- You are receiving this

[Bug 2243201] New: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Session-1.05-27.fc40 FTBFS with CGI-4.59: Failed test 'Expiry should not change' at t/06_expiry.t line 69

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2243201 Bug ID: 2243201 Summary: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Session-1.05-27.fc40 FTBFS with CGI-4.59: Failed test 'Expiry should not change' at t/06_expiry.t line 69 Product:

[Bug 2242326] perl-DateTime-Format-Natural-1.18 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2242326 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added CC|iarn...@gmail.com, |

Re: Request for comment- tuned replacing power-profiles-daemon plan

Hi Jonas, On Mon, Oct 9, 2023 at 2:20 PM Jonas Ådahl wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 05, 2023 at 03:29:44PM +0800, Kate Hsuan wrote: > > Hi Folks, > > > > We would like to replace power-profiles-daemon with tuned. There are > > many power-related software that offer similar functions. Advanced > > users

Re: Request for comment- tuned replacing power-profiles-daemon plan

Hi Yanko, On Thu, Oct 5, 2023 at 5:49 PM Yanko Kaneti wrote: > > Hello > > On Thu, 2023-10-05 at 15:29 +0800, Kate Hsuan wrote: > > Hi Folks, > > > > We would like to replace power-profiles-daemon with tuned. > > > Moreover, the detailed change proposal can be found here. > >