https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2262599
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
the-new-hotness/release-monitoring.org's scratch build of
perl-Tie-Cycle-1.228-1.fc38.src.rpm for rawhide completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=112904787
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2262599
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 2014969
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=2014969=edit
Update to 1.228 (#2262599)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2262599
Bug ID: 2262599
Summary: perl-Tie-Cycle-1.228 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Tie-Cycle
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Miro Hrončok wrote on 2024/02/04 2:17:
Dear maintainers.
Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages
should be retired from Fedora 40 approximately one week before branching.
5 weekly reminders are required, hence the retirement will happen
approximately in 4
Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> Then we will submit 10-15+ *-x11 packages for review. It can be done.
PS: Users will only have to install plasma-workspace-x11. If there is some
optional library that needs an ld.so.conf.d override or a plugin to support
X11, it can be conditionally dragged in
Steve Cossette wrote:
> There's also a secondary thing that I feel hasn't been discussed here
> though: I know work is being done right now to isolate the x11
> components of plasma and add build-time options to strip out those
> components. What happens when we (as-in, the KDE sig) split off
Neal Gompa wrote:
> It's extremely obvious that people want to use it. You replied to
> someone who did and denigrated their opinion. Frankly, I'm
> disappointed in your response as well as the tone of you and Kevin.
I cannot really speak for Sérgio. I do think his choice of words in the
Ping? Anybody?
Vít
Dne 11. 01. 24 v 15:00 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Working on update of rubygem-puma, I observe following test failure
trying build rubygem-rails in Mock:
~~~
/usr/share/ruby/socket.rb:68:in `connect': Errno::EACCES: Permission
denied - connect(2) for /run/host/notify
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2262550
Bug ID: 2262550
Summary: perl-Catalyst-Manual-5.9012 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Catalyst-Manual
Keywords: FutureFeature,
Hi all.
Following packages will be retired in Rawhide branch:
seqan (deprecated by seqan3), https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/seqan
seqan2 (deprecated by seqan3), https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/seqan2
wise2 (unmaintained by upstream, no longer needed in Fedora),
(Not involved in any way here so feel free to ignore most of what I'm
saying)
Marc Deop i Argemí wrote on Sat, Feb 03, 2024 at 03:16:47PM +0100:
> - If a user decided to install the X11 package and has an issue: who do you
> think they are going to reach? who is gonna get the "bad publicity" for
On 2024-02-03 12:12, JT wrote:
> Thank you all for the solution. I notice I lack access to commit
changes on f21-backgrounds so proven packagers are welcome to do so.
Thanks
As I said on Monday when I replied to this ticket, I had talked to
Neil about this already, I'm aware of the fix,
> Thank you all for the solution. I notice I lack access to commit changes
on f21-backgrounds so proven packagers are welcome to do so. Thanks
As I said on Monday when I replied to this ticket, I had talked to Neil
about this already, I'm aware of the fix, but as I am on the road and
unable to
On 2024-02-03 01:27, Dan Horák wrote:
On Fri, 2 Feb 2024 23:55:43 -0800
l...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On 2024-02-01 11:26 p.m., Neal Gompa wrote:
On Fri, Feb 2, 2024 at 2:04 AM Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
Luya Tshimbalanga wrote on 2024/02/02 10:25:
Hello team,
It appears a change within
Hey Folks,
As many of you may know, FOSDEM is going on but still, we are hosting
the KDE test weeks.
You can still submit the results here[0]. KDE is very important for
our community members
and testing this way ahead of time helps us find bugs and eliminate them!!
Thanks for testing!
[0]
Dear maintainers.
Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages
should be retired from Fedora 40 approximately one week before branching.
5 weekly reminders are required, hence the retirement will happen
approximately in 4 weeks, i.e. around 2024-02-28.
Since
On 2024-02-03 06:16, Marc Deop i Argemí wrote:
- As the packages stand right now, the KDE general updates will have to wait
for the proposed packages to be updated by their maintainers or we will have
to do the updates ourselves (which defeats completely the point of our change
proposal).
Why?
On 2/3/24 01:12 AM, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
Any interested people can already request comaintainership now (e.g., by
replying to this mail), and I will almost certainly grant it (though I will
have reservations about some specific types of requests, such as blanket
admin permissions for
On Friday, 2 February 2024 20:56:22 CET Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
> regarding tracking (and taking) bugs, and
> lack of timely updates, for something as
> visible as the entire desktop.
Here you are highlighting some of my (I speak for me, not the KDE SIG) main
concerns:
- If a user decided to
On 2024-02-03 9:01 a.m., Björn Persson wrote:
Neal Gompa wrote:
It's extremely obvious that people want to use it.
It's extremely obvious that *some* people want to use Wayland. It's
equally obvious that some other people want to use X. It's also obvious
that certain people want to make
Neal Gompa wrote:
> It's extremely obvious that people want to use it.
It's extremely obvious that *some* people want to use Wayland. It's
equally obvious that some other people want to use X. It's also obvious
that certain people want to make *everybody else* use Wayland. On the
other hand I'm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2262451
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
On Fri, 2 Feb 2024 at 17:52, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2024-02-01 at 09:44 +0100, Ondrej Mosnáček wrote:
> > On Thu, 1 Feb 2024 at 09:13, Milan Crha wrote:
> > > The kernel tracing log for sig==9 shows:
> > >
> > > gnome-terminal--2924[002] dN.2. 2520.462889: signal_generate:
> > >
On Fri, Feb 2, 2024 at 1:05 PM Sérgio Basto wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2024-02-02 at 01:34 -0600, Jonathan Bennett via devel wrote:
> > Hey folks, outside observer, and long-time Fedora user weighing in
> > with
> > some thoughts. First off, I've been hyped to see Fedora lead the way
> > with finally
On Sat, Feb 3, 2024, 11:04 AM Mattia Verga via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Il 01/02/24 22:44, Fabio Valentini ha scritto:
> > On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 7:47 PM Mattia Verga via devel
> > wrote:
> > (snip)
> >
> >> That said, I'd like to make a request and maybe make all
Il 01/02/24 22:44, Fabio Valentini ha scritto:
> On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 7:47 PM Mattia Verga via devel
> wrote:
> (snip)
>
>> That said, I'd like to make a request and maybe make all reviewers aware
>> of a feature which was implemented some time ago. I've noticed many
>> reviewers change the
On Fri, 2 Feb 2024 23:55:43 -0800
l...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
>
>
> On 2024-02-01 11:26 p.m., Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 2, 2024 at 2:04 AM Mamoru TASAKA
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Luya Tshimbalanga wrote on 2024/02/02 10:25:
> > >> Hello team,
> > >>
> > >> It appears a change within
27 matches
Mail list logo
