Hi,
Will the subject packages be included in epel 7? I don't see them
listed on the web pages at
http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/beta/7/SRPMS/repoview/
tia
___
epel-devel mailing list
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 05/03/2013 09:45 AM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
snip
Why not just make the assumption that administrators will use the
netinstall and or ks and desktop users will use live spins?
JBG
I don't know if it is still the case, but historically you could NOT
specify a file system different
On 05/03/2013 12:30 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 05/03/2013 04:22 PM, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
On 05/03/2013 09:45 AM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
snip
Why not just make the assumption that administrators will use the
netinstall and or ks and desktop users will use live spins?
JBG
I don't
On 03/13/2013 11:51 AM, Felix Miata wrote:
On 2013-03-13 17:29 (GMT+0200) Sebastian Mäki composed:
* remove the hood of the car, and keep it off in case something
goes wrong, or to entice new drivers to look in there and guess
what is going on. * keep the hood of the car on, and if something
On 03/13/2013 12:02 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
snip
2) You can take the longer release time, get the new codebase in and
done and then you are in much better shape moving forward.
We choose 2.
(Anaconda folks, feel free to drop in and correct me if I got anything
wrong).
I can't see much way to
On 02/25/2013 09:26 AM, Jan Dvořák wrote:
Hi,
I am running rawhide for fun and since a few days ago a few seconds
after starting gdm the whole system freezes. I am sorry that I can't
really pinpoint the exact update as I suspend and this only manifested
after a reboot.
The problem is that I
On 02/23/2013 03:48 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
snip
mygui - http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5047260
No idea what should be providing libCommon.so for it.
snip
maybe should be libcommon vice libCommon?
--
Regards,
OldFart
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 01/27/2013 06:12 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Tue, 22 Jan 2013 09:44:43 -0600, Justin M. Forbes wrote:
snip
kernel-3.8.0-0.rc4.git5.1.fc19.x86_64
is significantly slower than the previous release for all graphical
activities.
For me the opposite is true. It is (subjectively) faster
On 01/23/2013 11:55 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Greetings.
As some of you may know, I switched my laptop over to rawhide and have
been posting a series of blogs about the various issues I have run into
in the last month.
To recap from those:
- xfce4-session crash:
On 01/23/2013 12:25 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Wed, 23 Jan 2013 12:08:21 -0500
Clyde E. Kunkel clydekunkel7...@verizon.net wrote:
Would issues with specific 3.8 kernel drivers affecting rawhide be a
candidate?
Candidate for a tracker bug? Perhaps. It would depend on how widespread
the issue
On 01/16/2013 12:00 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
snip I haven't seen any recent activity in Fedora from him. Have you?
Rahul
Some patches on the btrfs list on Jan 7 and 8, 2013.
--
Regards,
OldFart
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 12/08/2012 12:07 AM, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
snip
Why does there need to be a long-term support for Fedora? Why not just
use Red Hat Enterprise Linux?
I imagine it boils down to money since Fedora=free and RHEL=$$$.
Corporate suits will will weigh cost of Fedora support vs RHEL
On 11/21/2012 03:01 PM, David Lehman wrote:
snip
Yes. I've just completed testing of patches for this stuff. It was
decided that it's too late to try to get them into the Beta. I can
provide you with an updates image that adds the functionality if you are
interested.
David
I, for one, would
On 10/17/2012 11:55 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2012-10-17 at 16:05 +0200, Dario Lesca wrote:
Il giorno mer, 17/10/2012 alle 08.37 -0500, David Lehman ha scritto:
to keep you on your toes, of course
you forgot ;-) ... because if you're talking seriously this is a wild
unacceptable
On 12/06/2011 05:26 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 11:08:32PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
snip
It might be interesting to run this script across every single user
in the Fedora accounts system, and proactively identify any users
whom have not done anything in Fedora
On 11/14/2011 11:19 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 4:15 PM, Matthew Garrettmj...@srcf.ucam.org wrote:
Something that was brought up at the last fesco meeting is that
fesco membership is currently restricted to members of the packaging
group. That's arguably overly
On 10/17/2011 10:20 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
I want to try to modprobe netconsole during boot, but it needs to happen
after the network is up. Is there any standard place (rc.local and
modules-load seem to happen too early) to do this?
I filed
On 10/17/2011 01:10 PM, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
On 10/17/2011 10:20 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
I want to try to modprobe netconsole during boot, but it needs to happen
after the network is up. Is there any standard place (rc.local and
modules-load seem to happen too early) to do this?
I filed
On 10/11/2011 04:05 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
We are going to be having another proventesters meetup tomorrow on IRC
in #fedora-meeting at 18:00UTC.
Purpose of meetup: Brainstorm ideas on improving testing and processes
for testing updates.
* Intro/gather more agenda items
* Recruiting more
On 10/08/2011 05:43 PM, Christoph Wickert wrote:
Since Mozilla switched to the new rapid release model, Firefox in Fedora
is no longer fun: Every 6 weeks a new major version hits our stable
release and breaks Firefox horribly:
* My favorite extensions (and actually the only thing that
On 10/07/2011 11:31 AM, Richard Shaw wrote:
I posted this on the main mailing list but didn't get any hits.
Hopefully I'll have better luck here.
---
I found the following thread but I don't think mine is the same problem:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/2011-June/100861.html
On 10/07/2011 12:57 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Tomasz Torcz wrote:
Do you have caches enabled and fully built? Remounting with
-o space_cache,inode_cache will enable them. Then wait few minutes
for caches to be built (I/O will stop when they're ready). Subsequent
mounts should be
On 09/12/2011 07:39 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
Didn't say like, said similar. Don't you test your changes somehow? Or
do you just toss the mods over the wall and hope for the best? I don't
think so. Share your test cases for those packages that should just
work
On 09/12/2011 06:01 AM, Matej Cepl wrote:
Too much QA (or any external QA) imposed on the development make it
slower. Compare Linux v. OpenSolaris kernel development. Fedora tries to
be very fast developing distro, thus less QA in the development version.
Ah yes, the ol' QA conundrum.
On 09/12/2011 10:17 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Sure, we need QA, but for rawhide the development shouldn't be totally
stalled as it is already in F16 right now, where updates for critpath
packages, even when they have several hundred thousands of tests
performed already during package building,
On 09/12/2011 11:57 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
In reading the long trash each other fest that accompanies pre-release
jitters, could we start on a cleaner plate? What do the people who are
using rawhide day-in/day-out expect out of the channel? What level of
pain does someone like
On 09/11/2011 04:33 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
darrell pfeifer wrote:
Fails for me too, with the same error.
Thanks for confirming that.
I don't mean to be rude or inflammatory, but do have to wonder how such
a fundamentally-broken package was released -- even to rawhide. In the
fedora
On 09/11/2011 06:19 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
Maybe there needs to be a classification for rawhide similar to the
karma system for updates-testing, but limited to just a set of packages
that should just always work (maybe openssh would be one). For such
packages
On 07/26/2011 12:22 PM, Jim Meyering wrote:
snip
service ssh restart
Would that be:
service sshd restart
?
--
Regards,
OldFart
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 06/24/2011 04:07 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 06/24/2011 12:55 PM, JB wrote:
JBjb.1234abcdat gmail.com writes:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trusted_computing
TC is controversial because it is technically possible not just to secure the
hardware for its owner, but also to secure against
On 06/24/2011 11:04 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 06/24/2011 09:55 PM, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote
Rahul,
Seems he is using references to support contentions...like a scholarly
journal article. With respect, just as you are free to criticize on
these mailing lists, he is free to speak on them
On 06/21/2011 01:56 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/builds
is there any way to get this filtered only for F15 or whatever is used?
Maybe try:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/
then select Fedora 15. You may need a FAS account, not sure.
--
Regards,
On 06/20/2011 06:46 AM, Paul Johnson wrote:
Hi,
After doing a rather large update to my rawhide box, it seems that it
no longer wants to play fair with Gnome giving a very unfriendly
Something has gone wrong which I can't recover from. You should
logout and try again message. Other than some
On 06/10/2011 04:44 PM, mike cloaked wrote:
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 8:13 PM, Rahul Sundarammethe...@gmail.com wrote:
On 06/11/2011 12:36 AM, mike cloaked wrote:
Would be nice to see the systemd author join this discussion?
I am sure you can get answers when someone is off vacation. However
On 05/20/2011 05:35 AM, Rawhide Report wrote:
kernel-2.6.39-0.fc16
* Thu May 19 2011 Dave Jonesda...@redhat.com
- Update to 2.6.39 final.
* Sat May 14 2011 Kyle McMartinkmcmar...@redhat.com
- Update to v2 of Mel Gorman's SLUB patchset
Above didn't update installed
On 05/18/2011 10:20 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
While everyone that worked on the F15 release deserves thanks and congrats,
I'd like to give a special thanks to the systemd and gnome3 developers because
of the large amount of work needed to implement those features. By working
hard to get these
On 05/11/2011 03:27 PM, Andre Robatino wrote:
As per the Fedora 15 schedule [1], Fedora 15 Final Release Candidate 1
(RC1) is now available for testing. Please see the following pages for
download links and testing instructions.
Installation:
Hi,
Is rawhide following current btrfs development releases with kernel
patches and userland programs? Or, should we role our own? I am
interested in testing only.
TIA
--
Regards,
OldFart
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 05/07/2011 12:50 PM, Mario Blättermann wrote:
Am 07.05.2011 16:51, schrieb Richard W.M. Jones:
On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 03:58:51PM +0200, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
On Sat, 2011-04-16 at 11:05 +0100, Camilo Mesias wrote:
snip
GNOME 3. We need a new GNOME as close as possible to the old one, to
On 05/07/2011 01:23 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Sat, 07 May 2011 13:15:11 -0400, CEK wrote:
snip
It's entertaining already to see how people [try to] leave Ubuntu because
of Unity, and to hear that they like Fedora 15's GNOME 3 better. ;)
(sorry, going way off topic, but then it seems
On 04/21/2011 11:40 AM, Paul Johnson wrote:
Hi,
Just done quite a big update to my rawhide box, performed a reboot and have
been left without an x server. I thought it was the xserver, so downgraded
to 1.10.99.1-2.20110418.fc16, but still the same problem.
I'm getting a segfault at adress
On 03/30/2011 07:54 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Heya,
I just uploaded a new version of systemd into F15, which establishes a
directory /run in the root directory. Most likely you'll sooner or later
stumble over it, so here's an explanation what this is and why this is.
It's a fairly minor
On 02/27/2011 09:55 AM, Mike Chambers wrote:
snip
I used to be able to hover my mouse over the time and at least it would
tell me the date instead of having to click on it just to see it.
try:
$ gsettings set org.gnome.shell.clock show-date true
--
Regards,
OldFart
--
devel mailing list
On 01/29/2011 09:21 AM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
New package: ghc-process-leksah-1.0.1.4-2.fc15
Haskell process-leksah library
Is it not possible to try a little harder to write a useful package
summary? Or for the package reviewer to take just a quick look and
notice that a
On 01/29/2011 10:58 AM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 9:34 AM, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
On 01/29/2011 09:21 AM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
New package: ghc-process-leksah-1.0.1.4-2.fc15
Haskell process-leksah library
Is it not possible to try a little harder
On 01/16/2011 02:32 AM, Jason D. Clinton wrote:
There's a twenty second pause in my boot sequence, shown below, before GDM
starts and I'm not certain if it's in NetworkManager waiting on org.bluez,
bluez itself or the bluez systemd unit file. (Or maybe I'm completely off.)
Later on, the
On 01/13/2011 10:59 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
For some reason, boot is hanging with today's rawhide update -- I get stuck
at Bringing up loopback interface. Oddly, if I boot into runlevel 1, lo is
there just fine. (But if I telinit 5 from there, it immediately tries to
bring it up again and
On 12/09/2010 08:59 AM, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
snip
- debuginfo-install is just a fallback if ABRT fails to retrieve the
debuginfo itself (and ABRT doesn't need the root privs, as is *does not*
install the packages, it just unpacks them)
snip
Jirka
Currently, abrt says the debuginfo packages
On 12/02/2010 02:25 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 14:10 -0500, Doug Ledford wrote:
My package in question (mdadm) is only used in certain circumstances,
but if it isn't right, systems fail to boot. I can certainly see why
something that can render a machine unbootable
On 11/17/2010 02:26 PM, Jon Masters wrote:
On Wed, 2010-11-17 at 14:14 -0500, Ric Wheeler wrote:
snip
Yes, thanks Ric, your reply to me was most helpful.
Jon.
What was the reply?
TIA
Regards,
OldFart
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 11/12/2010 11:14 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Clyde E. Kunkelclydekunkel7...@cox.net writes:
snip
The major packages that I work with have regression test suites,
which in fact get run as part of the RPM build sequence. It's not
apparent to me that I should need to invent some more tests.
I
On 11/12/2010 02:32 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Till Maasopensou...@till.name writes:
snip
It's absolutely crystal clear to me that we don't have enough tester
manpower to make the current policy workable; it's past time to stop
denying that. I'd suggest narrowing the policy to a small number of
On 10/31/2010 03:18 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Sun, 31 Oct 2010 04:37:38 +0100, Kevin wrote:
Martin Stransky wrote:
there's a new Firefox update waiting in Bodhi and we can't push it to
stable because of new rules. We recommend you to update to it ASAP as it
fixes a public critical 0day
On 10/05/2010 11:01 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
snip
cool! I suppose I could turn it on in rawhide, or you could just
build your own e2fsprogs to get it ...
-Eric
Cool if you turn it on in rawhide. Helps those of us who are build
challenged :-). I can test in raid and LV environments.
On 10/06/2010 02:01 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
snip
OK gang, it's in e2fsprogs-1.41.12-6.fc15
you have to invoke it with -test options to make it go ;)
Word of warning, it's not had a lot of attention, and the whole
design could change in the future, but it's something to play with :)
-Eric
On 09/17/2010 02:18 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
While upstart is still in the repo, the initscripts package now pulls
in systemd and systemd-sysvinit.
Bill
from todays 201009218 rawhide update (bz'd on the yum site as #593):
sudo yum --enablerepo=mash --skip-broken update
.
Updating for
On 08/13/2010 04:32 AM, Joachim Backes wrote:
Hi,
having the following question: What does the DVD/CD media check exactly
if booting a Fedora DVD/CD? Is it the sha256sum? If yes, why this media
check, because it could be done after having burned the DVD?
If not, is it possible to perform
On 08/03/2010 07:25 PM, John Reiser wrote:
Ok, so this compose seems to have anaconda-14.14. When trying to do an
nfs install, once I put in the server/directory information, it shows it
connecting and trying to pull up the gui. But after that, my monitor
just stays black and nothing ever
58 matches
Mail list logo
