On Thu, 2021-02-25 at 11:57 +0100, David Sommerseth wrote:
> On 22/02/2021 16:29, Petr Menšík wrote:
> > Why? I thought about common interface to various DNS cache
> > implementations for workstations and different VPN providers
> > available.
> > While I think the best place to direct, which
On Tue, 2020-09-29 at 15:14 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Tue, 2020-09-29 at 11:20 -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
> > On Mon, 2020-09-28 at 16:40 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> > > On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 5:18 pm, Chuck Anderson > > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
On Tue, 2020-09-29 at 09:18 -0700, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
> On Tuesday, September 29, 2020 5:13:48 AM MST Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-
> Szmek
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 11:41:12PM -0700, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
> >
> > > On Monday, September 28, 2020 9:39:17 AM MST Michael Catanzaro
> >
On Mon, 2020-09-28 at 16:40 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 5:18 pm, Chuck Anderson
> wrote:
> > I think the VPN plugin and VPN server has some input, no? All the
> > VPN
> > servers I've used send routes to the VPN client to determine which
> > traffic the client
On Mon, 2020-09-28 at 23:37 -0700, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
> On Monday, September 28, 2020 12:42:32 PM MST Lennart Poettering
> wrote:
> > On Mo, 28.09.20 12:14, Paul Wouters (p...@nohats.ca) wrote:
> >
> >
> > > On Mon, 28 Sep 2020, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > I don't
On Mon, 2019-08-26 at 09:15 -0400, Robert Marcano wrote:
> On 8/26/19 9:07 AM, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote:
> > Well the thing is, blocknig ports tends to break applications that
> > want
> > to use those ports. We're not going to do that, period. It also
> > doesn't
> > really accomplish
On Wed, 2018-02-14 at 23:49 +0100, Sandro Mani wrote:
> Hi
>
> Does anyone know how to contact Lubomir Rintel (lkundrak)? He is
> obviously still active since his last koji build is as recent as
> last
> Sunday the 11th, but he isn't answering to this ticket [1] and I
> also
> had no luck
On Thu, 2018-02-01 at 12:34 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> For the "Improved Laptop Battery Life" feature:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ImprovedLaptopBatteryLife
>
> I'm working on for Fedora 28 I would like to also try and enable
> Panel Self Refresh on laptops with Intel
On Wed, 2017-07-12 at 09:05 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 7:09 AM, Hans de Goede
> wrote:
>
> > If the kernel team wants some specific help with ia32 support then
> > 2 things need to happen:
> >
> > 1) A clear request for help needs to be send
> > 2)
On Wed, 2017-04-12 at 16:28 +0200, Christian Dersch wrote:
> On 04/12/2017 04:19 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 02:56:24PM +0200, Christian Dersch wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 11:08:46AM +0200, Björn 'besser82'
> > > > Esser wrote:
> > > > > I hope someone can help
On Mon, 2016-12-12 at 12:26 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 12:23 PM, Tom Hughes wrote:
> >
> > On 12/12/16 18:56, Chris Murphy wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > The firmware https://01.org/linuxgraphics/intel-linux-graphics-fi
> > > rmwares
> > > is not included in
On Thu, 2016-10-06 at 12:39 -0600, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-10-06 at 14:28 -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> >
> > I rarely mess with docker, but I expect that the docker0 bridge has
> > an ip
> > address on it which may conflict with the one on libvirt
> > bridge. That is to
> > say,
On Sun, 2016-08-07 at 08:31 +, jack smith wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Disabling ipv6 in Gnome Control Center / Network / "My connection"
> doesn't work. ifconfig show that an ipv6 is still attributed and the
> problem I have with ipv6 enabled is still there (gone if I really
> disable ipv6).
On Fri, 2016-05-13 at 09:36 +0300, Alexander Todorov wrote:
> На 12.05.2016 в 15:32, Phil Sutter написа:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 02:47:19PM +0300, Alexander Todorov wrote:
> > >
> > > # cat /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-enp1s0f0
> > > Generated by dracut initrd
> >
On Mon, 2016-01-25 at 19:43 -0800, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 6:34 PM, Peter Robinson > wrote:
> > > > > > > It is intended as a convenient fallback mechanism, and is
> > > > > > > only supposed
> > > > > > > to have an effect if 'gateway' is not
On Tue, 2016-01-26 at 09:47 -0800, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 9:19 AM, Dan Williams <d...@redhat.com>
> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2016-01-25 at 19:43 -0800, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 6:34 PM, Peter Robinson <
> >
On Tue, 2016-01-26 at 13:32 -0800, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 12:48 PM, Samuel Sieb
> wrote:
> > On 01/26/2016 09:47 AM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
> > >
> > > I still think that, for the default workstation use case,
> > > configuring
> > > a hostname as a
On Tue, 2016-01-05 at 17:07 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Greetings, we've been told that the email addresses
> for this package maintainer is no longer valid. I'm starting the
> unresponsive maintainer policy to find out if they are still
> interested
> in maintaining their packages (and if so,
On Wed, 2016-01-06 at 10:51 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Wed, 06 Jan 2016 09:46:32 -0600
> Dan Williams <d...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2016-01-05 at 17:07 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > > Greetings, we've been told that the email addresses
> > > f
On Wed, 2015-12-16 at 10:45 -0500, Neal Becker wrote:
> Tomasz Torcz wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 09:33:18AM -0500, Neal Becker wrote:
> > > P J P wrote:
> > >
> > > > > On Wednesday, 2 December 2015 6:33 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > >
On Fri, 2015-12-04 at 16:09 +0100, Timotheus Pokorra wrote:
> > is deployed in probably half of the homes in Germany... Also I am
> > pretty sure other routers form other manufacturers do the same
> > thing. Now, if we default to DNSSEC validation soon, does this mean
>
> Same for Vodafone
On Tue, 2015-11-17 at 17:36 -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > > > > > "DW" == Dan Williams <d...@redhat.com> writes:
>
> DW> Could you confirm what NetworkManager-* packages are installed on
> DW> F23 server?
>
> On my custom install
On Wed, 2015-11-18 at 11:32 -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > > > > > "DW" == Dan Williams <d...@redhat.com> writes:
>
> DW> I suppose NM-tui could be pulled out of Server since not that
> many
> DW> other things require newt, and nmcli is
On Mon, 2015-11-16 at 20:39 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> b'NetworkManager': 138
NM does have a larger dep-chain than we'd like, however we did split
the package apart a couple releases ago and made sure that WWAN, WiFi,
and Bluetooth were no longer required for the server cases. Could you
On Sun, 2015-11-08 at 20:36 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 08.11.2015 um 20:29 schrieb Richard W.M. Jones:
> > On Sat, Nov 07, 2015 at 05:28:54PM +, Christopher wrote:
> >> I recently updated my desktop to f23, and it went smoothly, for the most
> >> part. However, it broke my mediatomb
On Thu, 2015-10-29 at 15:30 -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Zach Villers said:
> > If it helps, Sixxs (https://www.sixxs.net/main/) is a very highly
> > recommended tunnel broker. I have not tried it and am not affiliated. I do
> > have ipv6 capability from my
On Fri, 2015-07-17 at 13:22 -0400, Chuck Anderson wrote:
Looks great! I've been using this daily on Fedora 21 and I have to
say it mostly works well EXCEPT for the captive portal detection stuff
which is just horrendously bad, so I'm happy to see a new design that
may work a lot better.
What
On Mon, 2015-06-15 at 14:57 +0200, Petr Spacek wrote:
On 12.6.2015 18:53, Dan Williams wrote:
On Fri, 2015-06-12 at 17:10 +0200, Petr Spacek wrote:
On Tue, 2015-06-09 at 12:30 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 11:34:39AM -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
decision needs
On Fri, 2015-06-12 at 14:32 -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
On Fri, 12 Jun 2015, Dan Williams wrote:
That is why HTTP redirection and DNS failure have to be detected by
whatever is the hot spot detector. Both items weigh in on triggering
a hotspot logon window.
Agreed. But how does
On Wed, 2015-06-17 at 13:17 +0200, Tomas Hozza wrote:
On 12.06.2015 18:58, Dan Williams wrote:
On Fri, 2015-06-12 at 10:58 +0200, Tomas Hozza wrote:
On 11.06.2015 22:48, Dan Williams wrote:
On Tue, 2015-06-09 at 12:30 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 11:34:39AM -0400
On Fri, 2015-06-12 at 10:20 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 10:58:14AM +0200, Tomas Hozza wrote:
NetworkManager is pure network configuration manager in this scenario.
We don't expect nor want NM to handle /etc/resolv.conf. We will only get
the current network
On Fri, 2015-06-12 at 17:10 +0200, Petr Spacek wrote:
On Tue, 2015-06-09 at 12:30 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 11:34:39AM -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
decision needs to then be made by the system. I believe that's been
mostly due to lack of time for the various
On Fri, 2015-06-12 at 10:58 +0200, Tomas Hozza wrote:
On 11.06.2015 22:48, Dan Williams wrote:
On Tue, 2015-06-09 at 12:30 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 11:34:39AM -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
decision needs to then be made by the system. I believe that's been
mostly
On Fri, 2015-06-12 at 00:48 -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
On Thu, 11 Jun 2015, Dan Williams wrote:
Unfortunately the Proposal doesn't say anything about how this will
actually work, which is something NetworkManager needs to know. It also
fails to address the failure cases where your local
On Thu, 2015-06-11 at 14:41 -0700, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 1:48 PM, Dan Williams d...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, 2015-06-09 at 12:30 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 11:34:39AM -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
decision needs to then be made
On Tue, 2015-06-09 at 12:30 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 11:34:39AM -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
decision needs to then be made by the system. I believe that's been
mostly due to lack of time for the various parties to sit down and
plan and then program this further.
On Mon, 2015-04-20 at 16:27 -0600, Philip Prindeville wrote:
On Apr 20, 2015, at 12:23 AM, Siddhesh Poyarekar siddh...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 01:49:57PM -0600, Philip Prindeville wrote:
If you go back through the previous glibc bugs, you'll find:
On Tue, 2015-04-14 at 09:12 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 04/14/2015 09:06 AM, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Sergio Pascual sergio.pa...@gmail.com said:
I was wondering what is the correct way of enabling WOL on a network
card.
I think it is enabled by default. At least, I
connectivity interval 0
systemctl reload NetworkManager
Take a look at
https://blogs.gnome.org/dcbw/2015/02/16/networkmanager-for-administrators-part-1
it's Dan Williams' blog post I mentioned earlier. According to that,
your command should work.
As stated before, all the options
On Thu, 2015-03-26 at 18:29 +0200, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 6:24 PM, Bastien Nocera bnoc...@redhat.com wrote:
You can edit /etc/NetworkManager/conf.d/20-connectivity-fedora.conf to
disable it.
Is there a *proper* way to do that so that there aren't any
On Thu, 2015-03-26 at 10:45 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
On Wed, 2015-03-25 at 21:02 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
This was most likely caused by some issues with out proxy servers this
evening. We were adding 3 new proxy servers into the rotation and there
were some config issues with some
On Mon, 2015-03-02 at 08:42 -0800, Brian C. Lane wrote:
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 04:21:51PM +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 08:18:12AM -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 10:43 AM, Lennart Poettering
mzerq...@0pointer.de wrote:
On
On Fri, 2015-02-20 at 17:43 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
On 02/20/2015 05:11 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Also, NM fixed a similar issue with /etc/resolve.conf in their code a
long time ago, to my knowledge. Am I so misguided to assume that
Anaconda can fix a fricking file copy too, in
On Mon, 2015-02-02 at 06:19 +0100, Björn Persson wrote:
Dan Williams wrote:
I'd also point out that there are three different NetworkManager GUIs,
and one TUI:
1) GNOME Shell network settings - not really targeted for server
environments, has a smaller set of options that are suitable
On Tue, 2015-01-27 at 22:20 -0500, Scott Schmit wrote:
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 02:18:31PM -0600, Dan Williams wrote:
NetworkManager is not intended only for mobile devices or notebooks,
because that's a small part of the networking story. Plus, more than
just notebooks have needs
On Wed, 2015-01-28 at 11:09 -0500, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
Hi,
I just filed 2 bugs [A], [B] for the Python 3 switch [C] and I realized that
I should probably follow the mass bug filing policy.
As I've said previously, we've already had both Python 2 and Python 3 on
LiveCDs for few releases,
On Tue, 2015-01-27 at 14:50 -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 12:40 PM, Adam Williamson
adamw...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Sun, 2015-01-25 at 08:49 -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
* KVM bridge configuration
Works fine in F21+, I'm using NM on both my main
On Tue, 2015-01-27 at 20:56 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 27.01.2015 um 20:50 schrieb Nico Kadel-Garcia:
On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 12:40 PM, Adam Williamson
adamw...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Sun, 2015-01-25 at 08:49 -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
* KVM bridge configuration
On Tue, 2015-01-27 at 14:50 -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 12:40 PM, Adam Williamson
adamw...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Sun, 2015-01-25 at 08:49 -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
* KVM bridge configuration
Works fine in F21+, I'm using NM on both my main
On Wed, 2015-01-14 at 14:29 -0600, Ian Pilcher wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1161232
It seems like this is the 3rd or 4th time that this functionality has
been broken, leaving anyone who needs to simultaneously connect to both
VPN and other non-public (e.g. home network)
On Tue, 2014-12-09 at 10:19 -0500, Bastien Nocera wrote:
- Original Message -
Hi,
I also thought that the whole points of having Zones etc, was so that
we could pick a different zone per network connection,
/me too.
so if I'm in the office or at home I can say
On Sat, 2014-11-08 at 16:09 -0500, Colin Walters wrote:
I pushed:
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/polkit.git/commit/?id=1224d7b427a507339087e2f72c481b560c85149b
Built as: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8072916
Which makes polkit optional if NM (or anything else that
On Wed, 2014-11-05 at 18:17 +0100, Antonio Trande wrote:
Hi all.
I don't know how to fix these errors during IceCat compilation. Lately I
tried to adapt Fedora compilations flags but there is wrong something.
Here the log:
On Wed, 2014-11-05 at 18:57 +0100, Antonio Trande wrote:
Hi Dan.
On 11/05/2014 06:44 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
On Wed, 2014-11-05 at 18:17 +0100, Antonio Trande wrote:
Hi all.
I don't know how to fix these errors during IceCat compilation. Lately I
tried to adapt Fedora compilations
On Tue, 2014-08-05 at 09:26 +0200, poma wrote:
ModemManager
http://freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/ModemManager
- update to 1.3.0 git3dd6f93, almost ready for the new 1.4 release.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1125426
I actually did a full stack rebuild yesterday for the latest
On Tue, 2014-06-24 at 08:57 +0200, poma wrote:
We’ll Build A Dream House Of Net - by Dan Williams
http://blogs.gnome.org/dcbw/2014/06/20/well-build-a-dream-house-of-net/
Geez, are we done yet?
Not even close! Seriously, there’s more but I’m kinda tired
On Fri, 2014-06-20 at 08:55 +0200, drago01 wrote:
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 8:59 PM, Jared K. Smith
jsm...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 2:01 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
wrote:
if *that* is what is supposed to make DNF faster it's just a lie
This is
On Fri, 2014-06-20 at 23:27 +0200, poma wrote:
On 20.06.2014 17:55, Dan Williams wrote:
On Fri, 2014-06-20 at 08:55 +0200, drago01 wrote:
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 8:59 PM, Jared K. Smith
jsm...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 2:01 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
On Wed, 2014-06-11 at 12:00 +0400, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 11:19 PM, Dan Williams d...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, 2014-06-10 at 21:37 +0400, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 9:34 PM, Thomas Haller thal...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, 2014-06-10 at 21:25 +0400
On Tue, 2014-06-10 at 21:37 +0400, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 9:34 PM, Thomas Haller thal...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, 2014-06-10 at 21:25 +0400, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
Hi,
After latest update i can't use my wifi in NM. Probably this bug not
in NM, but I don't know how
On Tue, 2014-05-06 at 14:36 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Fedora 20, I'm seeing this list:
/etc/dbus-1/system.d/nm-ifcfg-rh.conf:
NetworkManager-1:0.9.9.0-38.git20131003.fc20.x86_64
/etc/dbus-1/system.d/nm-user-settings.conf: sugar-0:0.100.2-1.fc20.noarch
On Wed, 2014-04-30 at 13:22 -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
On Wed, 30 Apr 2014, Robert Marcano wrote:
What about domain and search lines? If NetworkManager will always use
127.0.0.1, it should still modify resolv.conf with the domain name received
from DHCP
That's actually not always
On Wed, 2014-04-30 at 15:36 -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
On Wed, 30 Apr 2014, Simo Sorce wrote:
Why would you care for the domain name as provided by dhcp ?
internal DNS views, eg server.internal.corp.com where the search domain
gets set to internal.corp.com and server.corp.com does not
On Wed, 2014-04-30 at 16:12 -0400, Chuck Anderson wrote:
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 01:06:51PM -0700, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 1:02 PM, Dan Williams d...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, 2014-04-30 at 15:36 -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
On Wed, 30 Apr 2014, Simo Sorce wrote
On Tue, 2014-04-29 at 22:10 +0800, P J P wrote:
Hello,
On Tuesday, 29 April 2014 7:22 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
So what exactly happens on upgrade? Before the upgrade,
most resolv.conf files will not point to 127.0.0.1.
What will they point to after the upgrade, and if they will point
On Mon, 2014-04-28 at 10:14 -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
On Mon, 28 Apr 2014, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
Speaking of which, I am not sure how dnsmasq plays with DNSSEC and/or
failover, but NetworkManager already has a config option
(/etc/NetworkManager/NetworkManager.conf,
On Mon, 2014-04-14 at 10:21 -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
Or how would you suggest this is solved. For arguments sake lets
say:
SSID: myawesomeopenhotspot
DHCP provides no domain-name info.
I CNAME all records to my.hotspot. until authenticated.
If this does not do http(s) redirection,
On Mon, 2014-04-14 at 12:00 -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
On Mon, 14 Apr 2014, Dan Williams wrote:
But another scenario I've seen: older Netgear routers which intercept
www.routerlogin.net as the setup page. The instructions literally
are:
1) connect your computer to the router
On Sat, 2014-04-12 at 02:33 +0800, P J P wrote:
Hello,
On Thursday, 10 April 2014 11:39 PM, P J P wrote:
I plan to file a feature/change request for this one. I got caught up with
other
work this past week so could not do it. Will start with it right away.
Please see -
On Fri, 2014-04-11 at 14:21 -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
On Sat, 2014-04-12 at 02:33 +0800, P J P wrote:
Hello,
On Thursday, 10 April 2014 11:39 PM, P J P wrote:
I plan to file a feature/change request for this one. I got caught up
with other
work this past week so could not do
On Sat, 2014-04-12 at 03:35 +0800, P J P wrote:
Hello Dan,
On Saturday, 12 April 2014 12:51 AM, Dan Williams wrote:
NM has had local caching nameserver capability built-in since Fedora 12
or something like that. Set 'dns=dnsmasq' in the [main] section
of /etc/NetworkManager
On Fri, 2014-04-11 at 14:45 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Fri, 11 Apr 2014 16:39:34 -0400 (EDT)
Paul Wouters p...@nohats.ca wrote:
...snip...
I've been running this solution on fedora for about five years now. It
works reasonably well, and anyone who is on this list surely has could
On Tue, 2014-03-25 at 16:53 -0300, Sergio Belkin wrote:
2014-03-25 16:20 GMT-03:00 Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com:
On Tue, 2014-03-25 at 16:19 -0300, Sergio Belkin wrote:
Hi Fedora folks,
Since NetworkManager I suffer the same issue, release after release, ok,
it's not a
On Wed, 2014-03-26 at 16:57 -0300, Sergio Belkin wrote:
El 26/03/14 12:45, Stephen John Smoogen escribió:
On 25 March 2014 13:53, Sergio Belkin seb...@gmail.com
mailto:seb...@gmail.com wrote:
Adam,
I've found that by default when I create a user, the checkbox in
On Fri, 2014-03-21 at 10:04 -0600, Philip Prindeville wrote:
Did something recently change with the packaging of NetworkManager?
I’m not finding NetworkManager-glib, just NetworkManager-glib-devel:
Outdated mirrors perhaps? It's clearly in the repos:
On Tue, 2014-03-18 at 02:21 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Mon, 17.03.14 17:18, Dan Williams (d...@redhat.com) wrote:
systemd-inhibit --list
Thanks...
*drum roll*
The offending package was telepathy-mission-control. Not really sure
why it cared about suspend/resume
On Fri, 2014-03-14 at 17:41 +0100, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 11:38:31AM -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
The lid switch is exposed as input device in Linux. logind opens that
device and reacts on it. However it gives DEs the chance to inhibit
this if they desire so. Gnome
On Fri, 2014-03-14 at 01:45 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Thu, 13.03.14 18:07, Martin Langhoff (martin.langh...@gmail.com) wrote:
My Lenovo X220, running up-to-date F20 occasionally gets into a state where
closing the laptop lid does not trigger suspend.
I want to narrow down on
On Thu, 2014-02-13 at 19:00 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Qui, 2014-02-13 at 12:56 -0600, Dan Williams wrote:
On Sat, 2014-02-01 at 15:03 +0100, poma wrote:
With a companion libraries. ;)
↗ libmbim-1.6.0
↗ libqmi-1.8.0
↗ ModemManager-1.2.0
poma
Oh Danny
On Sat, 2014-02-01 at 15:03 +0100, poma wrote:
With a companion libraries. ;)
↗ libmbim-1.6.0
↗ libqmi-1.8.0
↗ ModemManager-1.2.0
poma
Oh Danny boy, the pipes, the pipes are calling
From glen to glen, and down the mountain side
The summer's gone, and all the flowers are dying
On Sat, 2014-01-25 at 17:24 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Paolo Bonzini wrote:
From the BlueZ 5.0 release notes:
Remove internal support for telephony (HFP and HSP) profiles. They
should be implemented using the new Profile interface preferably by the
telephony subsystem of choice (e.g.
On Fri, 2014-01-24 at 12:21 +0100, David Sommerseth wrote:
On 23/01/14 21:19, Dan Williams wrote:
On Thu, 2014-01-23 at 14:17 -0600, Dan Williams wrote:
On Thu, 2014-01-23 at 20:04 +0100, David Sommerseth wrote:
On 23/01/14 19:58, Frank Murphy wrote:
On Thu, 23 Jan 2014 19:53:19 +0100
On Thu, 2014-01-23 at 20:04 +0100, David Sommerseth wrote:
On 23/01/14 19:58, Frank Murphy wrote:
On Thu, 23 Jan 2014 19:53:19 +0100
David Sommerseth dav...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi all,
This might be a viewed as a fire torch, but there is, IMO, a major
regression in BlueZ 5 which is
On Thu, 2014-01-23 at 14:17 -0600, Dan Williams wrote:
On Thu, 2014-01-23 at 20:04 +0100, David Sommerseth wrote:
On 23/01/14 19:58, Frank Murphy wrote:
On Thu, 23 Jan 2014 19:53:19 +0100
David Sommerseth dav...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi all,
This might be a viewed as a fire
On Thu, 2014-01-23 at 16:58 -0500, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
On Thu, 2014-01-23 at 20:04 +0100, David Sommerseth wrote:
Nope, several packages depends on the bluez-5.13-1 package.
Indeed. However I could probably live without gnome-bluetooth if
blueman were still available.
problems, by all means file bugs and we'll work to fix them.
Dan
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Mateusz Marzantowicz
mmarzantow...@osdf.com.pl wrote:
On 16.01.2014 21:38, Dan Williams wrote:
On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 14:53 -0500, Steve Dickson wrote:
On 16/01/14 14:39, Steve Dickson wrote
On Sat, 2014-01-18 at 17:35 +0100, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
On 16.01.2014 21:38, Dan Williams wrote:
On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 14:53 -0500, Steve Dickson wrote:
On 16/01/14 14:39, Steve Dickson wrote:
On 16/01/14 14:09, Dan Williams wrote:
Also, if wouldn't mind passing along
On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 13:53 -0500, Steve Dickson wrote:
Hello,
Has anybody had any luck with getting bridges
consistently up in running in either F19 or F20?
I know I have not...
I go into setup/networks. Add a bridge which creates
two file in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts
On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 14:53 -0500, Steve Dickson wrote:
On 16/01/14 14:39, Steve Dickson wrote:
On 16/01/14 14:09, Dan Williams wrote:
Also, if wouldn't mind passing along the systemd journal output for
NetworkManager, that might help us figure out what's going on:
journalctl -b
On Tue, 2013-12-17 at 12:17 -0500, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
In the last few days, I have been running cppcheck on quite a few programs
including systemd, transmission, libvirt, ndjbdns etc and cppcheck has
found real and potential bugs (null pointer dereferences, uninitialized
variables,
On Wed, 2013-11-27 at 09:27 -0700, Jerry James wrote:
For one package for which I am part of upstream, we are talking about
adding TLS support. The upstream project is GPLv3+. We're looking at
the preferred list of crypto implementations on
On Thu, 2013-10-31 at 11:49 -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
Can you wildcard the greylist so that modemmanager *never* runs? I
haven't used a modem in decades but MM keeps mucking with all my
serial-connected toys.
You can do anything you want with the udev rules. Just put them
in
On Thu, 2013-10-31 at 12:50 -0400, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
On 10/31/2013 02:03 AM, rran...@ihug.com.au wrote:
I have run into an issue which seems to call into question the udev
paradigm for USB devices. In my case it has ramifications in
ModemManager and gpsd packages, but I see it as a
On Tue, 2013-10-08 at 08:42 -0600, Jerry James wrote:
Do you remember when I ranted about lack of communication between
provenpackagers and the maintainers of the packages they touch [1]?
Here is another case of lack of communication between people touching
the same package.
On Aug 8,
On Fri, 2013-09-13 at 11:23 +0300, Oron Peled wrote:
On Friday 13 September 2013 01:51:00 drago01 wrote:
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 1:26 AM, Oron Peled o...@actcom.co.il wrote:
- This means that any privileged service controlled by GUI client (e.g:
NetworkManager) is still only as
On Thu, 2013-08-29 at 15:46 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 29.08.2013 15:38, schrieb John Chludzinski:
I need to used multiple loopback addresses (interfaces) for an server
application that communicates with multiple clients running on the same
machine. Since a loopback interface short
On Thu, 2013-08-01 at 18:36 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 6:14 PM, Tomasz Torcz to...@pipebreaker.pl wrote:
On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 07:05:39PM +0200, Stefan Held wrote:
What exactly is holding the Updates back in Fedora?
Is there a reason for excluding the 5.x Series?
On Tue, 2013-07-30 at 23:03 +0200, Lars Seipel wrote:
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 04:28:55PM +0200, Christoph Wickert wrote:
thunar and pcmanfm are file managers and require ConsoleKit for handling
removable storage.
Are you sure you aren't confusing this with something? HAL maybe?
There's
On Tue, 2013-07-23 at 11:46 -0700, David Strauss wrote:
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 6:12 AM, Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com wrote:
Support for adding new NetworkManager connections using the nmcli
commandline
tool.
This would be wonderful to have on servers.
That is exactly the
On Tue, 2013-07-16 at 12:52 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
On Tue, 2013-07-16 at 13:25 +0200, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
= Proposed Self Contained Change: Plasma-nm =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Plasma-nm
Change owner(s): Jan Grulich jgrul...@redhat.com, Lukáš Tinkl
1 - 100 of 228 matches
Mail list logo