On Wed, 12 Oct 2011, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Wed, 2011-10-12 at 11:41 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 13:30:19 -0400
Jeff Layton jlay...@redhat.com wrote:
I have a question not covered here: I just changed my ssh key a week
or two ago in the wake of the kernel.org
On Wed, 12 Oct 2011, Henrik Nordström wrote:
ons 2011-10-12 klockan 13:04 -0500 skrev Mike McGrath:
Lots of people use and share keys across different projects.
There is no security issue in sharing kes across different projects,
other than that it gives a strong hint that you are the same
On Mon, 18 Jul 2011, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Mon, 18.07.11 15:13, Simo Sorce (s...@redhat.com) wrote:
On Mon, 2011-07-18 at 20:57 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Mon, 18.07.11 20:54, Michał Piotrowski (mkkp...@gmail.com) wrote:
Hi,
2011/7/18 Neal Becker
On Thu, 16 Jun 2011, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 20:42 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
I've seen some reports of F15 not working in Virtualbox. There's a few
notes online about possible fixes. Is there some way we can better test
this in the future (I'm thinking about QA
On Thu, 2 Jun 2011, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
Is there any way to rsync from repos.fedoraproject.org? I'd like to
have a local mirror of spot's chromium repository, and wgetting it is
pretty nasty.
This should do it:
rsync -az --progress -e ssh fedorapeople.org:/srv/repos/ /your/path
You do
I've seen some reports of F15 not working in Virtualbox. There's a few
notes online about possible fixes. Is there some way we can better test
this in the future (I'm thinking about QA but that might not be the right
place).
Smolt has virtualbox rated as pretty common:
Hey all, I'm doing a horrible horrible job of maintaining my packagegs,
some of which people actually use. Please pick up what you can if you're
interested. Here's the list:
cacti
perl-Crypt-PasswdMD5
perl-Date-Pcalc
perl-File-RsyncP
perl-MIME-Lite
perl-SOAP-Lite
phpMyAdmin (robert's been an
Hey everyone, just a heads up. Looks like sourceforge was attacked.
Details are still on the way but please do pay extra careful attention
when downloading and updating your packages, verify whatever checksums you
can, etc.
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
* Can we finally remove hal? (xfce4.8 shouldn't need it anymore with
any luck).
Current HEAD of smolt doesn't require it, expecting to release to rawhide
soon.
-Mike
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Tue, 19 Oct 2010, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
On 10/19/2010 11:25 AM, seth vidal wrote:
On Tue, 2010-10-19 at 16:22 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
Hmm, So when this was broken a lot of bugs were triggered?
Sure seems like if a lot of bugs are being triggered then it is NOT a
niche
On Sat, 16 Oct 2010, Jesse Keating wrote:
Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
As the subject says.
The yubikey still works fine for logging to FAS at
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/
My regular FAS password works fine at
https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/
Is
There will be an outage starting at 2010-10-16 00:30 UTC, which will last
approximately 3 hours.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2010-10-16 00:30 UTC'
Reason for outage:
Converting our postgres (db2)
There will be an outage starting at 2010-10-16 00:30 UTC, which will last
approximately 3 hours.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2010-10-16 00:30 UTC'
Reason for outage:
Converting our postgres (db2)
On Fri, 8 Oct 2010, Maxim Burgerhout wrote:
Hi,
I am the maintainer for ykpers and libyubikey for Fedora. It's great
to see Fedora starting to use these nifty devices!
If there is anything I can do to help out and make the use of
Yubikey's in the Fedora project into a success, just holler.
The Fedora Infrastructure team is happy to announce support for the
hardware key authentication device, the yubikey. Users will be able to
use their own yubikeys to access some Fedora services, like
fedorapeople.org or some web services.
Why have we done this? The main purpose was to provide
On Thu, 7 Oct 2010, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 12:04:49 -0500,
Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote:
We also decided to allow yubikeys as an authentication option for the
larger community to some hosts and services like fedorapeople.org or
https
On Thu, 7 Oct 2010, Paul Wouters wrote:
On Thu, 7 Oct 2010, Mike McGrath wrote:
We also decided to allow yubikeys as an authentication option for the
larger community to some hosts and services like fedorapeople.org or
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/community/. When asked for a password
On Thu, 7 Oct 2010, Ricky Zhou wrote:
On 2010-10-07 07:25:47 PM, Mike McLean wrote:
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 5:51 PM, Paul Wouters p...@xelerance.com wrote:
I have one and I've played with it in fedora. There is however an
important
catch. The server and the yubikey share the same AES
The Fedora Infrastructure team is happy to announce support for the
hardware key authentication device, the yubikey. Users will be able to
use their own yubikeys to access some Fedora services, like
fedorapeople.org or some web services.
Why have we done this? The main purpose was to provide
On Tue, 28 Sep 2010, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Richard Zidlicky wrote:
One issue - many people have a mix of systems not all 64 bit capable. As
long as the advantages are not overwhelming many of those will stick to a
single variant for practical reasons and obviously that can only be 32
bit.
On Mon, 27 Sep 2010, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
The Fedora web resources (e.g. http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora )
continue to promote i686 installs over x86_64, the result being that
only a third of fedora users are on x86_64.
When will the Fedora project begin recommending x86_64 as the
On Wed, 15 Sep 2010, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 14:27 +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
Personally, I'm very sad because of deferring systemd to F15. It may
cause slipping of SysV-free Fedora to F16, full year wait from now. And
integration as session daemon in DEs even
On Wed, 15 Sep 2010, Jon Masters wrote:
On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 21:26 -0400, Máirín Duffy wrote:
On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 19:02 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
I'm happy to look for ways to make the other fesco voices heard.
Any ideas? I could try making the tickets have some more descriptive
On Mon, 13 Sep 2010, Ralph Lange wrote:
Hi,
Today I had to learn that the koji client, while being the only way to
request a build, does not support proxies.
In a university like environment with no open ports whatsoever, with an
increasingly paranoid IT group in charge of the firewall
On Sun, 5 Sep 2010, Tom Lane wrote:
I was under the impression that
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/
was the replacement for the old cvsweb viewer for Fedora packages.
However, so far as I can tell in some quick looking around, this
server is showing month-old data. It isn't reflecting
On Tue, 31 Aug 2010, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 00:45:49 -0400,
Arthur Pemberton pem...@gmail.com wrote:
So far the only brokeness I have had in all of F13 is with `seabios-bin`.
Wasn't there recently a packagekit problem where it stopped doing updates,
making it
The short version (as paraphrased by tibbs):
20:01 tibbs|h nss-3.12.6-7 doesn't work, 3.12.6-12 works.
The longer version: A recent update to fas included an upgrade of the OS
to the RHEL6 alpha. One unintended consequence of this is we're now
generating pkcs#8 keys instead of rsa. This
On Sun, 29 Aug 2010, Manuel Escudero wrote:
2010/8/29 Gerard Braad gbr...@fedoraproject.org
dead
It would be more appropriate to have this discussion to take place on
openetherpad.org instead of Google Wave. As at least everyone can
participate instead of these
On Sun, 29 Aug 2010, Camilo Mesias wrote:
We wish we weren't and we want to learn from our mistakes rather than
repeat them. In the case of the start page I believe it was a
concession combined with the hope that it would be replaced with a
free solution in the future. It at the very
On Sat, 28 Aug 2010, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 08/28/2010 08:28 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
What are you afraid of?
I think my concerns have been very clear.
Fedora is not a country, you don't have to move to get away. All the code
is free. Most the code isn't even ours, it
On Sun, 29 Aug 2010, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 08/28/2010 09:40 PM, Mike McGrath wrote:
Dennis is his backup (RH employee) and if need be I know jwb (not redhat
employee) is more than capable of handling these problems. Believe it or
not, we do consider these things and cross
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 2:06 PM, Paul W. Frields sticks...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't think anyone can generalize that the usage of Fedora is
declining. What we can prove, and certainly is troublesome, is that
yum check-ins of successive releases
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010, Eric Sandeen wrote:
Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 15:52 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
It's just risk management. I think we'd be better off acknowledging there
are unknown unknowns and try to mitigate them. One way we could have done
that this time
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 11:15 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 08:45:33AM -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
GENERAL SANITY
- Booting a system shall achieve a similar result as booting in upstart:
-- The same set of services
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 12:10 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
People like you and me would opt-in. (well I would on some hosts) because
we know what we're doing. Expert eyes get a look at it before it's forced
onto our users, who are already leaving
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010, Till Maas wrote:
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 10:46:41PM +0200, Farkas Levente wrote:
for workstation most users already use ubuntu. why? because it's more
user friendly.
There is nothing wrong with using Ubuntu, if it servers their needs.
do you think workstation users
On Wed, 25 Aug 2010, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Matthew Miller wrote:
When there's a compelling use case for NetworkManager on machines that
don't move around?
The compelling use case is that it doesn't make sense to maintain 2 pieces
of core infrastructure code doing the same thing, especially
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Mon, 23.08.10 10:52, Garrett Holmstrom (gho...@fedoraproject.org) wrote:
Lennart Poettering wrote:
So, to turn this around. Do you think this behaviour is problematic? Can
you make a good case for dropping this automatism? If so I'd be
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010, Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 11:38 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
And change it. The request was pretty clear.
-Mike
Try to stay friendly, maybe ?
Lennart said at the outset that he was open to change it.
And, while this discussion rages here
There was an unexpected outage starting at 2010-08-23 17:57 UTC, which
lasted about 20 minutes
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2010-08-23 17:57 UTC'
Reason for outage:
hosted01 died. Root cause still
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Matthew Miller (mat...@mattdm.org) said:
So, I'm honestly asking: what are the odds that these few things are the
only improvements that cause a disruptive change to user interaction? I
don't think it's unreasonable to wonder if there are other
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Mike McGrath (mmcgr...@redhat.com) said:
My concern with this line of thinking is that you're asking us to quantify
the unknown unknown, and define a time period of testing which is
'long enough' for us to catch all the unknown unknowns
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Mon, 23.08.10 16:39, Mike McGrath (mmcgr...@redhat.com) wrote:
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Mon, 23.08.10 16:22, Mike McGrath (mmcgr...@redhat.com) wrote:
(yet another thing we ignored in this process). My
Obligatory Why does X run as root since it doesn't have to? thread given
the exploit re-announcement.
-Mike
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Mon, 16 Aug 2010, Peter Jones wrote:
On 08/12/2010 02:39 PM, Mike McGrath wrote:
On Thu, 12 Aug 2010, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
BN == Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com writes:
BN I can't help but note that the slips have become more frequent as we
BN started to actually *have
On Mon, 16 Aug 2010, Peter Jones wrote:
On 08/16/2010 02:06 PM, Mike McGrath wrote:
On Mon, 16 Aug 2010, Peter Jones wrote:
On 08/12/2010 02:39 PM, Mike McGrath wrote:
On Thu, 12 Aug 2010, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
BN == Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com writes:
BN I can't
On Fri, 13 Aug 2010, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
On Thursday, August 12, 2010 09:33:17 pm Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Thu, 12.08.10 13:19, Mike McGrath (mmcgr...@redhat.com) wrote:
Since 2006 I counted 18 slips (I think one or two of those may just be a
single slip listed twice). Lets
Do you like fixing things but don't care what?
Are you a jack of all trades sort of person?
We need your help!
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Engineering_Services:Join
-Mike
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Fri, 13 Aug 2010, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Mike McGrath wrote:
I'll admit, this is a convenient view to have. The problem is we're not
in high school anymore. We're professionals. We're expected to set and
keep schedules because people besides ourselves rely on those schedules
On Fri, 13 Aug 2010, Adam Tkac wrote:
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 09:48:56AM -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
Do you like fixing things but don't care what?
Hello,
may I ask you about FES workflow? Should FES members (with
provenpackager perms, for example) push fixes directly to git
and close
On Fri, 13 Aug 2010, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 09:49:42 -0600,
Nathanael D. Noblet nathan...@gnat.ca wrote:
Since the move to git, would it not be easier to allow features to
branch rawhide, get their individual bits together (syncing with 'trunk'
periodically)...
Oct 6 2006: Fedora Core 6 release date slip -
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/announce/2006-October/002243.html
Oct 16 2006: Another slip in the FC6 schedule -
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/announce/2006-October/002248.html
Jul 11 2006: FC6 test2 freeze slipping by a week -
On Thu, 12 Aug 2010, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
BN == Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com writes:
BN I can't help but note that the slips have become more frequent as we
BN started to actually *have* release criteria to test against. We
BN didn't slip nearly as much when we weren't testing
On Thu, 12 Aug 2010, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Matthias Clasen (mcla...@redhat.com) said:
This is a collective failure.
I'd like to question that premise. Why is it a failure if we adjust our
release schedule to meet our release criteria ?
Well, ideally we'd be able to schedule such
There will be an outage starting at 2010-08-15 01:00 UTC, which will last
approximately 4 hours.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2010-08-15 01:00 UTC'
Reason for outage:
Network work is being done in our
On Thu, 12 Aug 2010, Kevin Kofler wrote:
seth vidal wrote:
All your packages are now orphaned.
Thanks for letting us know.
Do we have a list of the packages that got orphaned? Unfortunately, querying
pkgdb doesn't help anymore now that you set the stuff to orphaned.
Luckily Remi got
On Fri, 6 Aug 2010, Mike McGrath wrote:
On Fri, 6 Aug 2010, Till Maas wrote:
On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 04:32:36PM -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
On Thu, 5 Aug 2010, Till Maas wrote:
Yes ssh is secure if used properly. To get the proper known_hosts entry,
one has to download https
On Thu, 5 Aug 2010, Till Maas wrote:
On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 01:11:24PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Wed, 04 Aug 2010 22:03:14 +0200
Till Maas opensou...@till.name wrote:
The attack is quite trivial:
1) clone the git pkg Fedora repos
2) commit some nasty change
3) publish the
On Tue, 3 Aug 2010, Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) wrote:
I think it because name of package contain plus sign:
$ fedpkg -v clone DivFix++
Cloning ssh://hubbi...@pkgs.fedoraproject.org/DivFix++
Running git clone ssh://hubbi...@pkgs.fedoraproject.org/DivFix++
directly on the tty
On Mon, 2 Aug 2010, Robert 'Bob' Jensen wrote:
- Carl G. carl.gaudrea...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, i'm happy to be a bug triager so
you can get real work done. /s
Let me know if you need some help to
make the stats looks pretty.
Thank You Carl, this will help the community a lot
Sorry, it was owned by packagers, I've changed that.
-Mike
On Sat, 31 Jul 2010, Gerard Braad wrote:
Hi Mike,
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 5:04 AM, Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote:
I'm happy to announce the availability of repos.fedorapeople.org.
-Mike
when running
On Sat, 31 Jul 2010, Mark Rader wrote:
Hello
I am trying to checkout the package I put into the repository via CVS a
couple of weeks ago, frama-c, and i am getting a couple of errors.
[ra...@tpath3 upload]$ fedpkg -v clone frama-c
Cloning ssh://mra...@pkgs.stg.fedoraproject.org/frama-c
On Sat, 31 Jul 2010, Tom Lane wrote:
Just in case you thought we weren't having enough infrastructure fun
already ...
My web browser is complaining that admin.fedoraproject.org is presenting
an invalid SSL certificate: it expired July 31, 2010 8:17:52 AM ET,
ie about three hours ago.
On Sat, 31 Jul 2010, Matt McCutchen wrote:
On Sat, 2010-07-31 at 10:30 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
On Sat, 31 Jul 2010, Tom Lane wrote:
Just in case you thought we weren't having enough infrastructure fun
already ...
My web browser is complaining that admin.fedoraproject.org
On Sat, 31 Jul 2010, Orion Poplawski wrote:
Trying to check out vtk (or other packages):
$ fedpkg co vtk
Cloning into vtk...
Warning: No xauth data; using fake authentication data for X11 forwarding.
open log failed: Permission denied
fatal: The remote end hung up unexpectedly
Could not
On Sat, 31 Jul 2010, Mike McGrath wrote:
On Sat, 31 Jul 2010, Orion Poplawski wrote:
Trying to check out vtk (or other packages):
$ fedpkg co vtk
Cloning into vtk...
Warning: No xauth data; using fake authentication data for X11 forwarding.
open log failed: Permission denied
On Fri, 30 Jul 2010, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 12:41 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
Any particular reason we are using gitweb at
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/. Cgit is used in freedesktop.org
is much more faster and resource efficient.
With my fd.o hat on:
On Fri, 30 Jul 2010, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 9:36 AM, Mike McGrath wrote:
On Fri, 30 Jul 2010, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 12:41 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
Any particular reason we are using gitweb at
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb
On Fri, 30 Jul 2010, Conan Kudo (ニール・ゴンパ) wrote:
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 2:17 PM, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote:
On 07/31/2010 12:41 AM, Conan Kudo (ニール・ゴンパ) wrote:
Uhh... Firefox 4 GA is before F14 even goes into GA stage. So, that
isn't true. Firefox 4
On Fri, 30 Jul 2010, Mike McGrath wrote:
On Fri, 30 Jul 2010, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 09:01:47 -0500 (CDT)
Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, 30 Jul 2010, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 9:36 AM, Mike McGrath wrote:
On Fri, 30 Jul
I'm happy to announce the availability of repos.fedorapeople.org.
Intended for non-transient package hosting, it's a good central location
to store packages that users might find interesting.
It's still a bit manual (but coprs should fix that). When the time comes
we'll be able to properly
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010, Mike McGrath wrote:
Maybe baby steps? Small incremental changes. Sure some features will be
missing that kopers will provide. But perhaps we could just create a
Fedora-13-devel tag in koji, push it to it's own repo or to individual
fedora-13-spot / fedora-13-mmcgrath
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010, Florent Le Coz wrote:
On 28/07/2010 00:24, Brandon Lozza wrote:
F11 or F12 had a beta version of firefox
spot's chromium builds do support webm, it works great :)
It's still not included in fedora's repositories, so it doesn't change
anything.
Firefox 4 in F14
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010, Peter Jones wrote:
On 07/28/2010 01:10 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 11:37 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 03:04:46PM +0200, Florent Le Coz wrote:
On 28/07/2010 14:52, Mike McGrath wrote:
In my opinion including software
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010, Peter Jones wrote:
On 07/28/2010 02:25 PM, Mike McGrath wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010, Peter Jones wrote:
On 07/28/2010 01:10 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 11:37 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 03:04:46PM +0200, Florent Le Coz
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010, drago01 wrote:
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 8:42 PM, Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010, Peter Jones wrote:
On 07/28/2010 02:25 PM, Mike McGrath wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010, Peter Jones wrote:
On 07/28/2010 01:10 PM, Adam Williamson wrote
On Tue, 27 Jul 2010, Athmane Madjoudj wrote:
On 07/27/2010 10:53 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi,
Are we skipping Firefox 4 for Fedora 14? Beta 2 has been released
recently and I am wondering if we can go with it if it fits into the
schedule. There are dozens of new features including
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010, David Malcolm wrote:
On Tue, 2010-07-20 at 20:02 -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
I'm planning to do a partial mass-rebuild for Python 2.7.
This would cover all Python 2 users within the distribution, roughly
1000 src.rpms.
Some notes can be seen at:
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 16:49:50 +0200
Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de wrote:
1. Parallelization: we can completely get rid of any serialization of
startup. We can start *every* signle daemon at the same time in one
big step, regardless whether
On Wed, 21 Jul 2010, Dave Jones wrote:
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 04:47:38PM -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
There will be an outage starting at 2010-07-21 16:00 UTC, which will
last approximately 3 hours. Outages will be small but noticeable for
small segments as systems are updated
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Wed, 21.07.10 13:29, Chris Adams (cmad...@hiwaay.net) wrote:
Once upon a time, drago01 drag...@gmail.com said:
And when I say/here admin I'd expect to be talking about a human (not
some kind of robot that has hardwired commands and can't
On Wed, 21 Jul 2010, Colin Walters wrote:
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 8:39 PM, Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote:
I think the bigger question is why are we doing this?
There's some motivation here:
http://0pointer.de/blog/projects/systemd.html
I was pretty clear in everything you cut
There is an ongoing outage at this time in PHX2. The exact start time is
not yet known and the ETA to be fixed is not yet known.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2010-07-05 01:00'
Reason for outage:
On Fri, 2 Jul 2010, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 07/02/2010 06:00 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 09:53:00AM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 07/02/2010 09:37 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 07/02/2010 12:57 PM, Josephine Tannhäuser wrote:
It's seems to me that you have to
There will be an outage starting at 2010-06-22 21:30 UTC, which will last
approximately 2.5 hours.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2010-06-22 21:30 UTC'
Reason for outage:
Work is being done on buzilla's
There will be an outage starting at 2010-06-22 21:30 UTC, which will last
approximately 2.5 hours.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2010-06-22 21:30 UTC'
Reason for outage:
Work is being done on buzilla's
Version:1.78
-Release:4%{?dist}
+Release:5%{?dist}
Summary:RPM spec file generation utility
License:GPL+ or Artistic
Group: Development/Tools
@@ -53,6 +53,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%{_mandir}/man1/*
%changelog
+* Fri Jun 11 2010 Mike McGrath
There will be an outage starting at 2010-06-04 14:00 UTC, which will last
approximately 1 hours.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2010-06-04 14:00 UTC'
Reason for outage:
Updating some vpn settings. I hope
On Sun, 23 May 2010, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
On 05/16/2010 11:31 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
And it causes a load of obscure Koji-specific bugs which require
workarounds just for Koji builds. This was the latest one:
http://www.mail-archive.com/qemu-de...@nongnu.org/msg25242.html
On Wed, 12 May 2010, Clovis Tristao wrote:
Hi Frank,
Em 12-05-2010 14:37, Frank Murphy escreveu:
On 12/05/10 18:31, Clovis Tristao wrote:
Hi all,
I want to upgrade to Fedora F12-F13 but the first time I tried I had
this error:
Not enough space in /boot/upgrade to download
On Sun, 9 May 2010, Gilboa Davara wrote:
On Sun, 2010-05-09 at 14:07 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Sun, May 09, 2010 at 20:34:57 +0300,
Gilboa Davara gilb...@gmail.com wrote:
Thus far, it seemed that the both the user and the developer communities
were left out of these
Here's a list of f12 - f13 with unclean update paths based on srpm.
I'll work with FES to to go through and get some builds out. Some might
make it in to F13 final, some will go out as F13-updates.
greater for f12: rawtherapee
f12 = rawtherapee-3.0-0.20.a1.fc12.src
f13 =
There was an outage starting at 2010-05-04 22:13 UTC, which lasted
approximately 1 hour.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2010-05-04 22:13 UTC'
Reason for outage:
While trying to recover from this last
There will be an outage starting at 2010-04-29 03:50:00 UTC, which will
last approximately 4 hours.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2010-04-29 03:50:00 UTC'
Reason for outage:
Total power loss to the
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 11:18:09 -0400,
Tom Lane t...@redhat.com wrote:
I'm getting
500 Internal error
The server encountered an unexpected condition which prevented it from
fulfilling the request.
Powered by CherryPy
There was an outage starting at 2010-04-25 14:30 UTC, which lasted
approximately 1 hour.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2010-04-25 14:30 UTC'
Reason for outage:
db3, koji's primary database, was throwing
There was an outage starting at 2010-04-25 14:30 UTC, which lasted
approximately 1 hour.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2010-04-25 14:30 UTC'
Reason for outage:
db3, koji's primary database, was throwing
On Fri, 9 Apr 2010, Mike Chambers wrote:
I burned the cd/dvd iso from that site and tried to boot with it to test
doing an install with F13. But the problem is during boot, it wants to
configure net0 for networking (wired built-in ethernet on computer) and
fails. Is it suppose to do net0 or
Almost no traffic on devel has caused me to send this test.
-Mike
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Mon, 22 Mar 2010, Christoph Wickert wrote:
Am Montag, den 22.03.2010, 09:13 -0400 schrieb Seth Vidal:
On Mon, 22 Mar 2010, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 12:50 AM, Christoph Wickert wrote
Any ideas what made Fedora become so fat or how to further investigate
1 - 100 of 146 matches
Mail list logo
