Re: RFC: retiring yum

On Sep 1, 2017 4:54 PM, "Kai Bojens" wrote: On Friday, 1 September 2017 21:30:44 CEST Matthew Miller wrote: > RPM specfile changelogs are often of interest to systems > administrators. Agreed. Before I update a huge number of hosts I'd like to check the changelogs for any

Re: OpenVPN, OpenSSL and Fedora 26+

On Apr 27, 2017 3:13 PM, "David Sommerseth" wrote: On 27/04/17 01:20, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > On Wednesday, 26 April 2017 at 21:18, David Sommerseth wrote: >> On 26/04/17 17:08, Lee Howard wrote: >>> On 04/25/2017 01:39 PM, David Sommerseth wrote: This is

Re: future of official optical media support in Fedora

On Dec 15, 2016 08:09, "Matthew Miller" wrote: On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 07:31:29AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > > This is interesting. Does IPMI also allow you boot from a "remote > > USB device"? > Not any of the servers I've worked with. Only remote DVD boot. I've >

Re: upstream dev. asks suggestions about howto make packagers work easier (bundled libraries, etc.)

On Nov 20, 2016 1:49 AM, "Germano Massullo" wrote: > > We often deal with upstream developers that bundle libraries in their > code, so to make a package we have to debundle them, etc. > This time, an upstream dev. asked me what he could do to make easier > the work of

Re: /sbin/nologin in /etc/shells

On Sep 30, 2016 05:17, "Toby Goodwin" wrote: > > As a member of the "remove nologin from /etc/shells" faction, I have 2 > technical reasons for my position. I don't think either of these points > have been addressed by the "leave it in" faction. > > 1. Certain programs use

Re: Re-review to unretire package: python-nikola

On Jul 6, 2016 9:59 AM, "Igor Gnatenko" wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 2:13 PM, José Abílio wrote: > > Hi, > Hi, > > I have submitted python-nikola to unretire the package for rawhide since > > it is available in the other branches. > Link to

Re: Preparing a new release of Fedora Developer Portal - asking for feedback

This might also be interesting for Docs people. --Pete -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: 3D printing SIG

On Mar 17, 2016 11:14 AM, "Miro Hrončok" wrote: > > On 17.3.2016 16:08, Miro Hrončok wrote: >> >> Hi Fedorains, >> >> I was thinking about creating a 3D printing SIG in Fedora. Would anyone >> be interested in that? >> >> Miro > > > I've created a wiki page here: > >

Re: F24 Self Contained Change: Let's Encrypt client now in Fedora

On Feb 10, 2016 6:29 AM, "Josh Boyer" wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 11:32 AM, Jared K. Smith > wrote: > > > > On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 10:55 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: > >> > >> And aren't we supposed to *not* do stuff like

Re: Attempting to contact unresponsive maintainers - lnovich ooprala and vjancik

On Feb 14, 2016 2:07 PM, "Kevin Fenzi" wrote: > > On Sun, 14 Feb 2016 09:59:18 + > "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 10:06:58PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 01:34:28PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > >

Re: Urgent F23 testing request: logout bugs

On Oct 21, 2015 11:13 AM, "Adam Williamson" wrote: > > Hi folks! > > So we're building 23 Final RC2 now, but we have a couple of outstanding > proposed blocker bugs, and we could use some more data to evaluate > them. > > The way to test is really simple: > > * Install

Re: Packaging of PlayOnLinux

On 10/15/2015 12:55 AM, drago01 wrote: > On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 5:46 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote: >> >> - Original Message - >>> Dne 14.10.2015 v 16:50 Bastien Nocera napsal(a): If the application cannot work without downloading anything, or being supplied

Re: ansible in Fedora 23+ (python3)

On 10/14/2015 07:47 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 08:57:57PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: >> Beyond that, though, why not just have your ansible play ensure its own >> deps are installed? If you're dealing with docker, make sure the >> package you need is installed before

Re: Orphaned packages available for new point of contact

On Sep 10, 2015 4:24 AM, "Mathieu Bridon" wrote: > > On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 11:16 +0200, Matěj Cepl wrote: > > On 2015-09-09, 19:37 GMT, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > pytz > > > python-dateutil > > > > I see these two as too important to let them fall, so I am > > taking them.

Release Notes: Wiki Freeze Looming

help. If you'd like to propose content for after the freeze, reach out to d...@lists.fedoraproject.org or #fedora-docs. -- Pete Travis Fedora Docs Project Lead [0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Documentation_beats -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https

create-tx-configuration retirement

I am re-retiring create-tx-configuration. I kept it around after Sparks retired it in case we needed it for the transition away from transifex, and that's done, and we didn't. -- Pete -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Sponsors - who does (not) work on FE-NEEDSPONSOR tickets

On Aug 17, 2015 10:07 AM, Marcin Haba marcin.h...@bacula.pl wrote: Hello, *snip* I am not going to continue this discussion because as I wrote in previous mail, it was only feedback from my side. It is not my intention to gain something by this feedback. It is just feedback to potential

Re: Validity of i686 as a release blocker

On Aug 4, 2015 9:40 AM, Paul W. Frields sticks...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 09:47:27AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: [...snip...] Perhaps it is time that we evaluate where i686 stands in Fedora more closely. For a starting suggestion, I would recommend that we do not treat it

[Test-Announce] Fedora 23 Release Notes are Open!

leads and requests thrown into the funnel, there are writers waiting to take it the rest of the way. -- -- Pete Travis - Fedora Docs Project Leader - 'randomuser' on freenode - immanet...@fedoraproject.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: F23 Self Contained Change: Netizen Spin

On May 18, 2015 7:34 AM, Jan Kurik jku...@redhat.com wrote: I am sorry for the wrong subject of my previous post. This is a Self Contained Change, not a System Wide. Regards, Jan - Original Message - From: Jan Kurik jku...@redhat.com To: devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: dnf replacing yum and dnf-yum

On Apr 13, 2015 5:07 AM, Radek Holy rh...@redhat.com wrote: From: Pete Travis li...@petetravis.com To: Development discussions related to Fedora devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Friday, April 10, 2015 5:31:08 PM Subject: Re: dnf replacing yum and dnf

Re: askbot-setup command not found

On Mar 23, 2015 7:20 AM, Pete Travis li...@petetravis.com wrote: On Mar 23, 2015 3:58 AM, Kalpani Anuradha anuradha...@cse.mrt.ac.lk wrote: Thank you Suchakra, Corey Sheldon and Ankur Sinha for the support. And after viewing the AskFedora Redesign Plan my interest to contribute towards

Re: askbot-setup command not found

On Mar 23, 2015 3:58 AM, Kalpani Anuradha anuradha...@cse.mrt.ac.lk wrote: Thank you Suchakra, Corey Sheldon and Ankur Sinha for the support. And after viewing the AskFedora Redesign Plan my interest to contribute towards this project further increased. As initial work to get involved in the

Re: F22 Self Contained Change: Disabled Repositories Support

On Mar 17, 2015 5:18 AM, Jan Zelený jzel...@redhat.com wrote: On 16. 3. 2015 at 15:52:10, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: = Proposed Self Contained Change: Disabled Repositories Support = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DisabledRepoSupport Change owner(s): Richard Hughes rhughes at redhat

Re: Is there a process for requesting packaging?

On Mar 7, 2015 6:15 AM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote: On Sat, 07 Mar 2015 10:53:27 +0100 fed...@activityworkshop.net wrote: Hi list, I'm an upstream developer and I'm unfamiliar with the Fedora processes, so my apologies if I'm asking obvious questions or asking in the wrong

Re: Why sysrq is limited to only sync command on official fedora kernel?

On Feb 25, 2015 1:50 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote: Am 25.02.2015 um 21:38 schrieb Zdenek Kabelac: Dne 25.2.2015 v 18:44 Reindl Harald napsal(a): Am 25.02.2015 um 18:37 schrieb Paul Wouters: On Wed, 25 Feb 2015, Lennart Poettering wrote: Hmm? Syncing is allowed to my

Re: Packages

/ Rahul I'll take python-dateutil15, and see it through to retirement once the last of the dependencies are gone. I see you've already retired askbot - any sign from upstream that they'll support a newer django within a reasonable timeframe? -- -- Pete Travis - Fedora Docs Project Leader

Re: Why sysrq is limited to only sync command on official fedora kernel?

On Feb 26, 2015 9:01 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl wrote: On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 08:51:46AM -0700, Pete Travis wrote: The only time I've needed sysrq reboots in recent memory was while running rawhide and knowingly venturing into uncharted territory. If I'm

Re: F22 Self Contained Change: LXQt

On Feb 24, 2015 2:57 AM, Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com wrote: = Proposed Self Contained Change: LXQt = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LXQt Change owner(s): Helio Chissini de Castro heliocas...@fedoraproject.org , Christoph Wickert cwick...@fedoraproject.org Package the LXQt

Re: F22 System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java platform in Fedora

On Feb 24, 2015 8:32 AM, Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com wrote: On 02/24/2015 02:17 PM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote: I would much rather live without any legacy jdk, and if so then without any rules. But not setting them will bring chaos for majority of users. I have a question: Is

Re: Changes in the f22 workstation

On Feb 20, 2015 2:09 PM, Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com wrote: I wanted to give a heads-up to the wider audience about a number of workstation changes that are landing in the f22 branch (and rawhide) this week, in time for the alpha freeze next week: - The message tray at the bottom is

Re: amending the new package process

On 01/22/2015 07:15 PM, Haïkel wrote: 2015-01-21 11:49 GMT+01:00 Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos n...@redhat.com: Step 6: ... If the proposed package is not reviewed for 2 months, the package must be reviewed by the submitter, and a git module with the master branch will be approved. I share your

Re: python-dateutil update

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 12/08/2014 09:47 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 09:10:59AM -0700, Pete Travis wrote: On Dec 8, 2014 8:51 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl wrote: On Sun, Dec 07, 2014 at 04:45:12PM -0700, Pete

Re: Deleting f20-gnome-3-12 copr

On Jan 7, 2015 6:00 AM, Richard Hughes hughsi...@gmail.com wrote: I'm planning to delete https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/rhughes/f20-gnome-3-12/ this week. The original description always had This COPR will be updated until Fedora 21 has been released or until the entropy death of the

Re: Deleting f20-gnome-3-12 copr

On Jan 7, 2015 7:23 AM, drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 3:13 PM, Pete Travis li...@petetravis.com wrote: On Jan 7, 2015 6:00 AM, Richard Hughes hughsi...@gmail.com wrote: I'm planning to delete https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/rhughes/f20-gnome-3-12

Re: Other download options

On Dec 10, 2014 10:47 AM, Mike Pinkerton pseli...@mindspring.com wrote: On 10 Dec 2014, at 11:52, Jerry James wrote: On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 6:27 AM, Maros Zatko mza...@redhat.com wrote: Yes, there is netinstall in the Server variant, I suppose it's not the same as Workstation one and (as

Re: Workstation Product defaults to wide-open firewall

On Dec 9, 2014 10:54 AM, Stephen John Smoogen smo...@gmail.com wrote: On 9 December 2014 at 10:46, Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com wrote: On 09/12/14 18:39, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: On 9 December 2014 at 10:27, Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com [cut] OS X's firewall is

Re: Workstation Product defaults to wide-open firewall

On Dec 9, 2014 11:33 AM, Chuck Anderson c...@wpi.edu wrote: On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 11:16:54AM -0700, Pete Travis wrote: But seriously, there's an implication in this thread that there will be work happening to give stuff a path to ask for an open port. Where can we follow along

Re: Workstation Product defaults to wide-open firewall

On Dec 9, 2014 12:06 PM, Chuck Anderson c...@wpi.edu wrote: On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 11:52:01AM -0700, Pete Travis wrote: On Dec 9, 2014 11:33 AM, Chuck Anderson c...@wpi.edu wrote: I should have said ask firewalld for a port to be opened - sorry, I thought that would come from the context

Re: Workstation Product defaults to wide-open firewall

On Dec 9, 2014 11:54 AM, Brian Wheeler bdwhe...@indiana.edu wrote: On 12/09/2014 01:45 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote: - Original Message - Richard Hughes wrote: So do I! I'm a developer, which spin do I use so that the firewall doesn't get in my way? We can't develop a *product* based

Re: Workstation Product defaults to wide-open firewall

On Dec 9, 2014 12:38 PM, Chuck Anderson c...@wpi.edu wrote: On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 12:09:23PM -0700, Pete Travis wrote: On Dec 9, 2014 12:06 PM, Chuck Anderson c...@wpi.edu wrote: On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 11:52:01AM -0700, Pete Travis wrote: On Dec 9, 2014 11:33 AM, Chuck Anderson c

Re: Workstation Product defaults to wide-open firewall

On Dec 9, 2014 12:55 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote: Am 09.12.2014 um 20:51 schrieb Pete Travis: Hmm... a whitelist of things that are allowed to ask for firewall accommodation doesn't help me develop new applications at all. And you're jumping to a really high level UI

Re: Workstation Product defaults to wide-open firewall

On Dec 9, 2014 1:31 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote: Am 09.12.2014 um 21:25 schrieb Pete Travis: Lets say I do have an understanding of network basics, just for the sake of argument. I share my application with you. The application is intended to listen on the network, you

python-dateutil update

for the maintainers involved. Please reply here with any concerns about this process that might not have occurred to me. [0] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1126521 [1] https://immanetize.fedorapeople.org/python-dateutil.requires - -- - -- Pete Travis - Fedora Docs Project Leader

Re: Fedora scientific packaging

On 11/21/2014 11:22 PM, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote: I think the Fedora policy requires more of a commitment from maintainers than I can offer. In any event, I know RStudio Server can be built from source on Fedora and that it works but it needs a lot of detailed attention to turn it into

Re: Fedora scientific packaging

On Nov 21, 2014 12:48 PM, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky zn...@znmeb.net wrote: The two I want most are RStudio (desktop and server) and R Commander. RStudio does exist in RPM form but the packages are made via 'cmake' rather than by Fedora's process, and the server's using the old school /etc/init.d

Re: Orphaned Packages in branched (2014-11-20)

On Nov 20, 2014 2:25 PM, opensou...@till.name wrote: The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:

Re: Removing packages that have broken dependencies in F21 tree

On Nov 13, 2014 8:02 AM, Kalev Lember kalevlem...@gmail.com wrote: On 11/13/2014 03:33 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 03:20:03PM +0200, Kalev Lember wrote: transifex Huh?? If this is the package I'm thinking of, it's pretty important to many other packages. It

Re: No more deltarpms by default

On Oct 18, 2014 5:00 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia nka...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 11:40 PM, Gerald B. Cox gb...@bzb.us wrote: My comment was not meant to be argumentative, but rather tongue-in-cheek. However, I do believe when changing a default, it isn't about what is convenient

Re: Samba as AD DC

On Sep 7, 2014 11:58 AM, Simo Sorce s...@redhat.com wrote: On Sun, 2014-09-07 at 01:12 -0300, Sergio Belkin wrote: Hi, Is (Samba) Fedora 20 still not capable of being Active Directory Domain Controller? I mean is that page current:

Re: Add Gparted into Live's

On Aug 8, 2014 4:03 PM, Hedayat Vatankhah hedayat@gmail.com wrote: GParted provides a number of essential features users might need, some of which are not provided even by any command line tools in Fedora repositories: resizing and moving partitions/filesystems. And something like resizing

Re: dnf even allows to uninstall RPM and systemd without warnings

On Jun 23, 2014 4:55 PM, Gerald B. Cox gb...@bzb.us wrote: First of all thank you for your reasoned response. I simply disagree. I understand the fact about require bugs, and the tons of dependent packages. I've seen that also when I've tried to remove a package and noticed it had a myriad

Re: F21 System Wide Change: Workstation: Disable firewall

On Apr 22, 2014 3:05 AM, Christian Schaller cscha...@redhat.com wrote: ... As a sidenote, there has been a lot of discussions on this an other Fedora lists over the last few Months where people have loudly come out against what they see as infringements on the Freedom part of the four F's.

Re: Diagrams and images used in documentation

On Apr 3, 2014 9:27 PM, William Brown will...@firstyear.id.au wrote: Hi, What is the software that is used to make images like : http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/18/html/FreeIPA_Guide/images/IPA_arch.png Or

Re: What will happen to XFCE, LXDE, Mate, Cinnemon in Fedora.Next

On Mar 25, 2014 8:27 PM, Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote: My point is that it must ALSO be possible to install the preferred desktop directly, without installing GNOME first. Exactly this. Installing MATE

Re: F21 System Wide Change: cron to systemd time units

On Mar 4, 2014 10:52 AM, Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de wrote: On Tue, 04.03.14 15:54, Miloslav Trmač (m...@volny.cz) wrote: Hello, 2014-03-04 15:32 GMT+01:00 Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com: = Proposed System Wide Change: cron to systemd time units =

Re: F21 System Wide Change: cron to systemd time units

On Mar 4, 2014 7:51 AM, Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote: On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 03:32:03PM +0100, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: = Proposed System Wide Change: cron to systemd time units = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/cron-to-systemd-time-units I'm in favor, but I think we

Re: proposal for changes to auto-expiring bugs

On Feb 6, 2014 11:06 AM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote: On Thu, 6 Feb 2014 04:00:17 -0500 Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote: I would like to see one of the following, in order of preference: 1. Step one: when a release hits EOL, move the bugs to NEEDINFO with a

Re: New UEFI guide on the wiki

On Feb 3, 2014 9:31 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: On Mon, 2014-02-03 at 20:14 -0800, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 8:09 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: So, look what I wrote today:

Review swap: glyphicons-halflings-fonts RHBZ#1050805

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I'd like to swap reviews with someone for a font I've packaged up[1] . [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1050805 - -- - -- Pete Travis - Fedora Docs Project Leader - 'randomuser' on freenode - immanet...@fedoraproject.org

Re: What to do about packaging beta, or rc as alternate installable

On Jan 23, 2014 1:12 PM, Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/23/2014 01:43 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: Christopher Meng wrote: But you can do this on copr IMO. Also update-testing is not just a place for updates to have a break,

Re: Fedora.next in 2013 -- Big Picture and Themes

://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/docs/2013-November/015337.html - -- - -- Pete Travis - Fedora Docs Project Leader - 'randomuser' on freenode - immanet...@fedoraproject.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net

Re: Best practice for multiple version/OS boot?

welcome. [1] https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/docs/multiboot-guide.git/ - -- - -- Pete Travis - Fedora Docs Project Leader - 'randomuser' on freenode - immanet...@fedoraproject.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http

Re: What is support status of PowerVR GPUs in Fedora? (Intel D2500 and gma500_gfx)

On Nov 14, 2013 5:05 AM, valent.turko...@gmail.com valent.turko...@gmail.com wrote: Friend of mine just showed me his cheap 13 laptop running Intel D2500 and first thing he said that he had issue installing linux on it. When I asked about GPU and answer was Intel I assured him that for last

Re: Is Gnome Software ready for primetime ?

On Oct 31, 2013 11:43 PM, Tim Lauridsen tim.laurid...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 4:58 AM, Ankur Sinha sanjay.an...@gmail.com wrote: It isn't a *package* management application. It's an *application* management application, ie., it only handles packages that are desktop

Re: Packages have proxy word.

On Oct 31, 2013 6:08 PM, مصعب الزعبي moc...@hotmail.com wrote: بسم الله الرّحمن الرّحيم Hi, The result of updating Fedora by yum is fail !! When any package have proxy word marked to (install or update) , error message will appear with http 403 error forbidden. In my country Syria (maybe

Re: communications and community [was Re: Lack of response about sponsorship]

On Oct 25, 2013 3:09 PM, Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, 25 Oct 2013 13:54:27 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: I'm sure the docs team talks about stuff in Rawhide occasionally too; Unlike devel, the docs list is related to Documentation only, isn't it? Could you imagine

Re: Lack of response about sponsorship

*snip* https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group lists, how to get sponsored. Just waiting might be a solution, but probably not the fastest one. Matthias -- I don't agree with this. The sponsorship process is as much an introduction to the community as

Re: Fedora Working Groups: Call for Self-Nominations

On Oct 10, 2013 8:20 PM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote: Matthew Miller wrote: On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 12:58:32AM -0400, Jens Petersen wrote: * Fedora Workstation Will this subsume Live-Desktop.iso and Live-KDE.iso? What about other current desktop Spins? Presumably some

Documenting Changes

, don't worry about presentation and such; it can be difficult to know what needs to be written about in the distribution and a point in the right direction really helps. -- -- Pete Travis - Fedora Docs Project Leader - 'randomuser' on freenode - immanet...@fedoraproject.org signature.asc

Re: Review swap request: web-assets

On Aug 23, 2013 6:00 PM, T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com wrote: Hi! Would someone be willing to trade me a review for: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=997678 It's dead simple at the moment: it just provides a couple directories and RPM macros. Later on it will

Re: no mention of interface naming in Fedora 19 Release Notes

On Jul 16, 2013 11:22 AM, Andrew McNabb amcn...@mcnabbs.org wrote: Fedora 19 has gone through yet another change to how network interfaces are renamed (biosdevname, etc.). This isn't mentioned in the Changes in Fedora for System Administrators section of the Release Notes, though it does

Re: F20 Self Contained Change: Application Installer

On Jul 10, 2013 5:25 AM, Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com wrote: = Proposed Self Contained Change: Application Installer = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/AppInstaller Change owner(s): Richard Hughes rhug...@redhat.com, together with the desktop team We will replace the existing

Re: icedtea-web installed and enabled by default in Fedora 19

On Jun 17, 2013 9:03 AM, Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com wrote: ... I think given all the trouble this plugin has caused recently, it wouldn't be wise to install it for everyone. If you need it, great, install it, but if a users doesn't need it, it's really just creating a level of

Re: git rebase master

On May 27, 2013 11:17 AM, Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com wrote: Hi, git puts me crazy in here : http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/debconf.git/ I have master now correct and want F19 be the same (git merge master) but do a commit just in F19, seems that never will be the same . I try

Re: Maintainer input on release notes

On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 12:04 AM, Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 12:52 PM, John J. McDonough wb8...@arrl.net wrote: We had a short discussion of this at this morning's meeting but felt a broader discussion here was warranted. When preparing the Release

Re: Do you think this is a security risk and if not is it a bad UI decision?

**will** bitch about being able to read the password as they type it. Any Press is Good Press is a bromide that Fedora shouldn't test. - Pete Travis - Fedora Docs Project Leader - 'randomuser' on freenode - immanet...@fedoraproject.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https

Re: How do *you* use Fedora?

On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 9:55 AM, David Lehman dleh...@redhat.com wrote: On Thu, 2013-04-04 at 08:59 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 08:29:21AM -0600, Pete Travis wrote: equated to the memory requirements for the running environment, especially for cloud guests

Re: How do *you* use Fedora?

On Apr 5, 2013 2:23 PM, David Lehman dleh...@redhat.com wrote: On Fri, 2013-04-05 at 08:59 -0600, Pete Travis wrote: On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 9:55 AM, David Lehman dleh...@redhat.com wrote: On Thu, 2013-04-04 at 08:59 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 08

Re: How do *you* use Fedora?

- but does anyone want to run Fedora with less memory than that, or is doing so venturing out of reasonable guidelines and into proof-of-concept adventureland? -- Pete Travis - Fedora Docs Project Leader - 'randomuser' on freenode - immanetize at fedoraproject.org -- devel mailing list devel

How do *you* use Fedora?

comprehensive documentation. Beyond a basic desktop, what use cases would you like to see us represent? -- Pete Travis - Fedora Docs Project Leader - 'randomuser' on freenode - immanetize at fedoraproject.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman

Re: Is there a reason we do not turn on the file system hardlink/symlink protection in Rawhide?

On Mar 15, 2013 10:13 AM, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote: On 03/15/2013 10:52 AM, Chris Adams wrote: I agree that it doesn't really need a feature page, but IMHO it should be in the release notes (this is something that could break existing programs). Here you go

Re: Fedora Knowledge Base / Help Center Idea

On Mar 13, 2013 11:31 AM, Máirín Duffy du...@fedoraproject.org wrote: On 03/13/2013 11:53 AM, Nils Philippsen wrote: I imagine that some kind of well discoverable (e.g. advertised during installation, or in the default browser homepage) knowledge-base beyond installation guides, release

Re: Fedora Knowledge Base / Help Center Idea

On Mar 13, 2013 1:55 PM, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote: On 03/13/2013 02:52 PM, Pete Travis wrote: . Guides are getting updated too, of course. More writers make for better docs, so if you want that for our users, please help write docs instead of competing. Have you thought

Re: Improving the Fedora boot experience

On Mar 12, 2013 9:12 AM, Peter Jones pjo...@redhat.com wrote: On UEFI systems, which is most new desktops: 1) we don't need any grub UI whatsoever 2) we don't need the 5 second timeout 3) we don't need to indicate to the firmware that we need USB probed unless it's the device we're booting

Re: Request for a firewalld secondary DHCP + PXEBOOT HOWTO

On Feb 15, 2013 6:39 AM, Aaron Gray aaronngray.li...@gmail.com wrote: Pete, Yeah that's the easy bits, they need details too. The bit I have yet to find out how to do is to forward HTTPS and DNS ports between the primary internet network and the secondary DHCP BOOTP network on 192.168.1.x. I

Re: Non-responsive Maintainer: mediawiki

On Feb 15, 2013 5:34 AM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: On 08/02/13 01:36 PM, Pete Travis wrote: . I haven't poked at mediawiki in a while, so please correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't it fairly self contained? I recall copying the content from /usr/share/ to /var/www

Re: Request for a firewalld secondary DHCP + PXEBOOT HOWTO

On Feb 9, 2013 3:47 AM, Aaron Gray aaronngray.li...@gmail.com wrote: On 7 February 2013 16:41, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com wrote: On 02/07/2013 04:23 PM, Aaron Gray wrote: Can someone who knows firewalld please do a HOWTO to on setting up a secondary DHCP with DNS and HTTPS

Re: Request for a firewalld secondary DHCP + PXEBOOT HOWTO

On Feb 14, 2013 12:03 PM, Pete Travis li...@petetravis.com wrote: On Feb 9, 2013 3:47 AM, Aaron Gray aaronngray.li...@gmail.com wrote: On 7 February 2013 16:41, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com wrote: On 02/07/2013 04:23 PM, Aaron Gray wrote: Can someone who knows firewalld

Re: Non-responsive Maintainer: mediawiki

On Feb 8, 2013 12:54 PM, Stephen John Smoogen smo...@gmail.com wrote: . Two the fix is to upgrade to a very new version which will break everyone who upgrades until they (or the first person who gets to the website :) ) runs the upgrade mode.. which might not work due to either custom changes

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Cinnamon as Default Desktop

On Jan 28, 2013 9:56 AM, inode0 ino...@gmail.com wrote: (snip) I'm happy to see renewed discussion about the future of the Fedora desktop. After four releases it isn't bad to step back and take a look at how things are working out. I hope we can do that with an eye to where we want to go in

Re: Feedback wanted: Fedora Formulas

On Jan 9, 2013 12:32 PM, Nathanael D. Noblet nathan...@gnat.ca wrote: On 01/09/2013 12:26 PM, Seth Vidal wrote: On Wed, 9 Jan 2013, Kevin Fenzi wrote: One of the big questions to answer is distribution. I can see good arguments on the one hand distributing formulas via RPM and on the

Re: GRUB menu hidden by default?

A simple short term solution might be to purge this statement from the documentation for affected releases. If we should expect the splash only in certain cases, of course the docs should state that expected behavior. Since you folks are testing, would anyone mind filing a bug against the

Re: RFC: Feature process improvements

I don't see why these are features at all. Surely it's better towards the end of each release cycle for someone to compare the versions of packages and add something in the release notes for each major GUI / programming language / user application that got a big update. Rich. I only have

F18 Release Notes

a handful of docs maintainers trying to follow all of hundreds of features. Thanks for helping us represent your work to the users, Pete Travis, The Fedora Docs Team ___ devel-announce mailing list devel-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org https