On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 6:31 AM Ryan Lerch wrote:
>
> The Koji web front end is now running a new theme that brings it into
> line with the majority of our other devel focused web applications:
>
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/
Love it, thank you.
P
On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 6:23 PM Tomas Hrcka wrote:
> The mass rebuild was done in a side tag (f38-rebuild) and moved over to
> f38. Failures can be seen at
> https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mass-rebuild/f38-failures.html
pamix fixed in pamix-1.6-7.fc38.
P
PSA: I've updated the license of tintin from GPLv2+ to GPL-3.0-only in
its 2.02.30 update. This should have been done a while ago, in 2.01.8;
Bodhi updates submitted.
P
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email
On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 1:59 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> Dear maintainers.
>
> Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages
> should be retired from Fedora 38 approximately one week before branching.
>
> tabbed psabata
On Wed, Nov 2, 2022 at 5:04 PM Petr Pisar wrote:
> Summing all these facts suggests that intents in Modularity are completely
> unused and their future won't be better. Therefore I'd like to deprecate
> intents in Modularity.
>
> What would it mean? The current YAML specification for
On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 12:27 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> Hi everybody,
>
> I'm unsure how to deal with this, so I'm asking here if anybody has ideas.
>
> - I'm getting serious spam from fedora-notif on IRC about successful -
> and a lot more failed - ELN builds for my packages (triggered
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 11:33 PM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>
> I am looking for challenges for upcoming year - what I and my team should
> enhance. I have some ideas, but I want to hear
> yours.
>
> What you - as Fedora packager - find most time consuming on packaging?
> Where you will welcome more
On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 11:08 PM James Szinger wrote:
>
> On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 22:10:03 +0100
> Petr Šabata wrote:
> > Disable the freeradius module; it only has a context for the default
> > perl stream and is blocking the switch.
>
> Still no joy. By the way,
On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 9:55 PM James Szinger wrote:
>
> On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 17:18:24 -0500
> Matthew Miller wrote:
>
> > Is there a particular part of the documentation you're struggling
> > with, or something specifically you find missing? I don't mean to be
> > snarky, but I heard a lot of
On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 11:57 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 10:13:13PM +0100, Petr Šabata wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 5, 2020 at 7:46 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 10:23:08PM +0100, Petr Šabata wrote:
> > > >
On Sat, Dec 5, 2020 at 7:46 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 10:23:08PM +0100, Petr Šabata wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 8:48 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 11:26:18PM +0100, Petr Šabata wrote:
> > > >
On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 10:46 PM Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I filed https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2512 asking FESCo to move all
> automated emails to a separate list where people who want to follow
> can, while I was part of the proliferation of compose reports coming
> here, there is now
On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 8:48 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 11:26:18PM +0100, Petr Šabata wrote:
> > Also a couple of notes on modularity here:
> >
> > # By default, module stream name is derived from the branch name
> > If we have any &q
Also a couple of notes on modularity here:
# By default, module stream name is derived from the branch name
If we have any "master" modules, those will get unexpectedly renamed
as soon as they get rebuilt. This might impact tagging or updates and
cause confusion in general. We should check if
On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 4:34 PM Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 04:16:56PM +0100, Petr Šabata wrote:
> > Since I don't see those on the list, does this impact
> >
> > * rpkg (fedpkg)?
>
> Wrapper to git, should not be impacted. The only thing I
Since I don't see those on the list, does this impact
* rpkg (fedpkg)?
* koji (if no git commit is provided)?
* COPR?
* Koschei or other such services?
P
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 7:38 PM Tom Stellard wrote:
>
> On 12/1/20 8:33 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> >
> > Dne 01. 12. 20 v 13:56 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a):
> >> On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 01:20:33PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> >>> Dne 01. 12. 20 v 2:37 Tom Stellard napsal(a):
> False
On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 11:10 PM Tom Stellard wrote:
> If you are a package maintainer and would prefer to update your packages
> on your own, please do so before Dec 14, which is when I will begin
> doing the mass update.
Checking packages linked to my name...
pamix: only calls %cmake macros,
On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 12:30 PM Marcin Dulak wrote:
>
> I noticed several, surprising to me email addresses, listed under "Email sent
> to" when making changes to my bugzilla.redhat.com bugs.
> For example this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1900680
>
> The individual email
On Sun, Nov 15, 2020 at 4:13 PM Jason Edgecombe wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I want to rebuild some of the fedora 33 packages for EL8 (vagrant, for
> example), but I'm having trouble getting all of the build dependencies right.
> I ran dnf to download the SRPMS with the --resolve option, but I'm
On Wed, Nov 4, 2020 at 7:16 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Remove_make_from_BuildRoot
>
> == Summary ==
> This change will remove make from the default buildroot in Koji and mock.
Huge +1 here, by the way.
P
___
devel
On Wed, Nov 4, 2020 at 7:52 PM Richard Shaw wrote:
>
> Is the expectation to explicitly BR: make?
>
> Or would pulling in autotools/automake/cmake suffice?
My general approach is that if I call it, or call things in my package
that directly call it, I buildrequire it.
If you do that, you don't
On Tue, Nov 3, 2020 at 1:16 PM Petr Pisar wrote:
> Another option would be adding the EOL data into modules dist-git
> repositories. To the same branches where modules are built from. But
> a different file. Pungi would enumarate all module builds directed to
> a compose, locate their dist-git
=
#fedora-meeting-1: FESCO (2020-06-15)
=
Meeting started by contyk at 15:00:27 UTC. The full logs are available
at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2020-06-15/fesco.2020-06-15-15.00.log.html
Meeting
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Monday at 15:00UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2020-06-15 15:00 UTC'
Links to all issues to be
On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 2:46 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 08. 06. 20 13:36, Petr Šabata wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > while we have some open tickets, we're waiting for the Modularity
> > presentation later this week. In the meantime, the discussion
> > continues
Hi,
while we have some open tickets, we're waiting for the Modularity
presentation later this week. In the meantime, the discussion
continues in the tickets. There doesn't appear to be anything else to
discuss today so I'm proposing we cancel the meeting.
I'll chair the next one.
P
On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 9:43 PM Colin Walters wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2020, at 7:19 AM, Petr Šabata wrote:
>
> > Details in the gist:
> > https://gist.github.com/contyk/0f0585c57976ca18a293b3566408
>
> How about s/use/globalbuildopt/ ?
Please, no :)
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 9:55 AM Nicolas Mailhot via devel
wrote:
>
> Le mardi 28 avril 2020 à 08:43 +0200, Petr Pisar a écrit :
> > On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 04:33:52PM +0200, Petr Šabata wrote:
> > >
> > > %_use_ncurses %{lua:
> > > if rpm.expand("%{nam
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 8:55 AM Petr Pisar wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 04:33:52PM +0200, Petr Šabata wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 4:04 PM Petr Pisar wrote:
> > > (2) Is it possible to override them on a per-package basis?
> > >
> >
; ...that's probably it from me.
>
> clime
>
> On Tue, 28 Apr 2020 at 03:06, clime wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 27 Apr 2020 at 13:21, Petr Šabata wrote:
> > >
> > > Based on the recent discussions around %fedora/%rhel macros and ELN,
> > > and %bcond generall
On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 6:38 PM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
>
> Dne 27. 04. 20 v 16:25 Petr Šabata napsal(a):
> > On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 3:01 PM Vít Ondruch wrote:
> >>
> >> Dne 27. 04. 20 v 13:19 Petr Šabata napsal(a):
> >>> Based on the recent di
On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 4:04 PM Petr Pisar wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 01:19:29PM +0200, Petr Šabata wrote:
> > Details in the gist:
> > https://gist.github.com/contyk/0f0585c57976ca18a293b3566408
> >
> I'm very interested in overriding the global setti
On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 3:01 PM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
>
> Dne 27. 04. 20 v 13:19 Petr Šabata napsal(a):
> > Based on the recent discussions around %fedora/%rhel macros and ELN,
> > and %bcond generally being confusing to work with, I came up with a
> > distributio
On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 3:42 PM Robin Lee wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 7:21 PM Petr Šabata wrote:
> >
> > Based on the recent discussions around %fedora/%rhel macros and ELN,
> > and %bcond generally being confusing to work with, I came up with a
> > distribu
On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 2:15 PM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 01:19:29PM +0200, Petr Šabata wrote:
> > Based on the recent discussions around %fedora/%rhel macros and ELN,
> > and %bcond generally being confusing to work with, I came up with a
> > d
On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 1:24 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 7:21 AM Petr Šabata wrote:
> >
> > Based on the recent discussions around %fedora/%rhel macros and ELN,
> > and %bcond generally being confusing to work with, I came up with a
> > distribu
Based on the recent discussions around %fedora/%rhel macros and ELN,
and %bcond generally being confusing to work with, I came up with a
distribution-wide feature that defines generic feature keywords and
associated helper macros that packages can check in build-time
conditionals.
The key
=
#fedora-meeting-1: FESCO (2020-04-06)
=
Meeting started by contyk at 15:00:22 UTC. The full logs are available
at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2020-04-06/fesco.2020-04-06-15.00.log.html
Meeting
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Monday at 15:00UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2020-04-06 15:00 UTC'
Links to all issues to be
=
#fedora-meeting-1: FESCO (2020-02-24)
=
Meeting started by contyk at 15:00:04 UTC. The full logs are available
at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2020-02-24/fesco.2020-02-24-15.00.log.html
.
Meeting
Sure.
On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 2:01 PM Nicolas Mailhot
wrote:
>
> Le 2020-02-24 13:37, Petr Šabata a écrit :
> > Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
> > FESCo meeting Monday at 15:00UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
> > irc.freenode.net.
>
> Hi,
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Monday at 15:00UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2020-02-24 15:00 UTC'
Links to all issues to be
Just a minor FYI announcement:
As most of the original Modularity Team is moving on to face new
challenges, Red Hat's effort will now be primarily represented by the
software management group, with Daniel Mach coming up with an updated
Modularity Objective in the following weeks.
In essence,
=
#fedora-meeting-1: FESCO (2020-01-13)
=
Meeting started by contyk at 14:59:55 UTC. The full logs are available
at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2020-01-13/fesco.2020-01-13-14.59.log.html
Meeting
=
#fedora-meeting-1: FESCO (2020-01-06)
=
Meeting started by contyk at 15:00:16 UTC. The full logs are available
at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2020-01-06/fesco.2020-01-06-15.00.log.html
Meeting
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Monday at 15:00UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2020-01-06 15:00 UTC'
Links to all issues to be
=
#fedora-meeting-1: FESCO (2019-12-16)
=
Meeting started by contyk at 15:00:06 UTC. The full logs are available
at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2019-12-16/fesco.2019-12-16-15.00.log.html
Meeting
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Monday at 15:00UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2019-12-16 15:00 UTC'
Links to all issues to be
Starting a new thread since the old one is hard to navigate at this point.
Modularity is a distribution-level change and requires some mindset
shift from packagers and users alike. I understand the concerns some
people have, feeling it’s something new and half-baked that is being
forced on them.
=
#fedora-meeting-1: FESCO (2019-09-23)
=
Meeting started by contyk at 15:00:22 UTC. The full logs are available
at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2019-09-23/fesco.2019-09-23-15.00.log.html
Meeting
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Monday at 15:00UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2019-09-23 15:00 UTC'
Links to all issues to be
=
#fedora-meeting-1: FESCO (2019-09-16)
=
Meeting started by contyk at 15:00:22 UTC. The full logs are available
at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2019-09-16/fesco.2019-09-16-15.00.log.html
Meeting
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Monday at 15:00UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2019-09-16 15:00 UTC'
Links to all issues to be
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2019-06-28)
===
Meeting started by contyk at 15:00:00 UTC. The full logs are available
at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2019-06-28/fesco.2019-06-28-15.00.log.html
Meeting summary
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Friday at 15:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2019-06-28 15:00 UTC'
Links to all issues to be
#fedora-meeting-3: Weekly Meeting of the Modularity Team
Meeting started by contyk at 15:00:00 UTC. The full logs are available
at
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2019-06-14)
===
Meeting started by contyk at 15:00:04 UTC. The full logs are available
at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2019-06-14/fesco.2019-06-14-15.00.log.html
Meeting summary
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Friday at 15:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2019-06-14 15:00 UTC'
Links to all issues to be
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2019-05-17)
===
Meeting started by contyk at 15:00:00 UTC. The full logs are available
at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2019-05-17/fesco.2019-05-17-15.00.log.html
Meeting summary
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Friday at 15:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2019-05-17 15:00 UTC'
Links to all issues to be
On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 08:27:07AM +0200, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> It is up to you. If the plan is always to have master in sync with your
> module stream, then you can keep master. If you want to retire sway from
> rawhide at some point, you would need to move to the stream branch.
This.
Though
=
#fedora-meeting-1: FESCO (2019-03-11)
=
Meeting started by contyk at 15:00:01 UTC. The full logs are available
at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2019-03-11/fesco.2019-03-11-15.00.log.html
Meeting
On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 09:56:35AM +0100, Petr Šabata wrote:
> Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
> FESCo meeting Monday at 15:00UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
> irc.freenode.net.
>
> To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
> http://fedo
On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 09:56:35AM +0100, Petr Šabata wrote:
> Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
> FESCo meeting Monday at 15:00UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
> irc.freenode.net.
>
> To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
> http://fedo
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Monday at 15:00UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2019-03-11 15:00 UTC'
Links to all issues to be
On Mon, Mar 04, 2019 at 11:11:48AM +0100, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> On Monday, March 4, 2019 10:46:45 AM CET Petr Šabata wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 04, 2019 at 10:22:05AM +0100, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > > On Monday, March 4, 2019 10:01:14 AM CET Petr Šabata wrote:
> >
On Mon, Mar 04, 2019 at 10:22:05AM +0100, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> On Monday, March 4, 2019 10:01:14 AM CET Petr Šabata wrote:
> > Replying in general.
> >
> > While it's never been entirely the same, I'd also like our mock configs
> > to be as close to koji environment a
On Fri, Mar 01, 2019 at 08:25:32AM -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:
> Not replying to anyone in particular but just a nit for me...
>
> I've been a Fedora packager for probably 10 years now (need to check!) but
> I *STILL* don't really understand modules other than at a high level (it
> lets you use
Replying in general.
While it's never been entirely the same, I'd also like our mock
configs to be as close to koji environment as possible. In the
current situation that would mean no modules being available.
Once/if we proceed with one of the
modules-in-the-non-modular-buildroot proposals, I
On Mon, Mar 04, 2019 at 08:56:26AM +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 04. 03. 19 v 7:30 Richard W.M. Jones napsal(a):
> > Bonus question: Are "Problem 1" (etc) in each section of the error
> > message supposed to relate to each other in some way? Or is the
> > second list a new list of problems?
On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 03:23:19PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 26. 02. 19 15:07, Petr Šabata wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 02:23:35PM +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > > From:
> > >https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680320#c2
> > >
> &g
On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 02:41:56PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2019, 14:24 Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>
> > From:
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680320#c2
> >
> > When you try to run:
> > mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64 shell
> >
> > You will get:
> > Problem
On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 02:23:35PM +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> From:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680320#c2
>
> When you try to run:
> mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64 shell
>
> You will get:
> Problem 1: conflicting requests
> - nothing provides module(platform:f30)
=
#fedora-meeting-1: FESCO (2019-02-18)
=
Meeting started by contyk at 15:00:00 UTC. The full logs are available
at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2019-02-18/fesco.2019-02-18-15.00.log.html
Meeting
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Monday at 15:00UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2019-02-18 15:00 UTC'
Links to all issues to be
On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 08:08:38PM -0600, Wart wrote:
> As per
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Orphaned_package_that_need_new_maintainers#Claiming_Ownership_of_an_Orphaned_Package
>
> ...I will be taking ownership of the rogue package. I was actually the
> maintainer for this package many years
On Tue, Jan 08, 2019 at 05:58:35PM +0100, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
> * Ralf Corsepius [08/01/2019 17:33] :
> >
> > Adding
> > BuildRequires: glibc-all-langpacks
> > to all the *.specs obviously fixes this issue. However, I doubt this is
> > right, because I think these warnings originate from some
On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 09:54:07AM +0100, Michal Novotny wrote:
> Hello Fedora devels!
>
> TL;DR: let's use rpm DistTag (DistTag, not the %dist macro) to denote
> stream names
>
> As we all know, modularity was created to provide
> parallel-availability, that is providing the same package in its
=
#fedora-meeting-1: FESCO (2018-12-17)
=
Meeting started by maxamillion at 15:05:25 UTC. The full logs are
available at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2018-12-17/fesco.2018-12-17-15.05.log.html
.
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Monday at 15:00UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2018-12-17 15:00 UTC'
Links to all issues to be
=
#fedora-meeting-1: FESCO (2018-12-03)
=
Meeting started by contyk at 15:00:02 UTC. The full logs are available
at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2018-12-03/fesco.2018-12-03-15.00.log.html
.
Meeting
pparently forgot.
The last week's agreement was to wait another week to discuss any open
questions.
P
>
> On Mon, Dec 3, 2018, 10:40 Petr Šabata
> > Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
> > FESCo meeting Monday at 15:00UTC in #fedora-meetin
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Monday at 15:00UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2018-12-03 15:00 UTC'
Links to all issues to be
=
#fedora-meeting-1: FESCO (2018-10-15)
=
Meeting started by contyk at 15:00:02 UTC. The full logs are available
at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2018-10-15/fesco.2018-10-15-15.00.log.html
.
Meeting
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Monday at 15:00UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2018-10-15 15:00 UTC'
Links to all issues to be
on to be present. Fortunately, we have a large set of very
> > competent people that I believe can step into this role without issue.
> > While it is only a suggestion, I would like to nominate Petr Šabata as
> > the new Council Engineering rep. He is more than capable of
On Tue, Oct 09, 2018 at 06:07:44PM -0600, Al Stone wrote:
> On 10/3/18 9:53 PM, Christopher wrote:
> > I'm still very confused about how to do modular packaging in Fedora. I
> > don't know:
> >
> > 1. How do I create a module for a new Fedora package?
> > 2. How do I create a module for my
On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 05:46:54PM -, Raphael Groner wrote:
> >> 4. How do I declare Requires on my runtime dependencies from another
> >> module?
> > No changes on the RPM level. You also have dependencies on the module
> > level,
> > which makes their packages available to you. At
On Wed, Oct 03, 2018 at 11:53:25PM -0400, Christopher wrote:
> I'm still very confused about how to do modular packaging in Fedora. I
> don't know:
>
> 1. How do I create a module for a new Fedora package?
> 2. How do I create a module for my existing non-modular Fedora package?
On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 12:45:59PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 17.9.2018 12:36, Petr Šabata wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 11:07:50PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > > > > d) (this example is not real (yet)) We decide to retire (remove)
> > > > >
On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 10:02:39AM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Hi,
> I have to admit that I am a bit puzzled about DNF behavior with modularity.
>
> I have installed repo files with modularity repos, but all of them are
> disabled. I have no module enabled on my system
> (F29 BTW). To be
On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 09:11:57AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 10:48:46AM +0200, Adam Samalik wrote:
> > There is another concept in Modularity we can use here: defaults. You could
> > have both streams 1.7 and 1.8 built for all active (non-EOL) Fedora
> > releases, but
On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 08:33:05AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> There was a bug[1] filed recently that indicated that printing was
> broken on certain printers. As a result of that discussion, it became
> apparent that there was no criteria for printing to work at all, which
> seems like an
On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 11:07:50PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 13.9.2018 22:44, Petr Šabata wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 03, 2018 at 04:43:15PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I was thinking about this for a while and I got the impression that th
On Mon, Sep 03, 2018 at 03:35:50PM +0200, Adam Samalik wrote:
> This is a summary of a recent thread [1].
>
> Traditional branches (such as "f29") have their EOL (end of life) encoded
> in the name. But what about stream branches [2] (such as "2.4" or "latest")?
>
> Stream branches of RPM
On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 10:22:12AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> At yesterday's F29 Go/No-Go meeting, we discussed the blocker status
> of BZ #1628192 - Fedora 29 installation cannot see a firmware RAID
> device. While the blocker criteria clearly states that this should be
> a blocker for
On Fri, Aug 03, 2018 at 04:43:15PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was thinking about this for a while and I got the impression that this is
> something I don't know the answer for. The question is a bit harder to
> formulate simply, so let put it in examples:
I see no one's really
On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 06:17:39PM +0200, Tomas Orsava wrote:
> Hi!
> We'd like to propose a new functionality for dnf: When a user tries to
> install a package XYZ and dnf doesn't find it, dnf would recommend them
> alternative packages. These offered packages would advertise that they are
> an
On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 04:24:05PM -0400, Langdon White wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 3:09 PM Stephen Gallagher
> wrote:
>
> > Go ahead
> >
> >
> +1
+1 as well.
P
>
> On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 3:04 PM Adam Samalik wrote:
> >
> >> We have some obsolete github repositories [1] from the f26
1 - 100 of 1884 matches
Mail list logo
