Re: convert everything to rpmautospec?

Am 07.04.24 um 17:15 schrieb Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek: Hi everyone, I'm revisting the topic of rpmautospec because I was doing some work on various packages, and it's annoying that some packages are using rpmautospec and others are not. All my packages have been converted, so in

Re: Update gumbo-parser to 0.12.1/libgumbo SONAME bump

Am 01.03.24 um 10:29 schrieb Michael J Gruber: Am Fr., 1. März 2024 um 10:19 Uhr schrieb Ralf Corsépius : Am 01.03.24 um 09:34 schrieb Michael J Gruber: Am Fr., 1. März 2024 um 07:55 Uhr schrieb Ralf Corsépius : Hi, I intend to update gumbo-parser to 0.12.1 in rawhide. This comes along

Re: Update gumbo-parser to 0.12.1/libgumbo SONAME bump

Am 01.03.24 um 09:34 schrieb Michael J Gruber: Am Fr., 1. März 2024 um 07:55 Uhr schrieb Ralf Corsépius : Hi, I intend to update gumbo-parser to 0.12.1 in rawhide. This comes along with an soname bump libgumbo to libgumbo.so.2 This requires a rebuilt of several dependent packages, AFAICT

Update gumbo-parser to 0.12.1/libgumbo SONAME bump

Hi, I intend to update gumbo-parser to 0.12.1 in rawhide. This comes along with an soname bump libgumbo to libgumbo.so.2 This requires a rebuilt of several dependent packages, AFAICT: claws-mail litehtml mupdf perl-HTML-Gumbo python3-PyMuPDF qpdfview zathura-pdf-mupdf I'll try to rebuild these

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F39 to F40

Am 24.02.24 um 10:12 schrieb Samuel Sieb: On 2/24/24 00:47, Ralf Corsépius wrote: Am 24.02.24 um 01:36 schrieb Samuel Sieb: On 2/23/24 15:38, Sérgio Basto wrote: On Sat, 2024-02-24 at 00:06 +0100, Ralf Corsépius wrote: Am 23.02.24 um 22:37 schrieb Samuel Sieb: On 2/23/24 10:50, Ralf

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F39 to F40

Am 24.02.24 um 01:36 schrieb Samuel Sieb: On 2/23/24 15:38, Sérgio Basto wrote: On Sat, 2024-02-24 at 00:06 +0100, Ralf Corsépius wrote: Am 23.02.24 um 22:37 schrieb Samuel Sieb: On 2/23/24 10:50, Ralf Corsépius wrote: # dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=40 ... No match for group

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F39 to F40

Am 23.02.24 um 22:37 schrieb Samuel Sieb: On 2/23/24 10:50, Ralf Corsépius wrote: # dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=40 ... No match for group package "multican" ... WTH? It was a program for controlling Canon cameras that has been retired. Some group you have ins

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F39 to F40

# dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=40 ... No match for group package "multican" ... WTH? -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

Am 21.02.24 um 18:50 schrieb Maxwell G: Report started at 2024-02-21 17:04:45 UTC The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper

Re: Doubts on /etc/mock/fedora-40-*.cfg

Am 16.02.24 um 12:00 schrieb Ralf Corsépius: Hi, today, mock-core-configs-40.1-1.fc39.noarch landed, bringing along /etc/mock/fedora-40-x86_64.cfg and /etc/mock/fedora-40-i386.cfg Now, I'm wondering about config_opts['package_manager'] fedora-40-*.cfg includes templates/fedora-branched.tpl

Doubts on /etc/mock/fedora-40-*.cfg

Hi, today, mock-core-configs-40.1-1.fc39.noarch landed, bringing along /etc/mock/fedora-40-x86_64.cfg and /etc/mock/fedora-40-i386.cfg Now, I'm wondering about config_opts['package_manager'] fedora-40-*.cfg includes templates/fedora-branched.tpl which sets config_opts['package_manager']=dnf

[rpms/rt] PR #2: use Droid Sans fonts from distro packages

corsepiu commented on the pull-request: `use Droid Sans fonts from distro packages` that you are following: `` I'll have a look at the proposed font-path changes, but I'll definitely will not apply %autosetup changes, because I don't consider them to be helpful. `` To reply, visit the link

[rpms/perl-Font-AFM] PR #4: Do not depend on files from /usr/share

corsepiu closed without merging a pull-request against the project: `perl-Font-AFM` that you are following. Closed pull-request: `` Do not depend on files from /usr/share `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Font-AFM/pull-request/4 -- ___

[rpms/perl-Font-AFM] PR #4: Do not depend on files from /usr/share

corsepiu commented on the pull-request: `Do not depend on files from /usr/share` that you are following: `` I've applied a differerent hack to work around this dnf5 regression. `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Font-AFM/pull-request/4 --

[rpms/perl-Convert-Color] PR #1: Do not depend on files from /usr/share

corsepiu commented on the pull-request: `Do not depend on files from /usr/share` that you are following: `` I do not agree with this patch nor with the new Guidelines The package directly accesses this file by its path, which is why this file is required. I.e. letting the package require a

Re: The new Change discussion process is painful

Am 13.09.23 um 12:19 schrieb Sandro: On 13-09-2023 08:09, Adam Williamson wrote:  From there, it's up to people where they see and respond to them. If more people are responding in discourse than on the mailing list, that would seem to suggest that there*is*  a reason to announce things

Re: KDE and GNOME Join Hands To Add Payments To Turn Flathub Into a Store for the Linux Desktop

Am 04.09.23 um 03:48 schrieb Ryan Bach via devel: Ryan Bach via devel wrote: First of all, as has been pointed out by others, the headline is misleading, since KDE and GNOME are not actually parties to the proposal and since the proposal was not even accepted. Secondly, IMHO, allowing

Re: koji: No space left on device

Am 01.08.23 um 17:14 schrieb Lubomír Sedlář: It should be possible as self service: koji tag-build f37-updates-candidate perl-Calendar-Simple-2.0.3-1.fc37 (If you can trigger the tagging by building, Koji should let you tag it directly too.) Great, thanks! This indeed did the job! Ralf

Re: koji: No space left on device

Am 01.08.23 um 16:55 schrieb Fabio Valentini: On Tue, Aug 1, 2023 at 4:49 PM Ralf Corsépius wrote: Hi, Right now, I have a package built in koji, which is in failed and success state at the same time: Cf. https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2267652 The link above

koji: No space left on device

Hi, Right now, I have a package built in koji, which is in failed and success state at the same time: Cf. https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2267652 The link above redirects to https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=104215785 Which contains: ... OSError:

koji: BuildError: error retrieving sources

Hi, Trying to go after an FTBFS, I am once again, facing a weird koji build errors: From https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=103995751 ... BuildError: error retrieving sources, mock exited with status 56; see root.log for more information ... From

Re: F39 Change Proposal: Enable fwupd-refresh.timer by default on IoT, CoreOS & Server Editions (Self-Contained)

Am 26.07.23 um 15:55 schrieb Solomon Peachy via devel: On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 09:45:13AM +0200, Ralf Corsépius wrote: It could be "my bubble", but for me, in all these fwupd is around, it has never, ever worked on any piece of HW for me. Most of the stuff I have that is updat

Re: Macros in side-tag

Am 26.07.23 um 13:46 schrieb Vít Ondruch: I think that Perl folks are using something aka %perl_bootstrap. Not sure if this is just for historic reasons and they could eventually migrate to regular bootstrap method. No, it's not historical. Perl has cyclic dependencies. To break them,

Re: F39 Change Proposal: Enable fwupd-refresh.timer by default on IoT, CoreOS & Server Editions (Self-Contained)

Am 26.07.23 um 08:48 schrieb Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski: On Wednesday, 26 July 2023 at 06:23, Ralf Corsépius wrote: Am 23.07.23 um 00:39 schrieb Neal Gompa: Actually, why wouldn't this be used everywhere? Because fwupd only works on a small set of machines? Define small. :) Almost

Re: F39 Change Proposal: Enable fwupd-refresh.timer by default on IoT, CoreOS & Server Editions (Self-Contained)

Am 23.07.23 um 00:39 schrieb Neal Gompa: Actually, why wouldn't this be used everywhere? Because fwupd only works on a small set of machines? Ralf ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: NTFS corruption with Fedora 37 and 38

Am 25.07.23 um 13:29 schrieb Michael Schwendt: Trying to figure out what has changed in Fedora land that causes NTFS corruption for some time. This is with default workstation with GNOME Shell auto-mounting external storage media when plugging them in. A ticket in bugzilla suggests there has

Re: Orphaning packages (was LibreOffice packages)

Am 01.07.23 um 14:28 schrieb Peter Robinson: On Sat, Jul 1, 2023 at 12:50 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: On 01/07/2023 13:36, Chris Adams wrote: A lot of the corporate world has gone to the "cloud" don't have to worry about local backups of important documents and spreadsheets, they

Re: What is Fedora?

Am 22.06.23 um 16:08 schrieb Stephen Gallagher: On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 4:26 PM Gerald Henriksen wrote: On Wed, 21 Jun 2023 21:06:40 +0100, you wrote: Hi all, Obviously many will have seen: https://www.redhat.com/en/blog/furthering-evolution-centos-stream and see, where EL

Re: (lack) of koji stability

On Fri, 16 Jun 2023 at 15:31, Ralf Corsépius wrote: Hi, I am facing (seemingly non-deterministic) FTBSes in builds, which flawlessly build local mocks. On top of that, a couple of minutes ago, koji reported: File "/usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/koji/daemon.py", line 1492, in ru

(lack) of koji stability

Hi, I am facing (seemingly non-deterministic) FTBSes in builds, which flawlessly build local mocks. On top of that, a couple of minutes ago, koji reported: File "/usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/koji/daemon.py", line 1492, in runTask response = (handler.run(),)

[rpms/perl-FCGI] PR #2: Conditionalize client tests

corsepiu commented on the pull-request: `Conditionalize client tests` that you are following: `` I do not agree neither with this patch nor with the attitude behind it. It has always been Fedora's convention to "test to the max" and not to cripple packages, which are providing self tests.

[rpms/perl-Class-Autouse] PR #1: Update Makefile.PL to not use Module::Install::DSL

corsepiu commented on the pull-request: `Update Makefile.PL to not use Module::Install::DSL` that you are following: `` Jitka, I do not understand the part below of your patch. Could you elaborate? # diff --git a/perl-Class-Autouse.spec b/perl-Class-Autouse.spec index c0f9d92..3206101 100644

Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2023-05-09)

Am 11.05.23 um 09:09 schrieb Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek: On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 12:22:09AM +0200, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: So you folks were not happy with the feedback on the mailing list, so you just made up a poll somewhere else. [snip] Was that poll

[rpms/perl-Type-Tiny] PR #1: Add conditions for build with/without big frameworks

corsepiu commented on the pull-request: `Add conditions for build with/without big frameworks` that you are following: `` I am hesitant, because I fail to understand the rationale behind it and am close to consider it "featuritis". `` To reply, visit the link below

Re: It’s time to transform the Fedora devel list into something new

Am 21.04.23 um 16:15 schrieb Solomon Peachy via devel: On Fri, Apr 21, 2023 at 11:42:20AM +0200, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: In all seriousness, I would advise you to hang out at the current discussion.fedoraproject.org and feel the vibe a bit. You kinda just demonstrated my point --

Re: Unable to install locally built rpms

Am 28.02.23 um 10:34 schrieb Kamil Paral: That's most certainly this problem: https://ask.fedoraproject.org/t/popular-third-party-rpms-fail-to-install-update-remove-due-to-security-policies-verification/31594

Unable to install locally built rpms

Hi, [Resending here, because the test list doesn't allow me to post, there] on f38, I am unable to install any locally built package (signed with a local key, I have been using for many years): # rpm -U xpetri-0.4.8-0.fc38.x86_64.rpm error: xpetri-0.4.8-0.fc38.x86_64.rpm: Header V4

Re: F38 proposal: Shorter Shutdown Timer (System-Wide Change proposal)

Am 30.12.22 um 10:42 schrieb Peter Boy: Am 30.12.2022 um 06:59 schrieb Nico Kadel-Garcia : Am 28.12.22 um 11:49 schrieb Peter Boy: It is a good idea to make the timeout configurable. But the default timeout for servers must remain unchanged. My problem is not "defined timeouts" it

Re: F38 proposal: Shorter Shutdown Timer (System-Wide Change proposal)

Am 28.12.22 um 11:49 schrieb Peter Boy: It is a good idea to make the timeout configurable. But the default timeout for servers must remain unchanged. My problem is not "defined timeouts" it is systemd delaying shutdowns for no obvious reasons. And as you asked: On my (bare metal)

[rpms/perl-Mo] PR #1: Split Mouse/Moose and Golf parts to separate packages

corsepiu commented on the pull-request: `Split Mouse/Moose and Golf parts to separate packages` that you are following: `` @mspacek I think there is a cut'n'pasto next to lines 33/34 inside of the diff: %package Moose Summary:Use Mouse instead of Mo Shouldn't the summary read "Use

Re: Strange FTBS

Am 09.12.22 um 11:53 schrieb Mamoru TASAKA: Ralf Corsépius wrote on 2022/12/09 19:01: Hi, I am facing a FTBS when trying to rebuild povray due to SPDX-changes: Not sure this is povray side bug or SDL2 side bug. Neither am I ;) Another observation: Fedora 37's last successful build's

Strange FTBS

Hi, I am facing a FTBS when trying to rebuild povray due to SPDX-changes: - In local mock environments, building suddenly waits for keyboard input. - In koji, building seemingly hangs and never times out (I killed a build job after 48h hours. Surprising to me is, this package had built

Re: Orphaned a lot of (mostly) Go packages owned by @fpokorny

Am 23.11.22 um 12:20 schrieb Miro Hrončok: Hello. Based on my conversation with Fridolín Pokorný @fpokorny, I've removed them from their Fedora packages. They left Red Hat and are no longer interested in maintaining Fedora packages. I am wondering, why Red Hat/FESCO/... still hasn't

Re: SPDX Statistics

Am 20.11.22 um 17:38 schrieb Miroslav Suchý: Dne 19. 11. 22 v 12:37 Miro Hrončok napsal(a): On 18. 11. 22 15:09, Miroslav Suchý wrote: |Fun fact: the script with the checks runs on my notebook for 32 hours.| That sounds pretty bad. What is the biggest bottleneck? Do you clone the

Re: F40 proposal: Porting Fedora to Modern C (System-Wide Change proposal)

Am 25.10.22 um 16:05 schrieb Ben Cotton: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/PortingToModernC. This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if

Re: Grub menu with 3 kernels by default

Am 05.10.22 um 17:33 schrieb Chris Murphy: Given this inconsistency, I have a mixed opinion of the hidden GRUB menu. I have a very clear opinion - It's a fault and usability regression. Ralf ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: [fedora-arm] Heads-up / for discussion: dnf not working with 1G of RAM or less

Am 29.08.22 um 15:43 schrieb Dan Čermák: I agree, this needn't block F37, but I still think that this should be fixed. Unless I use microdnf, I cannot upgrade my VPS with 1GB RAM that happily hosts my home page, which is quite a bummer and a bit of a shame to be honest. Are you trying to "dnf

Re: Packages silently dropping approved changes

Am 25.08.22 um 23:00 schrieb Iñaki Ucar: On Thu, 25 Aug 2022 at 19:15, Iñaki Ucar wrote: On Thu, 25 Aug 2022 at 18:34, Ralf Corsépius wrote: Am 25.08.22 um 13:19 schrieb Iñaki Ucar: I assume their maintainers didn't do it on purpose, maybe it was easier for a certain update, didn't

Re: Packages silently dropping approved changes

Am 25.08.22 um 13:19 schrieb Iñaki Ucar: I assume their maintainers didn't do it on purpose, maybe it was easier for a certain update, didn't have time to look into it and weren't aware of the guideline. But this is very frustrating. Seeing many hours of work just wiped out without any notice

Re: [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Important changes to software license information in Fedora packages (SPDX and more!)

Am 31.07.22 um 18:57 schrieb Richard Fontana: There are so few non-legacy, today-commonly-used, generally-accepted-as-FOSS licenses that are not viewed as GPLv3-compatible that I think it might be better for Ansible to just list those (the only one I can think of is EPL-2.0), or to list a

Re: empty reply from server error

Am 19.07.22 um 16:45 schrieb Globe Trotter via devel: Thanks, btw, the command here says unknown command (see below). Btw, the log is here: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2004683 The trigger of this breakdown is the sped missing "BuildRequires: gcc" However, I regret

Re: Once again, more than 8 days delayed notifications

Am 09.07.22 um 15:36 schrieb Stephen Smoogen: On Sat, 9 Jul 2022 at 09:25, Ralf Corsépius <mailto:rc040...@freenet.de>> wrote: Hi, I thought the notification delay mess was fixed. Apparently, I was wrong. No, I believe the service which is behind these emails is c

Once again, more than 8 days delayed notifications

Hi, I thought the notification delay mess was fixed. Apparently, I was wrong. I just received this: Subject: corsepiu pushed 1 commit to rpms/perl-Sub-HandlesVia (rawhide) Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2022 10:39:46 + (GMT) From: notificati...@fedoraproject.org ... Notification time stamped

Re: proposal idea: EOL notifications

Am 06.07.22 um 17:44 schrieb Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek: Hi, In https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2803 Artem asked for a user-visible notification when a Fedora stops being supported. Various proposals for online checks were discussed in the bug, but I think we might make do with something much

Re: Fedora SCM requests on the weekend

Am 03.07.22 um 10:46 schrieb Benson Muite: Maybe there are contributors where the working week is Sunday-Thursday? I feel, Fedora's leadership has forgotten, that Fedora is a international community project with people being located around the globe, which means there are quite a few people,

Re: F37 proposal: Linux Firmware Minimization (late System-Wide Change proposal)

Am 02.07.22 um 18:27 schrieb Ben Cotton: On Fri, Jul 1, 2022, 1:54 PM Ben Cotton > wrote: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Linux_Firmware_Minimization This proposal has been

Re: Tuesday's FESCo Meeting (2022-06-28) is cancelled. Many announcements

Am 28.06.22 um 14:51 schrieb Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek: On Tue, Jun 28, 2022 at 02:41:42PM +0200, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: It certainly is not true that the feedback was not considered by FESCo: there was a long discussion on IRC, and FESCo members also participated in the mailing

Re: shotcut: problem with unpacked files, after changing from qmake to cmake

Am 23.06.22 um 18:59 schrieb Martin Gansser: Hi, I have changed the rpm spec file for shotcut [1] from qmake to cmake. Now the program compiles to the end and fails when packaging it with the following error message: Processing files: shotcut-debuginfo-22.06.07-1.fc36.x86_64 Provides:

Re: What to do about this Koschei email?

Am 21.06.22 um 23:57 schrieb Scott Talbert: Look at the timestamps in the body of the notification emails.  Are they far in the past? Unfortunately, the Fedora notification system seems to be suffering from massive delays (e.g, several days) lately. Throughout this week, I've received

Re: [RFC] Build tag in RPM: from NVR to NVRB

Am 18.06.22 um 13:05 schrieb Aleksandra Fedorova: Hi, all, I'd like to discuss how we can add Build tag in the RPM. As one of the key points is to turn it into a common standard for rpm packages across the ecosystem, the conversation is currently opened upstream [1] and in RHEL Engineering.

Re: Archive value is out of time_t range

Am 06.06.22 um 16:38 schrieb Petr Pisar: I believe that glibc payed a special attention to provide both ABIs. But that does not apply to other libraries. Maybe it's not so important problem. Proprietary software tends to bundle the libraries, externally relying only on kernel and glibc. How

Re: Would it be useful to have a video call to discuss the "Deprecate Legacy BIOS" Change proposal?

Am 14.04.22 um 13:39 schrieb Kevin Kofler via devel: Ralf Corsépius wrote: I do not agree with this statement. Like previous "Legacy SIGs" this is a red herring to obfuscate RHATs lack of disinterest with topics, which do not match into their business objectives. I am al

Re: Would it be useful to have a video call to discuss the "Deprecate Legacy BIOS" Change proposal?

Am 13.04.22 um 20:05 schrieb David Cantrell: The Legacy BIOS SIG is a good proposal to handle this sort of ongoing work in Fedora. I do not agree with this statement. Like previous "Legacy SIGs" this is a red herring to obfuscate RHATs lack of disinterest with topics, which do not match

Re: nothing provides mpich-devel(x86-64) = 3.4.1 needed by petsc-mpich-devel-3.16.5-2.fc37.x86_64

Am 11.04.22 um 19:33 schrieb Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek: On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 03:37:04PM +0200, David wrote: On 4/11/22 15:29, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 02:36:57PM +0200, Ralf Corsépius wrote: Hi, apparently some broken packages have landed in rawhide

nothing provides mpich-devel(x86-64) = 3.4.1 needed by petsc-mpich-devel-3.16.5-2.fc37.x86_64

Hi, apparently some broken packages have landed in rawhide: DEBUG util.py:444: Error: DEBUG util.py:444: Problem: conflicting requests DEBUG util.py:444:- nothing provides mpich-devel(x86-64) = 3.4.1 needed by petsc-mpich-devel-3.16.5-2.fc37.x86_64 DEBUG util.py:446: (try to add

Re: F37 Change: Deprecate Legacy BIOS (System-Wide Change proposal)

Am 07.04.22 um 18:14 schrieb Robbie Harwood: Robert Marcano via devel writes: Is this change only related to install media support for booting with BIOS only? Would I be able to install newer Fedora releases using Legacy PXE on BIOS only machines? The intent is to indicate that new legacy

Re: F37 Change: Deprecate Legacy BIOS (System-Wide Change proposal)

Am 05.04.22 um 16:52 schrieb Ben Cotton: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DeprecateLegacyBIOS == Summary == Make UEFI a hardware requirement for new Fedora installations on platforms that support it (x86_64). Legacy BIOS support is not removed, but new non-UEFI installation is not

Re: Package downgrades on upgrade from F35 to F36 + categorized list

Am 24.03.22 um 18:07 schrieb Fabio Valentini: On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 5:58 PM Ralf Corsépius wrote: (...) Oh noes, the list isn't really getting shorter ... It's Fedora's old release management flaw ;) As usual at these times of the release cycle, Fedora 36 is in deep freeze, i.e

Re: Package downgrades on upgrade from F35 to F36 + categorized list

Am 24.03.22 um 17:51 schrieb Fabio Valentini: On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 2:32 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: Hi all, Yes, it's that time of the year again. Looks like it's not *that* bad this time round, but the fact that this keeps happening probably means some of our processes are broken ...

Re: F37 Change: Curl-minimal as default (System-Wide Change proposal)

Am 10.03.22 um 12:26 schrieb Vitaly Zaitsev via devel: On 10/03/2022 11:55, Alex wrote: May I suggest to leave at least the telnet protocol in curl-minimal for debugging purposes. Telnet is an extremely vulnerable protocol. It must be disable. It should not be used on a regular basis, but

Re: VERY late notification emails

Am 28.02.22 um 14:45 schrieb Richard Shaw: I almost wrote this a week ago but decided not to as it's been recently discussed but this is really annoying. 6 days later is more than useless. FWIW: I just received a bunch (ca. 10) of notifications with 5 days of delay. Don't know if somebody

Re: F37 Change: Curl-minimal as default (System-Wide Change proposal)

Am 24.02.22 um 19:35 schrieb Daniel P. Berrangé: On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 07:16:26PM +0100, Ralf Corsépius wrote: If someone is setting up a personal private mirror, I struggle to understand a reason why they would pick FTP over HTTP(S) today. Because an ftp server is much lighter and much

Re: F37 Change: Curl-minimal as default (System-Wide Change proposal)

Am 24.02.22 um 19:05 schrieb Kevin Fenzi: On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 10:19:33AM +0100, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: On 22/02/2022 21:45, Peter Robinson wrote: Does it make sense to keep FTP with most browsers obsoleting the protocol due to lack of security? Many Fedora mirrors still use

Re: Package notes feature causing build paths to be embedded

Am 27.01.22 um 10:46 schrieb Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek: But the problem is more general than this too. It also turns up in some *.pc (pkgconf) files. That's a bug too. I think this change should be reverted until a cleaner way can be found to implement it. I'm all for making better,

Re: new systemd in rawhide

Am 10.12.21 um 15:13 schrieb Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek: Some other replies in this thread assumed that the programs will crash. I have no idea why you would assume that. If properly implemented, such programs typically won't crash, they will "just not work" oder "error out". Functionally,

Re: new systemd in rawhide

Am 10.12.21 um 10:40 schrieb Vitaly Zaitsev via devel: On 10/12/2021 08:34, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: We also changed various libraries to be dlopened when actually used, instead of being dynamically linked. The goal is to reduce the required dependencies. dl-opening instead of

[rpms/perl-Font-AFM] PR #1: Use NimbusSans-Bold font for afm font metrics testing

corsepiu commented on the pull-request: `Use NimbusSans-Bold font for afm font metrics testing` that you are following: `` I do not agree with any of these patches and will not apply them Rationale: I consider using package deps instead of file deps to be insane and not helpful. `` To reply,

[rpms/perl-Params-Util] PR #1: Use make macros

corsepiu commented on the pull-request: `Use make macros` that you are following: `` Not OK with me. I consider %make_build and %make_install to be short-sighted stupidities causing functional and usabilty regressions. `` To reply, visit the link below

Re: [perl-Class-ReturnValue] Specify all dependencies

On 06/12/2012 11:15 AM, Petr Pisar wrote: commit a4ca8b042cc0504051a24fe7e1efb7d87c86f29c Author: Petr Písařppi...@redhat.com Date: Tue Jun 12 11:15:22 2012 +0200 Specify all dependencies perl-Class-ReturnValue.spec |9 - 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

Re: Patches for CVE-2011-0009

On 01/27/2011 12:31 PM, Xavier Bachelot wrote: On 01/27/2011 12:43 AM, Xavier Bachelot wrote: On 01/26/2011 09:16 PM, Xavier Bachelot wrote: On 01/26/2011 12:00 AM, Xavier Bachelot wrote: Hi, I've been looking at the issue for both rt 3.6 and 3.8. I have a rather full featured patch for 3.8

Re: rpms/perl-Algorithm-Dependency/devel perl-Algorithm-Dependency.spec, 1.19, 1.20

On 04/30/2010 03:06 PM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote: Author: mmaslano Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Algorithm-Dependency/devel In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv23471 Modified Files: perl-Algorithm-Dependency.spec Log Message: Remove test. Index: