Am 18.10.2014 um 23:07 schrieb Simo Sorce:
On Sat, 18 Oct 2014 22:51:52 +0200
Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
They do not say something like:
Sorry , I did not understand, can you repeat ?
the say bitte? like please in english (one single word) but for
sure not I'm not sure I
Am 19.10.2014 um 02:19 schrieb Solomon Peachy:
On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 07:00:19PM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
3) People who have a lot of hosts and high bandwidth, high speed
local deployment requirements can, and do, set up an internal Fedora
mirror with much lower bandwidth costs.
Am 17.10.2014 um 10:49 schrieb Roberto Ragusa:
On 10/06/2014 07:57 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
oh no - don't tie all together for reasons which did not destory the world over
years - it is a damned good design that the part dealing with rpm packages
don't need to know anything aboutt delta
Am 17.10.2014 um 10:55 schrieb Roberto Ragusa:
On 10/06/2014 07:25 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
the last discussions suggested that the result needs to be *identical* to the
full RPM downloaded for not break signatures
Bizarre design; the signature should protect the content (uncompressed
Am 17.10.2014 um 17:07 schrieb drago01:
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 5:02 PM, Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de wrote:
On 10/17/2014 04:24 PM, Tom Rivers wrote:
On 10/17/2014 10:05, drago01 wrote:
Because it makes no sense and pushes it to the user. The os (i.e we)
should handle that. In that
Am 17.10.2014 um 19:45 schrieb drago01:
1) deltarpms - low bandwidth use but takes a while to apply the updates
2) no deltarpms - high bandwidth use but faster updates application.
So now people suggest the user (or the distro) has to either choose 1) or 2) ...
What I am suggesting is adding a
Am 13.10.2014 um 16:49 schrieb Sergio Pascual:
Hello, since a week or so I have been unable to connect to
https://admin.fedoraproject.org with firefox, I get an error like (I'm
translating from Spanish)
Secure connection failed, no common cipher algorithms
(ssl_error_no_cypher_overlap)
I
Am 12.10.2014 um 02:52 schrieb poma:
On 11.10.2014 23:19, Peter Robinson wrote:
No, people make mistakes, the issue created wasn't intentional so
there's no needs to have derogatory comments, your response to Matt
isn't really appropriate either TBH.
If it so benign as you write, your
Am 07.10.2014 um 20:05 schrieb Matthias Clasen:
On Tue, 2014-10-07 at 13:24 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 1:19 PM, Gerald B. Cox gb...@bzb.us wrote:
Thanks James... I am aware of all the warnings. They might as well put up a
skull crossbones. I have all my data backed up
Am 06.10.2014 um 13:00 schrieb Richard W.M. Jones:
On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 04:41:07AM -0400, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
One of the long standing features that were enabled by default in yum is
support for delta rpms. dnf developers have disabled this and I think this
change deserves a broader
Am 06.10.2014 um 19:18 schrieb Lukas Zapletal:
because it needs to build the complete xz-compressed RPM
there was a discussion here not that long ago
Is the XZ the only option for RPMs now? Can't it do it uncompressed? Or
at least gzip -1.
Or Rich can add new feature to his
Am 06.10.2014 um 19:45 schrieb Florian Festi:
On 10/06/2014 06:53 PM, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
Get to coding. ;)
As mentioned elsewhere, the problem *is* signatures. yum (quite
rightly) refuses to install an rpm whose signature doesn't match the one
in the primary repodata. And I believe
I am sorry I did not fully follow the discussions earlier.
I only recall it was supposed to exist some compatibility
layer at some point.
But I keep all the time needing to
$ sudo rm -f /var/lib/rpm/__db*
there is no need to do so
because I forget and use yum instead of dnf in rawhide.
Am 04.10.2014 um 16:49
2014-10-04 11:08 GMT-03:00 Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net:
First think of me of as just an slightly above average user :)
I am sorry I did not fully follow the discussions earlier.
I only recall it was supposed to exist some compatibility
layer at some point
Am 04.10.2014 um 18:08 schrieb Florian Weimer:
On 10/04/2014 06:03 PM, Zdenek Kabelac wrote:
We still have universal:
#/usr/bin/env bash
Sadly, some systems have /bin/env, but not /usr/bin/env
on the Fedoras side a non-brainer
just use /bin/env since after UsrMove both works
Am 04.10.2014 um 18:08 schrieb Jaroslav Nahorny:
Am 03.10.2014 um 23:57 schrieb Rahul Sundaram:
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 5:38 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
generic is technical speak or for normal people outside IT at best
has a negative context to generica and spam
I never heared about
I checked that I was talking from experience as 1 or more weeks
ago. For a single package install indeed, dnf and yum are now
working.
I figured I have a lot of duplicates left from some earlier update,
for example:
$ rpm -q xz-libs
xz-libs-5.1.2-13alpha.fc22.x86_64
Am 03.10.2014 um 23:12 schrieb Rahul Sundaram:
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 4:57 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
To that end, fedup will grow a new mandatory option: --product. It will
take one of four arguments: standard (non-productized), server,
workstation or cloud.
When the
Am 03.10.2014 um 23:57 schrieb Rahul Sundaram:
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 5:38 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
generic is technical speak or for normal people outside IT at best
has a negative context to generica and spam
It is not really technical. Generic is often used in other contexts
Am 04.10.2014 um 00:29 schrieb Rahul Sundaram:
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 6:15 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
generic drugs is the one thing nobody wants to have in context honestly
Not true but irrelevant anyway since I was just pointing out that generic is
not a technical term.
why
Am 02.10.2014 um 09:14 schrieb Tomasz Torcz:
On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 08:33:23AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
since you have two packages to look after (Yes, by adding dash to the
default stack you just put the extra burden on Fedora to quickly
update two packages instead of just one in
Am 02.10.2014 um 16:32 schrieb Richard Hughes:
On 2 October 2014 15:17, Tim Lauridsen tim.laurid...@gmail.com wrote:
I think that is a bad idea to exclude applications from a Software manager,
because they don't live up to some visual quality guidelines.
There's actually a whole load of
Am 02.10.2014 um 16:50 schrieb Pierre-Yves Chibon:
On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 04:47:08PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 02.10.2014 um 16:32 schrieb Richard Hughes:
On 2 October 2014 15:17, Tim Lauridsen tim.laurid...@gmail.com wrote:
I think that is a bad idea to exclude applications from
Am 02.10.2014 um 17:34 schrieb Rahul Sundaram:
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 11:01 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
you misunderstood me
I don't think anyone misunderstood that you have trouble
disagreeing without also being insulting
my god i brought an cynical example what upstream may write
Am 02.10.2014 um 17:53 schrieb Rahul Sundaram:
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 11:38 AM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
The expected security improvement is essentially nonexistent. In the
current case of importing functions from
the environment (and we could have a looong philosophical conversation
Am 02.10.2014 um 18:04 schrieb Rahul Sundaram:
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 11:44 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
i doubt that you people are that
hypersensitive about every single word in real life too
People wouldn't say this if it was the first time you wrote
something like this
which
Am 02.10.2014 um 19:08 schrieb Bruno Wolff III:
On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 13:05:27 -0400,
Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
For the case of arbitrary variables (like USER_AGENT), the problem is
closed, because now only variables prefixed BASH_FUNC_ and with a suffix of
() in our
Am 02.10.2014 um 22:45 schrieb Rahul Sundaram:
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 11:57 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
because the conclusion that dash is not vulerable for
other things is invalid
I am afraid there was no such conclusions. To acknowledge known bugs in bash
doesn't require
Am 29.09.2014 um 15:14 schrieb Carlos O'Donell:
On 09/28/2014 02:17 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
What about the case where the user runs a custom kernel?
then he needs to build it right
That's not sufficiently conservative for a core runtime.
from the viewpoint of a distribution in context
Am 28.09.2014 um 20:13 schrieb Carlos O'Donell:
On 09/28/2014 01:24 PM, drago01 wrote:
On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 6:49 PM, Carlos O'Donell car...@redhat.com wrote:
On 09/26/2014 02:34 PM, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
Developers.
Testers wanted immediately for:
Am 28.09.2014 um 21:15 schrieb drago01:
On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 8:17 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 28.09.2014 um 20:13 schrieb Carlos O'Donell:
On 09/28/2014 01:24 PM, drago01 wrote:
On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 6:49 PM, Carlos O'Donell car...@redhat.com wrote:
On 09/26/2014
Am 29.09.2014 um 00:21 schrieb Andrew Lutomirski:
On Sep 28, 2014 12:25 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
mailto:h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 28.09.2014 um 21:15 schrieb drago01:
On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 8:17 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
mailto:h.rei
Am 24.09.2014 um 18:16 schrieb Stephen Gallagher:
There has been some discussion in various forums lately about how we
will handle fedup upgrades from Fedora 20 to Fedora 21 products.
Several suggestions have been made that warrant discussion:
* Upgrades from Fedora 20 remain
Am 24.09.2014 um 18:22 schrieb Jaroslav Reznik:
Maybe we can go with first option and say, upgrades to products are not
supported, please reinstall. It's new beginning and say non-productized
update support will be gone in F22 timeframe and only productized updates
will be allowed
don't do
Am 24.09.2014 um 19:12 schrieb Dennis Gilmore:
I have updated a few machines by running yum --releasever=21 install
fedora-release then yum distro-sync and not had any issues. As I
understand this thread it is soley about what to do in the case of
using fedup only. in which case we need to
Am 23.09.2014 um 19:41 schrieb Jóhann B. Guðmundsson:
On 09/23/2014 04:15 PM, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
On 09/22/2014 12:53 PM, DJ Delorie wrote:
For the journal you always keep all log history in it's original
state
On low-bandwidth systems, like laptops or diskless nodes, it's a
Am 22.09.2014 um 14:44 schrieb Jóhann B. Guðmundsson:
Then file a bug report against rsyslog and provide a patch which fixes
the default log filtering in Fedora to your expectation but leave
systemd out of it.
wow - in any other case the systemd developers saying that
they don't
Am 22.09.2014 um 15:55 schrieb Jóhann B. Guðmundsson:
On 09/22/2014 12:58 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
i suggest you get rid of that arrogance and some other developers
too because it's the reason for the subject and proves that you
*do not* care about users as long you have not the same opinion
Am 22.09.2014 um 16:25 schrieb Miloslav Trmač:
(stripping systemd-devel)
- Original Message -
Am 22.09.2014 um 14:44 schrieb Jóhann B. Guðmundsson:
This is simply untrue as journalctl -o export will show you.
where is it in the message?
the process is systemd
how to distinct
Am 22.09.2014 um 16:48 schrieb Sérgio Basto:
On Seg, 2014-09-22 at 16:08 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
no you refuse to understand that *nobody* wants to split
out *all* systemd logs because just the excessive *user
session* logging and that this messages should not exist
at all in a non
Am 22.09.2014 um 17:18 schrieb Sérgio Basto:
On Seg, 2014-09-22 at 17:00 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 22.09.2014 um 16:48 schrieb Sérgio Basto:
On Seg, 2014-09-22 at 16:08 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
no you refuse to understand that *nobody* wants to split
out *all* systemd logs because
Am 22.09.2014 um 18:35 schrieb Miloslav Trmač:
- Original Message -
For example if you want to see just error messages in the journal you
use journalctl -p 3 or journalctl -b -p 3 if you want it only from
last boot ( add boot id if you want to from specific boot ) or you add
Am 22.09.2014 um 19:37 schrieb Jóhann B. Guðmundsson:
On 09/22/2014 04:35 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
For example if you want to see just error messages in the journal you
use journalctl -p 3 or journalctl -b -p 3 if you want it only from
last boot ( add boot id if you want to from specific
Am 22.09.2014 um 19:51 schrieb Reindl Harald:
Am 22.09.2014 um 19:37 schrieb Jóhann B. Guðmundsson:
On 09/22/2014 04:35 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
For example if you want to see just error messages in the journal you
use journalctl -p 3 or journalctl -b -p 3 if you want it only from
last
Am 22.09.2014 um 21:00 schrieb Jóhann B. Guðmundsson:
On 09/22/2014 06:17 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
# Log systemd-logind to /var/log/secure
:programname, isequal, systemd-logind -/var/log/secure
:programname, isequal, systemd-logind stop
:msg, contains, Starting Session stop
:msg
Am 22.09.2014 um 21:05 schrieb Reindl Harald:
Am 22.09.2014 um 21:00 schrieb Jóhann B. Guðmundsson:
On 09/22/2014 06:17 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
# Log systemd-logind to /var/log/secure
:programname, isequal, systemd-logind -/var/log/secure
:programname, isequal, systemd-logind
Am 16.09.2014 um 10:50 schrieb Richard Hughes:
On 15 September 2014 13:06, Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com wrote:
But *I* do not want to reboot after each upgrade. Those crashes will be
0.1% of all crashes on my workstation
I think you might change your mind when it's you're the one
Am 16.09.2014 um 12:21 schrieb Richard Hughes:
On 16 September 2014 10:55, Zdenek Kabelac zkabe...@redhat.com wrote:
Just a thought - but wouldn't be better spend time to enlighten
Gnome/Firefox developers how to write applications in a way the could be
upgraded runtime
So, it's not just
Am 15.09.2014 um 14:28 schrieb Richard W.M. Jones:
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 10:57:13AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
1) I run some application, which loads my foo.rb file.
2) I later update the package which removes bar.rb file.
3) And I call some_function which fails due to missing bar.rb
How
Am 15.09.2014 um 14:44 schrieb Richard W.M. Jones:
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 02:40:34PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 15.09.2014 um 14:28 schrieb Richard W.M. Jones:
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 10:57:13AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
1) I run some application, which loads my foo.rb file.
2) I
Am 12.09.2014 um 18:33 schrieb Nathanael d. Noblet:
So I don't use Firefox anymore but I do know back in the day if we had
FF open when we updated it would do a double request for each page/form.
However when updating we just restarted FF and it would work fine after
that. I've never noticed
Am 12.09.2014 um 18:58 schrieb Till Maas:
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 06:37:07PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
* lsof | grep DEL | grep /usr and restart services on servers
There is a convenient script called needs-restarting to do this.
Checkrestart on debian even suggest potential init
Am 12.09.2014 um 23:36 schrieb Richard W.M. Jones:
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 10:33:13AM -0600, Nathanael d. Noblet wrote:
I am curious though. Everyone says the only way to do it securely and
safely is with nothing running. Why can't updates be applied with stuff
running prior to a reboot?
Am 10.09.2014 um 22:46 schrieb françai s:
The coding in binary code, in other words, machine code is necessary
currently?
The coding in assembly is necessary currently?
define necessary
* what data
* how much load
* how much concurrency
there is hardly a yes/no for most IT questions
Am 10.09.2014 um 22:55 schrieb françai s:
2014-09-10 17:53 GMT-03:00, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net:
Am 10.09.2014 um 22:46 schrieb françai s:
The coding in binary code, in other words, machine code is necessary
currently?
The coding in assembly is necessary currently?
define
Am 10.09.2014 um 23:10 schrieb DJ Delorie:
that question makes no sense at all and it's the wrong mailing-list
The question made sense to me
how?
white a webpage in asselmber - bullshit
white a video encoder like ffmpeg in PHP - bullshit
it depends on the usecase
and where else would
Am 09.09.2014 um 10:29 schrieb Karel Zak:
On Sun, Sep 07, 2014 at 09:12:57AM +0200, drago01 wrote:
On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 11:18 PM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com
wrote:
Whenever my laptop boots, the hard disk is pegged at 100% and the
machine is unusable for another 2 minutes
Am 09.09.2014 um 12:33 schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
Il 07/09/2014 20:04, Reindl Harald ha scritto:
on http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel/199113
*you* complain about systemd-readahead - guess what - if a virtual
machine is detected it is skipped
And why is it a good idea
Am 09.09.2014 um 13:51 schrieb Richard W.M. Jones:
On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 12:37:45PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 09.09.2014 um 12:33 schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
Il 07/09/2014 20:04, Reindl Harald ha scritto:
on http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel/199113
*you* complain
Am 09.09.2014 um 08:26 schrieb Adam Williamson:
certificate_list
This is a sequence (chain) of certificates. The sender's
certificate MUST come first in the list. Each following
certificate MUST directly certify the one preceding it. Because
certificate validation
Am 08.09.2014 um 09:43 schrieb Richard W.M. Jones:
On Sun, Sep 07, 2014 at 10:18:45PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
- detects virtualization (long story here, but a very bad idea to
encourage programs to do this)
I don't believe any Fedora units use this ability. It's there for people
Am 08.09.2014 um 10:43 schrieb Richard W.M. Jones:
On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 10:26:44AM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
so *what* is your problem by a unit knowing i must not run now
What open-vm-tools needs is a system feature known as the VMware
backdoor. This is provided by other hypervisors
Am 07.09.2014 um 05:55 schrieb Tomasz Torcz:
On Sat, Sep 06, 2014 at 10:18:20PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Whenever my laptop boots, the hard disk is pegged at 100% and the
machine is unusable for another 2 minutes because of
systemd-readahead, a misguided attempt to optimize the boot
first: that's the wrong mailing list!
Am 07.09.2014 um 09:26 schrieb Pál, László:
A few weeks ago I had to upgrade my kernel due to some nvidia related issue.
Currently I have the following
Installed Packages
Name: kernel
Arch: x86_64
Version : 3.15.10
Release :
Am 07.09.2014 um 12:47 schrieb Pál, László:
Harald, Thank you for extra helpful response. I'll do my best to
figure out on my own and stop disturbing you
i don't get why that offended response
* yum clean all yum upgrade to get the newest packages
* you need kernel-devel and not only
there must be something wrong in the infrastructure
* the update has more than enough karma
* it's even not visible in updates-testing
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/firefox-32.0-1.fc20,xulrunner-32.0-1.fc20,thunderbird-lightning-3.3-3.fc20,thunderbird-31.1.0-1.fc20
signature.asc
Am 07.09.2014 um 19:49 schrieb Richard W.M. Jones:
On Sat, Sep 06, 2014 at 06:54:03PM -0400, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 5:36 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
We need to decide if just because you manage to get an important core
package into Fedora 4 years ago, that means you
Am 07.09.2014 um 19:55 schrieb drago01:
On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 7:53 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
there must be something wrong in the infrastructure
* the update has more than enough karma
* it's even not visible in updates-testing
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates
Am 07.09.2014 um 20:17 schrieb Kevin Fenzi:
On Sun, 07 Sep 2014 20:06:03 +0200
Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 07.09.2014 um 19:55 schrieb drago01:
On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 7:53 PM, Reindl Harald
h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
there must be something wrong
Am 06.09.2014 um 23:18 schrieb Richard W.M. Jones:
Whenever my laptop boots, the hard disk is pegged at 100% and the
machine is unusable for another 2 minutes because of
systemd-readahead, a misguided attempt to optimize the boot process.
Did we agree to this when we adopted systemd as an init
Am 04.09.2014 um 17:11 schrieb Sérgio Basto:
since Fedora have some responsibility, unfortunately I think the group
have some valid reasons , systemd should be the replacement of
sysvinit , a built in DHCP !? why ? and others integration like crontab
should be modular, for someone else
Am 22.08.2014 um 21:53 schrieb Dusty Mabe:
I know I have probably been hiding under a Rock but can anyone help me
understand Fedora's stance on circular dependencies within RPMs?
At least in the past I think circular dependencies have been kept to a minimum
as it can cause issues with rpm
Am 18.08.2014 um 03:42 schrieb Nico Kadel-Garcia:
On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 9:12 PM, Robert Nichols
rnicholsnos...@comcast.net wrote:
The media would not get scrubbed since it is not yet mounted at that
point in the boot sequence. What _does_ get scrubbed is any leftover
/run/media/$USER
Am 12.08.2014 um 16:01 schrieb David Howells:
Dhiru Kholia dhiru.kho...@gmail.com wrote:
In Fedora, we recently enabled -fstack-protector-strong in system rpm
configuration - but are all packages using this enhanced hardening
feature?
What's the performance overhead of enabling this for
Am 09.08.2014 um 00:03 schrieb Hedayat Vatankhah:
/*Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com*/ wrote on Fri, 1 Aug 2014 07:08:52
+0800:
On Jul 31, 2014 7:44 PM, Álvaro Castillo net...@fedoraproject.org
mailto:net...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Dear Fedora Team,
I pray to God. Could Fedora
Am 09.08.2014 um 00:36 schrieb Felix Miata:
On 2014-08-09 00:06 (GMT+0200) Reindl Harald composed:
Anaconda provides resizing facility, but not move. Also, I'm not sure if
Anaconda can resize FAT partitions.
but that is nohting you do every day, frankly even not every year keep in
mind
Am 01.08.2014 um 14:27 schrieb Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos:
I'm maintaining a VPN server in fedora and I'm wondering whether
I'd need to integrate firewalld to that. After reading the information
in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FirewallD I don't think I'm sure what
I'm supposed to do.
There
Am 28.07.2014 18:16, schrieb Jiri Popelka:
At the moment dhcp package contains dhcpd (dhcp server) and dhcrelay (dhcp
relay agent).
I'd like to move dhcrelay into separate subpackage and rename the
(sub)package with dhcpd to something better then
'dhcp'.
Now the question is how to call
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=546585
State: building
Started: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 15:13:36 UTC
Est. Completion: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 17:07:03 UTC
i would say that's not explainable with timezones :-)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
Am 23.07.2014 10:04, schrieb drago01:
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 9:56 AM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=546585
State: building
Started: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 15:13:36 UTC
Est. Completion: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 17:07:03
Am 10.07.2014 09:37, schrieb Al Dunsmuir:
On Wednesday, July 9, 2014, 1:24:12 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 09.07.2014 19:18, schrieb Chris Adams:
Once upon a time, Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de said:
Please, no! As soon as you use disparate systems in a network
environment, having
Am 10.07.2014 14:30, schrieb Rex Dieter:
Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 08.07.2014 21:38, schrieb Rex Dieter:
Reindl Harald wrote:
until now https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=542357
for whatever reason did it not make to bodhi -
it was submitted early today,
https
Am 10.07.2014 15:15, schrieb Sérgio Basto:
On Sex, 2014-07-04 at 12:12 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 04.07.2014 12:02, schrieb Sérgio Basto:
http://apt.kde-redhat.org/apt/kde-redhat/fedora/kde.repo
have 3 repos is to use kde stable ? this will equal to future Fedora
20 , with kde 13
Am 09.07.2014 03:40, schrieb Matthew Miller:
On Thursday, DNF version 0.5.3 was announced, along with Core DNF
Plugins 0.1.1, which contains a new protected_packages plugin. So,
there we go.
It think it’s worth noting, though, that this a good example of how
mailing list discussions often
Am 09.07.2014 19:18, schrieb Chris Adams:
Once upon a time, Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de said:
On Wed, 09.07.14 10:30, Miloslav Trmač (m...@redhat.com) wrote:
* breaks the configurable [UG]ID_MIN logic
(http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/1000SystemAccounts, and yes,
that is
Am 08.07.2014 08:53, schrieb Lubomir Rintel:
On Sun, 2014-07-06 at 13:48 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
| 301 os.chdir(/)
| 302 shutil.rmtree(os.getcwd())
Ouch ... can we ban this guy from Fedora?
This is a bit dramatic. I really sincerely apologize for this and please
realize that I
until now https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=542357
for whatever reason did it not make to bodhi - upgraded last night
o my music server / KDE workstation and all is fine
IMHO should go to updates-testing to get karma
rtp-recv: fix crash on empty UDP packets
Am 08.07.2014 21:38, schrieb Rex Dieter:
Reindl Harald wrote:
until now https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=542357
for whatever reason did it not make to bodhi -
it was submitted early today,
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pulseaudio-5.0-6.fc20
thanks
Am 06.07.2014 13:41, schrieb Sandro Mani:
On 06.07.2014 13:38, drago01 wrote:
On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 1:04 PM, Till Maas opensou...@till.name wrote:
On Fri, Jul 04, 2014 at 04:26:07PM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
* A script automating most of the process of validating and processing
the
Am 06.07.2014 13:51, schrieb Sandro Mani:
On 06.07.2014 13:48, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 06.07.2014 13:41, schrieb Sandro Mani:
On 06.07.2014 13:38, drago01 wrote:
On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 1:04 PM, Till Maas opensou...@till.name wrote:
On Fri, Jul 04, 2014 at 04:26:07PM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote
Am 04.07.2014 12:02, schrieb Sérgio Basto:
http://apt.kde-redhat.org/apt/kde-redhat/fedora/kde.repo
have 3 repos is to use kde stable ? this will equal to future Fedora
20 , with kde 13 , many years ago I try use kde-redhat and I saw that a
quite different filosofy that was in Fedora
in the
Am 03.07.2014 10:22, schrieb Ales Kozumplik:
the packages are in Rawhide now. Should move to F20 next week too. There's
the protected_packages plugin now.
Release notes:
http://akozumpl.github.io/dnf/release_notes.html
http://akozumpl.github.io/dnf-plugins-core/release_notes.html
Am 03.07.2014 12:56, schrieb drago01:
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 5:01 PM, Kalev Lember kalevlem...@gmail.com wrote:
On 07/02/2014 03:15 PM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
I was wondering if there's a standard way of solving package conflicts
that arise from arch specific doc files. An example is here:
Am 03.07.2014 13:20, schrieb Kalev Lember:
On 07/03/2014 01:05 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
/home/builduser/rpmbuild/RPMS:
total 44K
drwxr-xr-x 2 builduser builduser 4.0K 2014-06-30 17:09 noarch
drwxr-xr-x 2 builduser builduser 36K 2014-07-02 22:44 x86_64
Thanks, this actually backs up what
Am 03.07.2014 13:33, schrieb drago01:
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 1:20 PM, Kalev Lember kalevlem...@gmail.com wrote:
On 07/03/2014 01:05 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
/home/builduser/rpmbuild/RPMS:
total 44K
drwxr-xr-x 2 builduser builduser 4.0K 2014-06-30 17:09 noarch
drwxr-xr-x 2 builduser
Am 03.07.2014 13:32, schrieb Michal Schmidt:
On 07/03/2014 12:04 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
dnf remove python ends in remove dnf and yum too
as weel as dnf remove kernel still offers to remove both
protected_packages.py is missing from the package.
Looks like an upstream bug - it's
Am 03.07.2014 14:09, schrieb Ales Kozumplik:
On 07/03/2014 01:32 PM, Michal Schmidt wrote:
protected_packages.py is missing from the package.
Looks like an upstream bug - it's not referenced in plugins/CMakeLists.txt
Michal
Thanks for the notice, should be good now:
is there any way to set the two options below in .rpmmacros
to use multi-threading? the shell-script below works in case
of tar but XZ_OPT env is ignored by rpmbuild and seeking
two hours the internet don't give any answer
in case of tar --threads=0 improves performance dramatically
on a modern
Am 02.07.2014 16:46, schrieb Richard W.M. Jones:
Doesn't the current process assume that xz always
produces the same output?
hopefully not
What would happen if a newer version of xz/lzma comes out which (for
example) produces better compressed output while still remaining
compatible with
Am 30.06.2014 11:55, schrieb Bastien Nocera:
Apparently, people can still file bugs for dead packages:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1114180
xorg-x11-server is a dead package?
seriously?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
devel mailing list
601 - 700 of 2086 matches
Mail list logo
