On Wed, 4 May 2022 at 15:31, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Wed, 2022-05-04 at 20:25 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
>
> dnf --enablerepo=epel-next-testing --whatprovides "libpoppler-qt5.so*"
> nothing ?!?
>
>
> I missed repoquery word .
>
> dnf --enablerepo=epel-next-testing repoquery --whatprovides
>
On Wed, 4 May 2022 at 08:55, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Hello EPEL.
>
> I have just found out that the pybind11 component from c9s / RHEL 9 CRB
> has
> been built in EPEL 9 in different version:
>
>
>
> Do I understand correctly that this is still *not* allowed? If so, what
> can we
> do to
On Mon, 2 May 2022 at 04:22, Alex Iribarren wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 4/29/22 21:17, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Fri, 29 Apr 2022 at 14:28, Germano Massullo
> > mailto:germano.massu...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> > Recent Ce
On Fri, 29 Apr 2022 at 14:28, Germano Massullo
wrote:
> Recent CentOS Stream Qt update broke some EPEL packages like keepassxc
> that needed a rebuild against the new Qt version.
> Can we talk about a way to prevent this from happening again?
>
>
This is the current situation of events for
On Fri, 22 Apr 2022 at 14:22, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've been trying to debug a segfault during %check that only occurs in
> epel9
> Koji, but not in mock.
>
> At the end, I compared the list of packages with:
>
>
> ...
> This seems like my local mock has newer c9s packages than the
On Sun, 17 Apr 2022 at 09:54, Amos wrote:
> > On Wed, 1 Jun 2016 12:31:01 -0600 Erinn Looney-Triggs
> >
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/FAQ#Does_EPEL_replace_packages_provid...
>
On Wed, 30 Mar 2022 at 10:55, Troy Dawson wrote:
>
>
> Current process (two bugzilla pings, two weeks total time):
>> - 1st request
>> - one week goes by
>> - 2nd request
>> - one week goes by
>> - releng ticket to be added as a collaborator
>>
>> Proposal A (three bugzilla pings, three weeks
On Fri, 25 Mar 2022 at 00:25, Carl George wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 5:50 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 09:18:08PM -0500, Carl George wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 2:54 PM Carl George wrote:
>
> >
> > Also could we tell if deps changed? Say I have
On Wed, 2 Mar 2022 at 17:00, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 3/2/22 14:14, epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org wrote:
> > Except that we are going to need python38-pytest, etc. in the EPEL8
> buildroot
> > if we are going to build (most of) the packages in the first place.
> That's
> > the problem
On Thu, 3 Mar 2022 at 11:07, Scott Talbert wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Mar 2022, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
> > OK with some help from Miro on the python team, I was able to use the
> > scripts they use regularly to list what dependency problems they have
> with
> > soon
On Wed, 2 Mar 2022 at 15:56, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
>
> #
>
> I expect that
>
>
I clearly dropped the ball in that sentence. Let me finish it up:
I expect that we will need to converse in this thread about what should be
done next. In the EPEL meeting Kevin me
When EPEL-8 was trying to get out the door, I tried to make it 'fully
operational' by having fedpkg in it. It turned out that was a bad idea on
my part as I ended up adding about 130 packages to EPEL-8 which have not
been updated or cared for since.
The problems involved is that I did this with
On Tue, 1 Mar 2022 at 08:19, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 01, 2022 at 04:21:56AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 1, 2022 at 3:07 AM Richard W.M. Jones
> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2058274
> > >
> > > fails to build with:
> > >
> >
On Tue, 1 Mar 2022 at 03:06, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2058274
>
> fails to build with:
>
> DEBUG util.py:444: No matching package to install: 'ocaml-dune >= 1.0'
>
> This package is in RHEL 9 buildroot (ocaml-dune-2.8.5-5.el9.x86_64).
>
> I
On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 at 15:55, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 19, 2022 at 3:21 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I have a Fedora package that I've recently also branched for EPEL 9.
> >
> > The (so called) binary package used to be called "python3-tox", but has
> been
> > renamed to
And of course sending emails like this do not help make things better for
either party. My apologies and I am going to cut back on sending email
without a 24 hour "Did you really want to send this timeout?"
On Thu, 17 Feb 2022 at 07:52, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
On Thu, 17 Feb 2022 at 07:11, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Hello EPEL packagers.
>
> I get it that you want as much as possible packages available in EPEL 9,
> but
> before you blindly branch all the dependencies of the packages you care
> about,
> could you maybe take a step back and consider for a
On Fri, 4 Feb 2022 at 12:12, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 4, 2022 at 8:20 AM Stephen John Smoogen
> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Fri, 4 Feb 2022 at 09:05, Richard Shaw wrote:
>>
>>> I've gotten frequent requests to support EPEL branches of packages I
>>>
On Thu, 27 Jan 2022 at 07:23, Nick Howitt wrote:
>
>
> On 27/01/2022 12:20, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 27 Jan 2022 at 04:38, Nick Howitt via epel-devel
> > > <mailto:epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org>> wrote:
> >
>
On Thu, 27 Jan 2022 at 04:38, Nick Howitt via epel-devel <
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Hi gents,
> It looks like btrbk has been updated to version 0.31.3-1 in EPEL7 from
> 0.25.1-1 and it has a requires of btrfs-progs >= 4.12. Unfortunately
> btrfs-progs in Centos 7 is still at
On Sun, 16 Jan 2022 at 07:23, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 16. 01. 22 12:49, Andrew C Aitchison wrote:
> > On Sun, 16 Jan 2022, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >
> >> On 15. 01. 22 20:22, Andrew C Aitchison wrote:
> >>> On Sat, 15 Jan 2022, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >>>
> python-pytest-cov is something I've
On Fri, 14 Jan 2022 at 10:57, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
>
> I mirrored the source rpms down and did the following for 8 and 9-stream.
> ```
> $ for i in AppStream BaseOS PowerTools; do echo $i; find ./$i -type f
> -name "*src.rpm" | xargs rpm --nosignature --qf='
On Fri, 14 Jan 2022 at 10:22, Troy Dawson wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 8:12 PM Orion Poplawski wrote:
>
>> While working on EPEL9, it seems that even more packages are missing
>> from RHEL9 than were in RHEL8. The latest I found was cppunit, which
>> appears to be completely missing
On Fri, 31 Dec 2021 at 10:58, Matthew Miller
wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 31, 2021 at 12:19:17PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > It seems that there is some kind of bottleneck somewhere, because the
> > delay often gets progressively worse if there are lots of
> > notifications in a short period of
On Thu, 30 Dec 2021 at 13:58, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 30, 2021 at 1:31 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 30, 2021 at 02:27:04AM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > > On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 03:17:42PM +, Tom Hughes via devel wrote:
> > > > At this point
On Wed, 29 Dec 2021 at 21:20, Matthew Miller
wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 10:51:44AM -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > F36 but needs to be worked through the proper channels of 'upstream'. Get
> > the FHS updated and fixed, work out that the change actually is going to
&g
On Wed, 29 Dec 2021 at 16:16, Michel Alexandre Salim <
sali...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 10:51:44AM -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > Also please realise that the community can eat only so many changes per
> > release no matter how much you w
On Wed, 29 Dec 2021 at 13:51, Gordon Messmer
wrote:
> On 12/29/21 09:59, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > The modern day case where /usr is read-only is inside a container and
> > you put an overlay or using some sort of linking to /var which is
> > read-write in case of
On Wed, 29 Dec 2021 at 12:49, Gordon Messmer
wrote:
> On 12/29/21 07:26, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> > On 29/12/2021 16:01, Ben Cotton wrote:
> >> Currently, the RPM databases is located in `/var`. Let's move it to
> >> `/usr`. The move is already under way in rpm-ostree-based
> >>
On Wed, 29 Dec 2021 at 10:19, Tom Hughes via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> I don't see how this is FHS compliant, which in turn would make
> it non-compliant with Fedora Packaging Guidelines, namely:
>
>
I am in agreement here and think that this is NOT a change to be made in
On Wed, 29 Dec 2021 at 10:19, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> Can someone shed light on the status of python-gevent in EL9? It seems
> to have been built for CS9:
>
> https://kojihub.stream.centos.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=3414
>
> (though perhaps not tagged?)
>
> but builds for EPEL9 fail to
On Wed, 29 Dec 2021 at 06:29, Mattias Ellert
wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Two packages I built for EPEL 9 are now reported by koschei as having
> missing build dependencies.
>
> https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/package/davix?collection=epel9
>
>
On Sun, 26 Dec 2021 at 23:32, Reon Beon via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Update?
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8455
I am going to be overly blunt here. Messages like this do NOT help.
1. Most of the people who are paid to work on this are on break for 1/2
On Mon, 20 Dec 2021 at 10:31, Ondrej Mosnacek wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> When I set up a rawhide cloud image
> (Fedora-Cloud-Base-Rawhide-20211217.n.1.x86_64.qcow2 from
> download.fedoraproject.org) with a root password using virt-sysprep:
>
> virt-sysprep -a --root-password password:123456
>
On Mon, 20 Dec 2021 at 10:16, Colin Walters wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sat, Dec 18, 2021, at 5:06 PM, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> >
> > Sure, I saw that ticket. But I fail to see how this is this a "new problem".
> > If you use, for example, some shiny, new features that are only going
> > to be in GCC 12 or
On Wed, 15 Dec 2021 at 05:51, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 14. 12. 21 23:29, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > - epel-packagers-sig (collaborator, epel* branches) for helping to
> >bootstrap on new EL releases
>
> Fine by me, although I prefer actual maintainers to be responsible
On Mon, 13 Dec 2021 at 22:20, Matthew Miller wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 09:40:19AM -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > It is a fairly manual process where a person volunteers to sit in
> > front of the firehose every day and deal with these requests. The
> > p
On Mon, 13 Dec 2021 at 09:25, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> I have two questions regarding epel9:
>
> 1) I have requested dozen of epe9 branches for my packages. It was 20+ hours
> ago. E.g.
> https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/39402
> Is it manual process? Or is the
On Mon, 13 Dec 2021 at 06:21, Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 6:13 AM Troy Dawson wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Dec 11, 2021 at 1:58 AM Frank Crawford
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Folks,
> >>
> >> I'm looking at building a package that currently exists in EPEL8 for
> >> EPEL9. I have a
On Sat, 11 Dec 2021 at 11:03, Richard Shaw wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 7:29 AM Troy Dawson wrote:
>>
>> We (The EPEL Steering Committee) are following up on EPEL issue 136[1]
>> regarding the status of EPEL8 Playground.
>>
>> Looking through the logs we see that there are still people
On Thu, 2 Dec 2021 at 14:37, Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/FsVerityRPM
>
> == Summary ==
>
> Enable the use of fsverity for installed RPM files validation.
>
> == Owners ==
>
> * Name: [[User:Dcavalca|Davide Cavalca]], [[User:Borisb|Boris
> Burkov]],
On Sun, 5 Dec 2021 at 14:05, Richard Shaw wrote:
>
> Any plans to add EL 9 to the list of test instances?
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Machine_Resources_For_Package_Maintainers
>
Could you please put in a ticket to
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue so it can be worked
On Fri, 3 Dec 2021 at 17:09, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 03, 2021 at 06:08:49PM +, Davide Cavalca via devel wrote:
> > Broadly speaking, fs-verity makes it possible to ensure that files that
> > were installed via an RPM have not been modified. It is useful in
> > environments
On Mon, 29 Nov 2021 at 16:26, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
>
> > Could we set up open-source Gitlab and run that? Well, history has
> shown that the answer is "probably not, actually".
>
> I don't believe it. If GNOME and KDE and freedesktop.org and Debian and
> Purism can all do it, I'm pretty
On Sun, 28 Nov 2021 at 19:32, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>
> On Sun, Nov 28, 2021 at 7:06 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 2:02 PM Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 8:26 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 6:19 AM Nico
On Sun, 28 Nov 2021 at 19:32, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>
> On Sun, Nov 28, 2021 at 7:06 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 2:02 PM Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 8:26 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 6:19 AM Nico
On Mon, 22 Nov 2021 at 10:15, Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 10:12 AM Carl George wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 8:37 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On 22/11/2021 15:00, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > > > - builds will require a valid Red Hat subscription
On Mon, 22 Nov 2021 at 10:15, Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 10:12 AM Carl George wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 8:37 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On 22/11/2021 15:00, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > > > - builds will require a valid Red Hat subscription
On Fri, 19 Nov 2021 at 11:42, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> Hello EPEL people,
>
> what do you think about setting the Bodhi days to stable limit to 3 days for
> EPEL 9 Next (at least until RHEL 9 GA)?
>
I think EPEL-9 Next being based off of Stream with its major changes
should have a small stable
On Fri, 19 Nov 2021 at 07:12, Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 7:05 AM Ahmed Almeleh
> wrote:
> >
> > I do think voting for packages to be included in the next Fedora release is
> > an amazing idea maybe we could create a survey through Google forms or make
> > a custom website
On Wed, 17 Nov 2021 at 12:57, Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 12:53 PM Richard Shaw wrote:
> >
> > I was talking to a software vendor about there install instructions using
> > yum instead of dnf for EL 8 and he took the feedback back to the
> > development team but the response
On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 15:10 Peter Boy wrote:
>
>
> > Am 16.11.2021 um 20:37 schrieb Miro Hrončok :
> >
> > On 15. 11. 21 20:15, Ben Cotton wrote:
> >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RetireARMv7
> >> == Owner ==
> >> * Name: [[User:pbrobinson| Peter Robinson]]
> >> * Email:
> >
> > May
For full details on the problems please see
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/10302
synopsis: z15 move failed, we are still on z13?/z14? until next week
or so when this will be tried again.
On Wed, 10 Nov 2021 at 06:55, Alexander Ploumistos
wrote:
>
> Now they're back up and running
On Tue, 9 Nov 2021 at 10:47, Richard Shaw wrote:
>
> I requested a CentOS 8 Stream server from IT at $DAYJOB, but it's not IT
> approved, so they gave me a RHEL 8.2 instance. Well fine, I don't need their
> support but whatever...
>
> I went to enable EPEL per the docs[1]:
>
> $ sudo dnf
On Tue, 9 Nov 2021 at 04:39, Rajeesh K V wrote:
>
> > > I remember seeing 60-70% reduction really often, and 90+ periodically.
> > > I've
> > > read Kevin's explanation of why it's not working as well now, but I wonder
> > > what changed between the early implementation when results were very
On Mon, 8 Nov 2021 at 08:16, Sergio Pascual wrote:
>
>
> El lun, 8 nov 2021 a las 13:39, Stephen John Smoogen ()
> escribió:
>>
>> On Mon, 8 Nov 2021 at 06:53, Sergio Pascual wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi, I upgraded my workstation to F35 last Friday, and today
On Mon, 8 Nov 2021 at 06:53, Sergio Pascual wrote:
>
> Hi, I upgraded my workstation to F35 last Friday, and today I 'dnf updated'
> and rebooted. After the reboot, all my USBs are disabled. No mouse, no
> keyword.
> I know my hardware works because the keyboard works in grub, and the light of
On Mon, 8 Nov 2021 at 04:32, Michael Schroeder wrote:
>
> On Sat, Nov 06, 2021 at 07:43:02AM -, Daniel Alley wrote:
> > Another issue - which is not per-se a security issue but it's still a
> > problem - is that deltarpm uses md5 checksums pervasively. They're
> > everywhere. And it uses
On Sun, 7 Nov 2021 at 13:44, Gordon Messmer wrote:
>
> On 11/7/21 01:14, Rajeesh K V wrote:
> > Deltarpm did
> > reduce a lot of update download size for many years since 2007
>
>
> I remember seeing 60-70% reduction really often, and 90+ periodically.
> I've read Kevin's explanation of why it's
On Mon, 8 Nov 2021 at 05:17, Samuel Sieb wrote:
>
> On 11/8/21 01:23, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> > On 11/7/21 12:15 AM, Sumit Bhardwaj wrote:
> >> It is not always about speed. There are still plenty of places in the world
> >> where people are on limited data plans and to them using delta rpms
On Sun, 7 Nov 2021 at 00:16, Sumit Bhardwaj wrote:
>
> It is not always about speed. There are still plenty of places in the world
> where people are on limited data plans and to them using delta rpms makes a
> lot of sense. They can work with slow speeds but not with high data expenses.
> So
On Sat, 6 Nov 2021 at 09:42, edmond pilon wrote:
>
> Thanks for your reply.
>
> I have a GTX 1080 and 495.44 drivers.
> The crash happens just after the same warning as you.
> I'm running the 5.15 rc6 kernel without issue.
> The boot problems started since 5.15 rc7 upgrade , and the only
On Fri, 5 Nov 2021 at 13:25, Gordon Messmer wrote:
>
> On 11/4/21 17:23, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> > I don't know if that's of interest to Fedora, as an organization, but
> > on the off-chance that it is: Is anyone in a position to ask someone
> > at Slack about that decision? And whether there's
On Fri, 29 Oct 2021 at 01:53, Ian Kent wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2021-10-28 at 10:41 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > On Thu, 2021-10-28 at 10:28 -0400, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
> > > Stephen John Smoogen writes:
> > >
> > > > Mainly because it is the authentic
On Thu, 28 Oct 2021 at 10:03, Kevin Kofler via devel
wrote:
>
> Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > a) Not have Lennart's name tied to a request. That just pulls in all
> > kinds of over-the-top statements where people will say 99.99% of the
> > people won't use it without any
On Thu, 28 Oct 2021 at 08:51, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
>
>
> What I just don't understand is why so much argument over a minuscule
> disk space increase. We can argue over the best way to create
> backtraces. But trying to step on the toes of other people who are
> working on this problem just
On Wed, 27 Oct 2021 at 23:47, Ian Kent wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2021-10-27 at 13:40 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 04:37:18PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > > == User Experience ==
> > > For some users this change may be a bit disruptive and it may
> > > require
> > > some
On Tue, 19 Oct 2021 at 01:22, Andrew C Aitchison wrote:
>
> On Thu, 7 Oct 2021, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > Things have probably improved, but the lesson I learned from EPEL-8
> > and afterwords was that koji depsolving is weird no matter how set up.
> > Koji s
On Mon, 18 Oct 2021 at 02:20, drago01 wrote:
>
>
>
> On Monday, October 18, 2021, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>>
>> Is it worth paying hundreds of MBytes of installer space, and the new
>> 2 GB minimum RAM to simply install Fedora? I'm not saying "discard
>> anaconda". I'm saying "be aware of some
On Thu, 14 Oct 2021 at 07:44, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 03:53:09PM -0600, Jerry James wrote:
> > The ELN package builds for the recent OCaml 4.13 update have mostly
> > been failing, over and over. I finally took a look at some today;
> > they're going to keep failing
On Fri, 8 Oct 2021 at 11:56, Sérgio Basto wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2021-10-08 at 10:13 -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > On Fri, 8 Oct 2021 at 09:55, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I see ccache for epel 7 here
On Fri, 8 Oct 2021 at 09:55, Sérgio Basto wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I see ccache for epel 7 here https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ccache
> , but is not available in repos ... why ?
>
https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/7/x86_64/Packages/c/ccache-3.7.7-1.el7.x86_64.rpm
On Thu, 7 Oct 2021 at 09:52, Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> >
> > That is the theory, yes, that grobisplitter isn't required.
> > But nobody was able to say that was for certain. Thus, it needs to be
> > tested.
> >
>
> I've verified this with my internal build infrastructure, so yes, I
> know it's not
On Tue, 5 Oct 2021 at 11:28, Matthew Miller wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 04, 2021 at 09:17:30PM +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> > >Is this really necessary?
> >
> > Yes. Because anyone can add something like this:
> > %post
> > rm -rf /
> >
> > And it will destroy the installed system or even
On Tue, 5 Oct 2021 at 07:26, Peter Boy wrote:
>
>
>
> > Am 04.10.2021 um 15:29 schrieb Mikolaj Izdebski :
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 2:08 PM Peter Boy wrote:
> >> However, we lack concepts on how to proceed after removing java-maint-sig.
> >> What consequences do we draw from the analyses?
On Mon, 4 Oct 2021 at 13:25, Josh Boyer wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 1:10 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 04, 2021 at 10:57:42AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> > > Thoughts?
> >
> > I like the idea!
>
> It's indeed a good idea.
>
> > We can block such a package from ever appearing in
On Sat, 2 Oct 2021 at 03:48, Mattia Verga via devel
wrote:
>
> Recently I've started seen a strange behavior of dnf while downloading
> RPMs updates: some packages are downloaded at the usual speed of my
> connection (ca. 10MBps), while other packages, in the same transaction,
> shows really slow
On Fri, 1 Oct 2021 at 12:51, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 01, 2021 at 12:28:38PM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > On Fri, 1 Oct 2021 at 12:21, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
> > >
> > > Stephen John Smoogen writes:
> > >
> > &
On Fri, 1 Oct 2021 at 12:42, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
>
> Stephen John Smoogen writes:
>
> >> > The places I have seen it still being used are in Universities run by
> >> > people who learned sysadmin in the 1990's and early 2000's. It is a
> >> >
On Fri, 1 Oct 2021 at 12:21, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
>
> Stephen John Smoogen writes:
>
> > The places I have seen it still being used are in Universities run by
> > people who learned sysadmin in the 1990's and early 2000's. It is a
> > light weight syste
On Fri, 1 Oct 2021 at 06:14, Björn 'besser82' Esser
wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm currently doing some experiments with replacing the - upstream
> mostly unmaintained - pam_unix module (authentication with user passwd)
> with something using less bloated and cleaner code. This topic is
> currently
On Wed, 29 Sept 2021 at 18:49, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
>
> As an aside, I'm somewhat surprised that the only commit on the Java
> SIG's main wiki page in nearly 4 years is one that simply fixes a
> spelling mistake. This doesn't jive with the amount of discussion we've
> had on this list nor
On Tue, 28 Sept 2021 at 08:20, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 02:06:58PM +0200, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> > Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > OCaml library code can in principle be dynamically linked, eg:
> > >
> > > $ rpm -ql ocaml-extlib | grep cmxs
> > >
On Mon, 27 Sept 2021 at 09:28, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I've been trying to add the OPT token from accounts.fedoraproject.org to my
> yubikey. I get a QR code and a otpauth://totp/username?secret=xxx URI.
>
> I copypasted the xxx secret (56 characters: digits and uppercase letters) and
On Mon, 27 Sept 2021 at 08:45, Peter Boy wrote:
>
>
>
> > Am 27.09.2021 um 12:30 schrieb Fabio Valentini :
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 12:19 PM Peter Boy wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> Am 27.09.2021 um 11:13 schrieb Pierre-Yves Chibon :
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 10:57:12AM +0200,
On Sun, 26 Sept 2021 at 16:35, Christopher wrote:
>
> I think part of the problem is that Java is too big. There are too
> many libraries to fit into a single community. I think there's
> probably willing volunteers to maintain some libraries and application
> packages, but these are not
On Wed, 22 Sept 2021 at 10:20, Steven A. Falco wrote:
>
> The KiCAD project builds "nightly" images via copr. Lately, I'm seeing many
> failures for the ppc64le architecture. In some cases [1] I get "Error:
> Failed to download metadata for repo 'fedora'". In other cases [2] I get
> "pigz:
On Mon, 20 Sept 2021 at 04:21, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
wrote:
>
> On 20/09/2021 09:41, Евгений Пивнев wrote:
> > What happened with koji?
>
> I can confirm. Koji is too unstable since Thursday.
>
Could you and others help the Fedora admins with more info on what you
mean by unstable? Currently
Mea-culpa to everyone.
On Fri, 17 Sept 2021 at 10:29, Eric Curtin wrote:
>
> Hi Guys,
>
> When I write to IRC I get:
>
> "Cannot send to nick/channel"
>
> How can I solve this?
>
> I would like to get added to the following groups, if possible:
>
> cla_redhat [OBSOLETE] Red Hat Employees CLA
On Mon, 13 Sept 2021 at 02:38, Benjamin Kircher wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2021-09-13 at 06:20 +, Eduard Ahmatgareev wrote:
> > According to documentation:
> > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/epel/
> >
> > EPEL repo: https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/ should contain epel-
> >
On Fri, 10 Sept 2021 at 14:05, Ken Dreyer wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 9:33 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > We use this in Copr. AFAIK Koji does not use it. You can join Fedora infra
> > to change it :)
>
> Is there more documentation about how Copr uses ccache? I was grepping
> around
On Fri, 10 Sept 2021 at 12:50, Marius Schwarz wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> since a few days, loading the enter_bug.cgi for "Product=Fedora" on RH
> BZ takes very long.
> It's quite possible, that it's happening for any other product too ;)
>
> It's over a minute ATM.
>
> Can someone take a look at this, or
On Fri, 10 Sept 2021 at 09:33, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>
> Dne 09. 09. 21 v 18:54 Demi Marie Obenour napsal(a):
> > Can the Firefox build be distributed among multiple machines?
>
> I would love to see a benchmark how much it speed up big packages and how it
> slow downs smaller packages. Whole
On Thu, 9 Sept 2021 at 13:01, Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 9, 2021 at 12:55 PM Demi Marie Obenour
> wrote:
> > Also, could the Fedora project itself perform at least
> > basic QA for critical security patches?
> >
>
> Who do you think is the "Fedora Project"? It's us in the community!
>
>
On Mon, 6 Sept 2021 at 07:07, Petr Pisar wrote:
>
> V Sun, Sep 05, 2021 at 09:47:51PM +0200, Stefan Bluhm napsal(a):
> > I am trying to build a package for EPEL-8.
> > (https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=75036069)
> >
> > The build fails with
> >
> > No matching package to
On Sun, 5 Sept 2021 at 07:12, Peter Boy wrote:
>
>
>
> > Am 05.09.2021 um 09:32 schrieb Samuel Sieb :
> >
> > On 2021-09-05 12:19 a.m., Peter Boy wrote:
> >> Much to my chagrin, you describe the biggest problem in Fedora for years
> >> and the one why Fedora is falling further and further behind
On Thu, 2 Sept 2021 at 12:42, Zebediah Figura wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> I'm a contributor to the Wine project. To summarize the following mail,
> Wine needs special versions of some of its normal dependencies, such as
> libfreetype and libgnutls, built using the MinGW cross-compiler, and I'm
>
On Thu, 2 Sept 2021 at 09:29, Troy Dawson wrote:
>
> We are pleased to announce that Red Hat is establishing a small team
> directly responsible for participating in EPEL activities. Their job
> isn't to displace the EPEL community, but rather to support it
> full-time. We expect many beneficial
On Mon, 30 Aug 2021 at 13:07, Nils K wrote:
>
> I recently had to perform a bit of development/research where I often had to
> take a look in the kernel documentation.
>
> Most of the time was spend offline so I wanted to download the `kernel-doc`
> package however it does not seem to exist.
>
On Fri, 27 Aug 2021 at 10:27, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> My two most recent ceph builds on s390x have been oom killed.
>
> As recently as four days ago they were building fine.
>
> Any ideas?
No idea without links to actual koji build logs to see which of the
systems it might be.
1 - 100 of 1763 matches
Mail list logo
