so.
openni is now fixed:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=102844216
Kind regards,
Till
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code
(this would certainly be the case for me).
That would be a lot of people in the initial email, but if you do that
at least in the follow-up where you mention the packages that were
rebuilt on accident, you could CC the affected maintainers.
Kind regards,
Till
Hi all,
On 6/5/23 23:13, Till Hofmann wrote:
Hi all,
I have updated libdc1394 to 2.2.7, which bumps the soname to
libdc1394.so.26. I created the side tag f39-build-side-68587 and built
the updated libdc1394 in the side tag.
If my query was correct, the following packages need to be rebuilt
can rebuild your packages with
fedpkg build --target=f39-build-side-68587
I'll merge the side tag after 7 days.
Kind regards,
Till
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
remember seeing a
spec file that did that, but I don't remember where.
Thanks for any pointers!
Kind regards,
Till
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code
://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131603
All those packages are trivial to review. I'd be happy to review
packages in exchange!
Kind regards,
Till
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le
order would
be the same (except if there are wait-repo delays that are not visible
for the eln automation) and the build load would be distributed.
Cheers
Till
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email
tion Fedora in some
> ways? e.g. I have a talk that will be hosted by their Config Management
> Camp.
Great. I added a section to the wiki page to collect this:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FOSDEM_2021#Presentations_and_other_Events_involving_Fedora
Thanks
Till
___
to track efforts for FOSDEM:
https://pagure.io/mindshare/issue/248
Thanks
Till
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org
r for you, too:
https://packit.dev/
Cheers
Till
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-cond
Hi,
On Sat, Dec 12, 2020 at 12:41:44PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 12:03:17PM +0100, Till Maas wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 11:13:19AM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >
> > > I don't think you can make branches
various
> packages that depend on them. We will help them bundle their nodejs
> libraries.
>
>
> == Contingency Plan ==
> Since we will be bundling the nodejs binaries, before we remove their
> current dependencies, we will simply stop where we are at the freeze.
> There wil
s a symref might help people that are used to using main.
Assuming that the symrefs are not visible, it makes more sense to use
the descriptive names for the branches such as rawhide/stable. Then they
Thanks
Till
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedorap
one what the branch is actually about.
Using a ref to introduce "main" for muscle memory also sounds like a
good idea.
Thanks
Till
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedor
efault was that it
is easier to use than vi. In case of a system upgrade, the users are
already familiar with vi or changed their editor. Therefore it seems to
be more disturbing to change this default during upgrade.
Thanks
Till
___
devel mailing list --
Hi all,
I've just orphaned rofi [1], as I don't use it anymore and use wofi instead.
The package is in a good shape, Dan (CCed) has already taken care of it
in the past.
Dan, please take the package if you want! If not, everyone else feel
free to take it!
Kind regards,
Till
[1] https
Hi all,
I'm updating librealsense to 2.39.0, which bumps the soname to 2.39.
I'll take care of rebuilding its only dependency (fawkes).
Kind regards,
Till
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel
Hi all,
I'll upgrade log4cxx to 0.11.0, which bumps the soname.
The only dependency is fawkes, which I will rebuild.
Kind regards,
Till
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le
On 10/11/20 1:51 PM, Till Hofmann wrote:
On 10/11/20 1:56 AM, Rich Mattes wrote:
On 10/10/20 5:27 PM, Till Hofmann wrote:
On 10/10/20 6:24 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Sat, Oct 10, 2020 at 10:59:12AM +0200, Till Hofmann wrote:
On 10/10/20 10:54 AM, Till Hofmann wrote:
On 10/9/20 11
On 10/11/20 1:56 AM, Rich Mattes wrote:
On 10/10/20 5:27 PM, Till Hofmann wrote:
On 10/10/20 6:24 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Sat, Oct 10, 2020 at 10:59:12AM +0200, Till Hofmann wrote:
On 10/10/20 10:54 AM, Till Hofmann wrote:
On 10/9/20 11:46 PM, Till Hofmann wrote:
On 10/9/20 9:19
On 10/10/20 6:24 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Sat, Oct 10, 2020 at 10:59:12AM +0200, Till Hofmann wrote:
On 10/10/20 10:54 AM, Till Hofmann wrote:
On 10/9/20 11:46 PM, Till Hofmann wrote:
On 10/9/20 9:19 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
I think this might be that we need a newer ignition-msgs
On 10/10/20 10:54 AM, Till Hofmann wrote:
>
>
> On 10/9/20 11:46 PM, Till Hofmann wrote:
>
>>
>> On 10/9/20 9:19 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
>>>
>>> I think this might be that we need a newer ignition-msgs package?
>>> Or something in gaz
On 10/9/20 11:46 PM, Till Hofmann wrote:
>
> On 10/9/20 9:19 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>>
>> I think this might be that we need a newer ignition-msgs package?
>> Or something in gazebo?
>
> I think it's the other way around: ignition-msgs needs protobuf 3.13
&
ignition-msgs package?
> Or something in gazebo?
I think it's the other way around: ignition-msgs needs protobuf 3.13
because that contains a patch that renamed AuxillaryParseTableField to
AuxiliaryParseTableField:
https://github.com/protocolbuffers/protobuf/commit/2ae7cf0e03c3469973e592e812565e4ee2470e0b
I don't
On 9/5/20 3:17 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 05, 2020 at 02:50:28PM +0200, Till Hofmann wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm having a weird problem with Bugzilla: Whenever I want to close an
>> issue and I click on the reason menu (the one that shows
zilla firefox bug status" obviously doesn't result in anything useful.
I've seen this for a couple of weeks now. This is on Fedora 32 with
Firefox 80.0.1.
Kind regards,
Till
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe sen
to
indicate pre-releases or git IDs for snapshots. How would that look
like with your proposal?
Thanks
Till
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Condu
the lack
of communication here.
Kind regards,
Till
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-c
Hi all,
I'm updating librealsense to 2.38.0 in the next few days, which includes
an soname bump.
The only dependency is fawkes, which I also maintain (and which is
currently FTBFS for other reasons).
Kind regards,
Till
___
devel mailing list -- devel
the latter]
Also, I didn't realize that the minor bump changed the soversion (I
don't usually glob shared libs in %files, I just took over this package).
This should not happen again in the future:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libdc1394/c/20e3515e3f80876ff24a3cb3e07b2a51f78d3f
On Tue, Jul 07, 2020 at 09:03:19PM +0200, Till Maas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> in https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2410 I proposed to name the dist-git
> branch for Fedora Rawhide "rawhide" to clarify the purpose of that
> branch. There was also some feedback that Rawhide mig
ather than pick yet another (different) name.
There are several other branches than the branch for Rawhide that have a
name that is unlikely to be found in many other projects like f32, el6,
epel7, epel8-playground. Why is it more intuitive to use a name from
other projects as the name for the branc
me instead of querying it from some place) or have other
remarks, please add them here or in the ticket for FESCo to learn about
them.
Thanks
Till
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email t
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 09:01:21AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 05:52:07PM +0200, Till Maas wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 08:16:29AM -0400, Gerald Henriksen wrote:
> >
> > > While it may be worth vim making themselves b
On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 05:21:58PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Package (co)maintainers Latest build
>
> gpscorrelate tillFedora 30
fixed.
Th
ot;. If they already use a console editor,
would it be typical that they do not set the EDITOR variable?
And if they are using a graphical Editor, shouldn't maybe that one be
defaulted to in graphical environments?
Thanks
Till
___
devel mailing list -- d
f there is no ~/.vimrc or some other indicator that shows the
user does not know vim, yet.
Did someone discuss improving the novice user experience with the vim
developers, yet? What was the outcome?
Thanks
Till
___
devel mailing list -- devel@l
for a package that
depends on an orphaned package says (waybar in my example):
"will have trouble 7 hours ago"
Kind regards,
Till
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fed
ing this as part of the system upgrade would be a good
idea.
[I'll dig into this and see if I need to file a bug]
Kind regards,
Till
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora
On 6/16/20 1:16 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 16. 06. 20 v 0:37 James Cassell napsal(a):
>> Please not using mechanism. Make it easy to opt out, or better yet opt-in.
>
> On package level, there is likely no other way. DNF team will have no
> time/resources to implement this on DNF level.
>
Hi all,
I'm updating librealsense to 2.35.2 in Rawhide. The only dependency is
fawkes, which is currently FTBFS because gazebo fails to install.
Kind regards,
Till
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email
On 6/3/20 4:50 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 03/06/20 13:36 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>> On 03. 06. 20 13:32, Till Hofmann wrote:
>>> Yes, that's what I meant. I'm not going to test patches by submitting
>>> builds over and over again, that's not really time ef
On 6/3/20 1:01 PM, Frantisek Zatloukal wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 12:46 PM Jonathan Wakely
> mailto:jwak...@fedoraproject.org>> wrote:
>
> On 03/06/20 12:35 +0200, Till Hofmann wrote:
> >
> >
> >On 6/2/20 5:24 PM, Jonatha
you only update the
changelog if the build was successful?
I'll fix this as soon as boost 1.73 shows up in rawhide.
Kind regards,
Till
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora
rom a packager's perspective. Also,
while you don't really care about sway, I don't have much interest in
i3. So what exactly would a joined SIG do? All the work would be either
towards i3 or sway, I don't see any synergetic effects of a joint SIG.
Kind regards,
Till
can people find out more about you?
Then candidates can mention their blog, social media, ... to provide
more background information for the interested reader.
Thanks
Till
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an em
s.
Writing it as questions helps to write this because it will also make
shorter sentences. Basically you are telling people to answer questions
like the following, if I understand correctly:
What are your contributions to the Fedora Project?
What do you hope to accomplish?
Why should community mem
Hi all,
I'm looking for a review for freeopuca, a C++ OPC-UA library:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1824467
The package should be rather easy to review. I'm willing to do a review
in return.
Kind regards,
Till
___
devel mailing list
On 4/7/20 9:21 AM, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
> we have updated the script which provides the cached review trackers
> pages at https://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/ (thanks to
> cverna for the assistance).
It looks like 1821497 [1] is displayed incorrectly (currently at the
or tasks used
by pagure.io to benefit from better Gitforge features, there, but keep
pagure for dist-git.
Also, I do not have any idea how easy it is to get changes into Gitlab,
so this is also something that needs to be taken into consideration.
I find it somewhat troublesome that these questions a
gone.
I hope it will still be easy to contribute to the future dist-git
solution for interested Fedora contributors.
Kind regards
Till
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.o
ackage. Since the packages were
already in FTBFS for quite some time, there was enough time for a
co-maintainer to step in. In the normal case when a package is orphaned,
then the time for the co-maintainers to take over a package starts.
What do you think?
Till
Hi Leigh,
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 09:56:10AM +0100, Leigh Griffin wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 10:13 PM Till Maas wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 11:28:59AM +0100, Leigh Griffin wrote:
> >
> > > No singular Forge satisfied ev
not part of a
gitforge and therefore no priority for Gitlab? Or will Fedora just get a
gitforge and need to figure out how to be able to implement their
workflows with it?
Kind regards
Till
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubsc
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 02:40:13PM +, Leigh Griffin wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 3:26 PM Till Maas wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 01:59:07PM +, Leigh Griffin wrote:
> > > On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 2:18 PM Till Maas wrote:
> &g
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 01:59:07PM +, Leigh Griffin wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 2:18 PM Till Maas wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 11:04:03AM +0100, Leigh Griffin wrote:
> >
> > > For transparency, we have published the ful
he future? Will there be a
different solution instead of a git forge for this?
Thank you
Till
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduc
Hi Naman,
Thank you for your interest. Please take a look at:
https://github.com/linux-system-roles/network/wiki
Thank you
Till
Am Mi., 25. März 2020 um 04:36 Uhr schrieb Naman Dhingra
:
>
> Hello there,
> Hope this email finds you well!
>
> This is in with reference to t
'll put a lot of
time into it. My FAS is thofmann.
Kind regards,
Till
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.o
in CC).
Thanks for the reminder, I happen to be maintainer of both. Fawkes is
the only package depending on librealsense, announcing an SONAME bump to
myself didn't seem like something particularly useful. I've rebuilt fawkes.
Kind regards,
Till
___
devel mailin
y still have interest and only if there is no
response, it should be closed. Maybe after 6-12 months.
Kind regards
Till
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
Hi Richard,
On 2/18/20 3:44 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> I am unable to build packages using mock for either f32 or f33 which is
> very problematic.
Afaik you need mock from updates-testing for the new config/keys.
Kind regards,
Till
___
devel m
eo.de email.
Kind regards,
Till
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List
ll github-cli
>
Would you mind submitting builds for F30? Some people (me) are still on
F30...
Thanks!
Till
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code o
e reason why they say they're not a certification authority.
All CAs support verification via insecure protocols AFAIK because
usually the certificate is needed to secure the protocol. What other
option would they have?
Kind regards
Till
___
devel
es, so there might be some
duplicates but it also seems to me that many of these items were not
mentioned.
Kind regards
Till
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedo
On 2/4/20 2:58 PM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 04. 02. 20 v 13:18 Till Hofmann napsal(a):
>> Does COPR itself also use the CDN for builds? I usually build dependency
>
> Yes. Since today.
>
>> chains, and since this morning, I see a lot of build failures due to
built dependency:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/thofmann/ros/build/1220759/
- failed build, it cannot find the previously built package:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/thofmann/ros/build/1220790/
Kind regards,
Till
___
devel mailing list -- devel
t rebuilt. Any guidance/info would be appreciated.
One possible explanation is that creating the SRPM failed in Koji.
AFAIR, the rebuild will then not listed on the page you linked.
Kind regards
Till
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 11/20/19 1:32 PM, Till Hofmann wrote:
On 11/20/19 4:49 AM, Richard Shaw wrote:
On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 9:27 PM Luya Tshimbalanga
mailto:l...@fedoraproject.org>> wrote:
Some users reported Blender which I maintain failed to start due to
this issue:
blender: symbol
++filt _ZN4YAML6detail9node_data12empty_scalarB5cxx11E
YAML::detail::node_data::empty_scalar[abi:cxx11]
So the problem is really with YAML. It looks like Till Hofmann built
yaml-cpp 0.6.3 for Fedora 30 and 31 (I only built it for Rawhide) and
did not rebuild OCIO.
Yes I did. There was no soname bump and the abidiff warnings looke
is the fawkes patch that fixed it:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fawkes/blob/master/f/fawkes.cgal-header-only.patch
Kind regards,
Till
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le
; --define "_speccdir
${PWD}" "$@"
Kind regards
Till
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-U
On 9/23/19 1:42 PM, Petr Pisar wrote:
On 2019-09-22, Till Hofmann wrote:
We have an odd issue with a module build of sway for F30: It looks like
the module was actually built with a F32 buildroot.
BZ: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1754167
Here's the build:
https
On 9/22/19 4:08 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 22. 09. 19 16:01, Till Hofmann wrote:
So the guidelines allow package retirement without any announcement on
devel. That's certainly unexpected, at least to me. I also don't think
this is a good idea, because maintainers of packages that depend
On 9/22/19 3:40 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 22. 09. 19 14:37, Till Hofmann wrote:
Hi all,
So I've just been notified that tolua++ has been retired, which is a
dependency of one of my packages (fawkes). BZ:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1736911
I've closed this bug because
On 9/22/19 3:01 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
But I do have something to say about the specific example used. tolua++
being retired
is not a problem for fawkes, as fawkes depends on compat-tolua++, which
is maintained
by me and has NOT been retired.
Thanks for pointing this out! I assumed
here was no way I could have heard about
the issue in time. It effectively requires me to become co-maintainer on
every package that I depend on. Clearly not something I want to do.
So can we please make sure that guidelines apply to everybody, also and
especially to scripts?
Thanks,
Till
[1]
ht
someone tell me what's going on here?
Thanks!
Till
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code
le.
(This will already get easier with the new buttons, though).
Kind regards,
Till
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.f
On 7/10/19 8:01 AM, Petr Kubat wrote:
> Hi Till,
>
> On 7/10/19 7:39 AM, Till Hofmann wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm trying to contact the maintainer (Marek Skalický) of
>> mongo-cxx-driver, which has a pending update:
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug
), to no avail.
Any idea what's causing this?
Thanks!
Till
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code
Hi,
Please help with updating youtube-dl and possibly other packages of mine
because I cannot do it and my comaintainers do not seem to be able to do it as
well.
Thank you and kind regards
Till
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
gin-clips-webview needed by
> fawkes-1.2.0-6.fc31.x86_64
> - nothing provides fawkes-plugin-rrdweb needed by
> fawkes-1.2.0-6.fc31.x86_64
Should be fixed now.
Kind regards,
Till
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedorap
On 7/19/19 11:33 AM, Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Jul 2019 at 05:09, Zdenek Dohnal wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 7/18/19 9:47 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
"ZD" == Zdenek Dohnal writes:
>>> ZD> Hi all, I would like to ask as Vim co-maintainer, do you find useful
>>> ZD> for Vim
want templates to set them up for themselves, rather
> than forcing users to disable templates they don't want.
>
Yes, that's exactly what I thought. We also have rpmdev-newspec, which I
typically use if I create a spec file for a Fedora package. It's
irritating that they're differen
d templates very useful, but I use the vim-template
plugin for that, and I was surprised to see that vim ships its own
template just for SPECs. Imo, everyone who wants a template should use a
plugin. Shipping one by default just for SPECs is somewhat inconsistent.
Kind regards,
Till
___
at account
is disabled.
Should the package have been orphaned?
Kind regards,
Till
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject
,
Till
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
it should default to this:
if os.path.exists(os.path.expanduser('~/.fedora.upn')):
with open(os.path.expanduser('~/.fedora.upn'), 'r') as f:
username = f.read().replace('\n', '')
else:
username = getpass.getuser()
Kind reg
). In that case, is it better to just use the master branch of
the package git, or should I create a dedicated stream branch nevertheless?
Thanks,
Till
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le
elcome :)
Awesome! Can we have such a plugin to claim orphaned packages as well,
please?
Kind regards
Till
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code
On 3/18/19 4:22 PM, Till Hofmann wrote:
> There's been ongoing discussions on BZ [1] with some people showing
> interest in a SIG. The main purpose of this email is to see who else
> would be interested in contributing to sway. If we can find enough
> people, I'd continue
a SIG before, so please let me know
if I forgot anything.
Kind regards,
Till
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1672268
[2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Creating_a_Fedora_SIG
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Hi friends,
Brian[0] made me think about my commitments and I realized that it is
time to step back from my FESCo seat.
Thank you for your confidence in electing me last year!
Kind regards
Till
[0] https://www.winglemeyer.org/ramblings/2019/01/07/cookie-cleanup.html
iguration
regarding the Strict Transport Security HTTP header? There are two
issues:
- it does not contain includeSubDomains
- http://libravatar.org odes not redirect directly to
https://libravatar.org but to the www subdomain instead.
Kind regards
Till
rustrating
The advantage is that this will clean up the co-maintainer list
eventually.
Kind regards
Till
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of
at run on other systems.
Kind regards
Till
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines:
tion pages or special download
> methods, please).
While I see that having them available infinitely has a benefit, it's
not enforced anywhere (and actually uncommon for the reviews I've seen).
Maybe the guidelines need an update, if that's actually something we
want to have?
Kind
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/15015894/git-add-signed-off-by-line-using-format-signoff-not-working
Nevertheless, then it becomes mostly boilerplate IMHO.
Kind regards
Till
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send
1 - 100 of 1188 matches
Mail list logo
