I just want to ask here, why did you retire the pywcs and considered
it as dead upstream whereas pypi pywcs has a new release in the
February?
And now APLpy is broken.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of
Hello
2014-07-21 10:59 GMT+02:00 Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com:
I just want to ask here, why did you retire the pywcs and considered
it as dead upstream whereas pypi pywcs has a new release in the
February?
The functionallity of pywcs is now in astropy, is where active development
is
Hello,
I would like to take over tinyca2.
I do not see anywhere on the list why the maintainers left it. So I'll
check the procedures and also other sources and take it.
According to Koji[1], some F21 build was successful last month so
hopefully there wont be many difficulties.
Sincerely
On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 12:38:10AM +0200, Sergio Pascual wrote:
I thought I had retired correctly pywcs, but is not in the list. Did I miss
some step?
The list contains only packages I am going to retire unless they are
taken care of. So if you retired a package, it is expected that the
package
On Wed, 2 Jul 2014, Peter Hanecak wrote:
I would like to take over tinyca2.
I do not see anywhere on the list why the maintainers left it. So I'll
check the procedures and also other sources and take it.
According to Koji[1], some F21 build was successful last month so
hopefully there wont
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 06:28:58PM -0500, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
alliance chitlesh, tnorth
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1105945
I applied your patch but then noticed that the version is also three
years behind upstream, therefore I am not convinced it is
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 12:24 AM, Till Maas opensou...@till.name wrote:
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 06:28:58PM -0500, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
alliance chitlesh, tnorth
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1105945
I applied your patch but then noticed that the version
On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 12:47:57AM +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 12:24 AM, Till Maas opensou...@till.name wrote:
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 06:28:58PM -0500, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
alliance chitlesh, tnorth
On 2014-06-24 15:12, Till Maas wrote:
The following packages are orphaned or did not build for two
releases and will be retired when Fedora (F21) is branched, unless someone
adopts them.
More patches:
alliance chitlesh, tnorth
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 10:31:18AM +0700, Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich wrote:
Package(co)maintainers
===
NearTree tmatsuu
The following packages
I'd like to claim the ownership of blktap and alliance.
What should I do next? DIrectly request the ACL via bugzilla?
Thanks.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct:
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 2:12 PM, Till Maas opensou...@till.name wrote:
cbmc orphan, shakthimaan
I have taken this package.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
The following packages are orphaned or did not build for two
releases and will be retired when Fedora (F21) is branched, unless someone
adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do
so now with a proper reason:
On 2014-06-24 15:12, Till Maas wrote:
The following packages are orphaned or did not build for two
releases and will be retired when Fedora (F21) is branched, unless someone
adopts them.
I have posted patches for a few of these (some before I realized they
were orphaned), should anyone want
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 10:12:11PM +0200, Till Maas wrote:
Depending on: jbosscache-support
hibernate3 (maintained by: gil, jhernand, msrb)
hibernate3-3.6.10-14.fc21.src requires jbosscache-common-parent
= 1.6-8.fc21
Package(co)maintainers
===
NearTree tmatsuu
The following packages require above mentioned packages:
Depending on: NearTree
rasmol (maintained by:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 10:31:18AM +0700, Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich wrote:
Package(co)maintainers
===
NearTree tmatsuu
The following packages require above
The following packages are orphaned or did not build for two
releases and will be retired when Fedora (F21) is branched, unless someone
adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do
so now with a proper reason:
On Mon, 2014-06-09 at 14:18 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
libguestfs uses hfsplus-tools in order to provide some HFS+ filesystem
features (mainly for Mac filesystems and .DMG files). We can remove
this functionality from the Fedora version, but of course it means
people won't be able to
On 06/18/2014 02:16 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
If I may vent for a moment, I'd like to point out exactly how spurious
the blocks usage was (and, implicitly, troll for code review):
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/hfsplus-tools.git/plain/hfsplus-tools-no-blocks.patch
That's right kids, the
On Wed, 2014-06-18 at 15:24 -0400, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
On 06/18/2014 02:16 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
If I may vent for a moment, I'd like to point out exactly how
spurious the blocks usage was (and, implicitly, troll for code
review):
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 02:16:49PM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Mon, 2014-06-09 at 14:18 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
libguestfs uses hfsplus-tools in order to provide some HFS+ filesystem
features (mainly for Mac filesystems and .DMG files). We can remove
this functionality from the
The following packages are orphaned or did not build for two
releases and will be retired when Fedora (F21) is branched, unless someone
adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do
so now with a proper reason:
python-gudev orphan, aledvink, sochotni
Taken.
Anyone who did miss the opportunity and still want it? Just let me know.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct:
Matthew Miller wrote:
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 02:00:13AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
That was overly critical of me and did nothing to actually further the
discussion. I apologise.
No need to apologize! It's just the truth: ARM is not ready to be a
primary
Kevin, I disagree. A positive
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 01:50:32AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Matthew Miller wrote:
Kevin, I disagree. A positive tone to discussion is important even when
speaking the truth.
There was no negative tone in Matthew Garrett's original message:
If the Fedora/ARM community don't care about
The following packages are orphaned or did not build for two
releases and will be retired when Fedora (F21) is branched, unless someone
adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do
so now with a proper reason:
On Wednesday, 11 June 2014 at 18:57, Till Maas wrote:
The following packages are orphaned or did not build for two
releases and will be retired when Fedora (F21) is branched, unless someone
adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please
do
so now with a proper
On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 02:22:57PM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
On Mon, 9 Jun 2014 17:08:13 +0100
Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
I have a Fedora 20 ppc64 Mac right next to my feet here that is
definitely booting using yaboot.
Then you did not install using Fedora 20.
On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 10:20:46PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 08:43:07PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Can we excludearch %{arm} for this one?
Why? It's a bug that it doesn't build on ARM. Refusing to build it
doesn't fix the bug, and then someone else will
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 10 Jun 2014 07:48:36 +0100
Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 02:22:57PM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
On Mon, 9 Jun 2014 17:08:13 +0100
Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
I have a Fedora 20
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 07:54:26AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 10:20:46PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 08:43:07PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Can we excludearch %{arm} for this one?
Why? It's a bug that it doesn't build on
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 03:45:57PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 07:54:26AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 10:20:46PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 08:43:07PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Can we excludearch
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 05:23:01PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 03:45:57PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
Eh. We're constrained by our own policies here, not by anything
fundamental - LLVM being broken on ARM ought to mean that our ARM
product is worse, not that
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 06:00:05PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 05:23:01PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 03:45:57PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
Eh. We're constrained by our own policies here, not by anything
fundamental - LLVM being
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 06:14:03PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 06:00:05PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
ExcludeArch implies that it's acceptable that it doesn't build on ARM
and removes the incentive for anyone to fix it. It's not.
There's a process for
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 06:21:00PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 06:14:03PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 06:00:05PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
ExcludeArch implies that it's acceptable that it doesn't build on ARM
and removes the
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 06:34:31PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
The bug that I'm actually fixing is that we haven't had a successful
hfsplus-tools build in nearly a year.
Ok. Once the build's done let's remove the ExcludeArch so it continues
to show up as a failure in mass builds. It can
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 06:39:52PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 06:34:31PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
The bug that I'm actually fixing is that we haven't had a successful
hfsplus-tools build in nearly a year.
Ok. Once the build's done let's remove the
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 06:44:06PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 06:39:52PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
Ok. Once the build's done let's remove the ExcludeArch so it continues
to show up as a failure in mass builds. It can be restored if we
actually need to
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 06:53:59PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 06:44:06PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 06:39:52PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
Ok. Once the build's done let's remove the ExcludeArch so it continues
to show up as a
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 07:05:56PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
In this case however I don't think much productive came from this
discussion we had about hfsplus-tools. Obviously no one wants
hfsplus-tools and/or clang enough on Fedora/ARM that they are prepared
to fix it. So I think we
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 07:11:53PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 07:05:56PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
In this case however I don't think much productive came from this
discussion we had about hfsplus-tools. Obviously no one wants
hfsplus-tools and/or clang
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 18:34:31 +0100,
Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
The relevant bit of the package guidelines is this:
If a Fedora package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in
ExcludeArch.
Matthew Garrett wrote:
Eh. We're constrained by our own policies here, not by anything
fundamental - LLVM being broken on ARM ought to mean that our ARM
product is worse, not that everything else is dragged down to the same
level.
Didn't YOU vote for ARM as a primary architecture, and even
Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 07:11:53PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
If the Fedora/ARM community don't care about feature parity with x86,
then we should just drop them back to secondary status.
+1, and:
That was overly critical of me and did nothing to actually further
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 02:00:13AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
That was overly critical of me and did nothing to actually further the
discussion. I apologise.
No need to apologize! It's just the truth: ARM is not ready to be a primary
Kevin, I disagree. A positive tone to discussion is
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 01:53:12AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Matthew Garrett wrote:
Eh. We're constrained by our own policies here, not by anything
fundamental - LLVM being broken on ARM ought to mean that our ARM
product is worse, not that everything else is dragged down to the same
On 06/11/2014 02:08 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 02:00:13AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
That was overly critical of me and did nothing to actually further the
discussion. I apologise.
No need to apologize! It's just the truth: ARM is not ready to be a primary
Kevin, I
Dne 1.6.2014 11:24, Till Maas napsal(a):
The following packages did not build for two releases (no new build
since 2013-07-25) and will be retired when Fedora (F21) is branched,
unless someone successfully builds them till then. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do
On Sun, Jun 01, 2014 at 11:24:09AM +0200, Till Maas wrote:
hfsplus-toolsajax, ajax
Just to be clear, is hfsplus-tools still at risk of being removed or not?
I notice there has not been a successful build since 2013-06-12
(approximately 1 year
On Sun, Jun 08, 2014 at 09:18:12PM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 9 Jun 2014 00:01:34 +0100
Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 04:36:28PM -0400, Al Dunsmuir wrote:
On Monday, June 2, 2014, 2:53:33 PM,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 9 Jun 2014 00:01:34 +0100
Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 04:36:28PM -0400, Al Dunsmuir wrote:
On Monday, June 2, 2014, 2:53:33 PM, Till Mass wrote:
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 11:01:53AM +0200, Dan Horák
On Monday, June 9, 2014, 12:08:13 PM, Richard Jones wrote:
On Sun, Jun 08, 2014 at 09:18:12PM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 9 Jun 2014 00:01:34 +0100
Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 04:36:28PM
On Mon, 2014-06-09 at 17:07 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Sun, Jun 01, 2014 at 11:24:09AM +0200, Till Maas wrote:
hfsplus-toolsajax, ajax
Just to be clear, is hfsplus-tools still at risk of being removed or not?
I notice there has
On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 05:07:14PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Sun, Jun 01, 2014 at 11:24:09AM +0200, Till Maas wrote:
hfsplus-toolsajax, ajax
Just to be clear, is hfsplus-tools still at risk of being removed or not?
It's required
On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 02:18:11PM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Mon, 2014-06-09 at 17:07 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Sun, Jun 01, 2014 at 11:24:09AM +0200, Till Maas wrote:
hfsplus-toolsajax, ajax
Just to be clear, is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 9 Jun 2014 17:08:13 +0100
Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 08, 2014 at 09:18:12PM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 9 Jun 2014 00:01:34 +0100
Richard W.M.
On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 08:43:07PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Can we excludearch %{arm} for this one?
Why? It's a bug that it doesn't build on ARM. Refusing to build it
doesn't fix the bug, and then someone else will crash into the same
issue when they dare to build something that needs
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 04:36:28PM -0400, Al Dunsmuir wrote:
On Monday, June 2, 2014, 2:53:33 PM, Till Mass wrote:
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 11:01:53AM +0200, Dan Horák wrote:
On Sun, 1 Jun 2014 11:24:09 +0200
Till Maas opensou...@till.name wrote:
yaboot dwmw2,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 9 Jun 2014 00:01:34 +0100
Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 04:36:28PM -0400, Al Dunsmuir wrote:
On Monday, June 2, 2014, 2:53:33 PM, Till Mass wrote:
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 11:01:53AM +0200, Dan Horák
Till Maas wrote:
The following packages did not build for two releases (no new build
since 2013-07-25) and will be retired when Fedora (F21) is branched,
unless someone successfully builds them till then. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 09:42:02PM -0400, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 5:57 PM, Till Maas wrote:
gdome2 sundaram
I have retired this already. What more should I do?
You need to retire it in pkgdb. Btw. the retiring reason could be
On Mon, 2 Jun 2014 23:54:10 +0200
Till Maas opensou...@till.name wrote:
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 04:36:28PM -0400, Al Dunsmuir wrote:
Please do not start deleting ppc32-only packages.
A few of us would like to resurrect ppc32, likely initially
as a Fedora Remix. Deleting
On 06/01/2014 05:24 AM, Till Maas wrote:
R-bigmemory spot, spot
RETIRED
log4net spot, cicku, spot
Fixed and built in rawhide:
log4net-1.2.13-1.fc21
netgospot, spot
On Tuesday, June 3, 2014, 2:37:49 AM, Dan Horák wrote:
On Mon, 2 Jun 2014 23:54:10 +0200
Till Maas opensou...@till.name wrote:
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 04:36:28PM -0400, Al Dunsmuir wrote:
Please do not start deleting ppc32-only packages.
A few of us would like to resurrect
On Sun, 1 Jun 2014 11:24:09 +0200
Till Maas opensou...@till.name wrote:
The following packages did not build for two releases (no new build
since 2013-07-25) and will be retired when Fedora (F21) is branched,
unless someone successfully builds them till then. If you know for
sure that the
On Sat, 2014-05-31 at 10:33 -0400, Al Dunsmuir wrote:
Is the mga450 supported? Aside from formal graphics test days, I can
run whatever tests required on x86 (both 32-bit and 64-bit).
Define supported. I believe for PowerPC in RHEL we build the matroxfb
driver for this card, so that plus
29.05.2014 17:43, Till Maas wrote:
Since the mass rebuild will start in a week (2014-06-06) it is a good
time to start cleaning up Fedora. After the mass rebuild, packages that
fail to build for two releases will be be added to this list. Since this
is the first run after adapting the script
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 11:01:53AM +0200, Dan Horák wrote:
yaboot dwmw2, dwmw2, fkocina,
this is a secondary arch only package since F-12, so it should be
excluded from the FTBFS list in primary koji
This needs special attention from Dennis:
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 11:01:53AM +0200, Dan Horák wrote:
On Sun, 1 Jun 2014 11:24:09 +0200
Till Maas opensou...@till.name wrote:
yaboot dwmw2, dwmw2, fkocina,
this is a secondary arch only package since F-12, so it should be
excluded from the FTBFS list in
On Monday, June 2, 2014, 2:53:33 PM, Till Mass wrote:
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 11:01:53AM +0200, Dan Horák wrote:
On Sun, 1 Jun 2014 11:24:09 +0200
Till Maas opensou...@till.name wrote:
yaboot dwmw2, dwmw2, fkocina,
this is a secondary arch only package since
On Monday, June 2, 2014, 10:05:22 AM, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Sat, 2014-05-31 at 10:33 -0400, Al Dunsmuir wrote:
Is the mga450 supported? Aside from formal graphics test days, I can
run whatever tests required on x86 (both 32-bit and 64-bit).
Define supported. I believe for PowerPC in RHEL
On Mon, 2014-06-02 at 16:52 -0400, Al Dunsmuir wrote:
On Monday, June 2, 2014, 10:05:22 AM, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Sat, 2014-05-31 at 10:33 -0400, Al Dunsmuir wrote:
Is the mga450 supported? Aside from formal graphics test days, I can
run whatever tests required on x86 (both 32-bit and
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 04:36:28PM -0400, Al Dunsmuir wrote:
Please do not start deleting ppc32-only packages.
A few of us would like to resurrect ppc32, likely initially as a
Fedora Remix. Deleting ppc32-only packages just adds more work
to that effort.
ok, but I guess there
On Sun, Jun 01, 2014 at 12:56:58PM +0200, Till Maas wrote:
On Sun, Jun 01, 2014 at 11:24:09AM +0200, Till Maas wrote:
The following packages did not build for two releases (no new build
since 2013-07-25) and will be retired when Fedora (F21) is branched,
I might have used the wrong
On Monday, June 2, 2014, 5:15:18 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Mon, 2014-06-02 at 16:52 -0400, Al Dunsmuir wrote:
On Monday, June 2, 2014, 10:05:22 AM, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Sat, 2014-05-31 at 10:33 -0400, Al Dunsmuir wrote:
Is the mga450 supported? Aside from formal graphics test days, I
On Monday, June 2, 2014, 5:54:10 PM, Till Mass wrote:
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 04:36:28PM -0400, Al Dunsmuir wrote:
Please do not start deleting ppc32-only packages.
A few of us would like to resurrect ppc32, likely initially as a
Fedora Remix. Deleting ppc32-only packages just
Hi
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 5:57 PM, Till Maas wrote:
gdome2 sundaram
I have retired this already. What more should I do?
Rahul
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct:
On Sun, Jun 01, 2014 at 11:24:09AM +0200, Till Maas wrote:
The following packages did not build for two releases (no new build
since 2013-07-25) and will be retired when Fedora (F21) is branched,
I might have used the wrong date, probably it should be 2013-02-12. I
will create an updated list
On Sun, 1 Jun 2014 11:24:09 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
The following packages did not build for two releases (no new build
since 2013-07-25) and will be retired when Fedora (F21) is branched,
unless someone successfully builds them till then.
rss2emailmschwendt, mcepl,
On Sun, Jun 01, 2014 at 03:33:28PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
rss2emailmschwendt, mcepl, mschwendt
That is inaccurate.
No, it is not.
The F21 mass-rebuild has been announced to start on 2014-06-06, so that
should be early enough for rss2email.
On Sun, Jun 01, 2014 at 07:28:38PM +0200, Till Maas wrote:
Branching is after the mass rebuild, so if rss2email will build in the
mass rebuild, nothing will happen to it.
Also nothing will happen to it if it keeps failing, because I written in
my other mail, the cut-off date is earlier,
On Sun, 1 Jun 2014 19:28:38 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
On Sun, Jun 01, 2014 at 03:33:28PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
rss2emailmschwendt, mcepl, mschwendt
That is inaccurate.
No, it is not.
The F21 mass-rebuild has been announced to
Hi
On Sun, Jun 1, 2014 at 5:24 AM, Till Maas wrote:
The following packages did not build for two releases
sundaram: transmission-remote-cli, gdome2
I have retired gdome2 as upstream has been dead for a long time and I don't
think there is any dependency on this. I have updated
On Friday, May 30, 2014, 12:22:18 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Thu, 2014-05-29 at 18:24 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 03:43:49PM +0200, Till Maas wrote:
Isn't this driver therefore required by this emulated card? Or does
another driver do the job?
No and yes,
On 29 May 2014 14:43, Till Maas opensou...@till.name wrote:
eclipse-subclipse orphan,
kdaniel, swagiaal
This affects some of my packages, taking.
--
Mat Booth
http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora
--
devel mailing list
On Thu, 2014-05-29 at 18:24 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 03:43:49PM +0200, Till Maas wrote:
xorg-x11-drv-cirrus orphan, airlied, ajax, alexl,
caillon, caolanm, glisse,
On Thu, 2014-05-29 at 15:43 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
xorg-x11-drv-apm orphan, airlied, ajax, alexl,
xorg-x11-drv-cirrus orphan, airlied, ajax, alexl,
xorg-x11-drv-glintorphan, airlied, ajax, alexl,
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 8:43 AM, Till Maas opensou...@till.name wrote:
Since the mass rebuild will start in a week (2014-06-06) it is a good
time to start cleaning up Fedora. After the mass rebuild, packages that
fail to build for two releases will be be added to this list. Since this
is the
On Thu, 29 May 2014 08:50:47 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 8:43 AM, Till Maas wrote:
Since the mass rebuild will start in a week (2014-06-06) it is a good
time to start cleaning up Fedora. After the mass rebuild, packages that
fail to build for two releases will be be
On 05/29/2014 08:43 AM, Till Maas wrote:
Since the mass rebuild will start in a week (2014-06-06) it is a good
time to start cleaning up Fedora. After the mass rebuild, packages that
fail to build for two releases will be be added to this list. Since this
is the first run after adapting the
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 9:27 AM, Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, 29 May 2014 08:50:47 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 8:43 AM, Till Maas wrote:
Since the mass rebuild will start in a week (2014-06-06) it is a good
time to start cleaning up Fedora.
On 29/05/14 15:31, Jon Ciesla wrote:
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 9:27 AM, Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com
mailto:mschwe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, 29 May 2014 08:50:47 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 8:43 AM, Till Maas wrote:
Since the mass rebuild
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 9:42 AM, Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org wrote:
On 29/05/14 15:31, Jon Ciesla wrote:
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 9:27 AM, Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com
mailto:mschwe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, 29 May 2014 08:50:47 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
On Thu,
On Thu, 29 May 2014 09:31:52 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
If someone doesn't step up soon I'll take CUnit.
I visited pkgdb to try taking CUnit, but I can't. Pkgdb presents an empty
Branch field and doesn't let me continue. I'll look into reporting that
as a bug first.
:-(
--
devel mailing list
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 9:57 AM, Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, 29 May 2014 09:31:52 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
If someone doesn't step up soon I'll take CUnit.
I visited pkgdb to try taking CUnit, but I can't. Pkgdb presents an empty
Branch field and doesn't let me
On Thu, 29 May 2014 09:59:00 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
I visited pkgdb to try taking CUnit, but I can't. Pkgdb presents an empty
Branch field and doesn't let me continue. I'll look into reporting that
as a bug first.
:-(
Odd, I took it with no issues. If you'd like it we can
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 08:50:47AM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
CUnit being required by curl. So maybe the output needs restructuring.
And one of the CUnit comaintainers needs to take ownership.
Do you have a suggestion about how to restructure? It seems to me that
the limits of plaintext emails
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 11:09 AM, Till Maas opensou...@till.name wrote:
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 08:50:47AM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
CUnit being required by curl. So maybe the output needs restructuring.
And one of the CUnit comaintainers needs to take ownership.
Do you have a suggestion
1 - 100 of 103 matches
Mail list logo
