Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 33 Python 3.9 rebuilds have started in a side tag

On 30. 05. 20 23:10, Jonathan Wakely wrote: On 29/05/20 16:17 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 22. 05. 20 3:06, Miro Hrončok wrote: Hello, in order to deliver Python 3.9, we are running a coordinated rebuild in a side tag.     https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python3.9 If you see a

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 33 Python 3.9 rebuilds have started in a side tag

On 29/05/20 16:17 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 22. 05. 20 3:06, Miro Hrončok wrote: Hello, in order to deliver Python 3.9, we are running a coordinated rebuild in a side tag.     https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python3.9 If you see a "Rebuilt for Python 3.9" (or similar) commit in

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 33 Python 3.9 rebuilds have started in a side tag

On 30. 05. 20 0:08, Orion Poplawski wrote: On 5/29/20 8:17 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 22. 05. 20 3:06, Miro Hrončok wrote: Hello, in order to deliver Python 3.9, we are running a coordinated rebuild in a side tag. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python3.9 If you see a "Rebuilt

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 33 Python 3.9 rebuilds have started in a side tag

On 5/29/20 8:17 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 22. 05. 20 3:06, Miro Hrončok wrote: Hello, in order to deliver Python 3.9, we are running a coordinated rebuild in a side tag. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python3.9 If you see a "Rebuilt for Python 3.9" (or similar) commit in your

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 33 Python 3.9 rebuilds have started in a side tag

On 2020-05-29 16:39, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 29. 05. 20 16:25, Richard Shaw wrote: On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 9:18 AM Miro Hrončok > wrote:     The side tag has been merged. Thank you all for your patience. Woohoo! So now Python can be rebuilt with the fix for

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 33 Python 3.9 rebuilds have started in a side tag

On 22. 05. 20 3:06, Miro Hrončok wrote: Hello, in order to deliver Python 3.9, we are running a coordinated rebuild in a side tag.     https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python3.9 If you see a "Rebuilt for Python 3.9" (or similar) commit in your package, please don't rebuild it in

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 33 Python 3.9 rebuilds have started in a side tag

On 29. 05. 20 16:25, Richard Shaw wrote: On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 9:18 AM Miro Hrončok > wrote: The side tag has been merged. Thank you all for your patience. Woohoo! So now Python can be rebuilt with the fix for PySide2? :) Technically blocked by

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 33 Python 3.9 rebuilds have started in a side tag

On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 9:18 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > The side tag has been merged. Thank you all for your patience. > Woohoo! So now Python can be rebuilt with the fix for PySide2? :) Thanks, Richard ___ devel mailing list --

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 33 Python 3.9 rebuilds have started in a side tag

On 22. 05. 20 3:06, Miro Hrončok wrote: Hello, in order to deliver Python 3.9, we are running a coordinated rebuild in a side tag.     https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python3.9 If you see a "Rebuilt for Python 3.9" (or similar) commit in your package, please don't rebuild it in

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 33 Python 3.9 rebuilds have started in a side tag

On 29. 05. 20 13:07, Jonathan Wakely wrote: On 29/05/20 12:17 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 29. 05. 20 11:49, Jonathan Wakely wrote: On 29/05/20 09:34 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 29. 05. 20 9:32, Felix Schwarz wrote: Am 29.05.20 um 09:19 schrieb Miro Hrončok: The side tag is being merged

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 33 Python 3.9 rebuilds have started in a side tag

On 29/05/20 12:17 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 29. 05. 20 11:49, Jonathan Wakely wrote: On 29/05/20 09:34 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 29. 05. 20 9:32, Felix Schwarz wrote: Am 29.05.20 um 09:19 schrieb Miro Hrončok: The side tag is being merged right now. Thank you for all the work

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 33 Python 3.9 rebuilds have started in a side tag

On 29. 05. 20 11:49, Jonathan Wakely wrote: On 29/05/20 09:34 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 29. 05. 20 9:32, Felix Schwarz wrote: Am 29.05.20 um 09:19 schrieb Miro Hrončok: The side tag is being merged right now. Thank you for all the work (also in advance with all the alpha/beta versions)

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 33 Python 3.9 rebuilds have started in a side tag

On 29/05/20 09:34 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 29. 05. 20 9:32, Felix Schwarz wrote: Am 29.05.20 um 09:19 schrieb Miro Hrončok: The side tag is being merged right now. Thank you for all the work (also in advance with all the alpha/beta versions) :-) Seems like quite a few Python packages

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 33 Python 3.9 rebuilds have started in a side tag

On 29. 05. 20 9:32, Felix Schwarz wrote: Am 29.05.20 um 09:19 schrieb Miro Hrončok: The side tag is being merged right now. Thank you for all the work (also in advance with all the alpha/beta versions) :-) Seems like quite a few Python packages were rebuilt in rawhide during your mass

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 33 Python 3.9 rebuilds have started in a side tag

Am 29.05.20 um 09:19 schrieb Miro Hrončok: > The side tag is being merged right now. Thank you for all the work (also in advance with all the alpha/beta versions) :-) Seems like quite a few Python packages were rebuilt in rawhide during your mass rebuild. Did that happen in the past as well?

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 33 Python 3.9 rebuilds have started in a side tag

On 22. 05. 20 3:06, Miro Hrončok wrote: Hello, in order to deliver Python 3.9, we are running a coordinated rebuild in a side tag.     https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python3.9 If you see a "Rebuilt for Python 3.9" (or similar) commit in your package, please don't rebuild it in

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 33 Python 3.9 rebuilds have started in a side tag

On Fri, 2020-05-29 at 00:12 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 28. 05. 20 8:33, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Wed, 2020-05-27 at 10:27 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > Hah, so it seems you're ahead of me =) > > > > > > The live image build finally finished, but when I booted it to check > > > it,

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 33 Python 3.9 rebuilds have started in a side tag

On 28. 05. 20 8:33, Adam Williamson wrote: On Wed, 2020-05-27 at 10:27 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: Hah, so it seems you're ahead of me =) The live image build finally finished, but when I booted it to check it, I found it includes both python3-3.8.3-1.fc33 and python3.9-

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 33 Python 3.9 rebuilds have started in a side tag

On 22. 05. 20 3:06, Miro Hrončok wrote: Hello, in order to deliver Python 3.9, we are running a coordinated rebuild in a side tag. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python3.9 If you see a "Rebuilt for Python 3.9" (or similar) commit in your package, please don't rebuild it in regular 

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 33 Python 3.9 rebuilds have started in a side tag

On 22. 05. 20 3:06, Miro Hrončok wrote: Hello, in order to deliver Python 3.9, we are running a coordinated rebuild in a side tag. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python3.9 If you see a "Rebuilt for Python 3.9" (or similar) commit in your package, please don't rebuild it in regular 

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 33 Python 3.9 rebuilds have started in a side tag

On 28. 05. 20 0:42, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 27. 05. 20 20:24, Miro Hrončok wrote: I'm currently trying to build a live image, but it's running insanely slow for some reason, mock in general on my Rawhide box seems to be really slow and I'm not sure why. If it ever finishes I'll try it. But so 

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 33 Python 3.9 rebuilds have started in a side tag

On Wed, 2020-05-27 at 10:27 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > Hah, so it seems you're ahead of me =) > > The live image build finally finished, but when I booted it to check > it, I found it includes both python3-3.8.3-1.fc33 and python3.9- > 3.9.0~b1-1.fc33.x86_64 . > > Digging into this I

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 33 Python 3.9 rebuilds have started in a side tag

On 27. 05. 20 20:24, Miro Hrončok wrote: I'm currently trying to build a live image, but it's running insanely slow for some reason, mock in general on my Rawhide box seems to be really slow and I'm not sure why. If it ever finishes I'll try it. But so far at least I see no problems. Hah, so 

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 33 Python 3.9 rebuilds have started in a side tag

On 27. 05. 20 19:27, Adam Williamson wrote: On Tue, 2020-05-26 at 16:22 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: On Tue, 2020-05-26 at 01:20 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 22. 05. 20 20:05, Adam Williamson wrote: On Fri, 2020-05-22 at 19:57 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 22. 05. 20 19:23, Adam Williamson

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 33 Python 3.9 rebuilds have started in a side tag

On Tue, 2020-05-26 at 16:22 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Tue, 2020-05-26 at 01:20 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 22. 05. 20 20:05, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > On Fri, 2020-05-22 at 19:57 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > > On 22. 05. 20 19:23, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > > > So a request

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 33 Python 3.9 rebuilds have started in a side tag

On 22. 05. 20 3:06, Miro Hrončok wrote: Hello, in order to deliver Python 3.9, we are running a coordinated rebuild in a side tag. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python3.9 If you see a "Rebuilt for Python 3.9" (or similar) commit in your package, please don't rebuild it in regular 

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 33 Python 3.9 rebuilds have started in a side tag

On 27. 05. 20 1:22, Adam Williamson wrote: On Tue, 2020-05-26 at 01:20 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 22. 05. 20 20:05, Adam Williamson wrote: On Fri, 2020-05-22 at 19:57 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 22. 05. 20 19:23, Adam Williamson wrote: So a request here: once the rebuilds are done,

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 33 Python 3.9 rebuilds have started in a side tag

On Tue, 2020-05-26 at 01:20 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 22. 05. 20 20:05, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Fri, 2020-05-22 at 19:57 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > On 22. 05. 20 19:23, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > > So a request here: once the rebuilds are done, before we consider > > > > moving

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 33 Python 3.9 rebuilds have started in a side tag

On 26. 05. 20 17:19, Justin Forbes wrote: On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 10:17 AM Miro Hrončok > wrote: On 26. 05. 20 16:14, Justin Forbes wrote: > > > On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 5:50 AM Miro Hrončok mailto:mhron...@redhat.com> >

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 33 Python 3.9 rebuilds have started in a side tag

On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 10:17 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 26. 05. 20 16:14, Justin Forbes wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 5:50 AM Miro Hrončok > > wrote: > > > > On 22. 05. 20 3:06, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > Hello, in order to deliver Python 3.9,

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 33 Python 3.9 rebuilds have started in a side tag

On 26. 05. 20 16:14, Justin Forbes wrote: On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 5:50 AM Miro Hrončok > wrote: On 22. 05. 20 3:06, Miro Hrončok wrote: > Hello, in order to deliver Python 3.9, we are running a coordinated rebuild in a > side tag. > >

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 33 Python 3.9 rebuilds have started in a side tag

On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 5:50 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 22. 05. 20 3:06, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > Hello, in order to deliver Python 3.9, we are running a coordinated > rebuild in a > > side tag. > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python3.9 > > > > If you see a "Rebuilt for Python

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 33 Python 3.9 rebuilds have started in a side tag

On Tue, May 26, 2020, 12:51 Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 22. 05. 20 3:06, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > Hello, in order to deliver Python 3.9, we are running a coordinated rebuild > > in a > > side tag. > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python3.9 > > > > If you see a "Rebuilt for Python

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 33 Python 3.9 rebuilds have started in a side tag

On 22. 05. 20 3:06, Miro Hrončok wrote: Hello, in order to deliver Python 3.9, we are running a coordinated rebuild in a side tag. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python3.9 If you see a "Rebuilt for Python 3.9" (or similar) commit in your package, please don't rebuild it in regular 

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 33 Python 3.9 rebuilds have started in a side tag

On Tue, 2020-05-26 at 01:20 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 22. 05. 20 20:05, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Fri, 2020-05-22 at 19:57 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > On 22. 05. 20 19:23, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > > So a request here: once the rebuilds are done, before we consider > > > > moving

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 33 Python 3.9 rebuilds have started in a side tag

On 22. 05. 20 20:05, Adam Williamson wrote: On Fri, 2020-05-22 at 19:57 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 22. 05. 20 19:23, Adam Williamson wrote: So a request here: once the rebuilds are done, before we consider moving them to Rawhide proper, can we have releng run a test compose using the side

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 33 Python 3.9 rebuilds have started in a side tag

On 22. 05. 20 20:05, Adam Williamson wrote: On Fri, 2020-05-22 at 19:57 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 22. 05. 20 19:23, Adam Williamson wrote: So a request here: once the rebuilds are done, before we consider moving them to Rawhide proper, can we have releng run a test compose using the side

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 33 Python 3.9 rebuilds have started in a side tag

On Fri, 2020-05-22 at 19:57 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 22. 05. 20 19:23, Adam Williamson wrote: > > So a request here: once the rebuilds are done, before we consider > > moving them to Rawhide proper, can we have releng run a test compose > > using the side tag and run openQA on it, to test

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 33 Python 3.9 rebuilds have started in a side tag

On 22. 05. 20 19:23, Adam Williamson wrote: So a request here: once the rebuilds are done, before we consider moving them to Rawhide proper, can we have releng run a test compose using the side tag and run openQA on it, to test for bugs in the installer or key critpath components caused by the

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 33 Python 3.9 rebuilds have started in a side tag

On Fri, 2020-05-22 at 03:06 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > Hello, in order to deliver Python 3.9, we are running a coordinated rebuild > in a > side tag. > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python3.9 > > If you see a "Rebuilt for Python 3.9" (or similar) commit in your package, >

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 33 Python 3.9 rebuilds have started in a side tag

On 2020-05-22 13:59, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: On Fri, 22 May 2020 at 12:02, Miro Hrončok > wrote: On 22. 05. 20 12:43, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: > [mode=serious] > On making transition from 3.8.x to 3.9.x all what would be necessary to do would > be

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 33 Python 3.9 rebuilds have started in a side tag

On 22/05/20 14:49 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 22. 05. 20 13:06, Miro Hrončok wrote: Could you give me the list of packages? Is it this? $ repoquery -C --repo=rawhide{,-source} --whatrequires boost-devel | grep src$ I can see where the sets overlap. Maybe we can figure things out somehow.

[HEADS UP] Fedora 33 Python 3.9 rebuilds have started in a side tag

Hello, in order to deliver Python 3.9, we are running a coordinated rebuild in a side tag. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python3.9 If you see a "Rebuilt for Python 3.9" (or similar) commit in your package, please don't rebuild it in regular rawhide. If you need to, please let me

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 33 Python 3.9 rebuilds have started in a side tag

On 22/05/20 13:06 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 22. 05. 20 12:54, Jonathan Wakely wrote: On 22/05/20 10:47 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 22. 05. 20 8:28, Jonathan Wakely wrote: On 22/05/20 03:06 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: Hello, in order to deliver Python 3.9, we are running a coordinated

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 33 Python 3.9 rebuilds have started in a side tag

On 22. 05. 20 13:06, Miro Hrončok wrote: Could you give me the list of packages? Is it this? $ repoquery -C --repo=rawhide{,-source} --whatrequires boost-devel | grep src$ I can see where the sets overlap. Maybe we can figure things out somehow. If this is the list, there are only 67 common

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 33 Python 3.9 rebuilds have started in a side tag

On Fri, 22 May 2020 at 12:07, Jonathan Wakely wrote: [..] > Maybe you should make a proper change proposal to do this, instead of > just being sarcastic about the work other people are doing? > I'm not 100% sure am I understand you correctly because I'm not sure is it still something not clear

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 33 Python 3.9 rebuilds have started in a side tag

On Fri, 22 May 2020 at 12:02, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 22. 05. 20 12:43, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: > > [mode=serious] > > On making transition from 3.8.x to 3.9.x all what would be necessary to > do would > > be just create compat-python3.8 package -> upgrade python.spec to 3.9 -> > monitor > >

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 33 Python 3.9 rebuilds have started in a side tag

On 22. 05. 20 12:54, Jonathan Wakely wrote: On 22/05/20 10:47 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 22. 05. 20 8:28, Jonathan Wakely wrote: On 22/05/20 03:06 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: Hello, in order to deliver Python 3.9, we are running a coordinated rebuild in a side tag.   

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 33 Python 3.9 rebuilds have started in a side tag

On 22/05/20 11:43 +0100, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: On Fri, 22 May 2020 at 10:42, Miro Hrončok wrote: [..] It is just the component name. The user installable package is still python3. I call it thing-which-should-not-exist or thing-which-shall-not-pass. That way it is easier to pronounce 

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 33 Python 3.9 rebuilds have started in a side tag

On 22/05/20 10:47 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 22. 05. 20 8:28, Jonathan Wakely wrote: On 22/05/20 03:06 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: Hello, in order to deliver Python 3.9, we are running a coordinated rebuild in a side tag.    https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python3.9 If you see a

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 33 Python 3.9 rebuilds have started in a side tag

On 22. 05. 20 12:43, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: [mode=serious] On making transition from 3.8.x to 3.9.x all what would be necessary to do would be just create compat-python3.8 package -> upgrade python.spec to 3.9 -> monitor number of packages still dependent on compat-python3.8 to focus what still

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 33 Python 3.9 rebuilds have started in a side tag

Am 22.05.20 um 12:47 schrieb Miro Hrončok: >> I was not aware that python-genshi is still part of the initial bootstrap >> sequence. The package does not work with Python 3.9 (upstream problem, the >> usual AST changes). I hope that won't make your life too difficult. > > genshi is used in some

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 33 Python 3.9 rebuilds have started in a side tag

On 22. 05. 20 9:42, Felix Schwarz wrote: Am 22.05.20 um 03:06 schrieb Miro Hrončok: fschwarz   babel python-genshi I was not aware that python-genshi is still part of the initial bootstrap sequence. The package does not work with Python 3.9 (upstream problem, the usual AST changes). I hope

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 33 Python 3.9 rebuilds have started in a side tag

On Fri, 22 May 2020 at 10:42, Miro Hrončok wrote: [..] > It is just the component name. The user installable package is still > python3. > I call it thing-which-should-not-exist or thing-which-shall-not-pass. That way it is easier to pronounce  > Reasoning: > > Build python3, python3-libs

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 33 Python 3.9 rebuilds have started in a side tag

- Original Message - > From: "Tomasz Kłoczko" > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > Sent: Friday, May 22, 2020 11:51:48 AM > Subject: Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 33 Python 3.9 rebuilds have started in a side > tag > On Fri,

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 33 Python 3.9 rebuilds have started in a side tag

On Fri, 22 May 2020 at 10:27, Peter Pentchev wrote: [..] > > Originally was python package. Than was python python2 and python3. Now > it > > is python3.9. > > Why not is used still and just python and to provide necessary > dependencies > > during transition python3.8? > > That way as well is

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 33 Python 3.9 rebuilds have started in a side tag

On 22. 05. 20 11:08, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: I'm only curious why to make transition to python 3.9 was chosen "debianised way"? Originally was python package. Than was python python2 and python3. Now it is python3.9. It is just the component name. The user installable package is still

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 33 Python 3.9 rebuilds have started in a side tag

On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 10:08:04AM +0100, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: > On Fri, 22 May 2020 at 02:17, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > Hello, in order to deliver Python 3.9, we are running a coordinated > > rebuild in a > > side tag. > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python3.9 > > > [..] >

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 33 Python 3.9 rebuilds have started in a side tag

On Fri, 22 May 2020 at 02:17, Miro Hrončok wrote: > Hello, in order to deliver Python 3.9, we are running a coordinated > rebuild in a > side tag. > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python3.9 > [..] I'm only curious why to make transition to python 3.9 was chosen "debianised way"?

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 33 Python 3.9 rebuilds have started in a side tag

On 22. 05. 20 8:28, Jonathan Wakely wrote: On 22/05/20 03:06 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: Hello, in order to deliver Python 3.9, we are running a coordinated rebuild in a side tag.    https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python3.9 If you see a "Rebuilt for Python 3.9" (or similar) commit in

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 33 Python 3.9 rebuilds have started in a side tag

Am 22.05.20 um 03:06 schrieb Miro Hrončok: fschwarz   babel python-genshi I was not aware that python-genshi is still part of the initial bootstrap sequence. The package does not work with Python 3.9 (upstream problem, the usual AST changes). I hope that won't make your life too difficult.

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 33 Python 3.9 rebuilds have started in a side tag

On 22/05/20 03:06 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: Hello, in order to deliver Python 3.9, we are running a coordinated rebuild in a side tag. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python3.9 If you see a "Rebuilt for Python 3.9" (or similar) commit in your package, please don't rebuild it in

[HEADS UP] Fedora 33 Python 3.9 rebuilds have started in a side tag

Hello, in order to deliver Python 3.9, we are running a coordinated rebuild in a side tag. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python3.9 If you see a "Rebuilt for Python 3.9" (or similar) commit in your package, please don't rebuild it in regular rawhide. If you need to, please let me