On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 8:10 PM Daniel Pocock wrote:
> As mentioned in the RTC thread, here is the review request:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815936
>
I've started the review, but I'm running into some issues in compiling the
software, as shown in the bug referenced above.
On 20/03/2020 00:08, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 6:42 PM Daniel Pocock wrote:
>> I had added Dakota as developer (commit?) and when I looked tonight, I
>> notice he had vanished. I've added him now as admin. Is there any way
>> to see how he vanished? Does he need to
On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 6:42 PM Daniel Pocock wrote:
>
>
>
> On 15/03/2020 13:32, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 2:06 PM Dakota Williams
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On 3/6/20 1:21 PM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 05/03/2020 21:26, Julian Sikorski wrote:
> >>>
> I would
On 15/03/2020 13:32, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 2:06 PM Dakota Williams
> wrote:
>>
>> On 3/6/20 1:21 PM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 05/03/2020 21:26, Julian Sikorski wrote:
>>>
I would like to take this opportunity to remind about the PR that I have
prepared
On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 2:06 PM Dakota Williams
wrote:
>
> On 3/6/20 1:21 PM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 05/03/2020 21:26, Julian Sikorski wrote:
> >
> >> I would like to take this opportunity to remind about the PR that I have
> >> prepared - let us not duplicate the work:
> >>
On Sat, Mar 7, 2020 at 11:47 AM Daniel Pocock wrote:
>
> On 07/03/2020 10:32, Julian Sikorski wrote:
>
> > In any case, Fedora is a more bleeding edge distro than Debian/Ubuntu
> > (First one of the foundations), so I am not sure how realistic it is to
> > be waiting for Debian/Ubuntu to include
On 07/03/2020 10:32, Julian Sikorski wrote:
> W dniu 06.03.2020 o 19:21, Daniel Pocock pisze:
>>
>>
>> On 05/03/2020 21:26, Julian Sikorski wrote:
>>
>>> I would like to take this opportunity to remind about the PR that I have
>>> prepared - let us not duplicate the work:
>>>
On Sat, Mar 7, 2020 at 9:02 AM Julian Sikorski wrote:
>
> W dniu 07.03.2020 o 13:53, Neal Gompa pisze:
> > On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 1:21 PM Daniel Pocock wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> If upstreams are using travis-ci, we are testing against version 1.12.2
> >> from Debian/Ubuntu and may not be aware of
W dniu 07.03.2020 o 13:53, Neal Gompa pisze:
On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 1:21 PM Daniel Pocock wrote:
If upstreams are using travis-ci, we are testing against version 1.12.2
from Debian/Ubuntu and may not be aware of issues in asio 1.14.0. Even
if you patch for the issue, it may be completely
On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 1:21 PM Daniel Pocock wrote:
>
>
> If upstreams are using travis-ci, we are testing against version 1.12.2
> from Debian/Ubuntu and may not be aware of issues in asio 1.14.0. Even
> if you patch for the issue, it may be completely untested upstream.
> That is why it is so
W dniu 06.03.2020 o 19:21, Daniel Pocock pisze:
On 05/03/2020 21:26, Julian Sikorski wrote:
I would like to take this opportunity to remind about the PR that I have
prepared - let us not duplicate the work:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/asio/pull-request/1
I have rebuilt all asio's
On 3/6/20 1:21 PM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
On 05/03/2020 21:26, Julian Sikorski wrote:
I would like to take this opportunity to remind about the PR that I have
prepared - let us not duplicate the work:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/asio/pull-request/1
I have rebuilt all asio's dependencies
On 05/03/2020 21:26, Julian Sikorski wrote:
> I would like to take this opportunity to remind about the PR that I have
> prepared - let us not duplicate the work:
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/asio/pull-request/1
> I have rebuilt all asio's dependencies and only encountered issues with
>
W dniu 05.03.2020 o 21:01, Daniel Pocock pisze:
>
>
> On 03/03/2020 23:23, Dakota Williams wrote:
>> On 3/3/20 4:10 AM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>
>>>
>>> But based on what you say, I'm happy to give access to Dakota and I'd
>>> also like to know if anybody else can help with the reSIProcate
>>>
On 03/03/2020 23:23, Dakota Williams wrote:
> On 3/3/20 4:10 AM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>>
>> But based on what you say, I'm happy to give access to Dakota and I'd
>> also like to know if anybody else can help with the reSIProcate
>> packages. There is a new release in the pipeline and if
n the thread AND putting some prefix on the subject. Here
is what I see:
From: devel-ow...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: Re: Non-responsive maintainer: pocock
>>
>> - the last message sent from the pocock.pro address was on 19 August, it
>> was delivered to
On 3/3/20 4:10 AM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
On 28/02/2020 10:00, Ankur Sinha wrote:
On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 17:07:21 -0500, Dakota Williams via devel wrote:
On 2/26/20 6:59 PM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
Would you like help? I'd be willing to be a co-maintainer to make the
branch.
Yes, I would
On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 1:39 PM Daniel Pocock wrote:
>
> On 28/02/2020 11:21, Radka Janekova wrote:
> > Please excuse me going completely offtopic here - for some reason I'm
> > getting this thread addressed directly to me. If someone's adding me as
> > bcc please don't, I have nothing to do
On Tue, Mar 03, 2020 at 05:52:10PM +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>
> Thanks for doing that
>
> Here are some observations:
>
> - the original email was sent to my pocock.com.au address and so my mail
> client replied to all mails using that address, I didn't notice until
> now. That address is
On 03/03/2020 17:35, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 3, 2020 at 4:10 AM Daniel Pocock wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 28/02/2020 10:00, Ankur Sinha wrote:
>>> On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 17:07:21 -0500, Dakota Williams via devel wrote:
On 2/26/20 6:59 PM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>>
>> Would you
On Tue, Mar 3, 2020 at 4:10 AM Daniel Pocock wrote:
>
>
>
> On 28/02/2020 10:00, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 17:07:21 -0500, Dakota Williams via devel wrote:
> >> On 2/26/20 6:59 PM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> >>
>
> Would you like help? I'd be willing to be a co-maintainer
On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 1:23 PM Julian Sikorski wrote:
>
> Hi Daniel,
>
> I would like to add to Ankur's point: while I understand that many of us are
> doing Fedora work voluntarily and the expectations should be set accordingly,
> I believe we should be open to accept help when we realise
Hi Daniel,
I would like to add to Ankur's point: while I understand that many of us are
doing Fedora work voluntarily and the expectations should be set accordingly, I
believe we should be open to accept help when we realise that we cannot
realistically commit enough time to the project. In
Please excuse me going completely offtopic here - for some reason I'm
getting this thread addressed directly to me. If someone's adding me as bcc
please don't, I have nothing to do with this.
Thanks,
Radka
--
*Radka Janeková (she/her)*
.NET Core QE Lead, Red Hat
On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 17:07:21 -0500, Dakota Williams via devel wrote:
> On 2/26/20 6:59 PM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>
> > >
> > > Would you like help? I'd be willing to be a co-maintainer to make the
> > > branch.
> >
> > Yes, I would welcome help with these packages
> >
> > But there is also an
On 2/26/20 6:59 PM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
On 26/02/2020 22:56, Dakota Williams wrote:
On 2/24/20 5:57 PM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
On 24/02/2020 20:47, Dakota Williams wrote:
Does anyone know how to contact maintainer pocock?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1806708
On 2/24/20 5:57 PM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
On 24/02/2020 20:47, Dakota Williams wrote:
Does anyone know how to contact maintainer pocock?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1806708
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1790674
Like most developers, I have a backlog of things
On FSF Europe's mailing lists, DP's using the "daniel at pocock dot pro"
address. I guess you could try messaging him using that address.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
Does anyone know how to contact maintainer pocock?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1806708
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1790674
Thanks,
Dakota
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an
29 matches
Mail list logo
