On Fri, Dec 2, 2022 Adam Williamson wrote:
I may think about having openQA Rawhide update tests enable the
buildroot repo that includes packages from the release tag; this would
make it include packages that have gone 'stable' since the previous
Rawhide compose. I'd have to think if there are
Thanks for the excellent explanation, Adam. It makes me to understand the
problem now.
Jiri
On Fri, Dec 2, 2022 at 10:03 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Fri, 2022-12-02 at 21:25 +0100, Jiri Kucera wrote:
> > Yes, builds in [1] were built with the `f38-build-side-60497` side tag.
> In
> > [1]
This will be not that easy as it looks like:
```
[ 63%] Generating
/builddir/build/BUILD/libphonenumber-8.12.57/cpp/src/phonenumbers/test_metadata.cc,
/builddir/build/BUILD/libphonenumber-8.12.57/cpp/src/phonenumbers/test_metadata.h
JAVA_BIN-NOTFOUND -jar
Hmm, concerning `libphonenumber` there is no Java binding, only the C++
port of the original Java library. Moreover, nothing Java-related is
distributed in the RPMs. That means that `BuildRequires: java-devel` is
redundant here. I will try to do a scratch build.
Regards,
Jiri
On Fri, Dec 2, 2022
Yes, builds in [1] were built with the `f38-build-side-60497` side tag. In
[1] there are two errors that were not here in time I hit the submit button
(maybe I should wait a bit longer):
* `nothing provides libqgpgme.so.7 needed by
kdepim-addons-22.08.3-1.fc38.i686` - this one was
caused by not
On 02. 12. 22 1:46, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2022-11-30 at 13:59 +0100, Jiri Kucera wrote:
Thanks for the reminder Petr. I will do the rebase in rawhide only then.
Thanks for taking care of these dependencies and announcing the bump.
For extra bonus points :D, if it's not too much
V Thu, Dec 01, 2022 at 04:46:06PM -0800, Adam Williamson napsal(a):
> On Wed, 2022-11-30 at 13:59 +0100, Jiri Kucera wrote:
> > Thanks for the reminder Petr. I will do the rebase in rawhide only then.
>
> Thanks for taking care of these dependencies and announcing the bump.
>
> For extra bonus
On Wed, 2022-11-30 at 13:59 +0100, Jiri Kucera wrote:
> Thanks for the reminder Petr. I will do the rebase in rawhide only then.
Thanks for taking care of these dependencies and announcing the bump.
For extra bonus points :D, if it's not too much trouble, it would be
great if you could do this
Petr Pisar wrote:
> Funilly, kdepimlibs-gpgme already provides a copy of an older
> libqgpgme.so.1.
That is a Qt 4 qgpgme. The Qt 5 port, initially released the same way by
KDE, was eventually upstreamed from KDE into gpgme and is hence no longer
available as a separate package from KDE (and a
Thanks for the reminder Petr. I will do the rebase in rawhide only then.
Regards,
Jiri
On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 9:46 AM Petr Pisar wrote:
> V Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 10:34:45AM -0500, Yaakov Selkowitz napsal(a):
> > On Tue, 2022-11-29 at 14:56 +0100, Petr Pisar wrote:
> > > V Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at
V Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 10:34:45AM -0500, Yaakov Selkowitz napsal(a):
> On Tue, 2022-11-29 at 14:56 +0100, Petr Pisar wrote:
> > V Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 01:07:19PM +0100, Jiri Kucera napsal(a):
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I am going to rebase gpgme to 1.17.1 in rawhide, f37, and f36. This
> > > bumps
On Tue, 2022-11-29 at 14:56 +0100, Petr Pisar wrote:
> V Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 01:07:19PM +0100, Jiri Kucera napsal(a):
> > Hello,
> >
> > I am going to rebase gpgme to 1.17.1 in rawhide, f37, and f36. This
> > bumps the SONAME of libqgpgme.so.7 to libqgpgme.so.15.
>
> Please, don't. That is an
V Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 01:07:19PM +0100, Jiri Kucera napsal(a):
> Hello,
>
> I am going to rebase gpgme to 1.17.1 in rawhide, f37, and f36. This
> bumps the SONAME of libqgpgme.so.7 to libqgpgme.so.15.
Please, don't. That is an incompatible change which will break a lot of
software. E.g. DNF. We
13 matches
Mail list logo
